You are on page 1of 13
Hole BoM 20151148 Vol. 61 No. 6 Nov. 2015 mh Rm @ F GEOLOGICAL REVIEW A Ul Ba He HS we A AV tS BBC? BAC) HR AER? WP? RE? 1) SABLE RES ELBE A AE ,230009 ; 2) PEW ELSE BE AL 100037 ; 3) FEA Beth EASE, ACHE, 100081 ; 4) PR PHERELE Sf BeBe KW 410083 POSER sIFR Wh Hy Fee i eB A a A AR a, HAEB e BTS . LFURGLADSEHE RAD LAT GAA RR ER UBM ES KR RO A SD BS SH PARTE, ASCH T KANE ROL: BL 10 ~8 Ma LAR, BAREIS ICRI NW 1 AR EE A DH, FOP 0, BH 02 0, KF 07, HANA 60° , ry Fe ALAA Ia 150° , BAAD RE Hy Sy Hl FL BB FE NE TaN 5 TE At RAB NE, AB SE BT SEH we a am ACP BREDA TEAR. AI BARRERA BT BN AEE A PTA STE OL BEAT Sei AR sa ACTA TE EH BS FB ISM Hh TS HOPBIE SHAAN ATA A LEAN KR K-Ar SEW 0. 68 + 0. 13Ma; AEM A H AE S O H. AXA WARS MGR RL OH IE YA Hy PB TB SR KH EAL a BV RE PREM HH 5 AT ARAL KABMW LT DKA MRR AR, BBRRE SARA HY — ABP ( A 1), eae A A BHF, ARES RAR ( BARA BRE SABIE SBA) PBA , 1988 ; Bite AR AF 2002 ; SKIERS, 2003). Ly PH HLA HK AL HB AK ZH A SREEARMD, BSA APIA HR, Kin WR Ra AA a PALPATION SRE ABEORANBEEE AR a FERAL Hl — ALB PETE AAS Et PE KP, He EA ee TE TH PERLE RATE RL FAA aR EE eT HE (Avouac et al., 1993; Xu Xiwei et al. , 1992, 1993; Peltzer, 1996), 26S ai Py Lh PHM AE AR A ERARLAT ERA ROR AR HSS 4#)E3Z Bh ( Molnar et al. , 1975; Tapponnier et al. , 1982; Zhang Yueqiao et al. , 1998, 2003; KBE, 2006) ,Zhang Yueqiao 3 (1998) #2H) 2.4 Ma BLE FRA RARF HL SRB AT Ro Sb SBAO ELS Bhat Ft wee $5 Zn aA LL AANHLIEB. TW He Jiankun 4 (2004) #48 GPS SEE WAR BIT IRA EB HERS, FEAR AS AE OH Hh SE TEE SEAT SRP RIE. ASp—we PEAR BEE 1 a ATE FHSS) AG BE (Yin An et al. , 2000; Liu Mian et al. , 2004; Chen Ling et al. , 2008, 2009; Chen Ling, 2009) ,FF#2H T Li Pi sat RATE BLA A BRAM DORA RH (Fa BS, 2011 ; RAE, 2011; PELE, 2014), Bebe HRB MEM SRB MEAS RF LHR TE RL PRA MAMAS L HH Ls PI RT PEO POI R A 9 ET OOS k WE WEAVE (TKE BF, 1986 ; BABE, 1987 5 RG, #5 1991 AEE, 2005). AIA IL ELA 2, RC MA (8S 1212011220259 1212011120009) BARE {WH EI :2014-12-06 CH LH :2015-09-02., BEER AIG. _Doi: 10. 165097}, goroview. 2015.06.004 ‘eR SA 3B 1989 APE, BEL DIST: MREIWBI Email xinfeiyoujian@® 163. com, VER MOM, HB, 1954 ARE. BESLAL, LSI, EE ARAMSHA TIT. mal; swdong@ cag. ac. cn, 1236 i 2015 4F PAOLA VER, KLEE AAMT MK DUET ASS. (AH FR Be SE BREPERKRSA A, RABRBET RH. ASTER SP SCR EN, LA aH FR LD BHPADALIT AAMGERMAY ARS UAB a Pa EAS A BS AN BE TK a ASE Li BRITT A BSS oh PE wR BOE SAARWE RNA. DOO HR TE ROL HA EE. 1 Raab BH Kia TG ERR PRR. SMES REE RT HA HAAR ARIE, Hae MEd et B RB te, MARAT EEORSAR BS SRRS. BP AER Za AC Pe HL RSE bE TBE, TF EB Ty RS eB DL A RRA ARMA T SAB BAS (Chen Ling et al. , 2009; 4 A #ESF,2011). AME HB LL Pa DR A eT a SO AS BAK, RADE IE A (Xu Xiwei et al. , 1993 ; Zhang Yuegiao et al. , 1998) . Aaa BEE BB 9 E112° ~ E115°, ABE, Fy N39° ~ N41°, Hs A ERA 120km?. ASE hy NE RATE LL eh FRE BS eh ORAL BRC FL) AR LL TL (2 ) LLL BE (3) 217 Wy Bre (FA ) ARE il Ab BFE (FS ) AB EE LBS AR BBE ( FO ) ye 6 HY (7) HS ( 1). Kah = LF PARA —H AEA -HKR aKa ERS Hh BPA ath, ee a HS a 2H. AMBTAABMAKA HER, Bk, 35 A ERT SLARTH ATR THAW HH OAR Hb. HTAAZHARAARM ERR AAA TARTS, FEE REA ERR eR Fie EP Lett, ERKS RDA SEER MEERA (Nb) ABR (NL). ZH RNA ER WS DS we, La SERA (NK) OAR ( Non). HEE ONT He, RARE FS Sah REAR CHWS ( 1 Bah HAIZE Be ,2002) . REALL EAT BAAR BRA SUH ARE Te HER PRUE, A a AE WER Wy 10 ~8 Ma( BMS, 1995; T ALS, 1998 ; Hi AR FF, 2004 ; XB HE, 2004; TK BEE, 2006 ; =H EE, 2009 ) , HEA FF Hs PRA BRE WH 10 ~8 Ma, MEERA RAAF SE RAVAN 10 ~8 Ma. ESL RT LEB: KABA EUR HERA 10 ~8 Ma, BUA Fal gach Re DR ALA) Jy 10 ~8 Ma. EAOAE Rit ARLERWURRAT BRL Qp'l) BA ( Qp’m) AMieF 4A ( Qp*s) WIR ; ah PH AVES ( Qp'*n) UAT AR Awe Hi A ( Qp’s) FATA ( Ql) SH ESS RL ERR AWAAKHRHRCA (Qhe:) 72 PAL ( Qhe) 2 4A FIAT AAMERAKEHERARA, ORIG Z RS MEMZRA SOBERA. KGZRAD AT RUBRRRER— HF, ERSENPT A ERA MX AMER BA RS RA 40 ~37 Ma (K-Ar WE, ERMIPF, 1988) MMA BEGE—SR PAAR, BAKA, ERS AREA RS, ATTA] HH 33 ~ 8 Ma( EIFS, 1985, 1988 ; SSE 1989 5 HEC AF, 2006 ) , SETAE BES “BE LERUIUNK REAR ST REMERAZ La MARERAUATRLEMZRSZ | RAS ERA MEAN 10 ~8 Ma” HAE; OK RSDHTAMSAMERSR— HF, EBS BEZRS MERE RA , WAM] Wy 0.74 ~0.1 Ma, Xo 1M Jk Us HE BE BR J HK TA kW BE (EES, 1988 ; BRE,2011) , 2 BAF Hie yee UPLB ETE OR EES FET ( FF, F3 F475, F6\F7) Bi]. WARREASRER AR, BASE FAI Dy NE 16), BTR AB LATTE ASR BAL EG REA. FSR LL BBE CPL) a A a BF, WTA SS PASE Fy N38°E, PTAA FRERS. HORUHRRA SSAA O BTHLRPORTE PS METAR EAN 1000 ~ 1800 m, WERE KR T FFL PABELUITBL (F2) HORE ARE Fa Jy NOO°E, 1 SRL PRAT AGB. VBL HTL, MAW IE 1500m., FBV PE XE 1237 FS AARITE ROLES ie ike slip fault ‘Normal fault ~2000 FL ~2000 2 _10km! (my (m) : awit AIH caine of ofathquteot o Eeriqualest 4 4 ERK arthquake of ¢ Earthquake of Earthquake of TiFetiotens TD jfoocere — EGaeSGVPARRH? | Voteanic etd OFF ptantadeS-6 magnitude © 4-3 magne BI) RRs Fig. 1 Simplified geological map of the Datong basin (a) ASM RISB HE NH (GE Zhang Yuogiao et al. , 2003 ABC) ; () AHEM NTE 5 (c) AA‘ TT FL 00S RY 5 F2— A 53 RY; F4— 2 FS A 5 FO AEE | FA (a) neotectonies map of the Datong basin and its adjacent areas (modified after Zhang Yueqiao t al. , 2003) ; (b) simplified geological map of the Datong basin; (c) geological section across A and A’. F1—Kouquanshan fault; F2—Liulengshan fault; F3—Hengshan fault; F4—Yunmenshan fault; F5—northern margin fault on Xionger Mountsin; F6—southern margin fault on Xionger Mountain; F7—Xiaowutaishan fault MRA A a EH > iecion of CED Pre Cenotie Mos (@ Sat ie FM Seismic monitoring place * A 2 tLe FS BROS Fig. 2 Photographs showing the stage faults along F3 (1) A BE RRS HA EARP; (bo) SRA A EE ks OF 1-25 7 HC) LH PSB Tj L, A AE ST 5; L, FB TT 5 Qf YA 5 Qn YEP; Op” s HRA (Qp?/ BFA 5 N,n FASTA 5 N, KSEE 5 NAR ABA 5 Ar, Tig PAS FE (a) Geomorphology of Dongeuizhuang uplift; (b) profile across Dongeuizhuang uplift (modified after 1; 250 000 regional geological map). L,—top surface of Datong basin’ s deposits; L,—top surface of Dongcuizhuang uplift; L,—top surface of Hengshan Mountain. ; Qfe—Fangcun Formation; Qp'~?n—Nihewan Formation; Qp's—Shiyu Formation; Qp*/—Lishi Formation; N,n—Nanyulin Formation; N,k—Kouzhai Formation; N,b—Baode Formation; Ar, Tgn—Archean gneiss 1238 i 2015 4F B_SPMBLRAA: KE EAR OBER B HAR -PUORE TAA AWM REAR mK. ‘PELL F3) ACF a ARE ANSE, BKABWRKOWAR. WAL HRAGSTNB, ABRRERM AW RIA 300m. {LLL BL RB SY Bt Oy BY BBAR, EAs HAE BARE RHR, AGRI TE HE we (A 2). we KO FS BB AST SRE F3-1 F3-2 73-3, FoR F3-1 YET AL, 1 BH MAT 2014 EB AAEM, ART WR WIRE 53-3 HRM, HIS) AY Rt (Qpsm) BREA. TTBS (4 ) AEE LL Pa DBL (FO) ‘FLL ( F7 ) ARETE FI NOS°E,, REA ACR WLC FS) SAE LE E—W fe], BR WARP TF AE, FF EA EH 10km Ze ARR RS TKR, 1998 ) , HERBIE BSE FRU ASHE il. FAL OR TUE Fy NNE [il , SoA WBF fd EBS NEE FA, FSR RL TE POT AGE IS OR AE PG HEB SRL AU a RE SEE IG FP BD wi. Aaa Ha A EE SP DP icici a hy FA3 OR FL) A Fig. 3 SPOT 6 image showing right-lateral strike-slip offset of gullies along F, (a) SPOT 6 SEARRGIS ; (b) RRR EAN AOR RES PIETY f 5, EXIM TE (a) Remote sensing image of the corresponding region from SPOT 6; (b) sketch of the remote sensing image showing that F1 is divided two branches and the gullies along them are of right-lateral strike-slip offset Dee RL Location of gully’s offset RRM AEM. ERT AE FE BE i HED FB PA (BL Lc) FL A328) SUL AE FDS EAT, HP (F2\F3F7) EWEN, HPAMARRER ERUURH EE A RAEI 10 ~8 Ma, at AA BHF BE Bh AY a fe ty 10 ~8 Ma. FRB Fl MARS BE PL BIE REE KMRL, LIMA RA A WOH 33 ~8 Ma, JEAb DATE ERE SS HY K- Ar SER 8 Ma (XB, 1986) 5“ FT BGG AAV MATL 10 ~8 Ma” HB. KABMWAGBH EER AE ZHA HREH MOR WB Fl) AAR RMa TE JERE ( T BS, 1983; Xu Xiwei et al. , 1993; WHF 2003). BASHIR LE Bee (SSR VE( 3) DEM BRAY OT, “vies CATE BU UEP SRE SP LBB HS LRAT AR TBE BE BE LL RS EUS ALL Lb RBA BS Bt AERTS SPOTS HERR ARE LR BEL BULA AA NE TE BBBRRAKAN 190m; 4 f, BBA 4S wR JAAR RT HG 10 a DES aH , SPER 75m. RAAB RAA A EI, ORE —— ATER Dextral slip fault 6 HH FS AARITE ROLES 1239 SLATE BEA 265m, RAVE MEG BETA 4000m, HL AT LA a Bae LEAL EZ A Hl TSMR THT RGA LF By SB HEBACBE 2H -WAATTAMS UH 0.4 mm/a, FASE RTA S SUAS PLR BR | ALR SEAT NE Hye KP ER (ERS, KSB) 3000m, #GE DEM BSE EEG HH LBL 1994) ARTE MEVR AE HOY LATER PB Sb WEEK TWF, BA 1000m LRH NE Dy el RAIL ST HERE T 24 0° CL A, AKEUGRAT AWA MERA = RAH NERA). POH BERRA 09 BTL ( Dh a TES, 1994 ) , HLL WTB LF ARIE NS Hl TS i. Direction of 6; (or direction of fault’ s extension) FS 4 PRU SLE ES Eh Fig. 4 Photographs showing geomorphology and striation features of faults in the Datong basin and inversion of the tectonic stress field based on striation (a) FSR LUMBER POT EM (TRE DAS) 5 (b) FL ARTEL 22 AT SPH IM; (c) ARIE b PH METT SH REAL H Wd) NAS UAT) — EAGER OWA D111) (0) FT ARSE (OD Be RAL ROR SEM BG (5) AUR F2) ROR SAS (WEA DIO) (bh) Be MRRLATO RARE ABR (i) eI MORAG PRM EBS RIED BIE PEER D32) (a) Scarp geomorphology of F1 in D455 (b) superposition of the dip-slip stration and eblique-sip stration of FL; () stress field inversion based on stration in DAS; (cl) triangle surface geomorphology of F7; (e) fault surface in D111 ({) striation of DIL and stress field inversion based on its (g) scarp geomorphology and large scale order-step of F2; (1h) stration of DIO and stress field inversion based on it; (3) stepped normal faults {formed in Nihewan Formation and stress fed inversion of D32 140 om ie 2015 AF KE. SRE RRA RE MIL RRR 2 mm/a, ASV HPGE (BES ,2013 ; Zhang Yuegiao et al. , 1998) BIAS (2002) ALGER PEATE Bh HH 09 9 Kl, AREA LR EAE ARE 1 WE I Se LS KEEL, WRATH RE URE LW AL=1, 0.12 ~1.48 mm/a, ARI S mm/a, KA 1 AN = I gear aces {REELS Fy 20000m , 4 Hh BY i BRE 8. 6% , FRY HUF 10 ~8 Ma DMF HH SR SED RRA BL, AKA a a hh FEY DIO D3 ® pay DI ® AS Aa RE ET Fig. 5 Tectonic stress field inversion based on the striation data of marginal faults in the Datong Basin (9) SEG BIE AH Bh RR (FA FoultKin SePPAEREGHE ) 5 (b) ERT AT RAAT TTT FH Stereo SAARC) (0) ERA BOSE RESETT EFA Stereo SPEER) . (BEB AIC BFA AER TF RR PR RE) (a) Swiation data and the corresponding tectonie stress feld inversion using FaultKin software; (\b) seater chart of principal stress axes using Stereo software; (c) density chart of principal stress axes using Stereo software ( All the data is processed under the hemisphere polar stereographic projection and by the Wulf net) BOM FS AARITE ROLES yan PEBMRZ PE. FAFA 22) DAT FANTR RR-MAATHRES =A L(A 4a.d.e.g) . FEA SR LUT ( Fl) SBE EE WEA D465) ADE FCT TDG EE PSEA, bh Fe ah A BX(Qpm) BO RHLAER EARS. AB ARR TTL SR AERA AT-AZAAA BMRA (BA 4b) BI 1 BHI 2 GE (RIE 2 EE, RIL 1 TAL), UT a a a a FASTER BR 2 BER, AERTS SPE ARR R. LPR BP RW 120° 264° , TRIER A I8 p, = 85° , BURT SW PERIYAR FH p, = 51°, MUR FI SW, Ht TA HH a ib DBT a Ge A= HBT PI BH (60° < p < 90°) JE SAERHHZBN(30° < p < 60°), aH ABTERBEHDE. ENE GB (FT) SARKRAA (A 4d) RAWRHLARAKEH BE RATRARA TREE Te F(A 4f) BM EB I. EK ABEL TE ( F2) HEB — TS B SABLA AAD rs RE 4eh) we Sb ARIE Bh ts EF HH . AEE UH FI PB EH FR AS) WAGES LSS = . 3 HAMAR A ARAB Fe RCT A NH Fe OR ‘BERHREET BBR A 2 90° (UDR HELI SHAT ( Anderson, 1905; Sperner et al. , 1993; Ragan ,2009 ; Bt ,2010 ; HEHE 2014) . FIA DAS aH RIC AR A BEE 90° CER 4b) LIS DLA 9 TE LAL I 3 RF RL ABA NT RANGER III SRK AE HET DEM 0 LEA, 02.05 BAF HA 02 BA FAK N3O°E 0, ITT ALA ALI N120°E 5 AEE — BILE BI IEE RR 90°, BORER p <90° TOL A DAS Hh AO NEE I EHRACMURSE p, = 51° AE RELAY. WRATH HB FT FETT ETT EAL, IUTITSR AE BAR A AF 90° (UL ARENT AGLI. PAC a a TTR aA LVI, LAAT LE A EBLUL A CE AR Ip, Pc = 90° — p FUEL HE RCE ABR HORA Hewat et (BRAIN E ) Fr EE ABE A AIS EL RW 1G BIL AA HMR FJ 90° HEI FE AMMAR A Hy 90° HEAL AEN I 0, 03.05 RES LR m ALSO RE ABE « BDA BUPA PRIA ELI) . eRe ARB EAT RHE DNATA Stereo MUSE Rs AAR AD EH DAS «(BH AEARC 713 BEREAN m (300° 2 26°) IL SPEDE E 34° BD AT 1 Bh IC A ME 13H, BD oy: 216. 6° 259. 5°07, :45. 5° 230. 2°, 313. 2° 23.9, 7 it BE CH A CR aultKin hc A 8 A a sw BA 6 RST AEE RE Fig. 6 Photographs showing Cenozoic basalt activity in the Datong Basin (a) PHS NE (EEE BRO ; (b) AU OA LSA PREF (a) Overall characteristics of paleogene NE-strike basaltic vein exposed outside; (b) Dayukou voleanic cone distributes on F2 1242 ih oF 2015 4B Bingham 32394 1.2.3, RGR = HM BH te. SSN | A ROL el AP BY TORN ew 3 A SP RRO HR HY PH TKS eS EM DyRHAE WE ( Marrett et al. , 1990; Fossen, 2010) , BU eeHw 1 AF 0, a2 HAF o, iM FAYF o;. ASA FaultKin ARAL DAS BFE Hh PRE AMMA ALM BES SRAM TI BA — Be, EA Te ME A SE (B1)6 Fl FaultKin fl Stereo APTA HAS HOI FBS Bh HIE IH 0, Ho, 03 7K F 03 AURELIA 150° ,o., BUTT LILA Hy 60°, BOE il HATE BRA PETS NW TB TE BT PMT AS; 221). ERR UR BARE A BARE 0, WH 150° HIE BBLS MMH a Se PAE 3 TA] Jy 60° BY TE BB, NE DBE (2 ) LL BBL (FB), ZT LL BB ( FA) AB EE LPS RDC F6 ) 7) LB F7) EA 65° X5RCREA PRAT RER—A, OR Ly FRA (FL) oa FHS a PB I IEA SBE 0 BBR, 4H 38°. 0, HH iy 150° BAS TE BF 29 HEE I 7 5 EF SL BBA ( FL) Bp ar — 5 BY AE PE STE RI, BU] KP LER EAE. REM HMM RAHASAT AAT SABA SP , BD NW rey fe RE BY TE wee TBBARIEARE. MAE AT Serer Bt, SCE MH Za FBEL—BOKNKA WA BCS iS A BBARIESEAVIE BH (Sibson, 1985; Ragan, 2009) BT MIR BO uN R= ass SLORY RT of Be Bee a, SER (Tei +u)' © RR FA ZA RERRH u HS 0, 6 (Byerlee, 1978) , MW R* = 3.0,B0 R= SAB 3 YA BEC Wh, A ERE AOR. Hu HO. 4, R* =2.2, REL MMTC TART MEM SAT AH OFM, BRIS Oz SHER Re MAME A NW PREM IK MAEM o, So, MLE — eH HO AREACODE TE ( EAM, 1980 ; HE BC, 2004 , FRR 2008 ) , AE RHEE MY HELA NE PEE MOEN H Hi 0,05 Rl DAGKRHELAPRMARMAR Table 1 Data table of tectonic stress field inversion based on the striation data of piedmont faults aS re [os CUE I (° ) 2 ERA) Dra CLARE °) BEER AC) Dor REIN) 2 ER AH (° Dio Rm 338.0286.0 22.621.7 132.523.6 pat Rn 216.1278.8 54.3.210.6 323.723.4 33 ¥6 31.8281.2 253 26.6 162.325.7 p34 FA 33.62.80.0 239.929.0 149.2.24.0 3s FA 14.7278.1 228.529.9 137.3.26.5 36 rs 14.4.276.4 226.3.212.0 317.626.2 37-1 rs 74.4.225.1 224.0261.5 338.4212.6 37-2 FA 68.6251.3 261.4238.0 166.5 26.3 38 FA 107.0274.2 43.9211.6 336.1210.5 39 rs 52.0275.0 89.5.214.4 158.424.3 pas. Fl 292.2.269.1 33.524.3 125.1.220.4 pas.2 Fl 247.2.255.5 47.5232.9 143.5 29.3 para Fl 44.7272.9 195.12 15.0 287.3.208.1 pare Fl 237.6267.0 67.2222.1 335.723.4 so Fl 258.0280.3 47.023.1 140.3 22.0 pi B 217.8.281.7 16.327.8 106.723.0 79 B 200.6.273.6 61.S211.4 335.1211.7 bu rr 150.4.282.3 53.920.9 323.827.6 seibeeresor te 1290 #838771) 60 £0( AFI) 150 200K) 6 FS AARITE ROLES 143, WA, HAE, o, EMH NE fo, EMA NW Fl, K-WEM ABER MT Pa HF RESHAREARE, SPAM TEAS “AFA DOBRA E, BARV MERA’ MEI (T ERIS 1983 ) ANTAL. Raed NW FR ASE IN SE, BRS NE (SEAR AER SER a] EA A Mt BRAS ERA SOP 0, BS 0, RAHA ERE. AM sas See AY RATHER ORES ABA Se 2B. KRABRRKT AA Be TE BSS A BB IE AA MY MY (Xu Yigang et all. , 2005 ;Kearey et al. , 2009). #YERES RGHIL BEN, AA BHA EMRE REAR SRREK, MAMARZRAD TAS AR BR) RRAAAAMABEA KAO -HSA RE AAS ARS REARS TK SRO ERW SS ABS GEE AA SLT POEM BP HE KBB G BEBE” (FA 7a; Chen Ling et al. , 2009) #2—3L. 4 BER ZR KELLY WEAR AMAT RAZ HW KAMP HAAMORARZES ZA AWKRS. TREMOR TARA BNW) Bisse) 2000 Brooo [c’ s x mdse ai a ® 200 400 cor | HE cen) ° 3 IMoho E so = law i a a 150! ° 00 700 SEBS Ck) » DAW) ng 2000 au 1000] @ = z °o 3 0 = 100 ® 200 0 400 600-800) HERS (kn) 7 KA RI Fig. 7 Diagram showing Datong basin’ s formation and evolution (a) #1 BB’ (40-4 CC’) SUI Moho 45 LAB Was ( 4 ARAL IL 1, 4 BEA Chen Ling et al. , 2009) ;(b) ‘RYTET DDH) LAB FS, 49 ws SR EPA FSB A eH eM > HAY LAB SPL, APS RE EIA Hoe FOES LAB FE ASSOC A] BAER 5 (c) EF RATRT CC PATE 2S a BS OY A LTE ASR (YB SHAR ABB EZ 2005 48) Moho — BEART; LAB — 387 BBM 5 CLA (a) Shape of Moho and LAB in profile BB’ ( including CC’ ) ( see Fig. 1 for all the profile lines” location. ‘The diagram is, modified after Chen Ling et al. , 2009); (b) shape of LAB of profile DD’. ‘The main part of the Shanxi Rift system is located in the LAB slope between Ordos block and Bohai Bay Basin. The arrow shows the change of LAB’ s shape is too localized to be detected seismologically as Taiyuan basin is narow; (c) diagram showing Datong basin’ s formation and evolution based on the lithospheric structure in profile CC’ ( temperature field data is modified after Xing Zuoyun et al. , 2005 )LAB — Lithosphere— asthenosphere boundary 1244 i 2015 4F BWCARAT RH RRR HS ABA RA JER SERL. BEAR EAA Re SBE PRES SPAS OCTETS RA SS Be ETAT BE DHABI ET PRERR, BAERS me (Kearey et al. , 2009) . FEAL F i PE, RAS LABEARKRA DT EROERERS “POP BE Hi Hh 2 ( El 6a; LN Pa IAI ZE Be , 2002 ) , BEE SRHERT OR LMSW AW PPT, KE FEKANIAS km, BEAK SEES ARS, BAAR DARE RMA SF LE BUGS ARAL ERE RM ow HRS, BUA ART SAE. PMMA AREA dk RT BHAMESER SEH. POBZRAERT RAL ATTA Bh WRPA RA. AABN ATR OIE ABA LE, Ke FB F2 (A 6b) , SCAG a RE HH BS BE A = a Agsh) , UN EAITE S50 FEO BY ASE Bh EE AE. SHEARS T BR AE ER EUG ARE WR ARS ih, FRE PS HR a ESE Hh Re a 7) FB RS HT K-Ar YSERA BP HE a BTR, MWR SS PEE (2002), KBAR D10d-3 HALAY K-Ar 4F #7 0. 68 +0. 13 Ma( #22), ARAM D10a A MAY K-Ar SEH 0.75 +0. 43 Ma(REMRK, SHAH). RARE AICO a ULE BBB BT] , FS Jk LE I LUPE REM AS. SU ees FRABMPR ZRAORREDSAMA BR DBRT aH Aa, ME NL RS AR HT] Dy 0. 451 £0.013 Ma( ERIS ,1988). BEXAR PRENIT AABOBZRA DAK: — 2H PRERA RMR RE ARE BE ,— UNF 60 kn, ARABS AAW RAE EA PO KWOZRS RTA A-BAT RA MEZ RS, AREA, — MY 100 ~ 200 km, ESRF RES SUR BT HE. HAKKAR AM BA TRMEZRS, RAMS RA ORG, SRSA, RBS RAKRS— BN (IKE R, 1986; Kearey et al. , 2009). ACAaesb38 PSE ZR SREZRAOHNS SSE HRS a Hb ASPSE HEARTY (Xu Yigang et al. , 2005). ZE AM AA LERSAA AWE PARR” AK UF BASHA RAB ALE, KSA ATE RAND TKD AB (EASES, 1988 , IS %§ 1993). 5 SBE UL RU aH J ie BIRR, TET EM EMAAR AOE DS ATE Ae, eH AR BURAK, AREASLA A BE, eA PA ARE A BE AER OE RK a RAREBDS WHE (HES, 1981; Xu Xiwei et al. , 1992, 1993; Kearey et al. , 2009) . 31 FRA EMS EMM AH AB ABRIL ES A A ah TE RL EAB MT BY ( Chen. Ling et al., 2009; #= 84%, 2011; RAAS, 2011). PEAR OR S EE HK (Xu Xiwei et al, 1992, 1993; Chen Ling et al. , 2008, 2009; Chen Ling, 2009) SVEN T AMIR AURA. PRET BRAM MR (AA IEE 200 km) SHES a 3h (85 EEA 80 km) LAB AAS AFR TET) HE L(A 7b) , IAL a FSR ARAKBLRA SR LAB RSRARR, FH JOR NW 2 a AT CC’ et BH 2 ( Ta): Moho SERA, SCE A (RK BONEMARS) AABELAN 80 km, KA HEF BEBE 80 ~ 100 km, 2b SABE La SERRE 100 km, KAHN MAY LAB A R2 KMOKUEARS K-Ar CRE EER ‘Table 2 K-Ar ages of the basalt in Dayukou volcanic cone mes | ASS | RAE ree K |] 40Amad | 40Arrad | Semerat (#1e,Ma) (%) | (mot Ze) |) SHI | Diodes SaL20IS | _Dida eo ue N39°5S" 29.48" [0.72 [8.522B-13| 4.57 e1i3°s4' 36.97" [0.47 [1.986E-12 | _1.52 0.68 20.13 0.75 20.43 BOM FS AARITE ROLES 1245 SE (HPAP YK. REKAWE EMH ZRE Sh BAY BUS ACHE T AA od TE RR ( 7c) 10 ~8 Ma LK, KAR AA RATT IEA, RAL EAM BRA RA ARE a FG, Tm Fw He BT AIR PEF (Xu. igang et al. , 2005 ;Kearey et al. , 2009; X3R,2014) JE RKEEMDH o, BHA NW REMI BE KABA MR. HATE HURT SR TE RAK BEM A CBA T RY ere we PAHURA. ATAAMES ABR PEM SE, AH HT SEALY LEG UMTRERSNS A PRA, SRVERLHHALRSAAH BRT PR HME ZS aR TB RT AAA BKB TAMIR A, BARA EE PY RAB A BY Re aR FOE AER , DE — AEA HEFT fe ILI wR OY EF By (Xu Xiwei et al. , 1993 ;48= 84,2011 ;Li Sanzhong et al. ,2012; Pitt HS ,2014). —HH AABN ea BIT DEWAR RRR EO. SRE LSA SABA RASA LONG LIEN A FB SHS BSA HH AGE PRS OH ET I 89 BARS RASA 5H A IR 10 ~ 8 Ma AUBRRUREF}- BB ABSE( Molnar et al. , 1990; HAR PR 1998 BREF, 2004). UEP ARIE FFE, PURE RATE BASH RS th RNR HSA RRR RIS A PUR Ue AEH a FEE DY RR (Molnar et al., 1975; Tapponnier et al. , 1982; Zhang Yueqiao et al., 1998, 2003; 3k HFS, 2006). ERS RIAAL AL ED BE RS TL AIRE AL ‘REI SR, BH a He 09 FE tT BET DOLE Ee, ASM. A Sh Fr WB, A Sa Hh AT eT BSE BIT A EK DRAMA A AOR. AMAT SEPA DERBY a BB, AE eB EXO tly AF RR ERS, 2011) . RASH EBT: ARH aR A 0 ES TE BRAK RLERSES PARMAR AW BEAK (ERIS, 1988 ; ABA BEF, 2008 ) , He RAPA PRBS ERA LS RE BAY BAR HE OF EF BB Gl (Asish et all, 1991). 6 Fe CL) MS TS OE AH I RR 3 K-Ar E89 0. 68 £0. 13Ma, ci 1k LE Val LB Yes BT RY kw ES — FEAT BINS (F2) BHAK. (2) NW Te 6S BE OH SS dH ER, HP o, BH, 02.0; KF, 0. HAMA 60°05 Fr iLAAy 150°, HoH AR A Fe Bite NE FEWER EM AD. (3) KISHI Be ARBRE DW FE PEAR, DARA BAER be ,10 ~8 Ma DAR, CREB EA, SORE Re TE ERE CHT HL NW PRA HH Bed TA HATE RAN OOS kW RE. (4) Kin Hb NTE aR PY ABET BR TNH AP SB % X M / References BUF, SSB, HL, AH, HRS, ERE, ROB, vis, RIB, RAIN. 2014. CAT Ly - FEA TH ARPT BR BAG. MEI, 60(6) ; 1245 ~ 1258, RH, REF, MOBS. 1987. KALA RA SEE. 3 BREE, 12(3) ; 233 ~239. SBE, ROG, MERE, REE, LEA. 1993. RRR E LT KU SARS OT MARIE. TMB, 15 (): 1-10. WR, HR, AAR, BRE, A, BSS. 2002. PRB EAE. PRBS (D-H. MARBS) , 3212); 1020 ~ 1030. 38, EAR, BAF, HRM. 2004. HERRERO TTT FR MOAR ,28(1); 41 ~47. Tim, SUG. 1983. HEA MT. AGORAE, 1(2) 1 ~9. THAL, IM, BAM, MM, BUR, HE, RAR, Be, SEAR. 1998. FR ea Bb - SOR PT a AB FR MUTA, (1); 86 ~94, RS, RR, BOF, RH. 2013. WENCH MOMS HME. HMMA, 15(3) ; 327 ~338. PX, HS, ET, RR, KEN, SRE, Re, MC, RBA, EH. 2010. KA WM PARA EM D1. WERE, 31(6) ; 769 ~780. BURR HREM MRI DRL. 1988. HSI ESB. 1K: MAA MAL, 77 ~ 108. FRE. 2009. ARs RGR -~ MRI. BALK S. PHL 1980. AGO TEN A MAE. MR MSR, 23 (4); 376 ~388, AS, BRR, TES, HAL. 2008 HALAS MAH BSAC HEDTSL. MBF, 30(6) . 570 ~580. KES, ACE, BE, Ne, NR, IM, ee, A = 1246 i 2015 4F BA. 2011. P HERBWCRART MARAE: at ARRAN PELE Oh. MPR, 18(3) ; 79 ~ 107. SUE, SBM, POCA. 1986, SetESMOC Ree FLA ze K ~ Arr. SUR RNG OT. . RTE FE(2). ACR, MOABH HEAL, 128 ~ 136. SUBRE, HUB. 1981. YHA. WIEEAESINA, (3), 110 ~ 123. ‘OLR, UML. 2005. PEAT - AAI A A BABE. PES, (4) 10 ~19, PAO BCWRAEBE. 2002. 1,25 TFL. AIR se RAB. ‘EA, SUN, SUE, BRS, Bede, Se, , SHER. 2013. RE BRA RR ERE EI. FBTR, 20(4); 1 ~1 HRE, LVF, WM, BKB. 1994. AM GHRAREAER He, NDA, (4) 21 ~32. WEY, DRAG, Shaw 1, AGE WAR LAE, KAM. 1998. We FARRER TIES IER, PEASE (D B, WRB) , 28(1) -79 ~84. ESS, MAR, BBR, SES. 1985. KRALHMARH K-Ar Ap mpitAt. MRL, (3); 206 ~215. ERS, BES, AHR, WHR, RA 1988. FEDRATALT Ag K-Ar FERRE RIG. MME, (1): 1 ~ 12. KER, RBA. 194. PHOPRRTA TER WARE PH, (1) 40 ~46 WEL, BA, QE, WR, FE. 2004. + RAMRGER REMAP. RRM MER, 47(4) ; 654 ~662. RE, ICE, ER, EMT, SE. 2003. WK A BRAM. HABA, 25(3) . 359-374 WH, EX, Tatsumoto M, Basu AR. 1989. LMA RABK PLA WEE EA RRR CS. RC, 184): 277 ~ 286. FER, ROR, BILL, TRAE. 2005. SHER Se PIAS RRIE RAVAPT. WEBER, 12(2) , 247 ~262. BNO, SAK, BER, TBM, EWG, RE. 1991. KA - ARORA AR MRAM. PER, 7(2): 77-85. FN, HEM, BEF. 1995. RMSE ANSE ORE SREB. BBM, 40(5) 447 ~449. BER. 2014. NOE LOMB AAMAE A RSM. HOE FF, 60(5) . 945 ~961 ERE, WG, KAM, EB, KF, BAR 204. REAM ‘ART BEETS. $ELPATE, 28(1) + 48 ~51 BR, NE, ERB, AR. 2011. KARMA MARS 3B. GF RBHLE BEF, 13(1) : 82 ~86. HORA, SR, BEM, Wet, BOR, A. 1998. Ke - ARRCRAS RAR SR. MRI, 20 (4): 104 111 HOE, BER, KAR, BE, LE, BR, ER. 2003. PEARED SSO. HBA, DH, 33 (B04) 1 ~20. HOS, EH. 2000. ARAM THERE RS AY Kvn EEA WIRE RRB FEL. BAM, 21(6); 1597 ~ 1607, HSU. 1986. KMMKERAWA TIME. WARIO, 8(1). 59 ~68. RE, BAD, Wes, SF. 2006. RSM a a WHEAERHALAR. BPR, 12(3) ; 285 ~297. RAPE, ORR, S4B7C, THER. 2011. ayERARLR ALA), 1 SOB. PERE: RRA, 41(5) ; 583 ~592. RAR, Hats, SOR, MGI, BIE, AW. 2002. A BC AUS eM 2 SRP MEE. BAR, 47(17) 1335 ~ 1340, SBAR, BOW, WAGE, RMT, HOM, AM, WiesA. 2008. PERAK ARIES AG. HIRES IER, 35 (3): 257-271 Anderson EM. 1905. ‘The dynamics of faulting, Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society, 8(3) : 387 ~402. Asish RB, Wang Junwen, Huang Wankang, Xie Cuanghong, Mitsunobu T. 1991, Major clement, REE, and Pb, Nd and Sr isotopic geochemistry of Cencanic volcanic rocks of eastem China: implications for their origin from suboceanic-type mantle reservoirs Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 105(1) ; 149 ~ 168. Avouae J P, Paul T. 1993. Kinematic model of active deformation in central Asia. Geophysical Research Letters, 20(10) ; 895 ~898. Byerlee J. 1978. Friction of rocks. Pure and applied Geophysics, 116(4 5): 615 ~626. Chen Ling, Cheng Cheng, Wei Zigen. 2009. Seismic evidence for significant lateral variations in lithospheric thickness beneath the central and western North China Craton. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 286(1) ; 171 ~ 183. Chen Ling, Wang Tao, Zhao Liang, Zheng Tianyu. 2008. Distinct lateral variation of lithospheric thickness in the Northeastern North China Craton. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 267(1) ; 56 ~ 68. Chen Ling. 2009. Lithospheric structure variations between the easter and central North China Craton from S- and P-receiver function migration. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 173 (3) 216 ~227 Fossen H. 2010. Structural Geology. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press, 190 ~201 He Jiankun, Cai Dongsheng, LiYanxing, Gong Zaisheng. 2004. Active cextension of the Shanxi rift, north China; does it result from anticlockwise block rotations? Terra Nova, 16(1) ; 38 ~42. Kearey P, Klepeis K A, Vine F J. 2009. Global tectonies. New Jersey John Wiley & Sons, 152 ~208. 14 Sanahong, Zhao Guochun, Dai Liming, Zhow Lihong, Liu Xin, Suo Yanbui, Santosh M. 2012, Cenozmic faulting of the Bohai Bay Basin and its bearing onthe destruction ofthe eastern North China Craton, Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 47; 80 ~93. Liu Mian, Cui Xiaojun, Lin Futian, 2004. Cenozoic rifting and voleanism in easter China; a mantle dynamic link to the Indo ~ Asian collision? "Tectonophysics, 393(1) ; 29 ~42. Marret R, Allmendinger R W. 1990. Kinematic analysis of fault ~ slip data. Journal of Structural Geology, 12(8) : 973 ~986, Marret, RA, Allmendinger RW, 1990, Kinematic analysis of falt-slip data; Journal of Structural Geology, v. 12; 973 ~986. Molnar P, Tapponnier P. 1975. Cenozoic tectonics of Asia; effects of a continental collision. Science, 189(4201) ; 419 ~426. Peltzor G, Saucier F. 1996, Present-day kinematics of Asia derived from geologic fault rates. Journal of Geophysical Research; Solid Earth (1978 ~2012) , 101( B12) ; 27943 ~27956. Ragan D M. 2009. Structural Geology: An Introduction to Geometrical Techniques. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press, 240 ~ 268. Sibson RH. 1985. A note on fault reactivation. Joumal of Structural Geology, 7(6) , 751 ~754, Spemner B, Retschbacher L, Ott R. 1993. Fault ~ striae analysis; a BoM ate LITE Ll EAE. 1247 turbo pascal program package for graphical presentation and reduced stress tensor calculation. Computers & Geosciences, 19(9) ; 1361 ~ 1388, ‘Tapponnier P, Peltzer G, Le Dain AY, Anmijo R, Cobbold P. 1982. Propagating extrusion tectonics in Asia; new insights from simple ‘experiments with plasticine. Geology, 10(12) ; 611 ~616. Xu Xiwei, Ma Xingyuan, Deng Qidong. 1993. Neotectonic activity along the Shanxi rift system. Chine. Tectonophysics, 219(4) : 305 ~325, Xu Xiwei, Ma Xingyuan, 1992. Geodynamics of the Shanxi Rift system, China. Tectonophysies, 208(1) : 325 ~340, North China Craton. Chemical Geology, 224(4) ; 247 ~271 Yin An, 2000, Mode of Cenozoic east ~ west extension in Tibet suggesting a common origin of rifts in Asia during the Indo ~ Asian collision. Journal of Geophysical Research; Solid Earth (1978 ~ 2012), 105(B9) , 21745 ~21759. ‘hang Yueqiao, Ma Yinsheng, Yang Nong, Shi Wei, Dong Shuwen, 2003. Cenozoic extensional stress evolution in North China. Journal of Geodynamics, 36(5) : 591 ~613 Zhang Yuegiao, Mercier J L, Vergély P. 1998. Extension in the graben systems around the Ordos (China), and its contribution to the extrusion tectonics of south China with respect to Gobi ~ Mongolia Tectonophysics, 285(1) : 41 ~75. Xu Yigang, Ma Jinlong, Frey F A, Feigenson MD, Liu Jiangfeng 2005. Role of lithosphere ~ asthenosphere interaction in the genesis ‘of Quaternary alkali and tholeitic basalts fom Datong, western Structural Analysis on the Formation Mechanism of Datong Basin CEN Min'”), DONG Shuwen”” , SHI Wei” , ZHOU Taofa’” , CHEN Long’“’, CHEN Xingqiang”” 1) Resource and Environment Engineering , Hefei University of Technology , Hefei, 230009 ; 2) Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing , 100037 ; 3) Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing, 100081 ; 4) Earth Science and Information Physics, Central South University, Changsha, 410083 Abstract; The Datong basin is a Cenozoic rift located in the central part of North China Craton. It has experienced intensive and persistent rifting since late Miocene. Based on the analysis on the kinematics and dynamics of the marginal faults, the summary on the Cenozoic sedimentary and basaltic strata and the discussion on regional dynamic background, writers proposed the formation mechanism of the Datong basin. Since 10 ~8 Ma, the NW extending tectonic stress field formed on the northeastern margin of the Ordos block and acted on the marginal faults resulting in the Datong basin’ s forming. The formation of the Datong basin corresponds to the lithosphere thinning process and may be related to the far-field effect of India—Eurasia collision and Pacific—Eurasia collision. What’s more, the article shows some new facts, The normal fault stress field of the Datong basin is that 7 is vertical, 3 and g is horizontal, the strike of g is about 150°, which differs from the strike-slip fault stress field of North China. The K-Ar age of Dayukou basalt in Datong volcanic field related to mantle activity is 0. 68 = 0. 13Ma. The Datong basin has characteristics of intraplate narrow rifts. All these research provide a new basis for building the Cenozoic kinematics and dynamatics model of the Shanxi Rift system. Keywords; Datong basin; formation mechanism; fault slip vector; tectonic stress field; mantle activity; intraplate rift

You might also like