Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Reginald Frazier appealed the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court's ruling and found the appeal lacked merit. The appellate court denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that habeas corpus relief was not warranted. The appellate court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1992-04-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 960 F.2d 146 Docket: 91-6135

    Original Title

    Reginald L. Frazier v. North Carolina State Bar Jean Boyd, Clerk of Superior Court Herbert Smalls, Superior Court Judge Pete Bland, Sheriff of Craven County, 960 F.2d 146, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Reginald Frazier appealed the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court's ruling and found the appeal lacked merit. The appellate court denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that habeas corpus relief was not warranted. The appellate court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Reginald Frazier appealed the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court's ruling and found the appeal lacked merit. The appellate court denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that habeas corpus relief was not warranted. The appellate court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    960 F.

    2d 146

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Reginald L. FRAZIER, Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR; Jean Boyd, Clerk of
    Superior
    Court; Herbert Smalls, Superior Court Judge;
    Pete Bland, Sheriff of Craven County,
    Respondents-Appellees.
    No. 91-6135.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: April 1, 1992
    Decided: April 29, 1992

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-91446-HC)
    Reginald L. Frazier, Appellant Pro Se.
    Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Office Of The Attorney General Of North
    Carolina, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    E.D.N.C.
    DISMISSED.
    Before WIDENER and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    OPINION

    PER CURIAM:

    Reginald L. Frazier seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas
    corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and
    the district court's oral ruling discloses that this appeal is without merit.
    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the
    appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Frazier v. North Carolina State
    Bar, No. CA-91446-HC (E.D.N.C. Aug. 12, 1991). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.
    DISMISSED

    You might also like