Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Margaret Gilliam v. Officer McCotter, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Margaret Gilliam appealed the district court's dismissal of her civil rights complaint against several prison officials under 42 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court that Gilliam's complaint failed to state a claim. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, concluding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court filings.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-10-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-6862

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Margaret Gilliam appealed the district court's dismissal of her civil rights complaint against several prison officials under 42 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court that Gilliam's complaint failed to state a claim. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, concluding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court filings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Margaret Gilliam v. Officer McCotter, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Margaret Gilliam appealed the district court's dismissal of her civil rights complaint against several prison officials under 42 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court that Gilliam's complaint failed to state a claim. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, concluding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court filings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-6862

    MARGARET A. GILLIAM,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    OFFICER
    MCCOTTER;
    UNIT
    MANAGER
    HUTCHERSON;
    SERGEANT
    SCHILLING; DOCTOR DUNSTON; DOCTOR MILLER; NURSE FORBES;
    CAPTAIN HAYWOOD; WARDEN HARRIS; MR. ALEXANDER, Director of
    Medical,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    James C. Fox, Senior
    District Judge. (5:14-ct-03301-F)

    Submitted:

    October 13, 2015

    Decided:

    October 16, 2015

    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Margaret A. Gilliam, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Margaret A. Gilliam appeals the district courts judgment
    dismissing

    her

    civil

    rights

    1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (2012).
    no reversible error.

    complaint

    under

    42

    U.S.C.

    We have reviewed the record and find

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

    stated by the district court.

    Gilliam v. McCotter, No. 5:14-ct-

    03301-F (E.D.N.C. May 18, 2015).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like