Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Dayyan Atta Bey v. Michaela Bass, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Dayyan Atta Bey's complaint. Bey had sought relief under 42 U.S.C. 1983 and other causes of action in district court against Michaela Bass. The district court dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in Bey v. Bass, No. 4:15-cv-00091-MSD-LRL (E.D. Va. Sept. 8, 2015).

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-03-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-2189

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Dayyan Atta Bey's complaint. Bey had sought relief under 42 U.S.C. 1983 and other causes of action in district court against Michaela Bass. The district court dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in Bey v. Bass, No. 4:15-cv-00091-MSD-LRL (E.D. Va. Sept. 8, 2015).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views2 pages

    Dayyan Atta Bey v. Michaela Bass, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Dayyan Atta Bey's complaint. Bey had sought relief under 42 U.S.C. 1983 and other causes of action in district court against Michaela Bass. The district court dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in Bey v. Bass, No. 4:15-cv-00091-MSD-LRL (E.D. Va. Sept. 8, 2015).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-2189

    DAYYAN ATTA BEY EX REL DERICK SEALEY, an individual,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    MICHAELA BASS, an individual,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Newport News. Mark S. Davis, District
    Judge. (4:15-cv-00091-MSD-LRL)

    Submitted:

    March 29, 2016

    Decided:

    March 31, 2016

    Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Dayyan Atta Bey ex rel Derick Sealey, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Dayyan

    Atta

    Bey

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012).


    In

    his

    complaint,

    Bey

    sought

    relief

    (2012), and other causes of action.


    and find no reversible error.

    under

    42

    U.S.C.

    1983

    We have reviewed the record

    Accordingly, we affirm for the

    reasons stated by the district court.

    Bey v. Bass, No. 4:15-cv-

    00091-MSD-LRL (E.D. Va. Sept. 8, 2015).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like