Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • McHam v. North Carolina Mutual, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Kenneth O. McHam, Sr. appealed a district court order that granted the defendants' motion to dismiss and dismissed McHam's civil rights complaint. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court order and affirmed the dismissal for the reasons cited by the district court. The appellate court found that oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-10-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-1623

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Kenneth O. McHam, Sr. appealed a district court order that granted the defendants' motion to dismiss and dismissed McHam's civil rights complaint. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court order and affirmed the dismissal for the reasons cited by the district court. The appellate court found that oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    McHam v. North Carolina Mutual, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Kenneth O. McHam, Sr. appealed a district court order that granted the defendants' motion to dismiss and dismissed McHam's civil rights complaint. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court order and affirmed the dismissal for the reasons cited by the district court. The appellate court found that oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-1623

    KENNETH O. MCHAM, SR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    NORTH CAROLINA MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY;
    BURT COLLINS; ROBERT W. NORRIS; CARLTON
    SPAULDING; CHARLES WELCH; FERRIS A. COLEMAN,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
    District Judge. (1:05-cv-01168-NCT)

    Submitted:

    October 1, 2007

    Decided:

    October 12, 2007

    Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Kenneth O. McHam, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Charles D. Watts, Jr.,


    NORTH CAROLINA MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Durham, North
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Kenneth O. McHam, Sr., appeals from a district court
    order granting the Appellees motion to dismiss and dismissing his
    civil rights complaint.

    We have reviewed the record and the

    district courts order and affirm for the reasons cited by the
    district court.

    See McHam v. N.C. Mutual Life Ins. Co., No. 1:05-

    cv-01168-NCT (M.D.N.C. June 11, 2007).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like