Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Capa PDF
Capa PDF
Table of Contents
Regulatory Expectations
CAPA as part of the Pharmaceutical Quality System (ICH Q10)
Integrated Quality Management
Corrective Action
Preventive Action
CAPA Process
CAPA Challenges
FDA 483 Observations Citations
CAPA Management Software
Example
Summary and Conclusion
Regulatory Expectations
ICH Q10 <Pharmaceutical Quality System>
The pharmaceutical company should have a system for
implementing corrective actions and preventive actions
resulting from the investigation of complaints, product rejections,
non- conformances, recalls, deviations, audits, regulatory
inspections and findings, and trends from process performance and
product quality monitoring. A structured approach to the
investigation process should be used with the objective of
determining the root cause. The level of effort, formality, and
documentation of the investigation should be commensurate with
the level of risk, in line with ICH Q9 <Quality Risk Management>.
CAPA methodology should result in product and process
improvements and enhanced product and process
understanding.
Quality and GMP 2010
June 7-9 and
June 14/15, 2010,
Integrated Quality
Management
Solutions
Triggers
Non-conformity
(deviation, OOS)
CAPA
Complaint
Risk
Assessment
Audit Finding
Document
Control
Change
Control
Trending, Quality
Review
Training
Recall
Corrective Action
Corrective action is aiming to correct an existing non-conformity
and to avoid reoccurrence of the same non-conformity.
Corrective action may arise e.g. from manufacturing deviations,
OOS investigations, complaints, audit findings, recalls.
A systematic investigation should be performed to determine the
reason(s) for the non-conformities and to agree upon appropriate
corrective action.
Agreed corrective actions should be closely followed-up and
monitored until their completion.
In the frame of the management review, management should be
notified about the costs and impact of failure including the respective
corrective actions.
Preventive Action
Preventive action is aiming to avoid the initial occurrence of a
non-conformity by proactively implementing improvements.
Preventive action may result i.e. from trending of in process data,
of analytical data, of audit findings, trending of root causes for
non-conformities or complaints, from product quality reviews
(annual product reviews), quality risk analyses, etc.
Similar to corrective actions, agreed preventive actions should be
closely followed-up and monitored until their completion.
Effectiveness of preventive actions should be reviewed regularly,
i.e. as part of the product quality review (annual product review).
Information regarding preventive actions including costs and cost
savings should be regularly subject to management review in
support of maintaining and improving the effectiveness of the Quality
Management System.
CAPA Process
1. Identification: Define the problem
2. Impact / Risk Assessment: Initial assessment of the impact
and the magnitude of the problem.
3. Immediate Action: Protect the customer from the problem.
4. Root Cause Investigation: Identify the root cause of the
problem by using a systematic approach.
5. Conclusion and Quality Decision: Final thorough
conclusion on the impact and magnitude of the problem,
decision regarding the use of the product, etc.
6. Action Plan: Define corrective and preventive actions.
7. Implementation and Follow-up: Implement corrective and
preventive actions and verify their effectiveness (global
approach).
Quality and GMP
June 2012
1. Identification
To enable an efficient root cause investigation, the problem has to be
clearly defined.
Collect all available information, ask questions: Who, when, what,
why, how
Summarize the problem in a detailed and concise description.
Example:
The stability of product XYZ failed.
The assay result of the 24 months stability time point of batch
123456 of product XYZ is out of specification. Specification: 95.0 % 105.0 %, Result: 93.4 %
2. Impact / Risk
Assessment
The problem must be evaluated to determine the need for immediate,
corrective and preventive actions and the level of action required,
based on the impact and risk of the problem.
The evaluation should include:
Potential Impact of the problem.
Risk to its customers and/or the company (i.e. risk to the patient
related to the quality, efficacy or safety of the product; risk for the
reputation of the company; risk of adverse regulatory actions; financial
risk)
Immediate action that may be required
10
3. Immediate Action
Immediate action is necessary, when the quality, efficacy or safety
may be compromised by the problem.
Examples for immediate action:
Product recall
Blockage of the stock of a product
Rejection of a batch
Interruption of the production (i.e. until problem is assessed and
fixed)
11
12
4. Root Cause
Investigation (continued)
List all potential root causes and evaluate their likelihood
(also using available supportive data and information):
Likely
Possible (but less likely)
Remote, unlikely
If more than one root cause is likely, a simulation of the potential
root cause can help to prove the root cause.
Finding the primary root cause is essential for determining
appropriate corrective and/or preventive actions.
These root causes suggest that the failure investigation did not go far
enough
Training, operator error or similar obvious root causes
Quality and GMP
June 2012
13
14
6. Action Plan
Based on the result of the root cause analysis, all tasks required to
correct the problem and prevent a reoccurrence are identified and
included in an action plan.
The plan assigns responsibilities and due dates for
implementation.
Enough detail must be included regarding the required action and
the expected outcome.
Pay attention on correct order of activities.
15
7. Implementation and
Follow-up
The Action Plan is executed and all tasks are completed.
The actions that were taken are documented.
The appropriateness and effectiveness of the actions taken is
evaluated:
Have all recommended changes been completed and verified?
Have all objectives been met?
Has training been performed to ensure that all affected
employees understand the changes that have been made?
Was an assessment made that the actions taken have not had
an adverse effect on other properties or aspects of a product or
process.
Closure of CAPA after successful implementation.
Quality and GMP
June 2012
16
CAPA Challenges
Key Questions
One of the most fundamental steps in the CAPA process is
completing an evaluation of the actions that were taken.
This evaluation must not only verify the successful completion of the
identified tasks, but also assess and adequately document the
appropriateness and effectiveness of the actions taken.
17
CAPA Challenges
Key Questions
Have all of the objectives been met? Did the actions correct or
prevent the problem with adequate assurance that the same
situation will not happen again?
Have all the recommended changes in enough detail been
completed, verified, and fully documented?
Has training and appropriate communications been
implemented to assure that all relevant employees understand the
situation and the changes that have been made?
18
19
20
21
Contra
22
Example
23
Example (ctd)
Result of the initial investigation and CAPA (informal, not systematic, quick fix
):
Several months earlier, a similar issue happened on the same machine, but with the
supply silicone tubing containing silicone oil; QA and production experts did not apply
a systematic root cause analysis, but suggested to implement a 1-year shelflife for
the tubing based on individual experience.
24
Example (ctd)
25
Example (ctd)
26
Example (ctd)
Result:
Appropriate CAPA identified and implemented; issue did not happen again.
27
Example (ctd)
Lessons learned:
The initial inappropriate investigation and CAPA implementation lead to additional
work and cost. A thorough investigation including consultation with all experts
including supplier could have improved quality through an enhanced understanding of
the process.
28
Summary
Regulatory Expectations
CAPA as part of the Pharmaceutical Quality System (ICH Q10)
Integrated Quality Management
Corrective Action
Preventive Action
CAPA Process
CAPA Challenges
FDA 483 Observations Citations
CAPA Management Software
Example
29
30