Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Farella M. 2002 Eur. J. Oral Sci
Farella M. 2002 Eur. J. Oral Sci
Farella M. 2002 Eur. J. Oral Sci
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11181484
CITATIONS
READS
30
478
4 authors, including:
Mauro Farella
Ambra Michelotti
University of Otago
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
Roberto Martina
University of Naples Federico II
98 PUBLICATIONS 918 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
European Journal of
Oral Sciences
ISSN 0909-8836
Farella M, Michelotti A, van Eijden TMGJ, Martina R. The curve of Spee and
craniofacial morphology: a multiple regression analysis. Eur J Oral Sci 2002; 110:
277281. Eur J Oral Sci, 2002
The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the curve of Spee and
skeletal facial morphology. Dental casts and lateral cephalograms were obtained from
59 orthodontic patients. The amount of concavity of the curve of Spee was calculated
by a second-order quadratic interpolation of buccal cusp tips obtained from lateral
digital photographs of the teeth. The cephalometric analysis aimed to evaluate the
sagittal and vertical craniofacial dimensions as well as the position of the mandibular
condyle with respect to the occlusal plane. These variables, included in a multiple
regression model, could explain 34% of the total variance of the curve of Spee. The
amount of the curvature was signicantly related to (a) the horizontal position of the
condyle with respect to the dentition, (b) the sagittal position of the mandible with
respect to the anterior cranial base, and (c) the ratio between the posterior and anterior
facial height. No signicant relationship was found between the curve of Spee and any
of the other cephalometric variables. The curve of Spee was not inuenced by age and
gender of the subjects investigated.
278
Farella et al.
Cephalometric measurements
The cephalometric analysis aimed to evaluate the sagittal
and vertical craniofacial dimensions. Vertical and
horizontal cephalometric measurements are shown in
Fig. 2a,b. The percentage ratio between the posterior facial
height (S-Go) and the anterior total facial height (N-Me),
and the percentage ratio between the anterior upper facial
height (N-ANS) and the anterior lower facial height (ANSMe) were also calculated. Since it has been reported that the
amount of the curve of Spee is related to the position of the
dentition with respect to the mandibular condyle (5, 6, 14),
this position was also included in the measurements
(Fig. 2c). A single examiner performed all cephalometric
measurements.
Error of the method
The errors of the method were calculated from 25 randomly
selected subjects. A second examiner retraced the radiograms as well as the digital pictures for the calculation of Sp.
The method error (ME) for all these measurements was
assessed by means of Dahlbergs formula
s
P 2
d
ME
2n
where d is the dierence between the two measurements and
n is the number of recordings (15). Systematic dierences
between replicate measurements were tested with paired
Students t-test setting the a error at 0.1 (16). Mean errors
were, in general, low. The errors for the distances varied
between 0.2 mm and 1.1 mm, and for the angles between
0.1 and 1.0. The mean error of Sp was 0.8 and ranged
from 0 to 2.1. There was no systematic error for either
cephalometric measurements or the coecient Sp (Students
t-test P > 0.1).
Statistics
Data were analysed with conventional descriptive statistics.
Mean, standard deviation (SD), standard error of mean
(SEM), range, and coecients of variation (CV
SD/mean 100) were calculated for the coecient Sp and
for all the cephalometric variables. The normal distribution
tting of data collected was tested by means of KolmogorovSmirnov test. The hypothesis that data collected were
normally distributed could not be rejected for any variable,
therefore subsequent analysis were performed by means of
parametric statistical tests. The goodness of t of Sp was
calculated by correlation coecients. A multiple linear
regression analyses with a stepwise elimination was
performed. The coecient Sp was considered as the
response variable. Explanatory variables included in the
model were gender, age, and the cephalometric measures
previously described. All the analyses were carried out by
means of commercial statistical software (SPSS 8.0; SPSS,
Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical signicance was accepted at
P < 0.05.
Results
Fig. 1. Cartesian axis references used for the measurement of
the curve of Spee.
Descriptive statistics for the cephalometric measurements are given in Table 1. The correlation coecients of
279
Discussion
The mathematical and statistical approach used in the
present study allows the description of the intrinsic shape
of the mandibular curve of Spee. Consistent with previous observations (13), in most cases the second-order
interpolation curve was judged to t the cusp tips very
well. Therefore, it appeared appropriate for the description of the curve.
As revealed by the coecient of variation of the curve
of Spee (Sp 42%), the amount of the curvature was
highly variable among the individuals. Nevertheless, in
only one case was the curve found to be almost completely at (Sp 2), and in no case was the coecient 0
(straight line) or negative (reversed curve).
In the subjects investigated, the amount of curvature
was not inuenced by gender. The lack of sexual dimorphism is in agreement with previous ndings obtained from either two-dimensional (10, 13) or threedimensional (17) evaluation of the occlusal curvature. In
the present study, no evidence was found about the potential relation between the curve of Spee and age. The
eect of age on the curve of Spee has been investigated in
growing subjects up to young adulthood (1820), however, to our knowledge, there is no data available regarding variation of the curve of Spee with age in adults.
With increasing age, it can be expected that a homogeneous dental wear may occur as a consequence of the
masticatory function. It is interesting to note that the
curve of Spee is usually seen in most of the primates and
mammals regardless of the amount of tooth wear (5, 6).
Tooth wear does not appear to aect the forward tilt of
the posterior teeth in the sagittal plane and even though
280
Farella et al.
Table 1
Summary statistics for the curve of Spee and cephalometric variables (n 59)*
Mean
SD
SEM
10.6
4.5
0.6
8.9
31.4
23.1
125.5
83.0
122.4
67.9
80.1
71.4
81.5
77.8
3.6
120.8
92.3
42.1
39.0
3.7
7.7
7.0
6.9
7.7
9.4
6.0
8.6
4.3
4.4
4.3
2.9
8.2
5.8
5.3
5.6
0.5
1.0
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.2
0.8
1.1
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.4
1.1
0.8
0.7
0.7
Minimum
Maximum
CV (%)
2.0
23.0
42.0
0.0
15.0
10.0
113.0
71.0
105.0
54.1
62.7
60.5
70.0
66.5
)4.0
103.0
78.0
31.0
28.5
15.0
50.0
42.0
144.0
104.0
143.0
80.2
100.0
83.0
94.0
88.5
11.0
143.0
104.0
53.0
50.0
41.1
24.6
30.5
5.5
9.3
7.6
8.8
10.7
6.0
5.4
5.5
80.5
6.8
6.2
12.5
14.3
*NSL/ANS-PNS, angle between sella-nasion line and palatal line; NSL/ML, angle between sella-nasion line and mandibular line;
ANS-PNS/ML, angle between palatal line and mandibular line; Ar-Go-Me, angle between the ramal line and mandibular line; S-Go,
distance between sella and gonion; N-Me, distance between nasion and menton; N-ANS, distance between nasion and anterior nasal
spine, ANS-Me, distance between anterior nasal spine and menton; S-N, distance between sella and nasion; SNA, angle between
sella-nasion line and nasion-A line; SNB, angle between sella-nasion line and nasion-B line; ANB, angle between nasion-A line and
nasion-B line; Cd-Gn, distance between condylion and gnathion; Cd-A, distance between condylion and point A; O-M, distance
between point O and point M; O-J, distance between point O and point J (see Fig. 2).
Table 2
Stepwise multiple regression analysis for the curve of Spee*
Dependent
variable
Sp
Statistically signicant
independent variables
SE B
P-value
R2
change
Constant
O-M
S-Go/N-Me %
SNB
24.9
)0.25
0.34
)0.34
9.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.01
0.01
0.001
0.02
0.20
0.07
0.07
*Sp is the curve of Spee. B is the unstandardized regression coecient. SE B is the standard error of B.
the cusps become more and more at, the curve of Spee
is maintained throughout the years.
It has been suggested that the position of the mandibular condyle in relation to the occlusal plane has a
considerable eect on the patterns of movements of the
lower teeth when the jaws are closed. These patterns
aect the way in which food is processed during mastication (crushshear ratio). In a theoretical model, Baragar & Osborn (6) have shown that an increased
forward tilting of the posterior lower teeth (i.e. curve of
Spee more marked) is mechanically advantageous when
the J point is raised up or moved anteriorly with respect
to the dentition. The sagittal arrangement of the teeth
with the curve of Spee may represent a strategy to align
the relatively large posterior forces that occur during
mastication along the long axes of the molar and premolar teeth. Page (14) summarized a geometrical description of this concept in the tangent law.
The ndings of the present study support the hypothesis that the position of the mandibular condyle in
281
References
1. Spee FG. Die Verschiebungsbahn des Unterkiefers am Schadel.
Arch Fur Anat und Physiol Leipzieg. Verlag Veit und Comp,
1890, 285293.
2. Spee FG. The gliding path of the mandible along the skull. J
Am Dent Assoc 1980; 100: 670675.
3. Academy of Prosthodontics. Glossary of prosthodontic
terms. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 71: 50112.
4. Ramfjord SP, Ash MM. Occlusion. Philadelphia:
WB Saunders 1983.
5. Osborn JW. Relationship between the mandibular condyle and
the occlusal plane during hominid evolution: some of its effects
on jaw mechanics. Am J Phys Anthropol 1987; 73: 193207.
6. Baragar FA, Osborn JW. Efficiency as a predictor of human
jaw design in the sagittal plane. J Biomech 1987; 20: 447457.
7. Tweed CH. Clinical orthodontics. St Louis: CV Mosby, 1966.
8. Braun S, Hnat WP, Johnson BE. The curve of Spee revisited.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 110: 206210.
9. Germane N, Staggers JA, Rubenstein L, Revere JT. Arch
length considerations due to the curve of Spee: a mathematical
model. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992; 102: 251255.
10. Orthlieb JD, Slaviceck R. Geometrische interpretation der
Spee kurve. Z Stomatologie 1985; 82: 118.
11. Ghezzi F, Drago E, De Thomatis P, Zallio F. Profondita`
della curva di Spee in rapporto a FMA, FH, ANB e classe
dentale. Mondo Ortodontico 1991; 1: 7376.
12. Orthlieb JD. The curve of Spee: understanding the sagittal
organization of mandibular teeth. Cranio 1997; 15: 333340.
13. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Miani A, Colombo A, Tartaglia G.
Mathematical definition of the curve of Spee in permanent
healthy dentitions in man. Arch Oral Biol 1992; 37: 691694.
14. Page HL. The occlusal curve. Dent Digest 1952; 58: 1921.
15. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological
students. New York: Interscience Publications 1940.
16. Houston WJ. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod 1983; 83: 382390.
17. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Miani A. Statistical evaluation of
Monsons sphere in healthy permanent dentitions in man. Arch
Oral Biol 1997; 42: 365369.
18. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Poggio CE, Serrao G, Colombo A.
Three-dimensional dental arch curvature in human adolescents
and adults. Am J Orthod 1999; 115: 401405.
19. Enlow DH. Normal variations in facial form and the anatomic
basis for malocclusion. In: Enlow, DH, ed. Facial growth, 3rd
edn. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1990, 193221.
20. Osborn JW, Francis LJ. The position of the dentition in the
mandible and its possible relation to orthodontic abnormalities.
Am J Orthod 1989; 96: 327332.
21. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Nixon WL. Occlusal forces in normal- and long-face adults. J Dent Res 1981; 62: 566571.
22. Ringqvist M. Isometric bite force and its relation to dimensions of the facial skeleton. Acta Odontol Scand 1973; 31: 3542.
23. Osborn JW. Orientation of the masseter muscle and the curve
of Spee in relation to crushing forces on the molar teeth of
primates. Am J Phys Anthropol 1993; 92: 99106.