Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. George Perry, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    George Perry appealed the denial of his motion to reopen the appeal period in his criminal case so he could challenge alleged sentencing amendments. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no qualifying order that would allow reopening the appeal period. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no sentencing amendments had been made by the district court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-11-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-7191

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    George Perry appealed the denial of his motion to reopen the appeal period in his criminal case so he could challenge alleged sentencing amendments. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no qualifying order that would allow reopening the appeal period. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no sentencing amendments had been made by the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. George Perry, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    George Perry appealed the denial of his motion to reopen the appeal period in his criminal case so he could challenge alleged sentencing amendments. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no qualifying order that would allow reopening the appeal period. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no sentencing amendments had been made by the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-7191

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    GEORGE PERRY, a/k/a Fuzz,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Newport News.
    Raymond A. Jackson,
    District Judge. (4:07-cr-00153-RAJ-JEB-1)

    Submitted:

    November 21, 2013

    Decided:

    November 26, 2013

    Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    George Perry, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant


    United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    George Perry appeals the district courts margin order
    denying his motion to reopen the appeal period in his criminal
    case so that he may challenge alleged sentencing amendments by
    the court.

    We have reviewed the record and found no qualifying

    order for which he sought a motion to reopen the appeal period.


    Accordingly, we affirm the district courts order.

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    this

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like