Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Arthur Gooden, II v. United States, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    12 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The plaintiff, Arthur Lee Gooden, II, filed a complaint against the United States, Virginia, and various individuals and entities alleging "genocide, civil rights offenses resulting in death, human trafficking, and treason." The district court dismissed the complaint. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-04-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-2483

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The plaintiff, Arthur Lee Gooden, II, filed a complaint against the United States, Virginia, and various individuals and entities alleging "genocide, civil rights offenses resulting in death, human trafficking, and treason." The district court dismissed the complaint. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    12 views2 pages

    Arthur Gooden, II v. United States, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The plaintiff, Arthur Lee Gooden, II, filed a complaint against the United States, Virginia, and various individuals and entities alleging "genocide, civil rights offenses resulting in death, human trafficking, and treason." The district court dismissed the complaint. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-2483

    ARTHUR LEE GOODEN, II,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; BARACK
    HUSSEIN OBAMA; TONYA R. HENDERSON-STITH; CHRISTOPHER W.
    HUTTON; BONNIE L. JONES; TIMOTHY FISHER; VINCENT H. CONWAY;
    ALBERT PATRICK; GARY MILLS; BRYANT SUGG; RICHARD KURNS;
    ALFRED MASTERS; PAMELA JONES; WILLIAM H. SHAW; PETER
    TRENCH; MATHEWS; NELSON T. OVERTON; JANE & JOHN DOES,
    1-100; JANE & JOHN DOES, A-Z (all officers of the
    Commonwealth of
    Virginia); JANE OR JOHN DOES, A-Z (all
    officers of the United States); JANE DOES I-X,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Newport News. Mark S. Davis, District
    Judge. (4:13-cv-00126-MSD-TEM)

    Submitted:

    April 24, 2014

    Decided:

    April 28, 2014

    Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Arthur Lee Gooden, II, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Arthur Lee Gooden, II, appeals the district courts
    order dismissing his complaint entitled criminal complaint for:
    genocide,

    civil

    rights

    offenses

    trafficking, and treason.


    no reversible error.

    resulting

    in

    death,

    human

    We have reviewed the record and find

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

    stated by the district court.

    Gooden v. United States, No.

    4:13-cv-00126-MSD-TEM (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 8 & entered Oct. 14,


    2013).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    this

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like