Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Michael Puzey v. Warden FCC Allenwood, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    1) Michael Paul Puzey, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of his motion to alter or amend its prior order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its January 7, 2016 order, and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court filings.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-06-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 16-6078

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Michael Paul Puzey, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of his motion to alter or amend its prior order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its January 7, 2016 order, and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court filings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Michael Puzey v. Warden FCC Allenwood, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Michael Paul Puzey, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of his motion to alter or amend its prior order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its January 7, 2016 order, and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court filings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 16-6078

    MICHAEL PAUL PUZEY,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    WARDEN FCC ALLENWOOD,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief
    District Judge. (3:15-cv-00067-GMG-MJA)

    Submitted:

    June 23, 2016

    Decided:

    June 28, 2016

    Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael Paul Puzey, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael

    Paul

    Puzey,

    federal

    prisoner,

    appeals

    the

    district courts order denying his motion to alter or amend the


    district courts prior order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.
    2241 (2012) petition.
    reversible

    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly,

    although

    we

    grant

    leave

    to

    proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by


    the district court.

    Puzey v. Warden, No. 3:15-cv-00067-GMG-MJA

    (N.D. W. Va. Jan. 7, 2016).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like