Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Hampton v. Turlington, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Wilbert Hampton filed a § 1983 complaint against several medical providers that was denied by the district court. Hampton appealed the denial. The appeals court reviewed the district court's decision and found no errors. The appeals court affirmed the district court's denial based on the reasoning in the district court's opinion and dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-08-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-6327

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Wilbert Hampton filed a § 1983 complaint against several medical providers that was denied by the district court. Hampton appealed the denial. The appeals court reviewed the district court's decision and found no errors. The appeals court affirmed the district court's denial based on the reasoning in the district court's opinion and dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    Hampton v. Turlington, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Wilbert Hampton filed a § 1983 complaint against several medical providers that was denied by the district court. Hampton appealed the denial. The appeals court reviewed the district court's decision and found no errors. The appeals court affirmed the district court's denial based on the reasoning in the district court's opinion and dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-6327

    WILBERT EUGENE HAMPTON,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    CATHERINE TURLINGTON, Doctor; EASTERN SHORE
    EYE CENTER; JOHN FOLEY, Doctor; RITE AID
    PHARMACY,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
    (CA-00-118-2)

    Submitted:

    July 27, 2000

    Decided:

    August 3, 2000

    Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Wilbert Eugene Hampton, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Wilbert Eugene Hampton appeals the district courts order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.
    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and
    find no reversible error.
    of the district court.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

    See Hampton v. Turlington, No. CA-00-118-2

    (E.D. Va. Feb. 24, 2000).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like