Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Anderson v. Evans, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Charles Anderson appealed a district court's dismissal of his constitutional claims and retaliation claim against the US Patent and Trademark Office. A district court also granted summary judgment against Anderson's Title VII and ADEA claims. The appeals court affirmed the district court's rulings, finding that Anderson did not provide sufficient evidence to support his claims. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary and affirmed the lower court's dismissal of all of Anderson's claims.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-12-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-2049

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Charles Anderson appealed a district court's dismissal of his constitutional claims and retaliation claim against the US Patent and Trademark Office. A district court also granted summary judgment against Anderson's Title VII and ADEA claims. The appeals court affirmed the district court's rulings, finding that Anderson did not provide sufficient evidence to support his claims. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary and affirmed the lower court's dismissal of all of Anderson's claims.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Anderson v. Evans, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Charles Anderson appealed a district court's dismissal of his constitutional claims and retaliation claim against the US Patent and Trademark Office. A district court also granted summary judgment against Anderson's Title VII and ADEA claims. The appeals court affirmed the district court's rulings, finding that Anderson did not provide sufficient evidence to support his claims. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary and affirmed the lower court's dismissal of all of Anderson's claims.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-2049

    CHARLES W. ANDERSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DONALD D. EVANS;
    TRADEMARK OFFICE,

    UNITED

    STATES

    PATENT

    &
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
    Judge. (CA-04-211-A)

    Submitted:

    December 3, 2004

    Decided:

    December 23, 2004

    Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Charles W. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr.,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Charles

    W.

    Anderson

    appeals

    district

    court

    orders

    granting the Appellees motion to dismiss the constitutional claims


    and the retaliation claim and the motion for summary judgment with
    respect to Andersons Title VII and ADEA claims and denying his
    motion for reconsideration under Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of
    Civil Procedure.

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts findings and affirm for the reasons stated by the district
    court. See Anderson v. Evans, No. CA-04-211-A (E.D. Va. filed June
    18, 2004 & entered June 22, 2004 & June 29, 2004).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like