Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Daly v. Worcester County MD, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Edward Daly filed a § 1983 complaint against Worcester County, Maryland which was denied by the district court. Daly appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit did not publish the opinion because unpublished opinions are not binding precedent. The court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the written materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-07-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-1669

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Edward Daly filed a § 1983 complaint against Worcester County, Maryland which was denied by the district court. Daly appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit did not publish the opinion because unpublished opinions are not binding precedent. The court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the written materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Daly v. Worcester County MD, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Edward Daly filed a § 1983 complaint against Worcester County, Maryland which was denied by the district court. Daly appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit did not publish the opinion because unpublished opinions are not binding precedent. The court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the written materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-1669

    EDWARD F. DALY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    WORCESTER COUNTY, MARYLAND,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA98-3296-CCB)

    Submitted:

    July 22, 1999

    Decided:

    July 27, 1999

    Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Edward F. Daly, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Bock Karpinski, ALLEN,
    JOHNSON, ALEXANDER & KARP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Edward Daly appeals the district courts order denying relief
    on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint.

    We have

    reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find no
    reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

    district court. See Daly v. Worcester County, Maryland, No. CA-983296-CCB (D. Md. Mar. 11, 1999).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like