Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Courtnay Brissett v. Craven County, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Courtnay and Ladwin Brissett's civil action. The district court had dismissed the case under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court also denied the Brissetts' motion for injunctive relief pending appeal and decided the case without oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-03-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-2094

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Courtnay and Ladwin Brissett's civil action. The district court had dismissed the case under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court also denied the Brissetts' motion for injunctive relief pending appeal and decided the case without oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Courtnay Brissett v. Craven County, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Courtnay and Ladwin Brissett's civil action. The district court had dismissed the case under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court also denied the Brissetts' motion for injunctive relief pending appeal and decided the case without oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-2094

    COURTNAY T. BRISSETT; LADWIN BRISSETT,


    Plaintiffs - Appellants,
    v.
    CRAVEN COUNTY; CITY OF NEW BERN; FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE
    INSURANCE COMPANY; SUMRELL, SUGG, CARMICHAEL, HICKS & HART,
    P.A.; WARD AND SMITH, P.A.,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Greenville. James C. Dever, III,
    Chief District Judge. (4:14-cv-00179-D)

    Submitted:

    February 25, 2015

    Decided: March 3, 2015

    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Courtnay T. Brissett; Ladwin Brissett, Appellants Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Courtnay T. and Ladwin Brissett appeal the district
    courts

    order

    dismissing

    1915(e)(2)(B) (2012).
    reversible error.

    (E.D.N.C.

    civil

    action

    under

    28

    U.S.C.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.


    00179-D

    their

    Sept.

    Brissett v. Craven Cnty., No. 4:14-cv26,

    2014).

    We

    deny

    the

    Brissetts

    motion for injunctive relief pending appeal and dispense with


    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    contentions
    this

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like