Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • H. Austin v. Douglas Peterson & Associates, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of H. Richard Austin's claims against all defendants. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It therefore affirmed the district court's ruling dismissing the case for the reasons stated in its December 1, 2011 opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials and that argument would not aid the decisional process.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-02-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-2427

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of H. Richard Austin's claims against all defendants. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It therefore affirmed the district court's ruling dismissing the case for the reasons stated in its December 1, 2011 opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials and that argument would not aid the decisional process.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    H. Austin v. Douglas Peterson & Associates, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of H. Richard Austin's claims against all defendants. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It therefore affirmed the district court's ruling dismissing the case for the reasons stated in its December 1, 2011 opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials and that argument would not aid the decisional process.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-2427

    H. RICHARD AUSTIN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    DOUGLAS G. PETERSON & ASSOCIATES; STEPHEN HOUGHTON; JIMMY
    PAU,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    W. Earl Britt, Senior
    District Judge. (5:11-cv-00373-BR)

    Submitted:

    February 16, 2012

    Decided:

    February 21, 2012

    Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    H. Richard Austin, Appellant Pro Se.


    George L. Goodridge,
    CURTISS, CAREY, GATES, GRAVES & GOODRIDGE, LLP, Greenfield,
    Massachusetts; Paul Marshall Yoder, WHARTON ALDHIZER & WEAVER,
    PLC, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    H. Richard Austin appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his claims against all defendants.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Austin v. Douglas

    G. Peterson & Assocs., No. 5:11-cv-00373-BR (E.D.N.C. Dec. 1,


    2011).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like