Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Henneghan v. Commissioner of Corr, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    Gerald Henneghan filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Commissioner of Correction and Correctional Medical Service which was denied by the district court. Henneghan appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief on Henneghan's § 1983 complaint, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-12-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-6399

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Gerald Henneghan filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Commissioner of Correction and Correctional Medical Service which was denied by the district court. Henneghan appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief on Henneghan's § 1983 complaint, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views2 pages

    Henneghan v. Commissioner of Corr, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Gerald Henneghan filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Commissioner of Correction and Correctional Medical Service which was denied by the district court. Henneghan appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief on Henneghan's § 1983 complaint, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-6399

    GERALD HENNEGHAN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION; CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA98-364-PJM)

    Submitted:

    June 18, 1998

    Decided:

    December 21, 1998

    Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Gerald Henneghan, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Gerald Henneghan appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and the district courts opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Henneghan v. Commissioner of Correction, No. CA-98-364-PJM
    (D. Md. Feb. 25, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like