Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Scottie Graves v. Mike Andrews, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Scottie Lee Graves on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its March 14, 2013 opinion. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-09-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-6590

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Scottie Lee Graves on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its March 14, 2013 opinion. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Scottie Graves v. Mike Andrews, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Scottie Lee Graves on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its March 14, 2013 opinion. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-6590

    SCOTTIE LEE GRAVES,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    MIKE ANDREWS; JULIAN COUCH; GODWIN MENSAH; PATRICIA BUTLER,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
    District Judge. (1:12-cv-00154-JAB-JLW)

    Submitted:

    August 26, 2013

    Decided:

    September 4, 2013

    Before AGEE and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Scottie Lee Graves, Appellant Pro Se. Marie Therese Inserra,


    DURHAM
    COUNTY
    ATTORNEYS
    OFFICE,
    Durham,
    North
    Carolina;
    Jennifer Bryant Milak, Rebecca Ann Rausch, TEAGUE, CAMPBELL,
    DENNIS & GORHAM, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Scottie Lee Graves appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Graves v. Andrews, No. 1:12-cv-00154-JAB-JLW (M.D.N.C.

    Mar. 14, 2013).


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the


    contentions

    are

    adequately

    this

    and

    argument

    court

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like