Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Raul C. Murean
Florin Albeanu
Adam Kampff
Table of contents
1. Testimonials about TENSS 2016 .................................................................................................................... 1
2. Scientific content of the event ....................................................................................................................... 2
2.1. Objectives ..................................................................................................................................................... 2
2.2. Selection of students................................................................................................................................. 2
2.3. Pre-TENSS workshop ................................................................................................................................. 5
2.4. General structure of the program ......................................................................................................... 6
2.5. Lab sessions.................................................................................................................................................. 7
2.6. Lectures ....................................................................................................................................................... 11
2.7. Some pictures from TENSS 2016 ......................................................................................................... 15
2.8. Contribution of TENSS to Neuroscience and future directions ................................................ 58
3. Information regarding the organizing of TENSS.................................................................................... 59
4. Financial report ................................................................................................................................................. 61
5. Final program of the event............................................................................................................................ 62
8. Egypt: 4 applications
9. Estonia: 1 application
10. Ethiopia: 1 application
11. Finland: 2 applications
12. France: 3 application
13. Germany: 5 applications
14. Greece: 1 application
15. Hungary: 2 applications
16. India: 8 applications
17. Iran: 3 applications
18. Israel: 4 applications
19. Italy: 7 applications
20. Kenya: 1 application
21. Lithuania: 1 application
22. Mexico: 4 applications
23. Morocco: 1 application
24. Netherlands: 3 applications
25. Nigeria: 2 applications
26. Norway: 3 applications
27. Pakistan: 3 applications
28. Poland: 9 applications
29. Portugal: 5 applications
30. Romania: 8 applications
31. Russia: 8 applications
32. Singapore: 1 application
33. Slovak Republic: 1 application
34. Spain: 1 application
35. Switzerland: 2 applications
36. Turkey: 1 application
37. United Kingdom: 4 applications
38. United States of America: 5 applications
39. Uruguay: 1 application
3
The selection process has been performed by 19 evaluators (organizers and TAs) distributed
in several labs around the world. We initially created 6 groups of 3 evaluators for screening
the applications and selecting the top ones for the second round. From the 6 groups, 2
received an identical selection of applications but evaluators were not aware of this. We
wanted to estimate the consistency of the evaluation across groups, for the same
applications, to improve the quality of the first round of selections. Each group selected 1015 applications that made it in the second round. For two corresponding groups (with the
same set to evaluate) we merged their selection lists there was about 70-80% agreement
between groups but we also included those applications that a group selected but the
other one did not. The second round contained a number of 50 applications that were
evaluated by all 19 evaluators, to level out individual preferences and eliminate as much as
possible subjective bias. We selected 13 top students by mixing those from well-established
labs with promising and talented students from less favored countries, such as places in
South America, Eastern Europe and Asia. From the initial selection, two students could not
attend due to their commitment to other courses and we selected the next two on the
waiting list. We ended up having the following 13 students to attend TENSS 2016:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Student name
Affiliation
Bast, Walter
Beniaguev,
David
Bottura de
Barros, Ana
Carolina
Coen, Philip
Javadzadeh,
Mitra
Kondrakiewicz,
Kacper
walter.bast@uns.edu.ar
david.beniaguev@gmail.c
om
7.
Laszlovszky,
Tamas
8.
Mahn, Mathias
9.
10.
11.
ana.botturadebarros@dp
ag.ox.ac.uk
pipcoen@gmail.com
mitrajz89@gmail.com
k.kondrakiewicz@nencki.
gov.pl
laszlovszky.tamas@koki.m
ta.hu
mathias.mahn@weizman
n.ac.il
lironmcley@gmail.com
noora.nevala@helsinki.fi
tsorrells@rockefeller.edu
4
12.
Zamfir, Elena
elena.zamfir07@gmail.co
m
13.
Zimmermann,
Robert
bobofon@gmail.com
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
galvanometric scanners and video cameras using National Instruments and Digilent boards
and Labview. Lab sessions were organized by experienced teaching assistants (TAs) that
helped & taught the students throughout the duration of the course: Priyanka Gupta,
Mehrab Modi, Federico Carnevale and Arkarup Bandyopadhyay from Cold Spring
Harbor Laboratory (CSHL), Balzs Hangya from the Institute for Experimental Medicine in
Budapest, Hungary, Iuliu Vasilescu from TIA Research, Petr Znamenskyi, Ivana Orsolic
and Rob Campbell from Biozentrum Basel, Josh Siegle from the Allen Brain Institute,
Gonalo Lopes from Sainsbury Wellcome Centre in London, Marius Pachitariu from
University College London, Nacho Sanguinetti from the Bernstein Center for
Computational Neuroscience in Berlin, Adriana Dbcan,
Medorian Gheorghiu from the Romanian Institute of Science and Technology, and Ovidiu
Jurju from the Centre for Integrative Neuroscience in Tbingen.
Chronologically, lab sessions covered the following:
1.
A first set of labs was concerned with basic optics, lenses, custom building simple
microscopes, Koehler illumination. Students learned how to construct microscopes
themselves on the horizontal, on an optical rail by using lenses and accessories (blue
LEDs, irises, lens holders, posts, post holders, laser pointers, CCD and CMOS cameras)
bought from the course budget, or obtained on loan from companies participating in
TENSS, and used their custom setups to image samples ranging from their own hair to
Golgi stains in fixed rat brain slices. Each group had to present images that they
acquired with their custom microscope.
2.
3.
The next set of lab sessions were concerned with intrinsic optical imaging, whereby
students needed to build custom rigs for intrinsic imaging and recorded in vivo data
from the olfactory system from anesthetized animals receiving olfactory stimulation
8
(EMX-Cre x Ai95-GCaMP6f mice). The microscopes were built from custom parts (Nikkor
SLR lenses, cameras from Allied/Vosskuhler and Andor controlled by NI boards with
Labview) and were used both for fluorescence and intrinsic imaging of brain slices and
in vivo. An odor delivery machine was assembled to stimulate the olfactory system of
transgenic mice and results were compared across intrinsic and fluorescence
techniques (imaging GCaMP6 responses in the glomerular layer of the bulb).
4.
In parallel with the intrinsic and fluorescence microscopy, students received also
training in Matlab,, Arduino and Bonsai with extended sessions teaching them basic
programming rules and preparing them to program the scanners for 2-photon imaging.
5.
Further, Ruben Portugues with help from Priyanka Gupta and Mehrab Modi set up a
functional custom light sheet microscope in the lab which they demo-ed to the
students in small groups using zebra fish samples. The microscope was built onsite
within 2 days time and the students enjoyed the demo and the realization that such
cutting edge tools are within their grasp both in terms of the underlying theory and
practical implementation.
6.
With the next set of labs, individual groups started to work on different rigs/setups.
Two-photon (2p) microscopy was now done in parallel in two independent custom
setups and students used various parts to build their own 2p microscope from scratch.
Demos were made also with a commercial microscope: the MOM from Sutter.
7.
When the custom 2p microscopes were ready they were used to acquire 2p images
from fixed slices as well as in vivo preparations in transgenic mice. Images were
compared to those obtained by the commercial Sutter 2p setup that TENSS received on
loan.
8.
Next, the electrophysiology module began, where students first learned how to design
custom electronic signal amplifiers by using electrical breadboards and various
electronic parts (operational amplifiers, resistors, transistors, diodes, capacitors and so
on).
9.
In the next lab sessions, participants learned electrophysiology in a dish of saline and
agarose. They went through demonstration experiments relating position of electric
field dipoles and signals acquired by electrodes. Participants were also taught about
basic principles of extracellular recordings, how to make tetrodes and design and
mount microdrives and fiber optics and headstages for behavioral experiments, etc.
9
10. The next day was dedicated to monitoring animal behavior and in vivo patch clamping.
To monitor animal behavior they learned to write small programs in Bonsai that used
input from CMOS cameras and also concepts related to state machines to describe the
trajectory of the animal in time in open or closed loop. The in vivo patch clamp
demonstrations allowed students to see and also do themselves in vivo patching. The
evening was used to prepare the behavioral and acute setups for the following days
and students could witness how various parts have to be assembled to obtain
functional setups. In addition, we included also some more intensive modules for
teaching students how to program, the sessions being taught in an interactive fashion.
11. The next lab sessions dealt with monitoring animal behavior and in vivo extracellular
recordings with optogenetics from freely moving mice. Mice were implanted with
several tetrodes 10 days before the lab sessions started by the Teaching Assistants in
the medial prefrontal cortex and striatum and were trained to follow a food pellet. The
monitoring of animal behavior was used in parallel with recording from these behaving
mice and also causally interfering with brain activity using optogenetics.
12. Recording sessions were complemented with extensive sessions for training in data
analysis. Students analyzed the very data they recorded from the behaving mice with
the analysis techniques they learned in those sessions. They wrote their own custom
software in Matlab for spike sorting. In addition, students took got exposure and used a
state-of-the-art spike sorting automated algorithm (Kilosort), designed and
implemented by Dr. Marius Pachitariu.
13. In addition, an important emphasis was on teaching students how to design their
custom behavioral paradigms, which they then applied directly during the recording
sessions.
14. Finally, students had the chance to go more in depth with techniques that were most
interesting to them and/or that were still unclear.
15. Michael Dickinson set a closed-loop fly flight arena demo and prepared flies for the
demo with help from Adriana Dabacan, Iuliu Vasilescu and Priyanka Gupta. This
premiere of fly flight arena at TENSS was a real success (after finding proper
transformers from 110V to 220V!), and students monitored changes in flight as a
function of optic flow and visual patterns presented
10
16. The last three days were dedicated to student projects, whereby participants could
propose and carry out short projects of their own choice, working together in small
informal groups and applying what they have learned during the school. These last
days were the most creative ones, with projects ranging from tracking and recording
from grasshopers, to in vivo closed-loop Brain machine interface (BMI) experiments in
behaving mice using either 2p imaging or extracellular recordings to closed-loop
monitoring and controlling escape responses of Pike Lake grasshopper caught from the
wild and monitoring social interactions between mice in an arena, and firing of
neuronal ensembles in the entorhinal cortex, while conditioning their proximity using
white noise stimuli. Lab sessions were particularly exciting and intensive, but also quite
exhaustive for participants and teaching assistants. Frequently, labs continued well
beyond midnight, showing the dedication and excitement of students. For these
reasons, the program also included break days (1 full day and 2 half days) with trips
through Transylvania such that participants could relax and recover after the
exhausting activities in the labs.
2.6. Lectures
Apart from intense experimental training, participants also received theoretical lectures
from top-level scientists and had the opportunity for a close interaction with these,
sprouting interesting scientific debates. The following instructors and TAs gave
presentations on various topics covered by the summer school:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Lecturer/TA name
Albeanu, Florin
Institution
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, USA
Bandyopadhyay,
Arkarup
Bhalla, Upinder
Burrone, Juan
Campbell,
Alexander
Carnevale, Federico
Dbcan, Adriana
Dickinson, Michael
Engert, Florian
Freiwald, Winrich
Freund, Tamas
Gupta, Priyanka
Hangya, Balzs
NCBS, India
Kings College London, UK
Biozentrum Basel, Switzerland
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, USA
Romanian Institute of Science and Technology, Romania
Caltech, USA
Harvard University, USA
Rockefeller University, USA
Institute for Experimental Medicine, Hungary
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, USA
Institute for Experimental Medicine, Hungary
11
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
Hromdka, Tom
Hbener, Mark
Ji, Na
Kampff, Adam
Keller, Georg
Kodandaramaiah,
Suhasa
Lopes, Gonalo
Modi, Mehrab
Monyer, Hannah
Mrsic-Flgel, Tom
Murean, Raul
Murthy, Venkatesh
Nikolic, Danko
Orsolic, Ivana
Portugues, Ruben
Sanguinetti, Nacho
Siegle, Josh
Singer, Wolf
Svoboda, Karel
Vasilescu, Iuliu
Watson, James
Zador, Tony
Znamenskyi, Petr
the students going to either PhD or postdoc in labs of TENSS lecturers. Not only students
and lecturers interacted but also lecturers among themselves. Therefore, TENSS is an
excellent opportunity for networking and to discuss science.
Lectures covered a wide range of the important topics that were studied in the labs (see
also section 5). The opening lecture happened on May 31st in the evening, after the arrival of
all students. On the first two days of the school, Florin Albeanu, Priyanka Gupta, Adriana
Dbcan, and Mehrab Modi started with basic principles related to optics (nature of light,
lenses, microscopes, Koehler illumination, Resolution, and so on), made a recap on
diffraction, resolution, numerical aperture, and objectives, and discussed wide-field
fluorescence imaging, general problems related to fluorescence (bleaching, ratiometry, and
so on). Adam Kampff and Goncalo Lopez lectured on detectors (cameras, photodiodes,
photomultipliers, with a brief foray into transistors MOSFET & CMOS etc) and noise.
Then, Juan Burrone covered fluorescent probes (GFP, calcium indicators, voltage dyes,
synaptophluorins etc) and Jim Watson talked about Going for the scientific gold!,
describing a set of basic rules for scientific success. On the fourth day, students had half-aday off to relax after the very intense introduction into the course activities. On June 5th,
Mark Hbener discussed wide-field intrinsic optical imaging in comparison with wide-field
fluorescence imaging while Florian Engert presented principles behind confocal and 2photon microscopy. On the sixth day Ruben Portugues gave both a demo and a lecture on
Light Sheet and Light Field microscopy. The next day, Georg Keller discussed building of 2p
microscopes and resonant scanning and Na Ji lectured on adaptive optics. On day 8, Petr
Znamenskiyexplained concepts of optogenetics and optical stimulation methods and Florin
Albeanu and Na Ji gave a lectures on 1p and 2p- structured illumination using intensity and
respectively phase modulation. On day 9, Hannah Monyer lectured on interneurons in the
entorhinal cortex and methods of recording and tracing. Day 10 was again half free, in the
morning Nacho Sanguinetti giving a talk on animal behavior and machine vision. On the
same day, Florian Engert gave a talk on LASERS on a hilltop close to Pike Lake, during an
informal barbecue. The electrophysiology began on day 11 with a talk by Upi Bhalla on
biophysics of neurons followed by a lecture by Petr Znamenskii on chronic extracellular
recordings and Georg Keller on virtual reality and closed-loop experiments in mice. The
introduction to patch clamp was given by Tomas Hromadka on day 12 and then Tom Mrsic13
14
Pre-TENSS workshop people debating. With: Florin Albeanu, Adam Kampff, Jakob
Voigts, Aaron Cuevas, Mattias Karlsson, Reid Harrison, Jon Newman, Goncalo Lopes.
15
Setting up the table for the Sutter microscope. With: Ivana Orsolic, Petr Znamenskii
and Adriana Dbcan.
16
The big table, for custom setups. With: Priyanka Gupta and Petr.
17
18
19
The students...
20
21
22
23
And they start building right away basic optics lab session.
24
Team work.
25
26
27
28
Jim and Liz visiting the Nicula monastery, close to Pike Lake.
29
30
Relaxing after a very intense day with Juan Burrone, Balzs Hangya and Fede.
31
32
Tomas on Arduinos.
33
Adam Kampff...
34
35
Party people.
38
Florin...
Na Ji on adaptive optics.
39
40
41
Florian lecturing on lasers, on the top of a Transylvanian hill near Pike Lake.
42
Arkarup Bandyopadhyay singing with a local band from the Cluj Music Conservatory.
43
47
48
Raul and Balzs in the Shadow bar waiting for some shots.
49
50
51
Live demo of fruit fly behavioral experiments Michael Dickinson, Balzs, Priyanka.
Its all in the details showing oscillatory entrainment in the gamma band.
53
Priyanka and Petr doing some last-minute experiments on the MOM 2p setup.
54
55
And the last evening of the school, with Nacho handing out certificates of attendance.
56
57
58
60
4. Financial report
The total budget of TENSS 2016 was a very large one because of the nature of the summer
school. Experimental schools require a tremendous logistic effort and lots of equipment and
therefore costs are much higher than in schools which are limited to theoretical lectures
only. The total spending of TENSS 2016 was around 88636 EUR as of June 24th, 2016. The
budget structure of TENSS 2016 is outlined in the following table.
Nr.
crt.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Budget category
Cost (RON)
106810
142130
109263
33593
10088
401884
Cost
(EUR*)
31347
23557
24098
7409
2225
88636
Cost
(GBP**)
18549
24683
18975
5834
1752
69793
Cost
(USD***)
35221
26469
27076
8325
2500
99591
Table 3. Spending per budget categories (rounded figures). *The costs in EUR were
estimated at the National Bank of Romanias exchange rate for 17.06.2016 (4.5341
EUR/RON). **The costs in GBP were computed by taking an average GBP/EUR exchange rate
of 1.27. ***The costs in USD were computed considering an exchange rate of 0.89 USD/EUR.
****Logistics costs are estimates as of 30th June 2016, because there are additional costs for
shipping loaned equipment back which, on this date, could only be estimated.
The sources of funding are described as follows.
Funding source
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Gatsby Foundation
Wellcome Trust
Simons Foundation
FENS-IBRO
PERC
The Company of Biologists
Registration fees
Total
Amount
(EUR)
25400
25400
12460
4000
4000
3876*
13500
88636
Amount
(GBP)
20000
20000
9811
3150
3150
3052
10630
69793
Amount
(USD)
28539
28539
14000
4494
4494
4356
15169
99591
% Budget
28.66%
28.66%
14.06%
4.51%
4.51%
4.37%
15.23%
100%
Table 4. Funding sources that covered the budget for TENSS 2016. * - the actual amount
received in the institutes account.
61
62
DAY
TIME SLOT
MAIN RESPONSIBLE
31/5/2016
19:00 20:30
20:30 21:30
Dinner
1/6/2016
GROUPS
CONTENT
08:00 09:00
Morning run/swim
09:00 10:00
Breakfast
10:00 11:00
Florin Albeanu
11:00 12:00
Adriana
Intro to Optics
Intro to image formation
12:00 12:15
12:15 13:00
Coffee break
TAs
ABCD
13:00 14:00
14:00 16:00
TAs
ABCD
16:00 16:30
16:30 18:00
Mehrab
18:00 20:30
TAs
63
20:30 21:30
21:30 23:00
2/6/2016
Dinner
TAs
ABCD
08:00 09:00
Morning run/swim
09:00 10:00
Breakfast
10:00 11:00
Priyanka/Mehrab
11:00 11:15
11:15 13:00
Coffee break
Fluorescence: Wide-field epi-fluorescence, PSFs and resolution, dF/F, bleaching,
ratiometry (dF/dR)
Florin Albeanu
13:00 14:00
14:00 16:30
Lunch
TAs
ABCD
16:30 16:45
Coffee break
16:45 18:30
Adam / Goncalo
18:30 20:30
TAs
Detecting signals: Noise, Cameras, PMTs and diodes, Introducing lab session on
noise measurements
ABCD
20:30 21:30
21:30 24:00
TAs
ABCD
64
3/6/2016
08:00 09:00
Morning run/swim
09:00 10:00
Breakfast
10:00 11:30
Juan Burrone
11:30 11:45
11:45 13:00
Coffee break
Tomas, Goncalo
Programming I: Basics
13:00 14:00
Lunch
14:00 15:00
Jim Watson
15:00 17:30
17:30 17:45
17:45 20:30
Coffee break
TAs
ABCD
20:30 21:30
21:30 onwards
4/6/2016
TAs
ABCD
08:00 09:00
Morning run/swim
09:00 10:00
Breakfast
10:00 11:00
11:00 13:00
13:00 14:30
Tomas, Goncalo
65
5/6/2016
14:30 20:30
20:30 onwards
08:00 09:00
Morning run/swim
09:00 10:00
Breakfast
10:00 11:30
Intrinsic Imaging - Principles and Intro to Lab session - practical aspects and
comparison with wide field fluorescence imaging
Mark Hubener
11:30 11:45
11:45 13:00
Coffee break
Florian Engert
13:00 14:00
14:00 16:00
Lunch
TAs
AB
Rob
CD
16:00 16:30
16:00 20:30
Coffee break
TAs
AB
Rob
CD
20:30 21:30
21:30 23:00
6/6/2016
08:00 09:00
Dinner
TAs
ABCD
Morning run/swim
66
09:00 10:00
10:00 12:00
Breakfast
Rob
AB
TAs
CD
12:00 13:00
13:00 - 14:00
14:00 18:15
Early Lunch
Ruben Portugues
Rob
AB
TAs
CD
18:15 18:30
18:30 20:30
TAs, Ruben
ABCD
20:30 21:30
Dinner
21:30 23:00
23:00 onwards
7/6/2016
Coffee break
TAs, Ruben
08:00 09:00
Morning run/swim
09:00 10:00
Breakfast
10:00 11:15
Georg Keller
11:15 11:30
11:30 13:00
Coffee break
Rob
AB
Florin
CD
67
13:00 14:00
14:00 19:00
Lunch
Rob
AB
TAs
CD
19:00 19:15
19:15 20:30
Coffee break
Na Ji
Adaptive Optics
20:30 21:30
21:30 23:00
8/6/2016
Dinner
TAs
ABCD
08:00 09:00
Morning run/swim
09:00 10:00
Breakfast
10:00 11:15
Florin
11:15 11:30
11:30 13:00
Coffee break
Florin
AB
Rob
CD
13:00 14:00
14:00 19:00
19:00 19:15
19:15 20:30
20:30 21:30
21:30 23:00
Lunch
TAs
AB
Rob
CD
Na Ji
TAs
ABCD
Coffee break
Structured Illumination via Phase modulation and Temporal focusing
Dinner
Continuation of lab sessions
68
9/6/2016
08:00 09:00
Morning run/swim
09:00 10:00
Breakfast
10:00 11:00
11:00 13:00
Marius
TAs
AB
Marius, Georg
CD
13:00 14:00
14:00 16:00
Lunch
Marius, Georg
CD
TAs
AB
16:00 16:30
Coffee
16:30 19:30
Marius, TAs
19:30 20:30
Hannan Monyer
ABCD
TBA
20:30 21:30
21:30 23:30
10/6/2016
10
Marius, TAs
ABCD
08:00 09:00
Morning run/swim
09:00 10:00
Breakfast
10:00 11:15
Nacho
11:15 11:30
Coffee
11:30 13:00
13:00 20:30
20:30 onwards
69
11/6/2016
11
08:00 09:00
Morning run/swim
09:00 10:00
Breakfast
10:00 11:15
Upi Bhalla
11:15 11:30
11:30 13:00
Coffee break
Petr
13:00 14:00
Lunch
Upi, Mehrab, Adriana
AB
TAs
CD
14:00 17:00
17:00 17:30
Coffee break
TAs
AB
CD
17:30 20:30
20:30 21:30
21:30 23:00
12/6/2016
12
Dinner
Georg Keller
08:00 09:00
Morning run/swim
09:00 10:00
Breakfast
70
10:00 13:00
TAs
AB
CD
13:00 14:00
Lunch
14:00 15:15
Tomas Hromadka
15:15 16:15
Suhasa
16:15 16:30
16:30 19:30
Coffee break
TAs
AB
CD
19:30 20:30
20:30 21:30
Early Dinner
Tom Flogel
21:30 24:00
13/6/2016
13
08:00 09:00
Morning run/swim
09:00 10:00
Breakfast
10:00 13:00
TAs
AB
TAs
CD
13:00 14:00
14:00 15:00
15:00 18:00
18:00 18:30
Lunch
Tony Zador
TBA
TAs
AB
TAs
CD
71
18:30 20:30
Balazs, TAs
ABCD
20:30 21:30
14/6/2016
14
21:30 22:30
Danko Nikolic
22:30 24:00
TAs
Continue analysis
08:00 09:00
Morning run/swim
09:00 10:00
Breakfast
Physiology III - recording from behaving mice
In vivo patch clamp
10:00 13:00
TAs
Tomas, Suhasa
13:00 14:00
Karel Svoboda
AB
CD
TBA
14:00 - 15:00
15:00 17:00
Tomas, Suhasa
AB
TAs
CD
17:00 17:30
17:30 20:30
Coffee break
ABCD
20:30 21:30
15/6/2016
DAY
15
21:30 22:30
ABCD
22:30 24:00
ABCD
Student Talks
08:00 09:00
Morning run/swim
72
16/6/2016
DAY
16
09:00 10:00
Breakfast
10:00 20:30
20:30
onwards
08:00 09:00
Morning run/swim
09:00 10:00
Breakfast
10:00 11:00
Mike Dickinson
11:00 12:00
Tamas Freund
12:00 13:00
13:00 15:00
Early lunch
Venki, TAs
AB
Student Projects
Tomas, Suhasa, M.
Dickinson
CD
15:00 15:15
15:15 17:15
Coffee
Venki, TAs
CD
Student Projects
Tomas, Suhasa, M.
Dickinson
AB
17:15 17:30
17:30 20:30
Coffee
TAs
20:30 21:30
21:00 23:00
Student Projects
Dinner
TAs
Student Projects
73
17/6/2016
18/6/2016
DAY
17
DAY
18
08:00 09:00
Morning run/swim
09:00 10:00
Breakfast
10:00 12:00
Group Experiments
12:00 13:00
Lunch
13:00 20:30
Group Experiments
20:30 21:30
Dinner
21:00 23:00
Group Experiments
08:00 09:00
Running around
09:00 10:00
Breakfast
10:00 11:00
Raul Muresan
11:00 12:00
19/6/2016
DAY
12:00 13:00
Lunch
13:00 18:00
Group Experiments
18:00 20:30
Group Experiments
20:30 21:30
Dinner
21:00 23:00
08:00 09:00
Morning run/swim
74
19
09:00 10:00
Breakfast
10:00 11:45
Informal chalk board talks by students (10 + 5 minutes): Very brief intro to
current research work and defend future proposals to use knowledge acquired
at the course
11:45 12:00
Coffee
12:00 13:30
13:30 14:30
Lunch
14:30 16:00
Evening
onwards
75