Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prelims Summary
Prelims Summary
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Title
Chapter 1: Scarcity, Choice and Opportunity Cost
Explain two ways in which an economy might move from a
point within its PPC to a point on it.
Discuss the most effective economic policies to move the
PPC outwards.
What is meant by the basic economic problem of scarcity?
Discuss whether economic growth solves the problem of
scarcity.
Chapter 2: Resource Allocation in Competitive Markets I
A manufacturer wishes to sell more of his product. How
may he try to achieve his aim?
Chapter 3: Resource Allocation in Competitive Markets II
Explain price elasticity of demand and income elasticity of
demand.
A government is proposing to increase the tax on petrol.
Examine the relevance of price elasticity of demand
and income elasticity of demand for this proposal.
Assess the relevance of elasticity concepts in explaining
the effects of the worldwide recession caused by the
911 terrorist attacks on the airline industry.
Chapter 4: Microeconomic Problems: Market Failure
Policies on Pollution and Evaluation Summary
Policies on Pollution and Congestion caused by Cars
Summary
Chapter 5: Government Intervention in the Market I
Chapter 6: Firms and How They Operate I
Discuss whether rising costs limit the size of firms over
time.
Banking Merger in Singapore Analysis
Chapter 7: Firms and How They Operate II
Discuss the view that the profit motive will always lead to
a few large firms dominating the market for each and
every type of product.
Explain what is meant by productive and allocative
efficiency.
A firm should be encouraged to maximize profits because
this makes it efficient. Discuss whether this argument is
true for a firm operating in an imperfect market.
Distinguish between monopolistic competition and
oligopoly.
Explain why oligopoly is a common market structure in
many economies.
Explain why governments throughout the world have been
Page
No.
2-3
4
5
6
7
8-9
10
11-13
14
14
15-16
17-18
19-21
22-23
24
25-30
31
31
32-38
39
40-41
42
43
44
45
1
26
46-48
Opportunity Cost
Real cost in terms of the next best alternative foregone
Calculating opportunity cost requires time and information
Opportunity cost may vary with circumstance
Economic rent: difference between what is earned and what could
have been earned
Used in specialization and trade
4. Production Possibility Curve
Maximum attainable combination of two goods and services that
can be produced in an economy, when all available resources are
used fully and efficiently, at a given state of technology
Assumptions: fixed amount of resources, factors fully and efficiently
employed, technology fixed, time period give, 2-product model
Fully: using all resources available
Efficiently: do as many things you can with the resources used
Wheat
*Draw dotted line to show comparison
between 2 countries with a common
yardstick
Cloth
B
A
Good
Y
Body
A. Increase employment of resources
Lower wages to be more competitive may be enticed to
produce more goods
Fiscal policy: increase government spending eg. circle line
multiplier effect
Monetary policy: lower interest rate firms borrow more,
increase investment
B. Increase efficiency in use of resources
Pay based on productivity: but only for jobs where output can be
measured (factory workers)
Reallocate resources to more efficient uses
Retraining
O
5 6
Good
(Brief) Implications:
Y
Trade as a solution to alleviate scarcity
Trade-off between consumer goods and capital goods
What (how scarcity affects decision-making of an economy), how
much, for whom and what to produce (market system)
10
11
Adjustment to equilibrium
Below equilibrium
Shortage consumers compete for goods, bidding up
prices price increases, quantity supplied increases
shortage eliminated market settles at equilibrium
Above equilibrium
Surplus - producers reduce prices to get rid of stocks
increase sales and decrease production price falls,
quantity demanded increases, surplus eliminated
market settles at equilibrium
Shifts in supply and demand: consider individual effects on price
and quantity then sum up
Interrelated demand and surplus
Joint / competitive / derived demand
Joint / competitive supply
4. Case Study
When asked to explain how a group of people intend to affect a
certain market, bring in limitations
Elasticity of demand
Responses of other firms / groups of people
Analyse theoretically first, then see how and why the data fits / does
not fit the theory
Desirability: consider for whom: producer, consumer, society
Effectiveness: limitations, long run vs. short run
12
13
Evaluation
Reduces price may conflict with profit maximization
More effective strategy if selling product that is price demand
elastic mass produce reap EOS lower prices increase
sales volume more than proportionately
14
16
17
18
7. Essay
Limitations to using elasticity concepts to explain price changes
Elasticity concepts are static need to relax ceteris paribus
assumption in reality simultaneous changes occur need to
consider relative magnitudes of changes in demand and
supply
Coefficients of elasticity mere estimates
Consumers not homogenous group
Among high-income earners, there are the yuppies
seeking the high life and are likely to be more price and
income sensitive compared to foreign investors who
would consider socio-political factors
May not consider some goods as substitutes
19
Definition
Formula
Sign
Coefficients: range of values for elastic / inelastic
Examples with their estimated values
20
21
22
23
24
25
3. Public Goods
Non-excludable: impossible / costly to exclude non-paying
consumers from receiving the good
Non-rivalrous: consumption by one person does not reduce amount
available to others
Eg. National defense
Free rider conceal demand private producer cannot gauge
demand will not produce non-production in free market total
market failure
Government provision necessary since public goods are socially
desirable and largely indivisible
4.
Inequality
Represented by the Lorenz Curve / Gini coefficient
Singapore: 0.485 in 2007
European countries: 0.25 0.3
Latin America and the Caribbean: 0.6
Average worldwide: 0.4
5. Essay
When asked to suggest new policies, consider whether it is
possible / practical to enact them
Policies may be difficult to administer, and policing expensive
Opportunity costs involved in attempted to control negative
externalities
Political implications eg. public satisfaction
26
Evaluate:
2) Identify: Quotas
Explain:
Evaluate:
3) Identify: Legislation
Explain:
27
Evaluate:
4) Identify: Nationalisation
Explain:
Evaluate:
Evaluate:
6) Identify: Subsidies
Explain:
Evaluate:
28
Evaluate:
Summation:
Air pollution may not be due to the country itself, so
need international / regional cooperation
Can integrate a few policies for better results
29
travel falls
Evaluate:
2) Identify: COE
Explain:
Evaluate:
cars
Evaluate:
Evaluate:
5) Identify: Rebates for green vehicles eg. 20% off purchase price
Explain:
Evaluate:
30
Evaluate:
for SUVs)
31
32
33
Exampl
es
Rent
of
factory Raw
building, interest on labour
capital invested in
Marginal Cost
Additional
cost
incurred in producing
an extra unit of
output in the short
run
while
some
inputs remain fixed
MC = change in TC /
change in Q
materials,
34
equipment
Graph
Averag
e
curves
ATC =
AVC +
AFC
Stage 1: AVC falls, AFC falls. Since AFC and AVC fall, ATC also falls
Stage 2: AVC rises, AFC falls. Since fall in AFC > rise in AVC, ATC still
falls
Stage 3: AVC rises, AFC falls: Since fall in AFC < rise in AVC, ATC
rises
35
3. Objectives of Firms
Profit-maximisation: equilibrium level of output since there is no
tendency to change
Before equilibrium level, MR > MC so firms want to produce
more
After equilibrium level, MR < MC and rational firms will not
produce at this output level
Firm continues production as long as it can cover variable
costs
Motivation of owners vs. motivation of managers: separation of
control and ownership principal-agent problem: managers tend to
pursue their alternative goals while maintaining minimum level of
profits to appease shareholders
Revenue maximization: managers aim to maximize firms short run
total revenue
Long-run profit maximization: managers aim to shift cost and
revenue curves so as to maximize profits over some longer time
period
Growth maximization: managers may aim for expansion to
maximize growth in sales volume over time
4. Theory of Costs in the Long Run
Returns to scale: measure of resulting change in output when all
inputs are changed in the same proportion (can be increasing,
decreasing or constant)
LRAC: lowest average cost for given level of output when all inputs
are variable
Minimum efficient scale: smallest plant size beyond which no
significant additional IEOS can be achieved
IEOS: savings in costs that occur to a firm due to the firms
expansion, and have been created by firms own policies and
actions
Technical: concerned with production process
Factor indivisibility economies: larger plant size makes it
possible to effectively use indivisible factors (combine
harvesters, power transmission: large and costly)
raises average output and reduces LRAC
Specialisation of labour: simpler and repetitive jobs
which require less training + more efficient eg. car
manufacturing
Managerial: functional specialization by employing experts to
increase efficiency as a whole
Greater use of existing staff
Decentralisation
of
decision-making:
increasing
efficiency of management because of faster flow of
36
37
Financial
Easier and cheaper to raise funds: given lower interest
rate and larger loans because better credit ratings and
more collateral
Raise capital through issue of shares to public who has
more confidence in reputed firms
Risk-bearing
Advantage in bearing non-insurable risks eg. conditions
of demand for final products and supply of raw
materials
Diversification of products and markets
Diversification in sources of supply
R+d
Better quality products increased market share and
demand
Better methods of production more productively
efficient lower average cost
Welfare: making workers feel they belong to the company
more apt to increase efficiency and productivity of company
IDOS
Complexity of management
Principal-agent problem
Bureaucracy
Strained relationships: impersonal no loyalty to firm
apathy, strikes
EEOS: savings in costs that occur to all firms in an industry due to
the expansion of the industry
Economies of concentration
Availability of skilled labour: demand for labour large
enough special educational institutions / firms can
collaborate to develop training facilities
No lack of labour to employ because experts want
to migrate there eg. Silicon Valley
Well-developed infrastructure to cater to that industry
Reputation: builds up name which consumers associate
with quality encourages brand loyalty and steady
clientele
Economies of disintegration
Subsidiary industries developed to cater to needs of
major industry
Eg. car industry in Japan: range of firms specialize
in production of different inputs for car
manufacturing provide output at lower prices to
main industry because specialization allows
38
39
EDOS
Increased strain on infrastructure: taxed to limits eg.
congestion loss of time and increased fuel consumption
Rising costs of FOP: growing shortage of specific raw materials
/ skilled labour
5. Growth of Firms
Methods of growth
Internal expansion: make more of existing product or
extending range of product when it builds a new bigger plant
Merger
Vertical integration: firms engaged in different stages of
productive process
Backward integration vs. forward integration
Eg. Starbucks merge with firm producing coffee
beans wants guaranteed access to raw materials
Horizontal integration: firm takes over similar firm at
same stage of production in the same industry
Eg. Coffee Bean and Starbucks merge
Eg. DBS and POSB
Market domination
Conglomeration
Eg. bank taking over developing firm to build properties
Diversify output
6. Survival of Small Firms
Demand-side factors
Nature of product
Bulky and perishable goods: small, localized markets eg.
fresh fish
Variety preferred to standardization eg. fashion
Specialised products: limited markets eg. highly
specialized machines
Prestige markets: limited by price eg. sports cars, luxury
yachts
Direct and personalized services eg. lawyers, doctors
Geographical limitations: high transport costs for bulky
products local market rather than national market
Supply-side factors
DEOS set in early: optimum size of firm small
Vertical disintegration: entire production process broken into
series of separate processes and different small firms perform
each process
Low BTE
40
Lack of capital
41
42
Discuss whether rising costs limit the size of firms over time.
[15m]
Introduction
Size: sales revenue / turnover, level of output, market share
Over time long run firm no longer constrained by fixed factor
Body
1) Can limit
Short run cost
Reason: over-use of fixed factor, inefficient labour-capital
combination increase MC eventual increase in AC
Increase costs fall in profits if total revenue is constant
constrain firms ability to expand
2) Will not limit
Long run
All inputs can vary firm can expand enjoy fall in LRAC due
to internal EOS (list 2 egs)
Fall in LRAC fall in price to ward off competitors (erecting
barriers to entry) increase profits plough into r+d better
quality products + if yields results further fall in AC due to
better production methods
Size of firm determined by demand for firms product if firm
making supernormal profits can still expand in size even if
cost increases eg. monopoly selling unique products
Conclusion: However, size of firm over time constrained by MES (list 1
eg of internal DOS). MES huge eg. electricity / water compared to MES
limited eg. fashion.
Banking Merger in Singapore Analysis
Why merge?
Face competition from foreign banks Singapore wants to
expand beyond our shores: big enjoy EOS fall in AC can
compete with foreign banks
Core part of Singapore economy 1997 Asian financial crisis
big stable
Why should not merge?
Possible monopoly power
Increase price
Quality of service
43
44
Perfect Competition
Number of
buyers /
sellers
Barriers to
entry
Monopoly
Large
No one buyer /
seller can influence
price
Firm price taker
None
FOP perfectly
mobile
No transaction /
transportation
costs
Minimal sunk costs
High
Natural: huge sunk
costs (AFC falls
over very large
output AC falls
continuously
enjoys huge IEOS),
exclusive
ownership of
essential raw
materials
Artificial: non-price
competition,
contrived barriers
(cartel), legal
protection:
Monopolistic
Competition
Large
FOP relatively
mobile
When firm makes
decisions, does
not have to worry
how its rivals will
react
No / Low
Firm lowers price
profits spread
thinly over many
rivals rivals
suffer negligibly
Retaliation
unlikely
No collusion
keen competition
Oligopoly
Substantial
Natural
Artificial:
legislation,
collusion /
mergers, nonprice
competition,
advertising
45
Nature of
products
Homogeneous
Buyers no
preference for any
firm
exclusive rights
(patents, tariffs to
block foreign firms)
No close
substitutes
CED and PED very
low
Differentiated:
quality, design,
location,
promotion
Demand price
elastic
Homogeneous /
differentiated
46
Knowledg
e
Perfect
Seller knows rivals
prices, market
costs and available
technology
Buyers know all
sellers prices,
quality and
availability of
products will not
purchase at a
higher price than
equilibrium price
P = AR = MR
Imperfect
Consumers not
fully aware of COP
Imperfect
Production methods
and prices
Cost structures
differ as some firms
enjoy more
favourable
locations / rentals
Imperfect
P > MR
Some degree of
control over own
prices
No single
equilibrium price in
market no market
P > MR
Firm increases
price other
firms will not
Firm decreases
price other
firms follow
Firms
curve
P > MR
Cannot increase
both output and
price at the same
time as curve is
downward sloping
47
demand curve
Examples
Firms SR
equilibriu
m
Firms LR
equilibriu
m
Stock market
Forex market
Agricultural
products: many
farmers in LDCs
Utilities
Starhubs EPL
coverage
SMRT for NS and
EW lines
Normal profits
industry to erode
supernormal profits
Bubble tea
Normal profits
Normal /
supernormal
LR
equilibriu
m curve
48
Productive
efficiency
Efficient
Firm produces at
MES
Allocative
efficiency
Efficient
P = MC
Inefficient unless
by coincidence
Inefficient
Inefficient unless
Will settle at LRAC
by coincidence
that is not
necessarily at MES
Firms POV: all points on LRAC
Societys POV: MES
Inefficient
P > MC
Could be seen as premium society pays for product differentiation
49
Monopoly
Allocative inefficiency: P >
MC, output below optimum
Productive inefficiency
X-inefficiency but
increasingly reduced due to
globalisation, reduced
customs duties and barriers
to trade
Dynamic efficiency: r+d
Variety of Unique
products Possible innovation and
new products: BTE
stimulus to the creativity
required to destroy barriers
monopoly profits
stimulates new entrants
producing new and
competing products
R+d and Profits lead to unequal
new
income distribution: dollar
profits
votes + shift of consumer
surplus to producer
Supernormal profits
plough into r+d better
quality products + better
methods of production
lower AC but there is no
Monopolistic Competition
Allocative inefficiency: P >
MC
Productive inefficiency: do
not utilise optimal plant
capacity, do not exhaust
potential for further EOS
because all small firms
Dynamic inefficiency: no
r+d
Large variety increase in
consumer welfare
More equity: no
redistribution of income
from consumers to
shareholders
Normal profits: no
additional profits to plough
into r+d
Oligopoly
Allocative inefficiency: P >
MC, output below optimum
Productive inefficiency
Dynamic efficiency: r+d
Differentiated
Supernormal profits
ploughed into r+d
50
51
Theory
vs
empirical
evidence
P/R/C
Pc
MCp
c
MC
m
Pm
Practise price
discrimination [hasMR
both AR
0
Q Q
Q
costs and benefits]
c m
Natural monopolies
Perfectly contestable
markets: costs of entry and
exit by potential rivals are
zero, and when such
entries can be made very
rapidly eg. deregulation of
airline industry in 1978
Hit and run competition:
market contestable for
certain seasons eg. parcels
service during festivals
Reduces wasteful
Wasteful competition
Advertising provides better
consumer information
which helps move market
structure closer to PC
model but loss of consumer
sovereignty
52
competition (instead of
extensive advertising,
money can be spent to
produce more goods)
53
3. Price Discrimination
Producer sells specific commodity to different buyers at two or more
different prices
Same consumer charged different prices for same product for
reasons not associated with cost differences
Conditions
Possible
Seller has control over market supply
Market segmentation and identifiable groups + no
resale
Profitable: each market as different PED
First degree
Practice of charging each customer his
reservation price
Captures all consumer surplus as revenue
Eg. auction sites
Impractical to charge each customer a different
price
Firm usually does not know the reservation price of each
customer: consumers do not tell and producers may not want
to spend time and resources to find out
Second degree
Charge different prices for different blocks of
the same product to the same buyer
Eg. photocopying shops
Third degree
Sells same product at different prices to
different customers
Conditions
Two or more markets which can be separated
PED of each market must be different
54
55
Discuss the view that the profit motive will always lead to a
few large firms dominating the market for each and every type
of product. [15m]
1) Barriers to entry
Few large firms merge greater market share reap EOS fall in
LRAC fall in price ward off rivals / block new entrants (natural
BTE) able to maintain supernormal profits
If plough into r+d better methods of production further fall in
AC - make more profits
But some industries have low BTE (technology easily replicated)
low sunk cost eg. retail, grocery
2) Market size
Small: eg. Singapore television broadcasting Mediacorp vs.
Mediaworks
Firms will eat into each others market share erode profits
so to keep profits just let one firm dominate
Market big: eg. US then can afford to have few large firms
3) Nature of product
Large firms: unique products with no close substitutes
Small firms: availability of substitutes, prestige market / services,
localized demand, perishables, limited MES fashion,
specialization, personalized services
4) Government Intervention / publics desire
Few large firms will help to reduce price increase in consumer
surplus increase in consumer welfare
Supernormal profits plough into r+d to produce better quality
products
Will still have competition unlike monopoly still have the
incentive to be more cost-efficient / innovative
56
D
(MB)
0
Quantit
If MB < MC, last unit of good less than opportunity cost of
y
producing that unit society benefits
from not producing that
last unit
If MB > MC, last unit of good more than opportunity cost of
producing that unit society benefits from producing that last
unit
Assumption aside, MSB = MSC
Perfect competition: firm price taker
MR = MC = P allocatively efficient
P/R/
C
MC
P1
MR
Q1
Quanti
ty
57
2. Productive efficiency
Long run concept
Firms POV
Any given level of firms output produced at lowest possible
AC all points on LRAC curve are productively efficient
Societys POV
LRAC minimum firm is at optimum size / MES all IEOS
exploited
P/R/
C
LRA
C
P1
MR
Q1
Quanti
ty
58
Triangle =
DWL MC
Pm
Pc
LRAC
MR
AR
0 needs to
Qm
Quantity
PC industry
beQc
at MES because
it needs to be as
cost-effective as possible price taker cannot pass cost
increase to consumers
Vs. imperfect market need not be at MES because price setter
can pass cost increase to consumers
3) X-inefficiency
Monopoly: lax in cost control no existing competition can pass
cost increase as price increase
But monopoly can also be cost efficient due to fear of new
entrants
Globalisation and international competition
If market is contestable
Force monopoly to be cost efficient
Oligopoly more likely to be cost-efficient compared to monopoly
but wastage of resources large scale advertising / promotion
increase cost for firm and opportunity cost to society as the
money could have been used to produce more goods
4) Dynamic efficiency
59
60
Monopolistic
Oligopoly
competition
Many one firms
A few large firms
action less likely to
interdependence one firms
affect others
action likely to evoke responses
from rivals
Differentiated eg.
Homogeneous / differentiated
retail: restaurants
eg. mobile service provision,
affect demand
petrol companies / taxi
curve demand
companies, OPEC kinked
price elastic
demand curve
P/R/C
P/R/
C
Pe
AR
0
AR
Quantit
y
Smaller scale
0
Quantit
y will
Firm increase price: rivals
not follow quantity demanded
for firms product falls more than
proportionately demand price
elastic
Firm reduces price: rivals likely
to follow price war + quantity
demanded for firms product
increases less than
proportionately demand price
inelastic
Larger scale
Less
Low / no low
sunk cost +
technology easily
Nonpricing
competiti
on
Likelihoo
d of
colluding
BTE
61
replicated long
run normal profits
62
63
Pm
Pc
AC
MR
AR
MC
0
Qm
Qc
Quantity
2) Private does not cater to lower income group vs. government more
likely to do so
3) Huge initial investment private firm likely to charge higher price to
cover costs vs. government can subsidise from revenue / taxes
4) If there is competition among a few private firms wastage +
duplication of resources vs. government: save costs for advertising
5) Earns revenue for government since it is essential
Conclusion
Main point is that government does not want to risk anything because
electricity and similar services are so essential
64
65
4. Nationalisation
Growth
Industries with major investment eg. steel and coal industry,
large spending on r+d required
Unfair competition of state-owned enterprises with private
sector
Efficiency
Natural monopoly, presence of positive externalities,
eliminate wasteful duplication
Lack of competition pressure lack of incentive Xinefficiency
Bureaucracy heavier burden on tax payers
Sunset industry
Decision may be made for political rather than economic
reasons eg. just to keep employment figures high
Equity
Special pricing policies eg. free bus rides for pensioners
Service which would otherwise not be provided eg. bus route
to remote areas
State monopoly no less disadvantageous to consumer than
private one no higher authority to maintain checks and
balances
Stability
For strategic reasons eg. national defence
Seen as a move towards communism
5. Privatisation
Competition
Increased competition cost efficiency + benefits for
consumers eg. lower prices, wider choice, improved quality
Unfair competition of state-owned enterprises with private
sector
Could be worse outcome
66
67
Efficiency
Greater efficiency
Commercially sounder decision making eg. higher
returns on investments
Greater accountability to public constantly need to
perform well or risk takeover by another firm
Natural monopolies, externalities, equity issues
Revenue
Revenue from selling state assets
Higher corporate tax receipts if privatized company is
profitable
Long term loss of revenue had the privatized firm been
profitable
68
J2 Topics
No
Title
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
Page
No.
50-51
52-53
54
55-58
59
59
60
61
62
63-66
67
68-69
70-71
72-74
75-76
77
78
79
80
81
81
82
69
51
52
53
83
84
84
70
71
3. Inflation Rate
CPI: measures change in price of fixed basket of goods and services
commonly purchased by households in a specified time period
Limitations
Not an accurate measure of COL
Substitution bias: consumers substitute toward goods that
have become relatively cheaper overstates COL
Quality adjustment: CPI increase might be due to quality
adjustments overstate inflation
New products: price declines sharply a few years after
introduction not added to market basket until years after
introduction price declines not recorded
4. Unemployment Rate
Unemployed: people aged 15 and over who are without work but
were available for work and were actively looking for a job
Frictional unemployment: unemployment because time taken for
workers to search jobs and for firms to search for suitable workers
Structural unemployment: workers do not have the skills needed to
obtain long-term employment
Cyclical unemployment: unemployment during recession
5. Balance of Payments
Record of countrys international transactions
Current account
Visible: imports and exports of goods and services BOT
Invisible: profit repatriation, interest, dividends, unilateral
transfers
Capital account
Portfolio: bonds, shares, money in banks
Direct: FDI
Financial account: something like bank reserves
72
74
Inflation rate
Real: adjusted for inflation
Cause: mainly cost factors like high imported oil price,
imported food shortages, partly GST
Lower-income group suffers more in the face of further
increase in prices / income gap
75
76
77
78
3. Consumption Function
Act of using income for the purchase of goods and services to
satisfy current wants
Consumption
Y=C
C = a + bY
X
W
Income
4. Investment
Act of acquiring new fixed capital assets and accumulating stocks
and inventories
Autonomous: not influenced by national income vs. induced
Expected rate of return > rate of interest will invest
Factors that cause shift
Business confidence and expectations
Cost and availability of capital goods
Rate of change of income: accelerator effect
Government policies
79
Change in technology
80
Interest rate
Investment
Y = AE
Autonomous
consumption
Y2
Y0
At OY1
AE = aY, Y = by AE < Y
unplanned inventory investment
ab
next period firms reduce output
Y1 falls to equilibrium Y0
National output
At OY2
AE = dY2, Y = cY2 AE > Y
excess demand, firms draw on
stocks
unplanned disinvestments cd
next period firms increase output
Y2 rises to equilibrium Y0
82
83
84
Savings
Y=C+S
Increase in S fall in C AE falls AE curve shifts from AE1 to AE2
Show adjustment to equilibrium
Summation: increase savings fall in C works through multiplier
fall in NY by a few multiples
Evaluation
Savings can be good for economic growth increase supply of
loanable funds interest rate falls cost of borrowing falls
increase I increase productive capacity increase AS
increase NY
Summation: S decreases actual growth but increases potential
growth
B.
Exports
Increase X increase AE AE curve shifts from AE2 to AE1
Show adjustment to equilibrium
Evaluation
Increase X if have unemployed resources increase NY
Increase X if near / at FE NY may not increase as fast /
demand-pull inflation
Discuss multiplier process in detail
Conclusion
Magnitude of change in national income depends on size of
multiplier
Larger MPW, smaller K
Eg. Singapore
85
86
87
88
89
2. Barriers to Trade
Natural
High transport costs raises COP and lowers relative
efficiency
Lack of mobility of factors
Increasing COP due to LDMR beyond certain level of output
Other market imperfections: imperfect information and
market conditions may not specialize to extent that theory
suggests
Artificial: protectionism
Tariff: custom duties imposed on imports of goods and
services by government
Depends on PED of imports and how much foreign
suppliers are willing to absorb may not protect
domestic producers, just a source of government
revenue
Cuts volume of imports improve BOT exchange rate
appreciates exports more expensive abroad reduce
exports in the long run
Non-tariff: import quotas
Greater certainty of protection since revenue earned by
foreign suppliers may not be as badly affected as tariff
Export subsidies: cash grants by government to local
producers
Reduces COP sell more of good at prevailing price
May induce complacency
Drain on government funds
Foreign exchange control: government control over sale and
purchase of foreign exchange
Financial quotas, charges made on people purchasing
foreign currencies
Malaysia used this method to recover from 1997 Asian
financial crisis
Difficult to enforce and might result in black market for
foreign exchange
Works
best
in
communist
countries
because
government monopolises money conversion
Others: embargo, trade agreements, international cartels
New protectionist measure: technical specifications and
standards which discriminate in favour of domestic
producers
Administrative regulations regarding import procedures
to delay and reduce volume of imports
90
91
Political
Essential to produce on military weapons in case of crisis
subsidies industry to ensure continuous supply eg. US 1980s
semiconductor industry for high-tech weaponry vs. Japans
Nation poorer but value of national security higher
Trade as weapon of foreign policy eg Gulf war: US imposed
trade sanctions against Iraq
Social
Subsidise agricultural sector to avoid further depletion of
population in rural areas / prevent further rural-urban
migration to overpopulated cities
Restrict import of harmful goods
4. Tariff Diagram
Loss in
consumer surplus
=a+b+c+d
a becomes producer surplus, c become tax revenue, b + d becomes
deadweight loss
Consumption effect:
- Reduce consumption from OQ4 to OQ3
- Reduce consumption of imports and switch to domestically
produced substitutes
- Pay extra amount (P2 P1)
- Consumer surplus falls
93
Production effect:
- Expand production from OQ1 to OQ2
- Increase revenue
- Producer surplus increases
Government revenue effect:
- Receives as tax revenue extra amount paid by consumers for the
imported quantity
94
Textiles
USA
100
60
China
5
10
Total
105
70
USA: CA in production of cars give up less textile
China: CA in textile give up less cars
Opportunity
Cost
1C: 0.6T
1C: 2T
Textiles
54
20
74
Textiles
64
10
75
95
1990s
and
beyon
d
CA
Labour-intensive industries:
Cheap, unskilled and surplus
labour
Move towards higher-end
Capital-intensive industries:
products and electronic
More educated workforce and
products; moving towards
improved technology
services like banking and
Loss of CA in labour-intensive
finance, tourism
industries to countries like
Malaysia and Indonesia which
have huge labour force
Electronics, pharmaceuticals,
High value-added, knowledgetelecommunication
intensive, technologyequipment, disk drives,
intensive industries:
integrated circuits
Highly qualified labour force,
Services: banking and finance, r+d infrastructure
tourism, educational hub,
Continue to lose CA in
medical hub
manufacturing industries to
countries like China and India
Textiles and simple
manufactured products
Type of imports
Imports: consumer items,
food, raw materials, capital
goods for development and
infrastructure building
Lack of CA
Lack of natural resources
especially lack of land for
agriculture and to support
huge export base
96
97
offers
any
advantages
over
Introduction
Protectionist measures
Advantages of specialization based on CA: gains from trade,
increase X economic growth, wider choice, EOS fall in LRAC
competitive prices, efficiency in resource allocation in the world,
welfare gain if world price cheaper than domestic price
Body
Infant industries
Rationale: NIE, reasons of economic diversification impose
quotas / tariffs allow new industries to grow and develop
EOS
SR implications: applies for all reasons to protect as long as
use quotas / tariffs
Society: DWL
Consumers: increase price
Other firms (some extent): increase COP if good
protected is important input eg. steel
LR implications
Grow enjoy EOS lower LRAC lower price of exports
able to compete internationally BOT improves if
demand is price elastic increase in total revenue from
exports increase exports increase NY/N
If do not grow
If government subsidizing waste of resources could
have been used elsewhere education / healthcare /
develop infrastructure
Consumers and society continue to suffer from
inefficiency higher prices
Shut down massive retrenchment
Summation: To the extent that infant industries grow.
However, the infant industries normally do not grow and may
become
inefficient
due
to
government
subsidies.
Protectionism cannot be long term.
Inefficient industries
Eg. US steel industry, textile: slap tariffs / quotas on Chinese
textiles / imported steel allow inefficient firms to eventually
be able to be more efficient develop new technology / adjust
cost structures
Eg. steel affects COP in many other industries eg. housing,
cars cost-push inflation affects domestic market and
erodes export competitiveness
98
99
Dumping
Foreign country selling goods below its actual COP local
firms driven out eventually foreign country gains monopoly
power
Difficult to ascertain if it is dumping / country really has CA in
production of these goods Chinese textile + abundance of
cheap labour
Could be baseless accusation
Solution: force firms to be more cost-efficient (dont protect),
training (subsidise firms for training), subsidise r+d
Economic diversification
Reduce over-dependence on a few key products / industries
Eg. Zambia: copper exports what if world demand falls
Balance of trade deficit value of imports > value of exports
Eg. US huge trade deficit USA consumes a lot, including on
imports breed further inefficiency
Alternative solution: increase interest rates encourage
people to save + discourage consumption
LR: high C low S low investment affects productive
capacity low LRAS (inefficiency)
National security
Eg. steel war weapons
Conclusion
If country protects, other countries retaliate world inefficiency
100
Explain the rationale for free trade and discuss the extent to
which FTAs are beneficial. [25m]
Introduction
Free trade based on CA lower opportunity cost ratio gains from
trade
FTA remove tariff and non-tariff barriers in theory in practice eg
Singapores FTAs also include investment
Development
A) Expounding theory of CA difference in factor endowments
Assumptions
3 tables
Summation: gains from trade, increase choice / increase societys
welfare, increase economic growth and SOL
B) Are FTAs beneficial
On trade
Increase X k increase NY / N associated benefit of largescale production EOS fall in LRAC able to price goods
more competitively may improve BOT
Singapore: small domestic market
China: may not be as dependent on X revenue because
people are getting more affluent. C increase can sustain itself
based on internal economy
Cambodia / Vietnam: NIEs because people are poor
But increase X demand-pull inflation when near / at FE
price of exports increase volume of exports may affect BOT
NY falls affects economic growth
Inflation
Access to cheaper consumer goods + raw materials / inputs
fall in COP fall in price of exports X increase may increase
BOT
Fall in COL extra savings can be used to buy domestic goods
increase C / NY
Price of consumer goods
Sdom
Pw
Ddom
10
30
101
50 Quantity of consumer
goods
102
Conclusion
Possibility of unequal gains
Singapore
More ST capital outflow to China but LT profits increase
GNP
Loss of jobs as companies go to China
Shifted focus to capital-intensive / technology-intensive
focus on services
103
104
USA
USA spend a lot because lost CA in lots of goods need
to buy more imports worsen trade deficit less
savings less investment reduced productive capacity
India
Demand for capital goods
Summation
FTA: macroobjective increase NY increase SOL, fall in price
increase BOT
Trade creation > trade diversion
105
106
C) Labour
For LDCs, provide jobs for labour cheap
May be SR exploitation but vs. no jobs
Eg. Vietnam inflation ~19% - lower income wage rise < price
rise
Free flow of labour influx of foreign workers depress wages in
jobs where supply elastic (abundant supply of manual workers) no
skills
Eg. Singapore / EU influx of workers into UK
Solution: provide training
Brain drain
Inequity issue
Manual workers wages fall
Skills demanded globally increase demand for work
increase wages for skilled jobs
Dual economy
Caters to international market people grow richer
Caters to domestic market people do not really get
richer
107
108
110
111
112
113
Conclusion
Brief mention of other criteria for success
Conflict between growth and inflation: relentlessly pursues growth
demand-pull inflation: stable growth vs low inflation
Which criteria most important: low inflation price stability
Singapore
114
115
Conclusion
FP in Singapore limited effect on Ad, serves as supply-side measure
to increase NY over long term + exchange rate management to
boost long term export competitiveness
116
117
Conclusion
Increase G on education and training + taxation incentives supplyside policies effect on AD and some effect on cyclical
unemployment limited role in Singapore due to small k
118
119