vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
ow that Legere pokes fun at Sprint's network all the time.
What I don't understand is, Sprint's network looks good on paper. While we're ch
eering each additional 700A acquisition, Sprint already has low-band 800MHz acro
ss the country which oughta deal with coverage issues. And while AT&T and Verizo
n scrambled for high-capacity spectrum in the AWS-3 auction, Sprint has lots of
2.5GHz spectrum that ought to be able to handle lots of capacity in high-density
areas. But why isn't this translating into a good network in reality, whereas T
-Mobile's not-as-good-on-paper assets seem to be doing better? Or, in other word
s, where did things go wrong for Sprint?
67 commentsshare