Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Octubre, 2009.
Definicin
Pavimento
Parte superior de la carretera, aeropuerto, o estructura
delrea deparqueo
Incluye todas las capas que recaen sobre elsuelo original
Consiste de todos los elementos estructurales o capas,
incluyendo arcenes
Diseo
Considerar /Desarrollar deun
planpara servir auna funcin especfica
Diseo de
Pavimentos
Anlisis de
Pavimentos
Rendimiento delPavimento
ConRespecto alaVidadeDiseo
Respuestas Estructurales
Distribucin tpica delesfuerzo bajo las cargas delas llantas
- Comportamiento del Sistema de Capas
- Todas las capas sienten parte de la carga
Efecto de profundidad
Agrietamiento Transversal
Deformacin permanente
Baches
Blowup(pandeo)
Rupturas enesquinas
Falla superficial
Bombeo
Factores deDiseo
Emprico
State-of-Practice
State-of-the-Art
MecnicoEmprico
Mecnico
Depende de la
mecnica del
comportamiento
estructural a la
carga
(Schwartz, 2001)
Empiricalvs.MechanisticBasedDesign
Wood Floor Joist Example
Mechanistic:
bending = PL allowable
4S
Empirical Rule of 2:
d in inches= (L in feet / 2) + 2
(Schwartz, 2001)
PavementDesignMethods
PavementDesignMethods Flexible
AASHTO 1993 Guide Empirical method
PavementDesignMethods
FlexibleAASHTO1993Guide
TrafficCalculation:
Cumulativeexpected18kipESAL
Axletype(single,tandem,tridem)
Axleload(2to90kips)
Terminalserviceability(pt =2,2.5,or3)
OverallstrengthofpavementstructureintermsofSN
PavementDesignMethods
FlexibleAASHTO1993Guide
22
PSI
log10
1.7
1, 094
0.4 +
( SN +1) 5.19
Typicalstressstrainanalysis
Wheel Load
HMA
t
Granular Base
Subgrade Soil
Bedrock
PavementDesignMethods
NewAASHTOMEPDG:MechanisticEmpirical
Traffic Model
Input Data
Environmental
Effects Model
Pavement
Response
Model(s)
Distress
Models
Performance
Predictions
NewAASHTOMEPDG:MechanisticEmpirical
25
TrafficMixAnalyzed
Separately
ESALs
NewAASHTOMEPDG:MechanisticEmpirical
LaboratoryCharacterizationofMaterials
DevelopmentofAxleloadSpectra
DeterminationofTemperatureandMoistureVariation
HomogenousSections
FieldForensicStudiesforCalibration
CalibrationandValidationoftheDesignMethod
AdditionalStudies
TrafficDataRequirementsforAASHTOMEPDG
Temperaturevariation
Watertable,
Saturationpercentage
Backcalculated ModulusforHMA
andGranularbases,soil,
Fullcharacterizationofsoil
materials:
CaliforniaBearingRatio(CBR)
DynamicConePenetrometer
(DCP),
Additional Testing
log( E*) = +
p
= aT a N a
r
2
1
N f = k1
t
1 + e + (log t r )
k2
1
E
k3
Hot-mix asphalt
Laboratory testing for HMA
Air voids percentage
Asphalt content
Aggregate gradation
Volumetric properties
Aggregate
Flat and elongated particles
Un-compacted voids in the fine
aggregate
Percentage of crushed faces
Cleanliness
Toughness: Los Angeles Abrasion
Surface Texture
Bulk Specific Gravity and absortion
Binder
PG Grade
Granular
materials
Cleanliness
Proctor Modified
CBR
Gradation
Durability
Soils
Soil Classification
Plastic Index
Constituve Model
M r = k1 pa
Pa
a+
Saturation correction
Fenv = 10
k2
oct
+ 1
Pa
k3
ba
b
1+ EXP ln + k m S S opt
a
HMA Fatigue
HMA Rutting
Unbound materials
Rutting
Subgrade Rutting
1
N f = f 1 k1
t
k2
1
E
p
= r1aT a N a
r
2
0
a ( N ) = x e
r
RDSG
k3
1 e k *hbedrock
=
k
vh
* p , z = 0
TASKB:LaboratoryCharacterizationofMaterials
1. SAMPLE PLAN
30 field projects for new construction
30 overlay projects
HMA samples/section: 15 buckets
Granular base materials/section: 15 buckets
Soil: 10 buckets/section
Typical Sampling Section
Questions
39