Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Ronald Holt, 900 F.2d 256, 4th Cir. (1990)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Ronald Holt appealed a district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal lacked merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its May 16, 1989 decision. The Fourth Circuit found oral arguments were not necessary as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1990-03-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 900 F.2d 256 Docket: 89-6702

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ronald Holt appealed a district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal lacked merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its May 16, 1989 decision. The Fourth Circuit found oral arguments were not necessary as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Ronald Holt, 900 F.2d 256, 4th Cir. (1990)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ronald Holt appealed a district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal lacked merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its May 16, 1989 decision. The Fourth Circuit found oral arguments were not necessary as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    900 F.

    2d 256
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    Ronald HOLT, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 89-6702.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted March 5, 1990.
    Decided March 15, 1990.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
    at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey, II, Chief District Judge. (C/A No. 89458-H; CR No. 84-428-H).
    Ronald Holt, appellant pro se.
    Larry David Adams, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore,
    Md., for appellee.
    D.Md.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Ronald Holt appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28
    U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the

    reasoning of the district court. United States v. Holt, C/A No. 89-458-H; CR
    No. 84-428-H (D.Md. May 16, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like