Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Vest v. McDade, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Keith Brent Vest filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief from his conviction. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina denied relief. Vest sought to appeal. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying relief.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-02-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-7000

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Keith Brent Vest filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief from his conviction. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina denied relief. Vest sought to appeal. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Vest v. McDade, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Keith Brent Vest filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief from his conviction. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina denied relief. Vest sought to appeal. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-7000

    KEITH BRENT VEST,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    MARTIN MCDADE; MICHAEL F. EASLEY,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-273-BO-5-2)

    Submitted:

    January 31, 2000

    Decided:

    February 22, 2000

    Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Keith Brent Vest, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Fitzgerald Wyatt, WYATT,
    EARLY, HARRIS, WHEELER & HAUSER, High Point, North Carolina; George
    Bullock Currin, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Clarence
    Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Keith Brent Vest seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West
    1994 & Supp. 1999).

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge


    and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certificate

    of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the


    district court. See Vest v. McDade, No. CA-97-273-BO-5-2 (E.D.N.C.
    June 23, 1999).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like