Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Energy
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/energy
Universite de Lyon, CNRS INSA-Lyon, CETHIL, UMR5008, F-69621, Villeurbanne, France, Universite Lyon 1, F-69622, France
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur 208016, India
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 18 September 2008
Received in revised form
23 March 2009
Accepted 28 March 2009
Available online 22 May 2009
This paper addresses the estimation of local entropy generation rate for diabatic saturated two-phase
ow of a pure uid. Two different approaches have been adopted for this thermodynamic characterization: the separated ow model using the classical vapor ow quality, and the mixture model, using the
thermodynamic vapor quality. Based on these two models, two distinct expressions for the local entropy
generation have been proposed. The analysis explicitly shows the contribution of heat transfer and
pressure drop respectively to the local entropy generation. The contribution due to phase-change process
is also determined using the mixture model. The developed formulation is applied to analyze the
thermodynamic performance of enhanced heat transfer tubes under different conditions. It is shown that
enhanced tubes may be a relevant solution for reducing entropy generation at low mass velocities
whereas smooth tubes remain the best solution at higher ones.
2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Entropy generation
Two-phase ow
Saturated ow boiling
Clapeyron equation
1. Introduction
In this paper, we focus our attention on the local entropy
generation during diabatic saturated two-phase ow. The primary
motivation of the study is to quantify local entropy generation under
such ow conditions. In the literature, efforts to evaluate numerous
heat transfer related processes in terms of entropy generation have
been promoted. Bejan [1] studied entropy generation through heat
and uid ow of a single-phase uid. He proposed an entropy
0
0
generation number given by NS S_ gen;enhanced =S_ gen;smooth. More
recently, Bejan [2] made a review on the thermodynamic optimization (or entropy generation minimization) of ow geometry in
engineering ow systems. It was observed that design improvements are registered by spreading the imperfections (e.g. ow
resistances) through the system. An expression was also proposed
for the entropy generation during a diabatic single-phase ow
indicating that irreversibilities come from two main causes: heat
transfer and pressure drops. Based on the entropy generation
theorem, Zimparov [3] has proposed equations for enhanced heat
transfer surfaces to include the effect of uid temperature variation
along the length of a tubular heat exchanger during single-phase
ow. This general evaluation criteria add new information to Bejans
entropy generation minimization method, assessing the two
objectives simultaneously. They may help to identify inappropriate
enhanced surfaces, in terms of irreversibilities, thereby assisting in
designing better heat transfer equipment. The article ended with
* Corresponding author. Tel.: 33 4 72 43 72 31; fax: 33 4 72 43 88 11.
E-mail address: remi.revellin@insa-lyon.fr (R. Revellin).
0360-5442/$ see front matter 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.energy.2009.03.014
1114
Nomenclature
A
Ar
Be
cp
cx
dz
D
Ec
G
h
L
m
_
m
NS
p
P
q
Q_
s
0
dS_
dt
T
DT
cross section, m2
area ratio between enhanced and smooth tubes based
on the internal diameter
0
0
Bejan number Be dS_ heattransfer =dS_
specic heat capacity at constant pressure, J/kg K
specic heat capacity at constant vapor quality, J/kg K
element of discretization, m
tube diameter, m
Eckert number Ec U 2 =cp DT
mass velocity, kg/m2 s
specic enthalpy, J/kg
length, m
mass, kg
mass ow rate, kg/s
entropy generation number
pressure, Pa
perimeter, m
heat ux, W/m2
heat rate, W
specic entropy, J/kg K
entropy generation rate per unit length, W/K m
characteristic time, s
temperature, K
wall superheat, K
U
v
x
z
velocity, m/s
specic volume, kg/m3
vapor quality
longitudinal abscissa, m
Greek symbols
b
parameter
G
slip ratio (Uv/Ul)
r
density, kg/m3
Subscripts
enhanced refers to enhanced tubes
gen
generated
in
inlet
l
liquid
lv
liquid to vapor
heattransfer heat transfer
m
mixture
min
minimum
t
total
tp
two-phase
sat
saturation
smooth refers to smooth tubes
v
vapor
w
wall
a counterow heat exchanger serving as a condenser in a vaporcompression-cycle refrigeration system by minimizing the total
entropy generation rate. Their numerical results showed how the
optimal conguration responded to changes in specied external
parameters such as refrigeration load, fan efciency, volume and
weight. This interesting work was however devoted to the system
and not the two-phase ow itself, which is the objective of the
present paper. Vargas and Bejan [13] considered the fundamental
problem of thermodynamically matching the two streams, one hot
and the other cold, so that the irreversibility generated by their
thermal interaction is minimum. Each stream experienced a change
of phase. The authors showed that the optimum was marked by an
optimal ratio between the stream mass ow rates, and an optimal
ratio between the two heat exchanger sizes when the total heat
transfer area was xed. This study was also devoted to the system
approach and not the local aspect of two-phase ow.
From the literature review, we highlight the fact that, while
quite some attempts have been made in the past to estimate
entropy generation in single-phase ows, almost no study has been
performed on the estimation of local entropy generation for a diabatic saturated two-phase ow. Moreover, most of the earlier
studies are dedicated to single-phase ow or, at best, to global
space-time averaged analysis of two-phase ow on a system level.
To begin with, we will redene some thermodynamic relations for
1-D diabatic saturated two-phase ow of a pure uid based on two
different approaches: the separated ow model and the mixture
model. Thereafter, we will propose two new local entropy generation equations based on these two models respectively. Finally, we
will demonstrate the use of this formulation with a case study of
enhanced heat transfer tubes.
2. Energy and mass conservation for a diabatic saturated twophase ow
Two different approaches may be found in the literature for
modeling two-phase ow: the relatively simpler homogeneous
_v
m
_ vm
_l
m
(1)
(2)
and
(3)
(4)
Assuming that the kinetic and gravity terms are much less than
the thermal energy component, rst law of thermodynamics gives:
dQ_
_t
m
d htp hlv dx xdhv 1 xdhl
(5)
(6)
_t
m
(11)
mm
mv ml
dtl
dtl dtl
(12)
or
dtv mv ml
mm
dtl
dtl dtv dtl
dQ_
mm mv ml
1115
(13)
with
dtl
Uv
G
dtv
Ul
(14)
(7)
(8)
_m
m
dsl
dTsat x0
dsv
Tsat dT
sat x1
cx;l Tsat
cx;v
rm
(9)
Using the Clapeyron equation dp=dTsat hlv =Tsat ylv , Eq. (7)
becomes:
dx
dQ_
_ t hlv
m
dp
flashing effect
_ l rm Ul A
m
(15)
xm
rv
1 xm
rl
1
arv 1 arl
(16)
(10)
_ t is the total
where A is the cross section of the channel. Note that m
mass ow rate of the inlet uid, which usually is liquid. Therefore,
_ t must be that of the liquid.
the time reference associated with m
The mixture density is thermodynamically dened as:
with
_v
m
xm
_v
_v
m
m
mv
_
_
_
mv Gml
mm
mv ml
(17)
xm
x
x G1 x
(18)
1116
Eq. (18) has been plotted in Fig. 1 for different slip ratios. As
expected, higher the slip ratio, greater is the deviation between
thermodynamic and conventional vapor quality; the former being
always lower than the latter for G > 1. For G 1, we obtain xm x.
The elementary derivative of the thermodynamic vapor quality
is given by the following relation:
dxm
G
2
x G1 x
dx
x1 x
x G1 x2
dG
(19)
hm xm hv 1 xm h1
(20)
and
0
sm xm sv 1 xm sl
(21)
dS_ dz
_ t vtp
_t
m
dQ_
m
dhtp
dp
Tsat
Tsat
Tw
(23)
dQ_
dS_ dz
Tsat
dQ_
Tw
_ t ytp
m
dp
Tsat
(24)
dS_
_ t ytp
m
dp
Tsat
dz
(25)
For a diabatic ow, we can write that Tw Tsat DT (DT being the
superheat of the wall), as a consequence, we get,
#
"
_ t ytp
m
dQ_
DT
0
dp
_
dS
2 1 DT=T
Tsat
dz
dz Tsat
sat
dQ_
0
_ v sv m
_ l sl
dS_ dz d m
Tw
(22)
where dS_ is the entropy generation rate per unit length, dQ_ is the
heat rate applied to the control volume and Tw is the wall
Slip ratio = 1
Slip ratio = 2
Slip ratio = 5
Slip ratio = 10
0.8
In
general,
DT/Tsat < < 1. Besides, we know that
q hDT dQ_ =dzP (assuming a constant perimeter P of the
channel with respect to z). Thus, this yields,
0
dS_
|{z}
entropy generation
q2 P
2
hTsat
|{z}
_ t ytp
m
dp
dz
Tsat
|{z}
(27)
where q is the heat ux and h is the heat transfer coefcient at the
tube wall.
Eq. (27) can be applied to any diabatic two-phase ow. The term
dp=dz indirectly takes into account part of the slip ratio effect.
However, the equation is not complete because it does not account
for the entire phase-change contribution.
1
0.9
(26)
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
dhtp
0.1
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
dQ_
_
m
Fdhm
(28)
As a result, from (b) we see that using F G (as has been done in
Collados theory) in this study is inappropriate. However, there
exists a relation between the vapor ow quality and the thermodynamic vapor quality, which is given by Eqs. (18) and (19).
Furthermore, the vapor ow quality can be expressed using
a simple energy balance (Eq. (10)). As a result, it is possible to
formulate an alternative and more comprehensive energy balance
for the mixture model, which would link the heat ux, the mass
ow rate and the mixture enthalpy. This energy balance formulation is described below.
1117
dQ_
_ t dhm
m
cx;m bcx;tp ylv Tsat hlv ym bytp
_ t dp
b
m
hlv dQ_
1
_ t hlv b
x1 xm
dG
GdQ_
(37)
or
Ghlv ddzQ
_
_ t dp x1 xm
_ t h2 bdG
bGhlv ddzQ cx;m bcx;tp ylv Tsat hlv ym bytp Gm
dz
lv dz
dQ_
hlv dx
_t
m
hlv
dp
(29)
dQ_
hlv
_t
m
2
"
#
dxm x G1 x x1 xdG
_t
m
(39)
G
ylv Tsat cx;tp hlv ytp
hlv
dp
(30)
F
x1 xdG
dp
(31)
with
cx;m bcx;tp ylv Tsat hlv ym bytp Gdp x1 xh2lv bdG
or
dQ_
(38)
(32)
x G1 x2
(40)
_ t dsm
dS_ dz m
(33)
dQ_
Tw F
(41)
or
we nally get:
_t
_ t ym
dQ_
m
m
dhm
dp
Tsat
Tsat
Tw F
dhm
dS_ dz
cx;m bcx;tp ylv Tsat hlv ym bytp
dQ_
b
dp
_t
m
hlv
x1 xhlv b
dG
(34)
where
(35)
dQ_
dS_ dz
Tsat F
dsl
dT
sat xm x0
dsv
Tsat dT
sat x x1
m
dQ_
Tw F
_ t ym
m
dp
Tsat
(43)
dS_
|{z}
and
cx;l Tsat
(42)
entropy generation
q2 P
2 F
hTsat
|{z
}
_ t ym
m
dp
dz
Tsat
|{z}
(36)
(44)
which is the entropy generation rate (with the time scale of the
liquid) per unit length. Again, we can determine the heat transfer
and pressure drop contributions to the entropy generation. When
cx;v
1118
0.1
245 kg/m2s
0.05
150
200
Plain tube
Enhanced tube
0
100
4.1. Results
and Thome [19] for smooth tubes. Regarding the enhanced tube, the
model by Koyama et al. [20] has been used for calculating the heat
transfer coefcient of the micron tube. The pressure drops have
been determined using the correlation by Kuo and Wang [21]. The
area ratio (Ar) between the enhanced and the smooth tubes is
arbitrarily set at 1.5. The void fraction has been determined using the
Steiner [22] version of the Rouhani and Axelsson [23] drift ux void
fraction model. Tube orientation is horizontal. As a result, the
gravitational pressure drop is non-existent. The acceleration and
frictional pressure drop have been taken into account.
250
300
350
400
Plain tube
Enhanced tube
0.1
0.05
235 kg/m2s
0
100
450
150
b
Entropy generation number []
300
350
400
450
2
1.8
1.8
NS>1 favorable for smooth tubes
1.4
NS
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
NS<1 favorable for enhanced tubes
0.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.2
0
100
250
1.6
200
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
0
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
- for G < 170 kg/m2 s, slug and stratied wavy, stratied wavy
and dryout,
- for G > 170 kg/m2 s, slug, intermittent, annular, dryout and mist
ow.
500
450
400
350
300
250
Slug
200
150
Slug+SW
100
Be
SW
50
S
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
NS
1119
dS_ enhanced
0
dS_
(45)
dS_ heattransfer
0
dS_
D = 9 mm
D = 10 mm
D = 12 mm
D = 14 mm
smooth
(46)
0.1
0.05
0
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
400
450
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
Bejan number Be []
Bejan number Be []
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
0
100
200
250
300
0.1
0
100
350
400
450
D = 9 mm
D = 10 mm
D = 12 mm
D = 14 mm
150
200
250
300
350
D = 9 mm
D = 10 mm
D = 12 mm
D = 14 mm
0.1
0.1
0.05
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
400
450
0.1
Uncertainties
0.05
0
100
150
200
250
300
350
0.05
0
100
150
200
250
300
Mass velocity
350
400
450
[kg/m2s]
1
0.9
0.8
Bejan number Be []
Uncertainties
0
100
Plain tube
Enhanced tube
a
Entropy generation [W/K]
1120
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
100
D = 9 mm
D = 10 mm
D = 12 mm
D = 14 mm
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
References
[1] Bejan A. Entropy generation through heat and uid ow. New York: Wiley;
1982.
[2] Bejan A. Thermodynamic optimization of geometry in engineering ow
systems. Exergy Int J 2001;4:26977.
[3] Zimparov VD. Extended performance evaluation criteria for enhanced heat
transfer surfaces: heat transfer through ducts with constant heat ux. Int J
Heat Mass Transfer 2001;44:16980.
[4] Zimparov VD, da Silva AK, Bejan A. Thermodynamic optimization of treeshaped ow geometries. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 2006;49:161930.
[5] Abbassi H. Entropy generation analysis in a uniformly heated microchannel
heat sink. Energy 2007;32:193247.
[6] Lior N, Sarmiento-Darkin W, Al-Sharqawi HS. The exergy elds in transport
processes: their calculation and use. Energy 2006;31:55378.
1121