Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • William E. Lee v. T.W. Powell (LT.) L.L. Williams, CPL., 808 F.2d 835, 4th Cir. (1986)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views1 page
    This document is an unpublished appellate court decision from 1986 regarding a Section 1983 civil rights claim brought by William E. Lee against two defendants. In a per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without oral argument, finding that the appeal was without merit based on a review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate's recommendation. The dispositive issues had been decided authoritatively in prior cases.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1986-12-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 808 F.2d 835 Docket: 86-7083

    Original Title

    William E. Lee v. T.W. Powell (Lt.) L.L. Williams, Cpl., 808 F.2d 835, 4th Cir. (1986)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished appellate court decision from 1986 regarding a Section 1983 civil rights claim brought by William E. Lee against two defendants. In a per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without oral argument, finding that the appeal was without merit based on a review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate's recommendation. The dispositive issues had been decided authoritatively in prior cases.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views1 page

    William E. Lee v. T.W. Powell (LT.) L.L. Williams, CPL., 808 F.2d 835, 4th Cir. (1986)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished appellate court decision from 1986 regarding a Section 1983 civil rights claim brought by William E. Lee against two defendants. In a per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without oral argument, finding that the appeal was without merit based on a review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate's recommendation. The dispositive issues had been decided authoritatively in prior cases.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    808 F.

    2d 835
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    William E. LEE, Appellant,
    v.
    T.W. POWELL (Lt.), et al; L.L. Williams, Cpl., Appellees.
    No. 86-7083.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Oct. 20, 1986.
    Decided Dec. 22, 1986.

    Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.


    William E. Lee, pro se.
    Richard F. Gorman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the
    recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal from its order
    refusing relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the
    dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with
    oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district
    court. Lee v. Powell, C/A No. 84-0870-A (E.D.Va., Mar. 4, 1986).

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like