Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Miller v. Bailey, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    This document is a summary of a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Albert Miller III in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several defendants. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in that court's opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-04-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6140

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a summary of a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Albert Miller III in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several defendants. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in that court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Miller v. Bailey, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a summary of a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Albert Miller III in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several defendants. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in that court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6140

    ALBERT MILLER, III,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    PATRICIA BAILEY; DAVID M. HINDS; JOSEPH E.
    SWANTON; HASHEMEE SAYD,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District
    Judge. (CA-00-172-5-BR)

    Submitted:

    April 12, 2001

    Decided:

    April 18, 2001

    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Albert Miller, III, Appellant Pro Se. Buren Riley Shields, III,
    NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; Kari
    Russwurm Johnson, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, L.L.P., Raleigh,
    North Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Albert Miller, III, appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion accepting
    the magistrate judges recommendation and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
    Miller v. Bailey, No. CA-00-172-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Nov. 20, 2000).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like