Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Mirpuri v. CA

    Uploaded by

    francessantos
    7 views1 page
    This case involves a dispute over a patent. The petitioner Pribhdas J. Mirpuri filed a petition for review of a Court of Appeals decision regarding a patent he obtained. The Court of Appeals had affirmed the Director of Patents' ruling that revoked Mirpuri's patent for a hair treatment product called Barbizone. The Supreme Court must now determine if the Court of Appeals and Director of Patents erred in their rulings.

    Original Description:

    Digest

    Original Title

    048. Mirpuri v. CA

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This case involves a dispute over a patent. The petitioner Pribhdas J. Mirpuri filed a petition for review of a Court of Appeals decision regarding a patent he obtained. The Court of Appeals had affirmed the Director of Patents' ruling that revoked Mirpuri's patent for a hair treatment product called Barbizone. The Supreme Court must now determine if the Court of Appeals and Director of Patents erred in their rulings.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views1 page

    Mirpuri v. CA

    Uploaded by

    francessantos
    This case involves a dispute over a patent. The petitioner Pribhdas J. Mirpuri filed a petition for review of a Court of Appeals decision regarding a patent he obtained. The Court of Appeals had affirmed the Director of Patents' ruling that revoked Mirpuri's patent for a hair treatment product called Barbizone. The Supreme Court must now determine if the Court of Appeals and Director of Patents erred in their rulings.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    G.R. No.

    114508

    November 19, 1999

    PUNO, J.:

    PRIBHDAS J. MIRPURI, petitioner, vs.


    COURT OF APPEALS, DIRECTOR OF PATENTS and the BARBIZON
    CORPORATION, respondents.

    You might also like