Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Discounted Cash Flow Valuation: The Inputs
Discounted Cash Flow Valuation: The Inputs
The Inputs
Aswath Damodaran
Discount Rate
Cost of Equity, in valuing equity
Cost of Capital, in valuing the firm
Cash Flows
Cash Flows to Equity
Cash Flows to Firm
DCF Valuation
I. Cost of Equity
l
The cost of equity is the rate of return that investors require to make an
equity investment in a firm. There are two approaches to estimating
the cost of equity;
a dividend-growth model.
a risk and return model
What is Risk?
l
The first symbol is the symbol for danger, while the second is the
symbol for opportunity, making risk a mix of danger and
opportunity.
E(R)
E(R)
E(R)
Step 2: Differentiating between Rewarded and Unrewarded Risk
Risk that is specific to investment (Firm Specific)
Risk that affects all investments (Market Risk)
Can be diversified away in a diversified portfolio
Cannot be diversified away since most assets
1. each investment is a small proportion of portfolio
are affected by it.
2. risk averages out across investments in portfolio
The marginal investor is assumed to hold a diversified portfolio. Thus, only market risk will
be rewarded and priced.
Step 3: Measuring Market Risk
The CAPM
If there is
1. no private information
2. no transactions cost
the optimal diversified
portfolio includes every
traded asset. Everyone
will hold this market portfolio
Market Risk = Risk
added by any investment
to the market portfolio:
Beta of asset relative to
Market portfolio (from
a regression)
The APM
If there are no
arbitrage opportunities
then the market risk of
any asset must be
captured by betas
relative to factors that
affect all investments.
Market Risk = Risk
exposures of any
asset to market
factors
Multi-Factor Models
Since market risk affects
most or all investments,
it must come from
macro economic factors.
Market Risk = Risk
exposures of any
asset to macro
economic factors.
Proxy Models
In an efficient market,
differences in returns
across long periods must
be due to market risk
differences. Looking for
variables correlated with
returns should then give
us proxies for this risk.
Market Risk =
Captured by the
Proxy Variable(s)
Equation relating
returns to proxy
variables (from a
regression)
APM
Multi
factor
Proxy
Expected Return
E(R) = Rf + (Rm- Rf)
Inputs Needed
Riskfree Rate
Beta relative to market portfolio
Market Risk Premium
E(R) = Rf + j=1 j (Rj- Rf) Riskfree Rate; # of Factors;
Betas relative to each factor
Factor risk premiums
E(R) = Rf + j=1,,N j (Rj- Rf) Riskfree Rate; Macro factors
Betas relative to macro factors
Macro economic risk premiums
E(R) = a + j=1..N bj Yj
Proxies
Regression coefficients
Betas Properties
l
l
10
Inputs required to use the CAPM (a) the current risk-free rate
(b) the expected return on the market index and
(c) the beta of the asset being analyzed.
11
o
o
The correct risk free rate to use in a risk and return model is
a short-term Government Security rate (eg. T.Bill), since it has no
default risk or price risk
a long-term Government Security rate, since it has no default risk
other: specify ->
12
13
14
15
o
o
16
The risk premium is the premium that investors demand for investing
in an average risk investment, relative to the riskfree rate.
As a general proposition, this premium should be
greater than zero
increase with the risk aversion of the investors in that market
increase with the riskiness of the average risk investment
17
If this were the capital market line, the risk premium would be a
weighted average of the risk premiums demanded by each and every
investor.
The weights will be determined by the magnitude of wealth that each
investor has. Thus, Warren Bufffets risk aversion counts more
towards determining the equilibrium premium than yours and mine.
As investors become more risk averse, you would expect the
equilibrium premium to increase.
18
Survey investors on their desired risk premiums and use the average
premium from these surveys.
Assume that the actual premium delivered over long time periods is
equal to the expected premium - i.e., use historical data
Estimate the implied premium in todays asset prices.
19
20
21
Stocks - T.Bonds
Arith Geom
7.57% 5.91%
5.16% 4.46%
9.22% 8.02%
22
Historical data for markets outside the United States tends to be sketch
and unreliable.
Ibbotson, for instance, estimates the following premiums for major
markets from 1970-1990
Country
Australia
Canada
France
Germany
Italy
Japan
Netherlands
Switzerland
UK
Period
1970-90
1970-90
1970-90
1970-90
1970-90
1970-90
1970-90
1970-90
1970-90
Stocks
9.60%
10.50%
11.90%
7.40%
9.40%
13.70%
11.20%
5.30%
14.70%
Bonds
7.35%
7.41%
7.68%
6.81%
9.06%
6.96%
6.87%
4.10%
8.45%
Risk Premium
2.25%
3.09%
4.22%
0.59%
0.34%
6.74%
4.33%
1.20%
6.25%
23
Rating
BBB
BB
AA
A+
BBB+
BBBB
BBB
Risk Premium
5.5% + 1.75% = 7.25%
5.5% + 2% = 7.5%
5.5% + 0.75% = 6.25%
5.5% + 1.25% = 6.75%
5.5% + 1.5% = 7%
5.5% + 1.75% = 7.25%
5.5% + 2.5% = 8%
5.5% + 1.75% = 7.25%
24
Rating
BBB+
BBB
BB+
AAA
AAA+
B+
BB+
AAA
AA+
A
Risk Premium
5.5% + 1.5% = 7.00%
5.5% + 1.75% = 7.25%
5.5% + 2.00% = 7.50%
5.5% + 0.00% = 5.50%
5.5% + 1.00% = 6.50%
5.5% + 1.25% = 6.75%
5.5% + 2.75% = 8.25%
5.5% + 2.00% = 7.50%
5.5% + 0.00% = 7.50%
5.5% + 0.50% = 6.00%
5.5% + 1.35% = 6.85%
25
26
6.00%
4.00%
3.00%
2.00%
1.00%
1996
1994
1992
1990
1988
1986
1984
1982
1980
1978
1976
1974
1972
1970
1968
1966
1964
1962
0.00%
1960
5.00%
Year
27
o
o
o
Assume that you use the historical risk premium of 5.5% in doing your
discounted cash flow valuations and that the implied premium in the
market is only 2.5%. As you value stocks, you will find
more under valued than over valued stocks
more over valued than under valued stocks
about as many under and over valued stocks
28
Estimating Beta
l
The slope of the regression corresponds to the beta of the stock, and
measures the riskiness of the stock.
29
30
31
o
o
32
If the stock is correctly valued, the CAPM is the right model for risk
and the beta is correctly estimated, an investment in Disney stock can
be expected to earn a return of 14.70% over the long term.
Investors in stock in Disney
need to make 14.70% over time to break even
will decide to invest or not invest in Disney based upon whether they think
they can make more or less than this hurdle rate
33
Managers at Disney
need to make at least 14.70% as a return for their equity investors to break
even.
this is the hurdle rate for projects, when the investment is analyzed from
an equity standpoint
34
35
A Few Questions
l
o
o
l
The R squared for Nestle is very high and the standard error is very
low, at least relative to U.S. firms. This implies that this beta estimate
is a better one than those for U.S. firms.
True
False
The beta for Nestle is 0.97. This is the appropriate measure of risk to
what kind of investor (What has to be in his or her portfolio for this
beta to be an adequate measure of risk?)
If you were an investor in primarily U.S. stocks, would this be an
appropriate measure of risk?
36
37
38
39
40
Beta Differences
BETA AS A MEASURE OF RISK
High Risk
Minupar: Beta = 1.72
Beta > 1
Above-average Risk
9 stocks
Eletrobras: Beta = 1.22
Telebras: Beta = 1.11
Petrobras: Beta = 1.04
Beta = 1
Average Stock
Beta < 1
Below-average Risk
Brahma: Beta=0.50
169 stocks
Low Risk
41
When analysts use the CAPM, they generally assume that the
regression is the only way to estimate betas.
Regression betas are not necessarily good estimates of the true beta
because of
the market index may be narrowly defined and dominated by a few stocks
even if the market index is well defined, the standard error on the beta
estimate is usually large leading to a wide range for the true beta
even if the market index is well defined and the standard error on the beta
is low, the regression estimate is a beta for the period of the analysis. To
the extent that the company has changed over the time period (in terms of
business or financial leverage), this may not be the right beta for the next
period or periods.
42
Estimate the beta for the firm from the bottom up without employing
the regression technique. This will require
understanding the business mix of the firm
estimating the financial leverage of the firm
43
Adjusted Betas: When one or a few stocks dominate an index, the betas
might be better estimated relative to an equally weighted index. While
this approach may eliminate some of the more egregious problems
associated with indices dominated by a few stocks, it will still leave us
with beta estimates with large standard errors.
Enhanced Betas: Adjust the beta to reflect the differences between
firms on other financial variables that are correlated with market risk
Barra, which is one of the most respected beta estimation services in the
world, employs this technique. They adjust regression betas for
differences in a number of accounting variables.
The variables to adjust for, and the extent of the adjustment, are obtained
by looking at variables that are correlated with returns over time.
44
45
46
= 20.60%
= 0.62%
= 77%
= $ 54,471(in mils)
47
Accounting Betas
If the noise in market data is what makes the betas unreliable, estimates of
betas can be obtained using accounting earnings.
This approach can be used for non-traded firms as well, but suffers from a
serious data limitation problem.
48
Relative Volatility
RELATIVE VOLATILITY AS A MEASURE OF RISK
High Risk
Serrano: Rel Vol = 2.20
Beta > 1
Above-average Risk
83 stocks
Beta = 1
Average Stock
Beta < 1
Below-average Risk
Brahma:Rel Vol=0.50
86 stocks
Low Risk
49
The risk premium used, based upon the country rating, is 7.5%.
Should this be adjusted as we go into the future?
Beta
0.87
0.85
0.72
Cost of Equity
5%+0.87 (7.5%) = 11.53%
5%+0.85 (7.5%) = 11.38%
5%+0.72 (7.5%) = 10.40%
50
Accounting Betas
l
l
l
51
52
53
o
o
o
o
54
55
Fama and French, in much quoted study on the efficacy (or the lack) of
the CAPM, looked at returns on stocks between 1963 and 1990. While
they found no relationship with differences in betas, they did find a
strong relationship between size, book/market ratios and returns.
A regression off monthly returns on stocks on the NYSE, using data
from 1963 to 1990:
Rt = 1.77% - 0.0011 ln (MV) + 0.0035 ln (BV/MV)
MV = Market Value of Equity
BV/MV = Book Value of Equity / Market Value of Equity
To get the cost of equity for Disney, you would plug in the values into
this regression. Since Disney has a market value of $ 54,471 million
and a book/market ratio of 0.30 its monthly return would have been:
Rt = .0177 - .0011 ln (54,471) + 0.0035 (.3) = 0.675% a month or 8.41% a
year
l
56
30.00%
25.00%
20.00%
Low
Medium
High
15.00%
10.00%
Beta
Debt/Equity
MV of Equity
Sales/Price
Earnings/Price
0.00%
Book/Market
5.00%
57
Bottom-up Betas
l
The other approach to estimate betas is to build them up from the base,
by understanding the business that a firm is in, and estimating a beta
based upon this understanding.
To use this approach, we need to
deconstruct betas, and understand the fundamental determinants of betas
(i.e., why are betas high for some firms and low for others?)
come up with a way of linking the fundamental characteristics of an asset
with a beta that can be used in valuation.
58
The beta value for a firm depends upon the sensitivity of the demand
for its products and services and of its costs to macroeconomic factors
that affect the overall market.
Cyclical companies have higher betas than non-cyclical firms
Firms which sell more discretionary products will have higher betas than
firms that sell less discretionary products
59
Operating leverage refers to the proportion of the total costs of the firm
that are fixed.
Other things remaining equal, higher operating leverage results in
greater earnings variability which in turn results in higher betas.
60
61
o
o
o
l
62
As firms borrow, they create fixed costs (interest payments) that make
their earnings to equity investors more volatile.
This increased earnings volatility increases the equity beta
63
64
65
The bottom up beta will give you a better estimate of the true beta
when
the standard error of the beta from the regression is high (and) the beta for
a firm is very different from the average for the business
the firm has reorganized or restructured itself substantially during the
period of the regression
when a firm is not traded
66
Levered
Beta
1.43
1.71
1.03
1.26
0.80
1.25
Riskfree
Rate
7.00%
7.00%
7.00%
7.00%
7.00%
7.00%
Risk
Premium
5.50%
5.50%
5.50%
5.50%
5.50%
5.50%
Cost of
Equity
14.85%
16.42%
12.65%
13.91%
11.40%
13.85%
67
Beta
1.40
1.15
1.14
0.54
0.25*
1.25
Comments
Company has changed significantly
Used MSCI as market index
Fundamental regression has low R2
Only 16 observations
Uses market cap and book/market
Reflects current business and
financialmix
* Estimated from expected return on 8.41%.
68
69
70
Approach Used
Beta
Comparable Firms
0.99
European Banks
Bottom-up Firms
0.85
Large, brand name food companies
Regression against BSE
0.94
Checked against global watch manufacturers
Bottom-up Beta
0.80
Global Beverage Firms
Bottom-up Beta
1.80
Internet Companies (Why not bookstores?)
71
72
The cost of debt is the market interest rate that the firm has to pay on
its borrowing. It will depend upon three components(a) The general level of interest rates
(b) The default premium
(c) The firm's tax rate
73
the interest rate at which the company obtained the debt it has on its
books.
74
If the firm has bonds outstanding, and the bonds are traded, the yield to
maturity on a long-term, straight (no special features) bond can be
used as the interest rate.
If the firm is rated, use the rating and a typical default spread on bonds
with that rating to estimate the cost of debt.
If the firm is not rated,
and it has recently borrowed long term from a bank, use the interest rate
on the borrowing or
estimate a synthetic rating for the company, and use the synthetic rating to
arrive at a default spread and a cost of debt
The cost of debt has to be estimated in the same currency as the cost of
equity and the cash flows in the valuation.
75
For Brahma,
Interest Coverage Ratio = 413/257 = 1.61
Based upon the relationship between interest coverage ratios and ratings,
we would estimate a rating of B for Brahma
76
Default Spread
> 8.50
6.50 - 8.50
5.50 - 6.50
4.25 - 5.50
3.00 - 4.25
2.50 - 3.00
2.00 - 2.50
1.75 - 2.00
1.50 - 1.75
1.25 - 1.50
0.80 - 1.25
0.65 - 0.80
0.20 - 0.65
< 0.20
AAA
AA
A+
A
A
BBB
BB
B+
B
B
CCC
CC
C
D
0.20%
0.50%
0.80%
1.00%
1.25%
1.50%
2.00%
2.50%
3.25%
4.25%
5.00%
6.00%
7.50%
10.00%
77
Approach Used
Rating & Default spread
Hansol Paper
Nestle
ABN Amro
Titan Watches
Brahma
Cost of Debt
7% + 0.50% = 7.50%
(in U.S. Dollars)
12% + 4.25% = 16.25%
(in nominal WN)
4.25%+0.25%= 4.50%
(in Swiss Francs)
5.40% (in NLG)
13.5% (in nominal Rs.)
5% + 3.25% = 8.25%
(in real BR)
78
79
1
(1
(1.075) 12,342
+
479
= $11,180
(1.075)3
.075
80
Equity
Cost of Equity =
Market Value of Equity =
Equity/(Debt+Equity ) =
Debt
After-tax Cost of debt =
Market Value of Debt =
Debt/(Debt +Equity) =
13.85%
$54.88 Billion
82%
7.50% (1-.36) =
4.80%
$ 11.18 Billion
18%
81
o
o
o
If you use book value weights for debt and equity to calculate cost of
capital in the United States, and value a firm on the basis of this cost of
capital, you will generally end up
over valuing the firm
under valuing the firm
neither
82
Equity
Cost of Equity =
23.57% (with beta of 1.78)
Market Value of Equity = 23000*15.062=
346,426 Million
Equity/(Debt+Equity ) =
26.72%
Debt
After-tax Cost of debt =
Market Value of Debt =
Debt/(Debt +Equity) =
16.25% (1-.3) =
11.38%
949,862 Million
73.28%
83
Objective:
A firm should pick a debt ratio that minimizes its cost of capital.
Why?:
Because if operating cash flows are held constant, minimizing the Cost of
Capital maximizes Firm Value.
84
85
AAA
7.20%
4.61%
13.00%
$53,842
10%1.17
13.43%
12.44
AAA
7.20%
4.61%
12.55%
$58,341
20%1.27
13.96%
5.74
A+
7.80%
4.99%
12.17%
$62,650
30%1.39
14.65%
3.62
A8.25%
5.28%
11.84%
$66,930
40%1.56
15.56%
2.49
BB
9.00%
5.76%
11.64%
$69,739
50%1.79
16.85%
1.75
B
10.25%
6.56%
11.70%
$68,858
60%2.14
18.77%
1.24
CCC
12.00%
7.68%
12.11%
$63,325
70%2.72
21.97%
1.07
CCC
12.00%
7.68%
11.97%
$65,216
80%3.99
28.95%
0.93
CCC
12.00%
7.97%
12.17%
$62,692
90%8.21
52.14%
0.77
CC
13.00%
9.42%
13.69%
$48,160
l
Firm Value = Current Firm Value + Firm Value (WACC(old) - WACC(new))/(WACC(new)-g)
86
Beta
Cost of
Int. Cov. Rating
Interest AT Cost
WACC
Firm Value
Equity
Ratio
Rate
0.00%
0.35
14.29%
AAA
12.30% 8.61%
14.29%
988,162 WN
10.00%
0.38
14.47% 6.87
AAA
12.30% 8.61%
13.89%
1,043,287 WN
20.00%
0.41
14.69% 3.25
A+
13.00% 9.10%
13.58%
1,089,131 WN
30.00%
0.46
14.98% 2.13
A
13.25% 9.28%
13.27%
1,138,299 WN
40.00%
0.52
15.36% 1.51
BBB
14.00% 9.80%
13.14%
1,160,668 WN
50.00%
0.60
15.90% 1.13
B+
15.00% 10.50%
13.20%
1,150,140 WN
60.00%
0.74
16.82% 0.88
B
16.00% 11.77%
13.79%
1,056,435 WN
70.00%
0.99
18.43% 0.75
B
16.00% 12.38%
14.19%
1,001,068 WN
80.00%
1.50
21.76% 0.62
B17.00% 13.83%
15.42%
861,120 WN
90.00%
3.00
31.51% 0.55
B17.00% 14.18%
15.92%
813,775 WN
l
Firm Value = Current Firm Value + Firm Value (WACC(old) - WACC(new))/(WACC(new)-g)
87
DCF Valuation
88
If looking at cash flows to equity, consider the cash flows from net
debt issues (debt issued - debt repaid)
89
Earnings Checks
l
90
91
In the strictest sense, the only cash flow that an investor will receive
from an equity investment in a publicly traded firm is the dividend that
will be paid on the stock.
Actual dividends, however, are set by the managers of the firm and
may be much lower than the potential dividends (that could have been
paid out)
managers are conservative and try to smooth out dividends
managers like to hold on to cash to meet unforeseen future contingencies
and investment opportunities
When actual dividends are less than potential dividends, using a model
that focuses only on dividends will under state the true value of the
equity in a firm.
92
Some analysts assume that the earnings of a firm represent its potential
dividends. This cannot be true for several reasons:
Earnings are not cash flows, since there are both non-cash revenues and
expenses in the earnings calculation
Even if earnings were cash flows, a firm that paid its earnings out as
dividends would not be investing in new assets and thus could not grow
Valuation models, where earnings are discounted back to the present, will
over estimate the value of the equity in the firm
The potential dividends of a firm are the cash flows left over after the
firm has made any investments it needs to make to create future
growth and net debt repayments (debt repayments - new debt issues)
The common categorization of capital expenditures into discretionary and
non-discretionary loses its basis when there is future growth built into the
valuation.
93
94
95
96
97
$1,533 Mil
$465.90
$363.33
$ 704 Million
Dividends Paid
$ 345 Million
98
1400
1200
FCFE
1000
800
600
400
200
0
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Debt Ratio
99
7.00
6.00
Beta
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Debt Ratio
100
101
232.00 Million BR
102
Cashflow to Firm
Claimholder
Equity Investors
Debt Holders
Preferred Stockholders
Preferred Dividends
Firm =
Equity Investors
+ Debt Holders
+ Preferred Stockholders
+ Principal Repayments
- New Debt Issues
+ Preferred Dividends
103
A Simpler Approach
EBIT ( 1 - tax rate)
- (Capital Expenditures - Depreciation)
- Change in Working Capital
= Cash flow to the firm
l The calculation starts with after-tax operating income, where the entire
operating income is assumed to be taxed at the marginal tax rate
l Where are the tax savings from interest payments in this cash flow?
104
$
$
$
$
3,558
612
477
2,469 Million
105
106
A firm which has a negative FCFF is a bad investment and not worth
much.
True
False
If true, explain why.
If false, explain under what conditions it can be a valuable firm.
107
DCF Valuation
108
Look at fundamentals
Ultimately, all growth in earnings can be traced to two fundamentals how much the firm is investing in new projects, and what returns these
projects are making for the firm.
109
110
111
112
113
A Test
l
o
o
o
o
You are trying to estimate the growth rate in earnings per share at
Time Warner from 1996 to 1997. In 1996, the earnings per share was a
deficit of $0.05. In 1997, the expected earnings per share is $ 0.25.
What is the growth rate?
-600%
+600%
+120%
Cannot be estimated
114
When the earnings in the starting period are negative, the growth rate
cannot be estimated. (0.30/-0.05 = -600%)
There are three solutions:
Use the higher of the two numbers as the denominator (0.30/0.25 = 120%)
Use the absolute value of earnings in the starting period as the
denominator (0.30/0.05=600%)
Use a linear regression model and divide the coefficient by the average
earnings.
115
116
117
118
While the job of an analyst is to find under and over valued stocks in
the sectors that they follow, a significant proportion of an analysts
time (outside of selling) is spent forecasting earnings per share.
Most of this time, in turn, is spent forecasting earnings per share in the
next earnings report
While many analysts forecast expected growth in earnings per share over
the next 5 years, the analysis and information (generally) that goes into
this estimate is far more limited.
119
Study
Time Period
Collins & Hopwood Value Line Forecasts
1970-74
Brown & Rozeff
Value Line Forecasts
1972-75
Fried & Givoly
Earnings Forecaster
1969-79
l
32.2%
16.4%
19.8%
120
121
122
123
Investment
in Existing
Projects
$ 1000
Investment
in Existing
Projects
$1000
Investment
in Existing
Projects
$1000
Current Return on
Investment on
Projects
12%
Next Periods
Return on
Investment
12%
Change in
ROI from
current to next
period: 0%
Current
Earnings
$120
Investment
in New
Projects
$100
Investment
in New
Projects
$100
Return on
Investment on
New Projects
12%
Return on
Investment on
New Projects
12%
Next
Periods
Earnings
132
Change in Earnings
= $ 12
124
X
X
Reinvestment Rate
83.33%
X
X
Return on Investment
12%
Return on Investment
12%
=
=
Change in Earnings
Current Earnings
$12
$120
Growth Rate in Earnings
10%
in the more general case where ROI can change from period to period, this can be expanded as follows:
Investment in Existing Projects*(Change in ROI) + New Projects (ROI)
Investment in Existing Projects* Current ROI
Change in Earnings
Current Earnings
For instance, if the ROI increases from 12% to 13%, the expected growth rate can be written as follows:
$1,000 * (.13 - .12) + 100 (13%)
$ 1000 * .12
$23
$120
19.17%
125
When looking at growth in earnings per share, these inputs can be cast as
follows:
Reinvestment Rate = Retained Earnings/ Current Earnings = Retention Ratio
Return on Investment = ROE = Net Income/Book Value of Equity
In the special case where the current ROE is expected to remain unchanged
126
127
Assume now that ABN Amros ROE next year is expected to increase
to 17%, while its retention ratio remains at 53.88%. What is the new
expected long term growth rate in earnings per share?
Will the expected growth rate in earnings per share next year be
greater than, less than or equal to this estimate?
greater than
less than
equal to
o
o
o
128
Corollary: The larger the existing asset base, the bigger the effect on
earnings growth of changes in ROE.
l
129
130
131
l
l
l
132
133
134
o
o
l
You are looking at a valuation, where the terminal value is based upon
the assumption that operating income will grow 3% a year forever, but
there are no net cap ex or working capital investments being made
after the terminal year. When you confront the analyst, he contends
that this is still feasible because the company is becoming more
efficient with its existing assets and can be expected to increase its
return on capital over time. Is this a reasonable explanation?
Yes
No
Explain.
135
136
137
138
139
When a firms cash flows grow at a constant rate forever, the present
value of those cash flows can be written as:
Value = Expected Cash Flow Next Period / (r - g)
where,
r = Discount rate (Cost of Equity or Cost of Capital)
g = Expected growth rate
This constant growth rate is called a stable growth rate and cannot
be higher than the growth rate of the economy in which the firm
operates.
While companies can maintain high growth rates for extended periods,
they will all approach stable growth at some point in time.
When they do approach stable growth, the valuation formula above
can be used to estimate the terminal value of all cash flows beyond.
140
Growth Patterns
l
2-Stage Growth
3-Stage Growth
141
142
143
Consider the example of ABN Amro. Based upon its current return on
equity of 15.79% and its retention ratio of 53.88%, we estimated a
growth in earnings per share of 8.51%.
Let us assume that ABN Amro will be in stable growth in 5 years. At
that point, let us assume that its return on equity will be closer to the
average for European banks of 15%, and that it will grow at a nominal
rate of 5% (Real Growth + Inflation Rate in NV)
The expected payout ratio in stable growth can then be estimated as
follows:
Stable Growth Payout Ratio = 1 - g/ ROE = 1 - .05/.15 = 66.67%
g = b (ROE)
b = g/ROE
Payout = 1- b
144
145