Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    Nathaniel Knox v. State, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Nathaniel Knox's motion to proceed in forma pauperis in his appeal. The court reviewed the record and found the appeal to be without merit. It denied Knox's request to proceed in forma pauperis and affirmed the district court's denial of pauper status for the reasons stated in its previous order. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Nathaniel Knox v. State, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Nathaniel Knox's motion to proceed in forma pauperis in his appeal. The court reviewed the record and found the appeal to be without merit. It denied Knox's request to proceed in forma pauperis and affirmed the district court's denial of pauper status for the reasons stated in its previous order. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-11-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-1709

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Nathaniel Knox's motion to proceed in forma pauperis in his appeal. The court reviewed the record and found the appeal to be without merit. It denied Knox's request to proceed in forma pauperis and affirmed the district court's denial of pauper status for the reasons stated in its previous order. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Nathaniel Knox v. State, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Nathaniel Knox's motion to proceed in forma pauperis in his appeal. The court reviewed the record and found the appeal to be without merit. It denied Knox's request to proceed in forma pauperis and affirmed the district court's denial of pauper status for the reasons stated in its previous order. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-1709

    NATHANIEL KNOX,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    THE
    STATE
    OF
    NORTH
    CAROLINA
    CUMBERLAND
    COUNTY
    TRANSPORTATION; MAJESTIC LUXURY TOURS, INCORPORATED; RUDY;
    UNKNOWN NAME DRIVER AND HELPER,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (5:11-cv-00107-BO)

    Submitted:

    November 17, 2011

    Decided:

    November 22, 2011

    Before KING, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Nathaniel Knox, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Nathaniel

    Knox

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying his motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis.


    The

    denial

    appealable.

    of

    in

    forma

    pauperis

    status

    is

    immediately

    Roberts v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 339 U.S. 844, 845 (1950)

    (per curiam).

    We have reviewed the record and conclude the

    appeal is without merit.

    Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed

    in forma pauperis on appeal and affirm the order denying pauper


    See Knox

    status for the reasons stated by the district court.

    v. North Carolina, No. 5:11-cv-00107-BO (E.D.N.C. June 9, 2011).


    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like