Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Byrd v. Moore, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a petition filed by Bernard Byrd under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit dismisses Byrd's appeal, finding no reversible error in the district court's denial of relief on Byrd's petition or its denial of reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit denies a certificate of appealability and dismisses the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its August 19 and November 10, 1999 orders.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-05-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-7664

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a petition filed by Bernard Byrd under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit dismisses Byrd's appeal, finding no reversible error in the district court's denial of relief on Byrd's petition or its denial of reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit denies a certificate of appealability and dismisses the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its August 19 and November 10, 1999 orders.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Byrd v. Moore, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a petition filed by Bernard Byrd under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit dismisses Byrd's appeal, finding no reversible error in the district court's denial of relief on Byrd's petition or its denial of reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit denies a certificate of appealability and dismisses the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its August 19 and November 10, 1999 orders.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-7664

    BERNARD BYRD,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    MICHAEL MOORE, Director of SCDC; CHARLES M.
    CONDON, South Carolina Attorney General,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Greenville. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
    Judge. (CA-98-3288-6)

    Submitted:

    April 20, 2000

    Decided:

    May 1, 2000

    Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Bernard Byrd, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Molony Condon, Attorney
    General, Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, John
    William McIntosh, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Bernard Byrd appeals the district courts orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 &
    Supp. 1999) and denying reconsideration of that order.

    We have

    reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and orders and
    find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

    appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    See Byrd v. Moore, No. CA-98-3288-6 (D.S.C. Aug. 19

    and Nov. 10, 1999).

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like