Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Atr PDF
Atr PDF
ABSTRACT
Renal tubular acidoses (RTA) comprises of a group of disorders characterized by a low capacity for net acid excretion and
persistent hyperchloremic, metabolic acidosis. The RTAs are classified into chiefly three types (types 1,2 and 4) based on clinical
and laboratory characteristics. Correct diagnosis involves careful evaluation, including exclusion of other entities causing
acidosis. A variety of tests are required to be administered in a stepwise fashion for the diagnosis and characterization of RTA.
[Indian J Pediatr 2007; 74 (7) : 679-686] E-mail : arvindbagga@ hotmail.com
Pathophysiological basis
The proximal tubule is the major site for reabsorption of
filtered HCO 3 (Fig. 1). The primary defect in proximal
RTA is reduced renal threshold for HCO 3, resulting in
bicarbonaturia. The proposed mechanisms include
defective pump secretion or function of the H + ATPase,
the Na+/H+ antiporter, the Na+/K+ ATPase or deficiency
of carbonic anhydrase in the brush-border membrane.
Proximal RTA may represent isolated or generalized
proximal tubular dysfunction, the latter (Fanconi
syndrome) characterized by tubular proteinuria and
aminoaciduria and variable degrees of bicarbonaturia,
phosphaturia, Na + and K+ wasting and glucosuria. K+
wasting is enhanced due to increased distal tubular
delivery of Na + and hyperaldosteronism secondary to
volume contraction.
Classification of RTA
Based on pathophysiology, RTA has been classified into
three types: type 1 (distal) RTA; type 2 (proximal) RTA;
and type 4 RTA secondary to true or apparent
hypoaldosteronism. The above conditions are either
secondary to other causes,1 or primary, with or without
known genetic defects.
679
84
85
86
Renal origin
Extrarenal origin
Renal origin
Uremic acidosis
Lactic acidosis
GFR <15-20 ml/min Diabetic ketoacidosis
Starvation ketoacidosis
Poisoning by ethylene
glycol, methanol or
salicylates
Extrarenal origin
Diarrhea
Ureterosigmoidostomy
Pancreatic or biliary losses
Drugs e.g., cholestyramine,
Fig. 4. Differential diagnosis of the causes of metabolic acidosis. GFR glomerular filtration rate
+
4
NH = 80 UAG
18
87
100
88
2.0
0.2
1.8
0.4
1.6
5.0
4.0
1.4
0.6
2.0
0.8
1.0
3.0
1.2
1.4
1.0
1.8
2.0
1.2
3.0
1.0
0.8
2.0
0.6
0.4
1.0
0.0
0.0
1.
00
5.0
1.6
0.
01
0.
0
5
0.
0.
10
99
0
0.
0. .20
9
5
0. 30
0.
90
0. 40
0.
50
8
0
0
0.
.
7
60
0. 0
0.
0. 60
70
50
0.
0.
80
40
0.
30
0.
90
0.
20
0.
10
0.
00
1.0
0.0
0.
00
0.0
0.
00
TABLE 1. Response of Urine pH and Potassium (K+) Excretion Following Frusemide Administration in Normal Subjects and Various
Defects Causing Distal RTA.
Defect
Normal
H+ ATPase defect
H+ ATPase defect
Voltage defect
Site of defect
None
Diffuse, cortical CT
Medullary CT alone
Cortical CT
Urine pH
During acidosis
After frusemide
<5.5
>5.5
>5.5
>5.5
Further decline
>5.5
<5.5
>5.5
K+ excretion
Baseline
After frusemide
Normal
Normal
Normal
Decreased
Increased
Increased
Increased
Unchanged
CT collecting tubule
684
89
Proximal RTA
Type 4 RTA
Distal RTA
When a diagnosis of distal RTA is made the diagnostic
Normal/low
< 5.5
Positive
Low
>10-15%
>20
Normal
Often present
Absent
Common
Distal RTA
Type 4 RTA
Classic
Hyperkalemic
Normal/low
> 5.5
Positive
Low
<5%
< 20
High
Absent
Present
Often present
High
> 5.5
Positive
Low
<5%
</>20
High
Absent
Present
Uncommon
High
< 5.5
Positive
Low
5-10%
>20
Normal/low
Absent
Absent
Absent
685
90
Negative
Positive
Gastrointestinal losses
Acid intake
Suspect RTA
Urine pH
Serum K+
Sodium bicarbonate loading
Urine pH <5.5
Serum K+ low normal
UB CO2 >20 mm Hg
FEHCO3 >10-15%
Proximal RTA
Urine pH >5.5
Serum K+ low/normal
UB CO2 <20 mm Hg
FEHCO3 < 5%
Classic type 1 RTA
(Secretory defect)
Urine pH >5.5
Serum K+ high/normal
UB CO2 </>20 mm Hg
FEHCO3 <5%
Urine pH <5.5
Serum K+ high/ normal
UB CO2 >20 mm Hg
FEHCO3 5-10 %
Type 4 RTA
Fig. 6. Evaluation of a patient with renal tubular acidosis. GI: gastrointestinal, U-B CO2: urine to blood PCO2 gradient, FEHCO3 fractional
excretion of HCO3-
Genetic studies
Recently, mutations have been identified in the genes
encoding a number of transporters involved in
pathogenesis of RTA and PHA types 1 and 2. 2,11,12
Identification of these mutations provides insights into
the pathogenesis of RTA, but are currently available only
as research tools.
The evaluation of patients with RTA requires
understanding of basic concepts and a methodological
approach, as outlined in Fig. 6.
REFERENCES
1. Dell KM, Avner ED. Renal tubular acidosis. In Behrman RE,
Kliegman RM, Jenson HB, ed. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics.
Philadelphia; WB Saunders, 2003; 1758-1762.
2. Soriano JR. Renal tubular acidosis, the clinical entity. J Am Soc
Nephrol 2002; 13: 2160-2170.
3. Bagga A, Bajpai A, Menon S. Approach to renal tubular
disorders. Indian J Pediatr 2005; 72: 771-776.
4. Sayer JA, Pearce SHS. Diagnosis and clinical biochemistry of
686