Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Timothy Walton v. William Martin, and Franklin County Jail Quint Overton Vicky Meadows, 983 F.2d 1059, 4th Cir. (1993)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Timothy Walton appealed a district court ruling denying him relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit to Walton's appeal. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its October 1, 1992 ruling in the case. The Fourth Circuit found that oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials submitted for the case.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1993-01-11 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 983 F.2d 1059 Docket: 92-7109

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Timothy Walton appealed a district court ruling denying him relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit to Walton's appeal. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its October 1, 1992 ruling in the case. The Fourth Circuit found that oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials submitted for the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Timothy Walton v. William Martin, and Franklin County Jail Quint Overton Vicky Meadows, 983 F.2d 1059, 4th Cir. (1993)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Timothy Walton appealed a district court ruling denying him relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit to Walton's appeal. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its October 1, 1992 ruling in the case. The Fourth Circuit found that oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials submitted for the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    983 F.

    2d 1059

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Timothy WALTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    William MARTIN, Defendant-Appellee,
    and FRANKLIN COUNTY JAIL; Quint Overton; Vicky
    Meadows, Defendants.
    No. 92-7109.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: December 14, 1992
    Decided: January 11, 1993

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of
    Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Chief District Judge. (CA-92-12-R)
    Timothy Walton, Appellant Pro Se.
    William Heywood Fralin, Jr., Woods, Rogers & Hazlegrove, Roanoke,
    Virginia, for Appellee.
    W.D.Va.
    Affirmed.
    Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    OPINION

    Timothy Walton appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42
    U.S.C. 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Walton v. Martin, No. CA-92-12-R (W.D. Va.
    Oct. 1, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like