Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Comegys v. Stouffer, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Robert L. Comegys. The district court had denied Comegys' petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. 2254. The appeals court reviewed the district court's decision and found that Comegys did not make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. As a result, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-09-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-6889

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Robert L. Comegys. The district court had denied Comegys' petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. 2254. The appeals court reviewed the district court's decision and found that Comegys did not make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. As a result, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Comegys v. Stouffer, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Robert L. Comegys. The district court had denied Comegys' petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. 2254. The appeals court reviewed the district court's decision and found that Comegys did not make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. As a result, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-6889

    ROBERT L. COMEGYS,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    J.
    MICHAEL
    STOUFFER,
    Warden,
    Maryland
    Correctional Training Center; ATTORNEY GENERAL
    OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA02-948-DKC)

    Submitted:

    September 5, 2002

    Decided:

    September 10, 2002

    Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Robert L. Comegys, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Robert L. Comegys seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. 2254 (2000).
    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and
    conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Comegys has
    not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional
    right. See Comegys v. Stouffer, No. CA-02-948-DKC (D. Md. filed May
    3, 2002; entered May 6, 2002).

    Accordingly, we deny a certificate

    of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

    See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)

    (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like