Filing # 47447766 E-Filed 10/11/2016 10:22:57 AM.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND
FOR DIXIE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 14-201-CF
vs.
TERRY GEORGE TRUSSELL,
Defendant.
/
STATE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SET BAIL PENDING APPEAL
COMES NOW the State and files this Response to Defendant’s Motion to Set
Bail Pending Appeal. The State objects to the setting of bail on the following grounds:
1. The criteria for setting of bail is set forth in Younghans v. State, 90 So.2d 308
(Fla.1986). The criteria in Younghans are as follows.
a. Whether the appeal is taken for delay or in good faith on grounds not
frivolous but fairly debatable.
b. The habits of the individual regarding respect for law.
c. Local attachments to the community by way of family ties, business or
investment
d. The severity of the sentence imposed and circumstances relevant to the
question of whether the defendant would remove himself from the
jurisdiction of the court.
2. As to the good faith, not frivolous, fairly debatable standard under above
paragraph (1)(a), the grounds are unknown at this time as the defendant has
not filed any assignments of error or stated any grounds for appeal
Electronically Filed Dixle Case # 14000201CFAXM® 10/11/2016 10:22:67 AM3. As to the Defendant's respect for law, the State is prepared to provide the
Court with several reasons that show the Defendant has utter disregard and
respect for the law and the Court. This includes but is not limited to the
following:
a. The Defendant was present in the courtroom on October 9, 2014 for
his arraignment. When his name was called he stood and stated to the
Court he was there to speak on behalf of the Defendant Terry Trussell.
When asked by the Court if he was Terry Trussell he answered, “He
was a natural born American citizen.” Trussell was told by the Court to
sit down. Trussell's name was called three more times by Judge
Hankinson, Judge Hankinson asked if the Defendant's bondsman had
been notified and the Clerk advised in the affirmative. Judge
Hankinson issued a capias and estreated the bail, recessed court and
left the courtroom. After the Judge left the courtroom the deputies took
Trussell into custody. Trussell stated, but | am here. Neither the Court
nor the State Attorney's Office knew Terry Trussell at that time.
Because of the lack of respect and contempt for the Court his
arraignment was unnecessarily delayed until October 30, 2014. The
Defendant failed to present himself to the Court's jurisdiction as like-
minded individuals do not recognize the authority of our Courts.
The Defendant tried to represent himself (Pro Se) for a time and
after his case was set for trial the Defendant retained attorney Stephen
Crawford on March 17, 2015. Attorney Crawford immediately filed amotion to continue which the State in good faith could not oppose.
However, on June 24, 2015 Stephen Crawford was discharged by
Terry Trussell after getting the continuance and Trussell retained his
current attorney Inger Garcia. Eventually, Trussell was granted a
second continuance at the request of attomey Garcia.
Therefore, as to the foregoing the Defendant has caused
unnecessary delay and demonstrated a total lack of respect for the
Court.
. Continuing with Defendant's respect for law, by his own actions and
conduct the Defendant failed to follow the Court's instruction as to the
role of the statutory Grand Jury. The Chief Judge of the Third Circuit
made himself available to the statutory Grand Jury. It was clear from
testimony at trial that the only person on the statutory Grand Jury
having any issue was the Defendant. When he could not get his way
the Defendant declared the statutory Grand Jury null and void. He
purported to recuse the Chief Judge from involvement with the
statutory Grand Jury and disqualify the State Attorney. Moreover, he
attempted to have the State Attorney arrested and jailed. All the while
the Defendant was violating the long held rules for Grand Jury
operation
Further, the Defendant showed total disrespect for the Court and the
integrity of the judicial process at his sentencing. The State is
attaching a video of his entrance into the courtroom on July 22, 2016(Attachment “A"). The Defendant appeared to be disabled to the point
a bailiff had to assist him into the courtroom and Trussell had to hold
the jury box railing to get to counsel table. Further, the Defendant
made a big issue of being unable to stand because of his weakness
and frailty, thus he was allowed to testify at sentencing from his seat.
Testimony was taken from Sheriff Hatcher that the Defendant was
doing just fine in custody. The State is attaching two additional videos,
one being Attachment “B" which is a twenty-four hour surveillance tape
taken in the Dixie County Jail on July 25, 2016 which was two days
after Trussell’s charade in court on July 22, 2016. This video shows
the Defendant exercising by walking up and down the stairs in his jail
pod no less than eleven times in succession. Many times the
Defendant is up and down the stairs without holding the stair rail. It is
the State's position that the Defendant was putting on an act for
courtroom spectators at his sentencing. Thus demonstrating his total
disrespect for the Court and the laws of our land. Attachment “C’
depicts the Defendant eating breakfast and getting several glasses of
drink during breakfast. This conflicts with his testimony at sentencing
about being dehydrated and his veins collapsing. Again this shows his
lack of respect for the Court and the law. The Court should also take
note of how the Defendant seemed to forget about his feigned
disability as he spoke about what a great American he was. The
Defendant seemed to get stronger the more he talked about himself,Additionally, the Court should take note from the actual trial of how
the Defendant seemed to be able to easily answer the questions
posed to him by his attorney but could not understand the simplest
questions asked by the State. This is further evidence of his contempt
and lack of respect for our system of law.
4. As to the Defendant's attachment to the community by way of family ties,
business or investment; the Defendant has no family in Florida. His only
daughter does not reside in Florida. He has no business in Florida and as
best is known he has invested in approximately five acres in Dixie County
which if called upon FDLE Agent Frank Linton would testify is unimproved
and apparently abandoned. “Agent Linton would also testify that while on
bond the Defendant lived in a motor home and left the five acre Dixie County
property.
5. The Defendant was sentenced to 8 % years which his attorney says is
tantamount to’a life sentence. If this is correct the Defendant would have
every reason to get in his motor home and leave this jurisdiction. Letters
were received and comments made on social media that would indicate the
Defendant has resources and supporters from all over the country. It would
be relatively easy for the Defendant to hide out with like-minded people and
live below the radar for the rest of his life. FDLE Agent Frank Linton would
testify that like-minded people have been known to hide bonded defendants
even with electronic monitoring in locations in the western United States
where law enforcement does not have access.Further, should a hearing be held the State would offer testimony from the
bondsman who posted Trussell’s pretrial bail that on two occasions the
Defendant left Dixie County without notifying his bondsman. The Defendant
moved to Gilchrist County without notifying his bondsman and the Defendant
himself testified that he relocated to Fort Lauderdale to be near his attorney
for pretrial preparation. Trussell's bondsman would testify that again he was
never notified of this move. Since the Defendant was at one time in the bail
bond business this is further evidence of his lack of respect for the law and
the justice system
WHEREFORE, in light of the foregoing the State requests that bail be denied for
the reasons stated or that a hearing be set to allow the State to prove the allegations as
to the standards set out in Younghans v. State.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ William N. Meggs
WILLIAM N. MEGGS
Assigned State Attorney
Leon County Courthouse
301 S. Monroe Street
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2550
(850) 606-6000
FL Bar No: 224545,
a02_leon@leoncountyfl.gov
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
| HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been
furnished via electronic mail to Inger M. Garcia, Esquire, 4839 Volunteer Road, #514,
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33330, attorney@ingergarcia.com and by U.S. Mail this the 11th day
of October, 2016
{s/ William N. Megs
WILLIAM N. MEGGS
Assigned State AttorneySTATE VS. TERRY TRUSSELL
DIXIE COUNTY CASE #14-201CF
Attachment “A” - July 22, 2016
Viewing starts at beginning of CD
Attachment “B”
34:44 — 35:42
36:26 - 37:26
39:29 — 40:30
41:16 - 42:16
43:00 - 43:56
44:39 — 45:48,
46:23 - 47:12
47:53 - 48:50
49: 31 - 50:27
51:30 - 52:22
52:57 - 53:44
- July 25, 2016
Attachment
09:54 - 10:40
14:25 — 14:52
19:45 — 20:08
28:00 - 29:00
- July 24, 2016