The Theoretical Framework of the Study

The Components to Measure Each Construct

The Items (Questionnaire) to Measure Each Component in a Construct

The Complete Framework in AMOS Graphic Ready for Analysis

The analysis Results Showing Standaardized Output

The analysis Results Showing Output of Regression Weights

The Text Output Indication the Significance of Relationship between Constructs

Construct

Construct

Estimate

S.E.

C.R.

Result

Charismatic Leadership

<--- Crisis Responsibility

-0.500

0.056

-8.891

***

Significant

Corporate Credibility

<--- Crisis Responsibility

-0.405

0.061

-6.672

***

Significant

Organizational Reputation <--- Crisis Responsibility

-0.223

0.044

-5.037

***

Significant

Organizational Reputation <--- Charismatic Leadership

.0533

0.082

6.479

***

Significant

Organizational Reputation <--- Corporate Credibility

0.147

0.039

3.822

***

Significant

The Text Output Explain the Effect of One Construct on the Other Construct in the Model
The probability of getting a critical ratio as large as 8.891 in absolute value is less
than 0.001. In other words, the regression weight for Crisis_Responsibility in the
prediction of Charismatic_Leadership is significantly different from zero at
the 0.001 level (two-tailed).
The probability of getting a critical ratio as large as 6.672 in absolute value is less
than 0.001. In other words, the regression weight for Crisis_Responsibility in the
prediction of Corporate_Credibility is significantly different from zero at the
0.001 level (two-tailed).

The probability of getting a critical ratio as large as 5.037 in absolute value is less
than 0.001. In other words, the regression weight for Crisis_Responsibility in the
prediction of Organizational_Reputation is significantly different from zero
at the 0.001 level (two-tailed).

The probability of getting a critical ratio as large as 6.479 in absolute value is less
than 0.001. In other words, the regression weight for Charismatic_Leadership in
the prediction of Organizational_Reputation is significantly different from
zero at the 0.001 level (two-tailed).

The probability of getting a critical ratio as large as 3.822 in absolute value is less
than 0.001. In other words, the regression weight for Corporate_Credibility in the
prediction of Organizational_Reputation is significantly different from zero
at the 0.001 level (two-tailed).