Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Marvin Leon Grimm Jr. appealed the district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit in Grimm's appeal. While dismissing the appeal, the Court notes that Grimm may still seek relief from the district court under Rule 60(b)(2) if he has evidence of newly discovered facts. The case was decided without oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in documents before the Court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1991-12-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 952 F.2d 395 Docket: 91-7693

    Original Title

    Marvin Leon Grimm, Jr. v. Clarence L. Jackson, Jr. John A. Brown George Hampton, Jr. Lewis W. Hurst Frank E. Saunders Gail Y. Browne Jacqueline F. Fraser Edward C. Morris Larry W. Huffman David K. Smith Barbara J. Wheeler Bobby W. Soles William P. Rogers Julian U. Pugh Charles Robb Gerald Baliles L. Douglas Wilder Michael A. Shupe Kim Gillespie R. White R. E. Beauford, Jr. J. C. Roseir, 952 F.2d 395, 4th Cir. (1991)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Marvin Leon Grimm Jr. appealed the district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit in Grimm's appeal. While dismissing the appeal, the Court notes that Grimm may still seek relief from the district court under Rule 60(b)(2) if he has evidence of newly discovered facts. The case was decided without oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in documents before the Court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Marvin Leon Grimm Jr. appealed the district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit in Grimm's appeal. While dismissing the appeal, the Court notes that Grimm may still seek relief from the district court under Rule 60(b)(2) if he has evidence of newly discovered facts. The case was decided without oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in documents before the Court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    952 F.

    2d 395

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Marvin Leon GRIMM, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Clarence L. JACKSON, Jr.; John A. Brown; George Hampton,
    Jr.; Lewis W. Hurst; Frank E. Saunders; Gail Y. Browne;
    Jacqueline F. Fraser; Edward C. Morris; Larry W. Huffman;
    David K. Smith; Barbara J. Wheeler; Bobby W. Soles; William
    P. Rogers; Julian U. Pugh; Charles Robb; Gerald Baliles; L.
    Douglas Wilder; Michael A. Shupe; Kim Gillespie; R. White;
    R. E. Beauford, Jr.; J. C. Roseir, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 91-7693.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: December 5, 1991
    Decided: December 30, 1991

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of
    Virginia, at Roanoke.
    Marvin Leon Grimm, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Gayl Y. Branum-Carr,
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond,
    Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Marvin Leon Grimm, Jr. appeals from the district court's order denying relief
    under 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's

    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on


    the reasoning of the district court. Grimm v. Jackson, No. CA-91-501-R (W.D.
    Va. Sept. 19, 1991). We also deny Grimm's Motion for Abeyance and/or Stay.*
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    We note that our disposition of the appeal is without prejudice to Grimm's right
    to seek relief from the district court under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(2) based on
    alleged newly discovered evidence. See Standard Oil Co. v. United States, 429
    U.S. 17 (1976)

    You might also like