Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Raw Data
Raw Data
Info:
606
Unique
respondants
Hypothesis:
1) The
long
deadline
conditions
should
have
higher
hits
than
the
no
deadline
condition
(No
difference
in
false
alarms
expected)
2) The
short
deadline
condition
should
have
higher
hits
than
the
long
deadline
condition
(No
difference
in
false
alarms
expected)
No
deadline:
Reduces
false
alarms
and
also
hits
1000ms
Deadline:
500ms
Deadline:
Descriptive statistics:
Con
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
Con
Hits
FAs
Missing
Percent
Total
Percent
Percent
181
100.0%
0.0%
181
100.0%
183
100.0%
0.0%
183
100.0%
193
100.0%
0.0%
193
100.0%
181
100.0%
0.0%
181
100.0%
183
100.0%
0.0%
183
100.0%
193
100.0%
0.0%
193
100.0%
Descriptives
Con
Hits
Statistic
Mean
95% Confidence Interval for
Lower Bound
.7951
Mean
Upper Bound
.8221
5% Trimmed Mean
.8128
Median
.8200
Variance
Std. Deviation
.09224
.56
Maximum
.98
Range
.42
Interquartile Range
.12
Kurtosis
Mean
.00686
.009
Minimum
Skewness
.8086
Std. Error
-.611
.181
.054
.359
.8055
.00714
Lower Bound
.7914
Mean
Upper Bound
.8196
5% Trimmed Mean
.8093
Median
.8200
Variance
.009
Std. Deviation
.09658
Minimum
.50
Maximum
.98
Range
.48
Interquartile Range
.14
Skewness
-.596
.180
Kurtosis
-.115
.357
Mean
.7848
.00730
Lower Bound
.7704
Mean
Upper Bound
.7992
5% Trimmed Mean
.7889
Median
.8000
Variance
.010
Std. Deviation
.10148
Minimum
.48
Maximum
.98
Range
.50
Interquartile Range
.14
Skewness
Kurtosis
FAs
Mean
-.663
.175
.268
.348
.1862
.00752
[False
Lower Bound
.1713
alarm
Mean
Upper Bound
.2010
rates]
5% Trimmed Mean
.1808
Median
.1800
Variance
Std. Deviation
.010
.10118
Minimum
.02
Maximum
.52
Range
.50
Interquartile Range
.13
Skewness
.848
.181
Kurtosis
.436
.359
Mean
.1628
Lower Bound
.1497
Mean
Upper Bound
.1759
5% Trimmed Mean
.1592
Median
.1600
Variance
.008
Std. Deviation
.08979
Minimum
.00
Maximum
.44
Range
.44
Interquartile Range
.14
Skewness
.00664
.446
.180
Kurtosis
-.212
.357
Mean
.2172
.00708
Lower Bound
.2032
Mean
Upper Bound
.2312
5% Trimmed Mean
.2142
Median
.2000
Variance
Std. Deviation
.010
.09842
Minimum
.02
Maximum
.58
Range
.56
Interquartile Range
.13
Skewness
.565
.175
Kurtosis
.321
.348
Graph
One
Way
ANOVA
Tells
us: ANOVA
tells
us
that
there
is
a
significant
effect
of
our
line-up
manipulation
among
our
groups
Oneway
ANOVA
Sum of Squares
False Alarms
Hits
Between Groups
df
Mean Square
.280
.140
Within Groups
5.170
554
.009
Total
5.450
556
.063
.032
Within Groups
5.206
554
.009
Total
5.270
556
Between Groups
p = .035
Effect
Size:
(How
big
the
effect
is)
2
Effect
size
for
hits:
.063/5.27
=
.01
Effect
size
for
false
alarms:
.28/5.45
=
.05
What
do
those
numbers
mean?
Sig.
15.009
.000
3.375
.035
(I-J)
[report the
Dependent Variable
(I) Condition
(J) Condition
False Alarms
No Deadline
1000ms
1000ms
500ms
Hits
No Deadline
1000ms
Std. Error
Sig.
Lower Bound
Upper Bound
.02335
.01013
.065
-.0010
.0477
500ms
-.03101
.01000
.006
-.0550
-.0070
No Deadline
-.02335
.01013
.065
-.0477
.0010
500ms
-.05436
.00997
.000
-.0783
-.0304
No Deadline
.03101
.01000
.006
.0070
.0550
1000ms
.05436
.00997
.000
.0304
.0783
1000ms
.00315
.01016
1.000
-.0212
.0276
500ms
.02385
.01003
.053
-.0002
.0479
-.00315
.01016
1.000
-.0276
.0212
.02070
.01000
.117
-.0033
.0447
No Deadline
-.02385
.01003
.053
-.0479
.0002
1000ms
-.02070
.01000
.117
-.0447
.0033
No Deadline
500ms
500ms
absolute value]
Why
is
the
ANOVA
significant
for
Hit
Rate
but
the
Bonferroni
test
is
not?
The
Bonferroni
test
is
a
more
conservative
test
because
it
adjusts
the
estimated
p-value
for
the
number
of
comparisons
that
we
are
making
Our conclusion would have to be that the significant ANOVA is likely a false positive
Report both, but point out the above, saying that the B test is the betterer