Professional Documents
Culture Documents
43.1
(a)
F=
q2
(1.60 10 19 )2 (8.99 10 9 )
=
N = 0.921 10 9 N
(5.00 10 10 )2
4 e0 r 2
(b)
U=
q2
(1.60 10 19 )2 (8.99 10 9 )
=
J 2.88 eV
4 e0 r
5.00 10 10
*43.2
We are told
K + C l + 0.7 eV K + + C l
and
C l + e C l + 3.6 eV
or
C l C l + e 3.6 eV
By substitution,
K + C l + 0.7 eV K + + C l + e 3.6 eV
K + 4.3 eV K + + e
43.3
(a)
(b)
E=U
r=
2A
r0 =
B
16
A
B
1
=
r = r0= 0
2
2
2A B
4
4A B
1 B2
B2
=
2 A
4A
This is also the equal to the binding energy, the amount of energy given up by the two atoms
as they come together to form a molecule.
(c)
(1.488 10
E=
4(0.124 10
60
*43.4
eV m 6
120
16
= 7.42 10 11 m = 74.2 pm
eV m12
= 4.46 eV
kBT 10 3 eV = 10 3 1.6 10 19 J
T
1.6 10 22 J
1.38 10 23 J K
~10 K
43.5
m1m2
132.9(126.9)
=
1.66 10 27 kg = 1.08 10 25 kg
m1 + m2 132.9 + 126.9
(I )2 J(J + 1)h2
E = 21 I 2 =
=
2I
2I
J = 0 gives E = 0
J = 1 gives E =
h2
(6.626 10 34 J s)2
=
= 6.41 10 24 J = 40.0 eV
I
4 2 (1.74 10 45 kg m 2 )
h f = 6.41 10 24 J 0
(b)
43.6
f=
to
E1 h2
h
=
=
r 2
h h I 4 2 r 2
h f = E =
f = 9.66 10 9 Hz
If r is 10% too small, f is 20% too large.
h2
h2
h2
2( 2 + 1)] [1(1 + 1)] =
( 4)
[
2I
2I
2I
4( h 2 )
h
6.626 10 34 J s
I=
=
=
= 1.46 10 46 kg m 2
2h f
2 2 f 2 2 2.30 1011 Hz
2
43.7
For the HCl molecule in the J = 1 rotational energy level, we are given
r 0 = 0.1275 nm.
Erot =
h2
J(J + 1)
2I
h2 1 2
= 2 I
I
or
2h2
h
= 2
2
I
I
mm 2
2
I = r0 = 1 2 r0
m1 + m2
(1 u)(35 u) 2
I=
r 0 = (0.972 u)(1.66 10 27 kg / u)(1.275 10 10 m)2 = 2.62 10 47 kg m 2
1 u + 35 u
Therefore,
= 2
h
1.055 10 34 J s
= 2
= 5.69 1012 rad / s
I
2.62 10 47 kg m 2
Goal Solution
An HCl molecule is excited to its first rotational-energy level, corresponding to J = 1. If the distance
between its nuclei is 0.127 5 nm, what is the angular speed of the molecule about its center of mass?
G: For a system as small as a molecule, we can expect the angular speed to be much faster than the few
rad/s typical of everyday objects we encounter.
O: The rotational energy is given by the angular momentum quantum number, J . The angular speed
can be calculated from this kinetic rotational energy and the moment of inertia of this onedimensional molecule.
A : For the HCl molecule in the J = 1 rotational energy level, we are given r0 = 0.1275 nm.
Erot =
h
J ( J + 1)
2I
so with J = 1,
Erot =
h2 1 2
= I
2
I
and
2h2 h 2
=
I
I2
mm
(1 u)(35 u) 2
I = r0 2 = 1 2 r0 2 =
r0
m1 + m2
1 u + 35 u
Therefore,
L : This angular speed is more than a billion times faster than the spin rate of a music CD, which rotates
at 200 to 500 revolutions per minute, or = 20 rad / s to 50 rad / s.
2
Then
r1 =
Also,
r2 =
I = m1
43.9
I = m1r 1 + m2 r 2
43.8
(a)
m2 r 2
m2 r 2
so
m1
m1r 1
m2 m12 r 2
+ r2 = r
m1
r1 +
Thus,
m2
m22 r 2
m1r 1 = m2 r 2
where
(m1 + m2 )2 (m1 + m2 )2
m1r 1
m2
m1m2 r 2 ( m2 + m1 )
(m1 + m2 )2
r1 + r 2 = r
and
r2 =
m1r
m1 + m2
and
r1 =
m2 r
m1 + m2
m1m2 r 2
= r2
m1 + m2
22.99( 35.45)
1.66 10 27 kg = 2.32 10 26 kg
(22.99 + 35.45)
)(
I = r 2 = 2.32 10 26 kg 0.280 10 9 m
(b)
=r
and
1.81 10 45 kg m 2
h2
3h2 h2 2h2
2h 2
hc h2
=
2( 2 + 1) 1(1 + 1) =
=
=
2I
2I
I
I
I
4 2 I
( )
43.10
number of the higher energy state (see Equation 43.7). We do not know J from the data.
However,
)(
hc
1 eV
E =
=
19
1.60 10
J
For each observed wavelength,
(mm )
0.1204
0.0964
0.0804
0.0690
0.0604
E (eV )
0.01032
0.01288
0.01544
0.01800
0.02056
1.055 10 34 J s
h2
I=
=
E1
(0.00256 eV)
and
1 eV
= 2.72 10 47 kg m 2
19
1.60 10
J
43.11
(a)
2.72 10 47
m = 0.130 nm
1.62 10 27
k
= 1.055 10 34
480
= 5.74 10 20 J = 0.358 eV
1.61 10 27
(b)
I
=
m1m2
35
=
1.66 10 27 kg = 1.61 10 27 kg
m1 + m2 36
E vib = h
43.12
r=
= 21 h f : A =
For HF,
hf
(6.626 10 34 J s)(6.69 1013 / s)
=
= 1.18 10 11 m = 0.0118 nm
320 N / m
k
A=
43.13
(a)
(b)
kg = 1.33 10 26 kg
I = r 2 = 1.33 10 26 kg 1.20 10 10 m
)(
(
(
J) J(J + 1)
Thus
E rot = 2.91 10 23
And for J = 0, 1, 2,
k
1
1
1.055 10 34 J s
E vib = v + h
= v+
2
2
1177 N / m
8(1.66 10 27 kg)
1
1 eV
= v+
3.14 10 20 J
19
2
1.60 10
J
For v = 0, 1, 2,
= 1.91 10 46 kg m 2
E rot
1.055 10 34 J s
h2
=
J ( J + 1) =
J ( J + 1)
2I
2 1.91 10 46 kg m 2
E vib = v +
43.14
1
(0.196 eV)
2
In Benzene, the carbon atoms are each 0.110 nm from the axis and each hydrogen atom is
(0.110 + 0.100 nm) = 0.210 nm from the axis. Thus, I = mr 2 :
)(
I = 6 1.99 10 26 kg 0.110 10 9 m
)(
(
(
1.055 10 34 J s
h2
=
J ( J + 1) =
J ( J + 1) = 2.95 10 24 J J ( J + 1) = 18.4 10 6 eV J ( J + 1)
2I
2 1.89 10 45 kg m 2
Erot
Erot =
(18.4 eV) J ( J + 1)
hf =
h2
J
4 2 I
where J = 0, 1, 2, 3, . . .
43.15
*43.16
The emission energies are the same as the absorption energies, but the final state must be
below ( v = 1, J = 0) . The transition must satisfy J = 1, so it must end with J = 1. To be
lower in energy, it must be ( v = 0, J = 1) . The emitted photon energy is therefore
hf photon = E vib
+ E rot
v=1
J = 0
+ E rot
E vib
v=0
J = 1
= E vib
E vib
E rot
v=1
v = 0
J =1
E rot
J = 0
*43.17
I x = 25 mr 2 + 25 mr 2 = 54 m 2.00 10 15 m
m
R
R
+m
=
2.00 10 10 m
2
2
2
The allowed rotational energies are E rot = h2 2I J ( J + 1) , so the energy of the first excited state
is E1 = h I . The ratio is therefore
2
E1, x
E1, y
*43.18
(h I ) = I
=
(h I ) I
2
(
(
) = (10 )
)
2
1
m 2.00 10 10 m
2
4
m 2.00 10 15 m
5
5
8
5 2
= 6.25 10 9
10 4 m
9
0.261 10 m
(10
~ 1017
10 4 m
m
9
0.261 10 m
~ 10 5 m 3
ke e 2
1
(1.60 10 19 )2
1
= 1.25 10 18 J = 7.84 eV
1
= (1.7476)(8.99 10 9 )
1
9
m
8
r0
(0.281 10 )
43.19
U=
43.20
Visualize a K+ ion at the center of each shaded cube, a C l ion at the center of each white one.
The distance ab is
Distance ac is
Distance ad is
43.21
U=
ke e 2 ke e 2 ke e 2 ke e 2 ke e 2 ke e 2 ke e 2 ke e 2
2k e 2
1 1 1
+
+
+
+
... = e
1 + + . . .
2 3 4
r
r
2r
2r
3r
3r
4r
4r
r
But,
ln(1 + x ) = 1
so,
U=
EF =
43.22
x2 x3 x4
+
+ ...
2
3
4
2ke e 2
ln 2,
r
h 2 3ne
2m 8
23
or
U = ke
e2
r
where = 2 ln 2
(6.625 10 34 J s)2
23 23
=
(3 / 8 ) n
31
19
2(9.11
10
kg)(1.60
10
J
/
eV)
43.23
8 2 mEF
ne =
3 h2
or
3/2
EF =
h 2 3ne
2m 8
31
kg)(5.48)(1.60 10 19 J)
8 2(9.11 10
=
3
(6.626 10 34 J s)3
23
3/2
= 5.80 10 28 m -3
1 atom
1u
nAg = 10.6 10 3 kg / m 3
= 5.91 10 28 m -3
27
kg
108 u 1.66 10
5.80
= 0.981 electron to the conduction band
5.91
43.24
(a)
1 mv 2
2
v=
(b)
= 7.05 eV
1
40
eV .
43.25
(a)
ne =
)(
*43.26
(b)
h 2 3ne 2
EF =
2m 8
(c)
vF =
2E F
m
(6.626 10
=
2 (9.11 10
34
2 5.05 10 19 J
9.11 10
31
kg
31
)=
) 3 (2.54 10
8
kg )
Js
28
m 3
2 3
= 5.05 10 19 J = 3.15 eV
1.05 106 m s
The melting point of silver is 1234 K. Its Fermi energy at 300 K is 5.48 eV. The approximate
fraction of electrons excited is
1.38 10 23 J K (1234 K )
kBT
=
2%
EF
( 5.48 eV) 1.60 10 19 J eV
43.27
E EF )
f = e(
e(
E EF ) k B T
kBT
+1
= 0.950
E EF
= ln(0.0526) = 2.94
kBT
E EF = 2.94
(1.38 10 23 )(800) J
= 0.203 eV
1.60 10 19 J / eV
or
E = 5.28 eV
Goal Solution
Calculate the energy of a conduction electron in silver at 800 K if the probability of finding an electron i n
that state is 0.950. The Fermi energy is 5.48 eV at this temperature.
G:
Since there is a 95% probability of finding the electron in this state, its energy should be slightly less
than the Fermi energy, as indicated by the graph in Figure 43.21.
O:
The electron energy can be found from the Fermi-Dirac distribution function.
A:
Taking EF = 5.48 eV for silver at 800 K, and given f (E) = 0.950, we find
f (E) =
1
= 0.950
EEF ) k BT
(
e
+1
E EF
= ln(0.05263) = 2.944
kBT
or
e( EEF )
so
k BT
1
1 = 0.05263
0.950
As expected, the energy of the electron is slightly less than the Fermi energy, which is about 5 eV for
most metals. There is very little probability of finding an electron significantly above the Fermi
energy in a metal.
43.28
d = 1.00 mm ,
V = 1.00 10 3 m
so
g(E) = CE 1
g (E) =
or
= 1.00 10 9 m 3
8 2 m3
h3
E1
8 2 9.11 10 31 kg
(6.626 10
34
Js
3 2
( 4.00 eV)(1.60 10 19
J eV
43.29
Eav = 1
ne
EN (E) dE
At T = 0,
Since f (E) = 1 for E < E F and f (E) = 0 for E > E F , we can take
N(E) = CE1/2
Eav =
1
ne
EF
CE 3/2 dE =
C
ne
EF
E 3 2 dE =
2C 5
E
5ne
C 3 3/2
= EF
, so that
ne 2
Eav =
3
2 3 3/2 5/2
E
EF
E
=
5 2 F
F
5
43.30
Therefore,
Similarly,
= A sin
From
sin kxL = 0
sin kyL = 0
sin kzL = 0
and
and
and
k xL = , 2 , 3 , . . .
k yL = , 2 , 3 , . . .
kzL = , 2 , 3 , . . .
ny y
nx x
nz z
sin
sin
L
L
L
d 2 d 2 d 2 2me
+
+ 2 = 2 (U E) ,
dx 2 dy 2
dz
h
n2 2 ny2 2 n2 2
2me
x
z
2 2 2 = 2 (E)
L
L
L
h
E=
h2 2 2
(nx + ny2 + nz2 )
2me L2
nx , ny , nz = 1, 2, 3, . . .
43.31
(a)
3h2 2
2me L2
g(E) = CE 1
g(8.50 eV ) C (8.50)
=
g(7.00 eV ) C (7.00) 1
2
1 2
(b)
From Eq. 43.22, the number of occupied states having energy E is N (E) =
= 1.10
CE 1
( EEF ) kBT
e(7.00 7.00 )
8.50 7.00
)
e(
N (8.50 eV ) (8.50)
=
N (7.00 eV ) (7.00) 1
N (8.50 eV ) (8.50)
=
N (7.00 eV ) (7.00) 1
And
N (8.50 eV )
= 1.55 10 25
N (7.00 eV )
1 2
2
1 2
2
+1
kBT
kBT
+ 1
+ 1
2.00
(1.50 ) 0.0259
+ 1
e
Comparing this result with that from part (a), we conclude that very few states with E > EF are
occupied.
43.32
(a)
Eg = 1.14 eV for Si
h f = 1.14 eV = (1.14 eV)(1.60 10 19 J/eV) = 1.82 10 19 J
(b)
c = f;
c 3.00 108 m / s
=
= 1.09 10 6 m = 1.09 m
f
2.75 1014 Hz
so
f 2.75 1014 Hz
Photons of energy greater than 2.42 eV will be absorbed. This means wavelength shorter than
43.33
All the hydrogen Balmer lines except for the red line at 656 nm will be absorbed.
650 10 9 m
43.34
Eg =
43.35
hc
max
(6.626 10
=
34
)(
J s 3.00 108 m s
1 eV
= 1.24 eV
6
19
1.60 10
1.00 10 m
J
Thus, the energy gap for the collector material should be Eg 1.24 eV .
Since Si has an
energy gap Eg 1.14 eV , it will absorb radiation of this energy and greater.
Therefore,
Since most photovoltaic solar cells are made of silicon, this semiconductor seems to be an
appropriate material for these devices.
O:
To absorb the longest-wavelength photons, the energy gap should be no larger than the photon
energy.
A:
)(
hc
1 eV
= 1.24 eV
hf =
=
-6
-19
1.60 10 J
10 m
Therefore, the energy gap in the absorbing material should be smaller than 1.24 eV.
L:
So silicon, with gap of 1.14 eV < 1.24 eV, is an appropriate material for absorbing solar radiation.
*43.36
If the photon energy is 5.5 eV or higher, the diamond window will absorb. Here,
(h f )max =
hc
= 5.50 eV :
min
min
)(
I = I 0 e e ( V )
43.37
kBT
1 Thus, e e ( V )
and
V =
At T = 300 K ,
V =
kBT
= 1 + I I0
kBT
ln(1 + I I 0 )
e
(1.38 10
J K ( 300 K )
23
1.60 10 19 C
I
I
ln 1 + = ( 25.9 mV ) ln 1 +
I0
I0
(a)
If
I = 9.00I 0 ,
(b)
If
The basic idea behind a semiconductor device is that a large current or charge can be
controlled by a small control voltage.
43.38
First, we evaluate I 0 in I = I 0 e e ( V )
*43.39
T = 300 K .
(
(
kBT
1.60 10 19 C (0.100 V )
e( V )
=
= 3.86 so
kBT
1.38 10 23 J K ( 300 K )
If V = 100 mV,
I = I 0 e e ( V )
43.40
(a)
(b)
kBT
I0 =
e ( V ) k B T
200 mA
= 4.28 mA
e 3.86 1
e( V )
= 3.86 ; and the current will be
kBT
N 0I
l
or
NI =
Bl (0.540 T)(2.50 10 2 m)
=
= 10.7 kA
0
(4 10 7 ) T m / A
43.41
I
B
B
=L
=A
.
t
t
t
Thus,
I =
A( B) (0.0100 m ) (0.0200 T )
=
= 203 A
L
3.10 10 8 H
2
The direction of the induced current is such as to maintain the B field through the ring.
Goal Solution
Determine the current generated in a superconducting ring of niobium metal 2.00 cm in diameter if a
0.0200-T magnetic field in a direction perpendicular to the ring is suddenly decreased to zero. The
inductance of the ring is 3.10 10-8 H.
G: The resistance of a superconductor is zero, so the current is limited only by the change in magnetic
flux and self-inductance. Therefore, unusually large currents (greater than 100 A) are possible.
O: The change in magnetic field through the ring will induce an emf according to Faradays law of
induction. Since we do not know how fast the magnetic field is changing, we must use the rings
inductance and the geometry of the ring to calculate the magnetic flux, which can then be used to find
the current.
A : From Faraday's law (Eq. 31.1), we have
I
B
B
=A
=L
t
t
t
or
I =
AB (0.0100 m ) (0.0200 T )
=
= 203 A
L
3.10 10 8 H
2
The current is directed so as to produce its own magnetic field in the direction of the original field.
L : This induced current should remain constant as long as the ring is superconducting. If the ring failed
to be a superconductor (e.g. if it warmed above the critical temperature), the metal would have a nonzero resistance, and the current would quickly drop to zero. It is interesting to note that we were able
to calculate the current in the ring without knowing the emf. In order to calculate the emf, we would
need to know how quickly the magnetic field goes to zero.
43.42
(a)
V = IR
If R = 0, then V = 0, even when I 0.
(b)
1
I
(155 57.8) mA = 43.1 1
=
=
R V ( 3.61 1.356) mV
R = 0.0232
(c)
Expulsion of magnetic flux and therefore fewer current-carrying paths could explain the
decrease in current.
*43.43 (a)
Since the interatomic potential is the same for both molecules, the spring constant is the
same.
Then f =
1
2
12 =
where
and 14 =
Therefore,
f 14 =
(b)
1
2
1
k
=
14 2
12
k 12
= f 12
= 6.42 1013 Hz
12 14
14
6.86 u
= 6.15 1013 Hz
7.47 u
I12
12
12
I14 =
(c)
7.47 u
1.46 10 46 kg m 2 = 1.59 10 46 kg m 2
6.86 u
The molecule can move to the ( v = 1, J = 9) state or to the ( v = 1, J = 11) state. The energy it
can absorb is either
or
E =
hc
h2
h2
1
= 1 + 21 h f 14 + 9(9 + 1)
0 + 2 h f 14 + 10(10 + 1)
,
2I14
2I14
E =
2
hc
h2
1 h f + 10(10 + 1) h .
= 1 + 21 h f 14 + 11(11 + 1)
0
+
14
2
2I14
2I14
(
(
These are:
c
c
or =
f 14 10h ( 2 I14 )
f 14 + 11h ( 2 I14 )
3.00 108 m s
6.15 1013 Hz
and
10 1.055 10 34 J s
2 1.59 10 46 kg m 2
3.00 108 m s
6.15 1013 Hz +
11 1.055 10 34 J s
2 1.59 10 46 kg m 2
= 4.96 m
)
= 4.79 m
43.44
For a rotational state sufficient to allow a transition to the first exited vibrational state,
h2
J(J + 1) = h
2I
Thus
43.45
J = 37
Emax = 4.5 eV = v + h
2
8.25 > 7.5
J(J + 1) =
so
so
v+
34
14 1
2
J s)(8.28 10 s )
(1.055 10
v=7
43.46
With 4 van der Waal bonds per atom pair or 2 electrons per atom, the total energy of the solid
is
6.02 10 23 atoms
E = 2(1.74 10 23 J / atom)
= 5.23 J/g
4.00 g
43.47
U total =
ke e 2
B
+ m
r
r
The total potential energy has its minimum value U 0 at the equilibrium spacing, r = r 0 . At
this point,
dU dr
r = r0
= 0,
dU
dr
or
*43.48
r = r0
k e2
d
B
e + m
dr
r
r
=
r = r0
ke e 2
2
r0
mB
m+1
r0
=0
ke e 2 m 1
r
m 0
Thus,
B=
U0 =
ke e 2
k e2 m 1 1
1
k e2
+ e r0 m = e
1
r
m
r0
m
r
0
0
*43.49 (a)
For equilibrium,
dU
= 0:
dx
d
Ax 3 Bx 1 = 3Ax 4 + Bx 2 = 0
dx
2
x describes one equilibrium position, but the stable equilibrium position is at 3Ax0 = B.
(b)
3 0.150 eV nm 3
3A
=
B
x0 =
0.350 nm
U0 = U x = x =
U0 = U x = x =
0
(c)
3.68 eV nm
)=
Fx =
2B 3 2
3 2 1
3
A
2 ( 3.68 eV nm )
33
3 2
0.150 eV nm 3
1 2
A B
AB 3 2
=
x03 x0 3 3 2 A 3
dU
= 3Ax 4 Bx 2
dx
(a)
BB 1 2
31 2A1
= 7.02 eV
dFx
dx
43.50
x = x0
xm =
so that
6A
B
Fmax = 3A
or
Fmax = 7.52
=0
1 2
B2
(3.68 eV nm)
B
B
=
B
=
6A
6A
12A
12 0.150 eV nm 3
Then
For equilibrium,
=0
x = xm
eV 1.60 10 19 J 1 nm
9
9 = 1.20 10 N = 1.20 nN
nm
1 eV
10 m
dU
= 0:
dx
d
Ax 3 Bx 1 = 3Ax 4 + Bx 2 = 0
dx
3Ax0 = B
or
x0 = 3A B
(b)
(c)
Fx =
U0 = U x = x =
0
A B
AB 3 2
= 3 2 3
3
x0 x0 3
A
BB 1 2
3 A1
1 2
= 2
B3
27A
dU
= 3Ax 4 Bx 2
dx
x = xm
= 12Ax 5 + 2Bx 3
x = x0
=0
then
Fmax = 3A
B2
B
B
=
B
6A
6A
12A
*43.51 (a)
dU
dr
At equilibrium separation, r = re ,
r = re
a( r e r 0 ) a( r e r 0 )
= 2aB e
1 e
=0
a r e r 0
or
re = r 0
(b)
(c)
( )
U (r ) U r 0 +
dU
dr
(r r 0 ) + 21 ddrU2
2
r = r0
r = r0
(r r 0 )
2( r r 0 )
( r r 0 ) 2( r r 0 )
U (r ) 0 + 0 + 21 ( 2Ba)ae
ae
1
r r0
e
r = r
1 kx 2
2
= 21 k r r 0
k = 2Ba2
f=
) = 1,
1 h
2
1
2
Ba2 r r 0
a
k
=
2
2B
a
=
B
2
ha B
= 21 h f =
8
ha B
8
43.52
T=0
E / EF
0
0.500
0.600
0.700
0.800
0.900
1.00
1.10
1.20
1.30
E TF
1
EF T
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
0
+
+
+
+
1.40
1.50
e +
f (E)
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
T = 0.1T F
T = 0.2T F
E TF
1
EF T
E TF
1
EF T
e
e
e
e
e
e
10.0
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
0.00
4.00
0.00
e 5.00
0.500
0.00
0.00
0.00
f (E)
1.000
0.993
0.982
0.953
0.881
0.731
e
e
e
e
e
e
5.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.500
0.500
1.00
1.50
0.0180
2.00
0.00669
e 2.50
0.500
0.269
0.119
0.0474
T = 0.5T F
f (E)
0.993
0.924
0.881
0.818
0.731
0.622
E TF
1
EF T
e
e
e
e
e
e
2.00
1.00
0.800
0.600
0.400
0.200
0.200
0.400
0.600
0.119
0.800
0.0759
e1.00
0.500
0.378
0.269
0.182
f (E)
0.881
0.731
0.690
0.646
0.599
0.550
0.500
0.450
0.401
0.354
0.310
0.269
43.53
(a)
3 r 0 to
U = 6 +
= 2.13 e
r0
2
3 r0
(b)
or
U =
ke e 2
with = 2.13
r0
The fourth term consists of 6 Na+ at distance r = 2r0 . Thus, to four terms,
U = ( 2.13 + 3)
k e2
ke e 2
= 0.866 e
r0
r0
So we see that the electrostatic potential energy is not even attractive to 4 terms, and that the
infinite series does not converge rapidly when groups of atoms corresponding to nearest
neighbors, next-nearest neighbors, etc. are added together.