Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Judy Miskell v. Harry Chase, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order returning correspondence Judy Kay Miskell attempted to file in her closed civil rights case. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The district court had previously closed Miskell's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case against two defendants.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-04-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 16-1108

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order returning correspondence Judy Kay Miskell attempted to file in her closed civil rights case. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The district court had previously closed Miskell's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case against two defendants.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    Judy Miskell v. Harry Chase, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order returning correspondence Judy Kay Miskell attempted to file in her closed civil rights case. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The district court had previously closed Miskell's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case against two defendants.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 16-1108

    JUDY KAY MISKELL,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    HARRY L. CHASE; WILLIAM L. HAUGH, JR.,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    Catherine C. Blake, Chief District
    Judge. (1:15-cv-00019-CCB)

    Submitted:

    April 19, 2016

    Decided:

    April 22, 2016

    Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Judy Kay Miskell, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Judy

    Kay

    Miskell

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    returning correspondence that Miskell attempted to file in her


    closed 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) action.
    record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    Miskell v. Chase, No.

    1:15cv00019-CCB (D. Md. Jan. 12, 2016).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like