Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Tommy McElveen v. Cameron M. Currie, Deputy Attorney General, 37 F.3d 1494, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    13 views2 pages
    The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Tommy McElveen in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint against Cameron M. Currie. The appeals court found the appeal was without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court decision concludes by affirming the district court's ruling and dispensing with oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1994-10-12 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 37 F.3d 1494 Docket: 93-7212

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Tommy McElveen in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint against Cameron M. Currie. The appeals court found the appeal was without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court decision concludes by affirming the district court's ruling and dispensing with oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    13 views2 pages

    Tommy McElveen v. Cameron M. Currie, Deputy Attorney General, 37 F.3d 1494, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Tommy McElveen in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint against Cameron M. Currie. The appeals court found the appeal was without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court decision concludes by affirming the district court's ruling and dispensing with oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    37 F.

    3d 1494
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    Tommy McELVEEN, Plaintiff Appellant,


    v.
    Cameron M. CURRIE, Deputy Attorney General, Defendant
    Appellee.
    No. 93-7212.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: Sept. 20, 1994.
    Decided: Oct. 12, 1994.

    Tommy McElveen, appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Ellis,
    Lawhorne, Davidson, Sims, Morrison & Sojourner, P.A., Columbia, SC;
    Edwin Eugene Evans, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, SC,
    for appellee.
    D.S.C.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that
    this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
    district court. McElveen v. Currie, No. CA-92-2010-21AJ (D.S.C. Oct. 20,
    1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like