Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Frederick Howell v. Alan Wilson, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Frederick Howell appealed the district court's dismissal of his § 1983 complaint against the South Carolina Attorney General. A panel of the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss the complaint. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors in the district court's adoption of the magistrate's report recommending dismissal under §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its order.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-06-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 16-6111

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Frederick Howell appealed the district court's dismissal of his § 1983 complaint against the South Carolina Attorney General. A panel of the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss the complaint. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors in the district court's adoption of the magistrate's report recommending dismissal under §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Frederick Howell v. Alan Wilson, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Frederick Howell appealed the district court's dismissal of his § 1983 complaint against the South Carolina Attorney General. A panel of the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss the complaint. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors in the district court's adoption of the magistrate's report recommending dismissal under §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 16-6111

    FREDERICK L. HOWELL,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    ALAN WILSON, Attorney General for the State of South Carolina,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Florence.
    Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (4:15-cv-02561-JFA)

    Submitted:

    June 23, 2016

    Decided:

    June 28, 2016

    Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Frederick L. Howell, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Frederick

    L.

    Howell

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    adopting the magistrate judges report and recommendation and


    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
    1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A (2012).
    find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

    stated by the district court.

    Howell v. Wilson, No. 4:15-cv-

    02561-JFA (D.S.C. Nov. 17, 2015).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like