dy 9 1 1 7] 1 1] ao) 21 22] 2s) 24] 2s) 26) 27 26) aa} 0} 3 | po Proctor Values for Aggregates print nl Last UPDATED - Fe2 203 Phone | Test method | Description woes] Set Tea wast [AST TeETC__[>T=aT mL ae [isssys 708471 446i [STH 1667 fei -B a 703 471-4461 | ASTM I557 [OTA GEAR 3o_|s0_| 200 | 162 [6 roar -aa0i_[ASTACT6S7G—[pt-A aes [3 3 a= ari-aabi_ ASTM 1667-6 as[ 0] 3 33 Toa a7t-aa6i_[ASTAL T6576 [OTA GARTER I 708-754 a144 VIM pia re Ee A 708 4 aiaa JVI i-8 as | so | 202 | 168 | 50 73758 aaa [VT jcaa-3 3a | vez | 202 | eet] 62 709-764-4144 [VT 6 Sones a | ara [a2 | e808 | 6a] 703-650-6134 [VTM-T A a2 | woz | 201 | 1488 | 50 703-890-6134 |VIN = iB a2 | s25| 20 703-630-5198 [VTM=1 Ta GTA) | 1959 | vor | 407 | 269 703-890-6194 [VIM 30 isaa | 02 [ore | 204 ck Stone Goose Gresik | 703-720-2800 [VTM-1 A ae sag | 202 [tuck Stone = Goowe Greek 703-777-3177 [viMi-1 iB a5 _| sas | 2096 suck stone Goose Greek | 703-720~2800_|VIM=1 R-3 aa_| aoa] 200 [tuck stone Leesburg 703-728-2800 JVTM=I ih az [ars | 200 [cuck stone Leesburg 709 729-2800 [VTM=1 ie aaa _| 200 [tuck Stone Leesburg 703-729 2600_JVTM = A Ra ar _[ ora | 207 [Cuck Stone - Leesburg 703-729-2600 |VTM=1 [cea -0 a2 | ara | 209 aan = Occoquan 73-6090 1760"[VTM=1 bi-a a7 [at | 265 lan - Occoquan 73600-1760 JVTM=T Bi-e 73 | 70 205 ean ~Ossoquar 08 = 690-1172 |VIM=1 [cra TAN re ee [ean Warrenton SAO 347-2641 VMI bia Tas|~s1_[ 207 Wataan Warrenton 3i0-347- S001 _[VTIA=T 7as|e1_| aor Natoan = Garsonvia a0 650-2008 [AASHTO THOR a6 _[s1_| 202 toon = Garsonvie 540-650-9008 [AASHTO TOBA as _| so [205 Ntoan- Garrsonviia $40 659-9005 [AASHTOT-GDA 7a| «| 28 = Gariconvile 40-659 a009 [AASHTO TSA me WVotean-tnassos 703-968-7160_JVTH-1 ver [7 | a7 | 2a aleanttanassae 70a 988-3195] tear 7] ar BaeAISI BIB III SI I ABA SSS Ss MID-ATLANTIC BASIC FOUNDATIONS MAY 2010c BASIC FOUNDATIONS STUDENT MATERIALS OCTOBER 2008 PowerPoint Graphics for Basic Foundations “#4 Correction Nomograph ‘Sample Geotechnical Report Report of Spread Footing — Foundation Observations Form Keystone Installation Instructions Sample Keystone Design Drawings [BCS Segmental Retaining Wall Observations Form and Standard Paragraphs ‘Sample Geopier® Shop Drawings Goopier® Quality Control Instructions Geopier® Observation Form and Standard Paragraphs Reinforcing Steel Drawings‘Ae Assocation of EngluringLohraeris, Tespcioe Agnes ad Bldg OFC STUDY GUIDE WACEL FOUNDATION INSPECTOR MARCH 2011 aoa a3> "@3 7 Foundation Inspector Study Guide ‘The purpose ofthis study guide is twofold: ‘Tobe an informational document to owners, engineers, and code officals fencstone i IR» krowedgeot JA. tenors ne fp seumantl tang ‘anette T+ unersancng ot (opie REQUIRED SKILLS (CONT'D) Dp” Genera! stone i, bey eos Re Sia et HAT TTABSOLUTE TRENCH SAFETY RULES!!! Al ID * No protective systom needed it IR ~Eniretyin stabi rock, [4 Excavation as than 5 * Otherwise, don't goin FA) rzounensxas Gases eting eile 1 krowieoe. I * Sunt &benavir ot ‘Steet el pes, Fe Iiomrt scorns & (tec reports IT + Gana inowadpe ot founda tons. IAT TT A aBASIC SOIL REVIEW “Samping. TASES Al BASIC SOIL REVIEW LA (CONT'D) SSeS (Al MOISTURE CONTENT Influences abity to compact cos. * Changes characteristics of sits and ays. 100 TIS aS = Mat = tat + Wight war wight of wat ot) esont oly sa)+MOVERSIZE CORRECTIONS ‘#4/OVERSIZE CORRECTIONS (CONT'D) ID * Detonnine corrections: ~Hprvited and compart usa aborary cemeced vale ~ Comput. Use VOOT Noga No. on, ‘Sample st Tab Use ETHEL, Ie la iF Ir ‘#4/OVERSIZE CORRECTIONS (CONT'D) Contd ant o- oBP: erect or ea dra ‘itty aay on ra me mn TT 5 “7peo ean eae ne aod Sonus noose rowan ny ations pecun ‘scone opm ioe es eu cs tape 0s « ‘ONITIONSOOHd ® SOSH dIwLS Que IN +) HAWEDOINON NOILOSHHOO 3ZISU3AO (No mT AIT I (sce games umand ‘og mae MOSS = xe) meamucaned one = rem cno domnind =hu 8UN, cameo oeeee auoo wnsow whundo peaueD + AZISUBAO/r# (a.1NO9) SNOLLOAHHOD e(Al STRIP CHECKS & [Alproorrotine (CONT'D) (4 STRIP CHECK & /{A| PROOFROLLING (CONT'D) * vn a ae ne TaSES i i 1 A) rcouneo sts * Basic tang alae & veowedge + Sunaby& badaver of ‘Aero 6 pen. + mart sol beng & eoecrcalrpons + General Knowing of ‘oundaton ese. SASeS Hil | bo a = Jao 4 sos'@ [ee TTT ea Al GRAVEL & SAND ID * General good structural fl material x “cone en gn J Reimer ta. * Good roadwayslab subgrade mater Al SILT & CLAY ID = Low permabaty R. + excoten for dam and pond construction. * Rolatvoly weak fr road subgrade. = Very sensitive to moisture. * High shink/swot potenti ls Fr fr OPTIMUM COMPACTION EQUIPMENT ID | ewer | Gutor | SWor | sitor In| op | cc | se | sc IN Fibber | Rubber rubber ttre | tke or | Rubber: | "tre oF stect | hoops) ke | sheeps| wheel | “toot foot a= HATAREQUIRED SKILLS TA). exc rt nonin, : Siete wanes * tere so barnes ‘goteomncat ‘epors * Gover none ttn 4 GEOTECHNICAL ‘Al REPORT ID = Normal ‘ocomplished J, ding design phase. * General deerption of he project. * Doeeription of aca! ‘eclogy GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS (CONT'D) mm Tl a a 5 ! a3 as ss a a i ss a)Tee TTT mT Te TSSe REPORTS (CONT 1p Evaluation of subsurace contins Ensure in GEOTECHNICAL "D)iy GEOTECHNICAL [A) reports (conro) > * Resammenstons ioc |g ‘Sarmpes at Tbe i FA omevsrass }D* facts sting tate 8 le, imowiodge + Suatity & bone of 1A" tern fo ype. 3 bo a a 3 od 8 8 a 3 sos os os| DEEP FOUNDATIONS a b= ose: DEEP FOUNDATIONS (CONT'D) mM A DEEP FOUNDATIONS 1BDEEP FOUNDATIONS lA (conro) * Teagan Inepecton of ven ioe many Treas TASES Cet epee =Pincomoe DEEP FOUNDATIONS Tass 1D = pried min pie. Re * Hota pers J (Chane anchors. IF Ir boa a Ls au. 4 ut 4 a at a43 [D+ soa Donsitcaton, * Chemical Ateraton. [A Consotidaion IF * Load astbuton Ir ‘GROUND IMPROVEMENTS: (CONT'D) p* Sal Densification: J ~ Beep Dyan ‘Compaction (000) 1A. Stam columns IF —verecompacton [Compaction ‘poung. ~ Coop GROUND IMPROVEMENTS (CONT'D) 3 Ohaica Aran ~Sallamart Sas : i iID 7 IR lA F 4 Ir 5 TASEE mM I 167)= Al REQUIRED EQUIPMENT ID * Geotechnical Report. JR * Hand Auger. JA. + “Safety Hammer” IE Tape Measure and Pormanent Marker. Ir * Other esting equipment Al TECHNICIANS ROLE ON > THE JOBSITE He + evauate the foundation sok. = Do not authorize changes. F * Do not approve footings that donot T conform othe approved plans. * Repo cbsorvatons and tes result TESTING PROCEDURES >” Meet with th prooct engineer. a. Review the geotechnical report. * Review approved foundation drawings & [A peri [F * Visually observe foundations. [7 ~Sottpe = Debs WiMEDIATELY IF: IR. * The contractor asks to approve aft JA _ change. fF * tho subgrade doos not most tosting rqurerenis + tthe contactor ignores th fad tet notiicaon end procoeds iy REQUIRED SKILLS A (CONT'D) See , ae Sn coe ea Sea oe gem RETAINING WALLS. 1 Omni je oars a * Se Soe + Serr fr * Stn + Testa end a 242 et 4a Ie 776 OVERVIEW/DEFINITION ‘TYPES OF RETAINING WALLS ‘TYPES OF RETAINING WALLS (CONT'D) + Rented Dene tn a 8) IR — Segment aig wa 2BSDENTRCATONGF A ete uc ON SITE PLANS [Dr Usuaty depicted g sect, ea eae : IT tiedstontet WALLS SEGHENTAL RETAINING [A “waits cowry ID * Detaled manufacturer inetructions: Ie Mae J, ~Consrcton sequence = _ ~Canerton uty contel * Request copy of manufacturer's |? instructions and construction drawings. * Use Both! mn Tl bs a Ls ee er re ee 43 as 3 ss os‘COMPONENTS OF WaLLs [ane] |b* Foundaton sois. * Drainage. cosyihats A Feong eae, roorommen F: ' Shear conan. ° Gack so (reinforced * Unteaage 28) + Rataned sl 6 = aa Al COMPONENTS OF SRWs A\ (CONTD) (ConT’D) Al COMPONENTS OF SRWsll Facog uns “any art tec = ay @ TASES Lf Al COMPONENTS OF SRWs (CONT'D) aaa ns a a 4 — ay 4Al COMPONENTS OF SRWs IA (CONT'D) Dm Ik ie F I Al COMPONENTS OF SRWs (CONT'D) Cringe and aot abr: Pv pean tetne tan rent prt conor, ‘@ 2(Al COMPONENTS OF SRWs. lA (CONT'D) COMPONENTS OF SRWs. (CONT'D) TaSaS COMPONENTS OF SRWs (CONT'D) SIS FS, ee oe a ss a7 Ie 777 TT eT T TIT TSE Ik Ib atin Ze re ~ fonnna S ~Satnecepy renew COMPONENTS OF SRWs a iN Feud ea TESTING/OBSERVATION ms To Bo Checked: OF SRWs TAS SS. Al TESTING * toms To Be Checked (oon ~Drinaetoapits IGIOBSERVATION OF SRWs ie 29TESTING/OBSERVATION OF SRWs (CONT'D) * Foundton at Ronan tat ‘aw tele TISsS =Tpsat matt Cimento tea, ‘TESTING/OBSERVATION OF SRWs (CONT'D) I> Gonneton a] ae 3 34JASES Al TESTING/OBSERVATION ‘OF SRWs (CONT'D) Drainage wenpholes * Gon oe =e, aS Al TESTING/OBSERVATION at triage stone: Cra ge nt ee ‘ery ~ Brkt age 31Al TESTING/OBSERVATION OF SRWs (CONT'D) TESTING/OBSERVATION ‘OF SRWs (CONT'D) il Peer: TESTING/OBSERVATION OF SRWs (CONT'D) HAT A au 4 ry a4 nyfe sen petupceen (a.tNoo) Tans aauinosy mT ATT I TIAGEL eS « Sips mgn 00 MeO “een ‘ay Son “Siem — Apne) Sonesoy « (d.4NO9) SAMUS 40 NOMVAYASEO/ONILSAL ww Bw 4© Sample shop drawings at Tab Vil Al GEOPIERS® (CONT'D) > Ik lA Fr aa es a a a a La7 |e 7 tt TTT eT TT T4I TT TSE * oops i ‘SonatAl GEOPIERS® (CONT'D) eT a a a 33 4ue Bo = ypu Qecue (a..Noo) @suaid039 Bl beter (a.1NO9) @suaId039 el eee ee WO LG es OM @)Al GEOPIERS® (CONT’D) |p, + Gooner Projects imaiving ES TESTING/OBSERVATION OF GEOPIERS® + sansa cata Son + Stardors parogrohs TISES + Samplos ot Tab x lI Al REQUIRED SKILLS Gener spe sab ses. ‘Shenidwel sot TASES ‘Observaton of {ettoreng set {ortoonatton ‘Somers 3d Ls a ey od 3 Ld Ls 3 3 ot 8 LaAl SLOPE STABILITY D Varies wat sot type, ang, end toning, Ie specied as an angi o tie: As Be le pee fr cia as * Stooper than 3H:1V usualy requires ‘engineer approval Al SLOPE STABILITY (con't) TAS So. 39Al SHRINK/SWELL ISSUES }D = Main CH and MH. Ik. * Footings, slabs and pavements must be J elated. ff Undorcut slabs and pavomonts 2 fet. [7 * Sep footings down 4 feet below exterior grade. il REQUIRED SKILLS R * Senet lA + camoce oe |? “iat re * sample dawns at Tab, mT AT aA a a a a a a a a —t os 37 gg 7 7 Te TS ge [JAlperormen BAR SIZES * Noinal Si Pn Bar Equant D+ petal Sze Grater han Nomina Ik” (Oetomatone) ly * Exar: l= East) Nomina Mi [> Se Dimuosin Se Osh 13 10h 3 18 225intas 7 FOOTING REINFORCING A (CONT'D) ID * authorized ype and minimum length I _ afta spon. [4 * Minimum concrete cover per ACI 318: Ip ~Z Wenposedio aur or washer 5° Weastaganstoamh |" Nos: cesk apectoasons for sir pes ‘sowed Al DOWELS & ANCHOR RODS mm TT 47 DOWELS & ANCHOR RODS: lA (CONT'D) | a DOWELS & ANCHOR RODS (CONT'D) COLUMN ANCHOR RODS, D Rk lA F lr ea a a a 43 er7s TT TTT S| ttt 777} COLUMN \) ANCHOR RODS (CONT'D) * Length and diameter. * Grade (e.g. A86, A807). * Correct patiom and ection, * Boating of column: JaSES ‘COLUMN ANCHOR RODS (CONT'D) Ie srr bots Ea 4 seattcio, "en fr tessa [FA] sxcv01 no0s cowry 3 naan eee gap nee seated a a3 gy, & Page9 of 9 WACEL Soils I Field Technician Practical 0 Prcont Plus No. 4 Matera «0 8 & #€ 8 $$ 8 & g 8 Peewee eee eee eee733 7 gg TT age eC REPORT OF ‘SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ANALYSIS ‘CAPITAL ONE — PHASE 1 DEVELOPMENT "MONUMENT BUILDING AND GARAGE FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA FOR al OocrosER 1s, 2000 REVISED NOVEMBER 6, REVISED NOVEMBER 16, 200073a October 15,2000 Revised November 6, 2000 Revised November 16,2000 ‘Mr. Gury Fourie, ALA. Ai Architect 2100 M Steet, NW, ‘Suite 800 ‘Washington, DC 20005 ECS Job No, 6292-C Reference: Report of Subsurface Exploration and Geotetnicsl Engineering For Capital On, Phase 1 Development, Monument Building and Garage, Fairfax County, Virginia Dear Me Fourie: AS autborized by your acceptance of our propossl No. 12862-GP, dated September 6, 2000 and revised ‘analysis is enclosed with this eter, along with a Boring Location Diagram. ‘The recommendation osesg in this report are intended for use by your office and forthe wse of other design profesionalsnvohved on, ‘he design and implementation forthe specifi projet described herein A total of 26 sol test borings (orings BI-1 through B1-26) and a series of 4 pressuremeter tests were Performed forthe curent scheme of the proposed Phase I development. These borings were each enone {depths ranging frm 10 to 70 feet below the existing ground surface, Fata on the new upatd information provided ous by Ai Architect and James G. Davison November 9, 2000, we understand tht the proposed Phase One development will consist of epproximatly 565,000 ost {RAME [et of building (Monument Buildin) with 14 levels above grade and two below grade. Although te [sshed flor sab elevation ofthe office building is somewhat variable, itis typically betwee EL, he ara Ex 2375 fet. The lowest elevations generally occur inthe south, and the highest elevation pecraly eeu inthe west aod noth areas of the buling fotprit. Flor plate size wil be between 30000 any $0,000 square fet, wih posible tapering of the building on upper floors. A majority ofthe spec wil be general offices, with special areas including a cafeteria, conference center, and fitness ceater' eded vg Ta ee wil be = 650,000 square fot parking erage, of wich approximately 150,000 square fet wil be {aried below the bung and possible stuctured plaza. The remaining 500,000 square fx of parking Wil be below grade a lest one level, of concrete constuction and an average lowe finished foot at Ele 06 Fels part of the development is the constuction of Infomation Drive, widening the existing Sjormatr managenent pond es wells constctng a resning wall long the westside ofthe poroeed office building and the southside ofthe parking structure The Proposed office building will hve maximum column loads on the order of 1,500 to 2000 kipe andthe sdjacent parking srueture will have maximum column leds on th order of 1,250 io 1,800 tips,A cs seb No. e292. (ashe 5, 2000; Revie Nove 62000 ‘Revie Noverber 16,2000 ft ‘Sitiow existing fils Fnging from 3 to 5.5 feet below existing grades were encountered in some of the terings inthe ofc balling end parking stuctre ara, butter botom elevations are rich tat ihe tajony of the file wil be removed cing excavation 10 resch subgrade level The natural sis noounered in or borings exsised of rant low plantiysits with varying mice and sand contents. Loose soes were encountered within some ofthe natural soi uct eel weathering levels General, the dmiy ofthe voi increas with depth andthe sol tended to alo Dome micacous, sandy and ‘hibit some remnant stuctre ofthe unerying parent book with depth ‘Based on the current knowlege of the projet and our recommendations contained in the report, the ‘office building can be supported on spread footing foundations. With lowest slab elevations at EL. 315, 325 and 3375 fet, various shallow foundation systems with (wo different bearing capacities have been ‘considered for support ofthe structure a dscusted i the enclosed report. ‘With lowest slab elevation at EL, 316 fect, shallow foundations forthe parking strcture canbe deigned for ‘ maximum net allowable pressre of 10,000 psf. Soil adequete to support the design bearing pressure of 10,000 pa may be identified as those soils having « minimum blow count of 29 blows per foot (pt). It shoud be noted that some ofthe footings may require “stepping down” in order to achieve the design ‘bearing pressure. ‘The encloed report provides recommendations on oul bearing pressures, foundation settlement estimates, placement end compaction of new fills, below grade wall design and drainage, constuction, and other factors which may influence contruction st the sit. ‘We appreciate the opportunity tbe of service to Ai, Jones Lang LaSalle and Capital One on tis project. IF hve ey tins comccming Ue iformatin sn scenmendtions coined nthe coompanying fececnial reper or we can be of fite abstane to you inthe planing adler constacton phases, ie oat hein o contacto Respectfully, ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD. Samir A. Alquti, PhD, PE. Manol P. Andonyadis, PE. Senior Project Engineer Principal Engineer ce: Mr. Mike Goss (Rathgeber/Goss & Associates) ‘Mr. Dean Lopez (Jones Lang LaSalle) ‘Mr. Rob Walker (William H. Gordon & Associates) Me. Bill Moyer (James G. Davis) Skat arsetepon0A2- Ce € eo4 REPORT ee eee PROJECT Subsurface Exploration ‘and Geotechnical Engineering Analysis Capital One ~ Phase 1 Development Monument Building and Garage Fairfax County, Virginia ee Ai 210M Street, NW Suite 800 ‘Woshington, DC 20005 DATE __Cetober 15, 2000 Revised November 6, 2000 Revised November 16, 2000 ee eee‘TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT OVERVIEW Project Location Scope of Work ‘Proposed Construction Purposes of Exploration EXPLORATION PROCEDURES ‘Subsurface Exploration Procedures Pressuremeter Testing Program Laboratory Testing Program EXPLORATION RESULTS Site Conditions Regional Geology Soil Conditions ‘Groundwater Conditions ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Building Design Foundations ‘Spreed Footings on Natu Soils (FFE. 315 and 325 feet) Office Building ‘Spread Footings on Stone Columns (FFE. 337.5 fet) Office Building Parking Structure (FFE. 316 fet) General Foundations Rectmmendations Subgrade Preparation and Earthwork Operations Fill Placement Slabs-On-Grade ‘Underground Drainage Below Grade Wall Design and Backfill Loading Dock Wall Draimge Design Retaining Walls ‘Stormwater Management Pond Overview Pond Liners Excavation Slopes and Support Exterior Pavements Construction Considerations Closing 2% APPENDIX‘The project site for the proposed Phase 1 development is located along the west side of Dolley Madison Boulevard (Rt. 123), in the northeast comer of the intersection with 1-495 in Fairfax County, Virginia. The project site occupies approximately 28 acres and i currently referenced as ‘West*Gate Industral Park. A Site Vicinity Map, showing the generalized locaton ofthe project site is included within the Appendix of thi report. ‘Scope of Work ‘The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based on the results of our current field subsurface exploration, laboratory testing of selected samples by Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd. as well as our preliminary exploration program conducted atthe sie in May 2000. A total of 26 soil test borings (Borings BI-1 through B1-26) and a series of 4 Dressuremeter tests were performed forthe current scheme of the proposed Phase 1 development bby Engineering Consulting Services, id. These borings were each extended to depths ranging ‘rom 10 to 70 feet below the existing ground surface. Borings BI-1 through BI-14 were performed in the areas of the proposed office building and parking structure. Borings B1-15, ‘through B1-19 were performed in the area ofthe proposed Information Drive, while borings B1- 20 through B-22 and borings B1-23 through B1-26 were performed in the areas of the existing stormwater management pond and the proposed retaining wall along the west side of the proposed office building and the south side of the parking structure, respectively. The preliminary exploration of May 2000 performed by ECS, Lid. consisted of a total of 12 soil test ‘borings (B-1 through B-12). ‘These borings extended to depths ranging from 72.5 to 80 fect below existing grades. ‘A number of publicly available sources were utilized in addition to the traditional geotechnical services that were performed, in order to increase our knowledge of the original site topography as well as subsurface conditions across the project site. These services, as mentioned above, included a review of USGS mapping of topography in the project vicinity as well asthe review of Soil Conservation Services (SCS) soil mapping and topography of the project site, ‘The number and general locations of the borings performed for the subsurface exploration were selected by Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd, bated on the Site Development Plan provided to us by William H. Gordon & Associates. The borings were located in the field for diling ‘purposes by representatives of ECS, Ltd. The boring locations were established by « number of ‘techniques including taping and pacing with respect to exiting site features. The ground surface 1.5 Factor of Safety against Over-turing > 2.0 Factor of Safety against Bearing Capacity Failure > 2.0 Jt should be noted that based on the Site Plans prepared by William H. Gordon & Associates, Portions of the proposed retaining wall, west ofthe office building will be in conflict with the duct banks. ‘This section of the wal if supported on shallow foundations, should have grade ‘beams designed across the duct bank to bridge the load of the wall across the duct bank or theCS Jb No, 6292.6 oe wall section should be supported on a drilled piers. The diled piers should be located directly ‘Btiow the center GBthe proposed retaining wall. Since the drilled piers will representa relatively rigid point bencath a flexible retaining wall system it will also be necessary to construct a grade bbeam foundation across the top of the drilled piers in order to provide a uniformed bearing surface as well as protect the duct bunk. The design of the grade beam foundation should be ‘performed by the project Structural Engineer and should be incorporated into the final retaining ‘wall design, ‘The designer of the final retaining wall should take into account sliding between the bottom of the proposed retaining wall and the top ofthe grade beam. ‘The drilled piers should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 30 kaf and should ‘extend toa least 20 feet below the bottom of the wal supported by natural soil wth a minimum penetration value of 40 blows per foot. Actual bearing elevations may vary due to natural ‘subsurface variations between the tet borings. An allowable skin friction equal to 1,000 pounds per square foot may be applied through out the length of the pier. For uplift design, we recommend that allowable skin friction values equal to 50% of the above recommended values ‘beused, unless specifically evaluated ona case by case bass, by ECS, Lid. Caisson eine fr vert downvard reste mist bet es 30 inches in tro allow clean et ofthe base and ysl mpeton. Canons designed for pit (enon only ot reuse plysical ngpeton bt soul ve «minimum ameter of 24 inches The contacter wil be oued to prove enporry can foringes and aes. Cason cn provident "sisance but sch consideration doen, inp on the dsign det Ir the catwos ae _pesel fr ing rests, sional infection ih he rsa engine il be ede “Prove thon uns ‘Settlement of footings or drilled piers designed in accordance with our recommendations above is expected to be within tolerable limits, on the order of 1 inch. Maximum total settlement of footings supported on natural soils or properly compacted and controlled engineered fl, is ‘expected to be on the order of | inch. Differential settlement along any 25 foot zone is expected tobeon the order of one-half inch, or les. ‘Stormwater Management Pond Overview ‘As noted in the project overview section of this report, development of the project site will also ‘include expanding the existing stormwater Management (SWM)/Best Management Practice (BMP) Pond located in the east area ofthe development. This expansion will include dredging the pond to increase its total capacity. A clay liner is recommended for the pond and recommendation is given inthe following section. ‘The bottom of the pond is cureatly at EL. 293, while the top of the embankment is at EL, 304 feet, Borings B-I1, B-12, and B1-20 through BI-22 were performed in the area of the existing gfond. The soil pppfile in these borings encountered fill depth on the order of 22 feet below 3 a a a ]= atl BCS fb No, 292.0 “8. existing grades. The natural soils underlying the fill materials consisted of SILT and silty SAND. ils. Bond Liners ‘We recommend that a liner be included at the bottom and the sides of the pond to retain the ‘impounded water. We recommend that the proposed liner be extended up to the 100 year flood clevation level along the sides of the embankment, ‘The proposed liner should consist of 2 feet of compscted clay materials. We recommend using ‘the most cohesive, medium to high plasticity soils, with only limited amounts of coarse grained soils or rock permitted avaiable onsite or imported from an off-site source. It is anticipated that ‘the materials excavated from the pond bottom at the start of dredging operations will not be suitable for reuse as liner materials. It should be noted that if sufficient amounts of clayey ‘materials arenot available, then 1 foot of on ste fine grained soils (CL/ML,) should be placed and ‘compacted in accordance with the criteria previously outlined, This should be followed by 1 foot ‘of soil-bentonite mix to create an artificial clay liner. The soil-bentonite mix should be prepared bby utilizing equipment such asa cross axle mixer and compacted as outlined previously. In order to facilitate the establishment of grass on the embankment slopes, it is considered acceptable to place a 6 inch thick topsoil layer on the face of the embankment slopes. The ‘topsoil should be placed in 6 inch lifts and compacted with atleast 4 passes of a track dozer. Excavation Slopes and Support For temporary cuts or excavations, side slopes as steep a8 1.SH:1V are possible in the natural sols observed at this site. For long-term stability, sie slopes should be no steeper than 3H1:1V {neither natural soils or fill soils. All temporary and permanent slopes should be aggressively protected, such as by seeding and mulching as soon as possible after placement, to prevent from sloughing and erosion. ‘Any excavation that will have a slope steeper than 1.5HL:1V (to adjacent roadway, underground Utltes that are to be preserved, et.) will require a temporary earth retention system for support (of the excavation. All temporary and permanent slopes should be aggressively protected from sloughing and erosion. ‘required, we are providing the following design guidelines and recommendations for retention systems. “Although design of the earth retention sysiem is best performed by a specialty ‘contractor, a free-aining system consisting of soldier piles and wood lagging with the required ‘bracing would be appropriate. The system could be braced externally using tieback anchors. ‘Soldier piles and legging should be designed for lateral earth pressures equivelent to not less than 35 times the height of the excavation in pounds per square foot. ‘The contractor should avoid stockpiling excavated materials or equipment immediately adjacent to the excavation walls. We recommend that stockpiled materials be kept back fom the .BCS eb No, 6292-C 20. ‘excavation « minimum excavation walls. If this retained with bracing designed for the anticipated surcharge load. In addition the earth retention system design should consider surcharge Joads from cranes and other construction equipment ap TTT |e [ECS Job No, 6252-C a for CBR testing. A soaked CBR values of $4 and 6.7 were obtained on the composite sample of| the subgrade scils, with a design CBR values of 36 and 45, respectively. ‘Based upon the soil borings, we anticipate thatthe typical subgrade eols forthe proposed now pavement ares will consist of ether silt or sity sand, therefore; we recommended using a design (CBR value of 4.0 which is based on expectations of long-term performance ofthe material ‘The following minimum pavement section, based on a CBR of 40, is recommended for preliminary planning and design: ‘Standard Duty Pavements (Parking Stalls) Subgrade: On site soils, compacted to dry density of at least 95% of that soil’s Standard ‘Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D-698) -Aseregate Base:6.0 inches Aggregate Base Material Typel, Size 21A or 21B ‘Asphalt Base: 3.0 inches Asphalt Base Material ‘Asphalt Surface: 1.5 inches Asphalt Concrete Surface Material Heavy Duty Pavements (Main Parking Drive Lanes) Subgrade: (On site soils, compacted to a dry density of at least 95% of that soil’s Standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D-698) ‘Aggregate Base:8.0 inches Aggregate Base Material Type I, Size 21A or 21. ‘Asphalt Base: 3.0 inches Asphalt Base Material ‘Asphalt Surface: 1.5 inches Asphalt Concrete Surface Material Heavier pavement sections will likely be necessary for main roads, or other sccess rosds dicated to state maintenance. These designs are typically performed by the Civil Engineer and ‘Will result in much heavier sections than parking sections described above, Large, ffont loading trash dumpsters frequently impose concentrated front-wheel loads on pavemenis during loading. In a sinilar manne, truck loading docks ean also experience Very high tuning wheel londs. This typeof loading typically results in rting of the pavement and ulimately pavement failures. Therefore, we recommend thatthe pavement in tach pickup ares and atthe osding docks consist ofa 6inch thick, mesh reinforced concrete slab with a minimum "unconfined compressive srength of 4,000 pi ‘Construction ConsiderationsBCS 1b No, 62926 2 sor dffcaltes,guring construction ofthis project are not anticipated, provided that some onary are taken to ensure that preparation ofthe ital excavation eubgrade and footing bearing surfices are accomplished by the econmended procedures. ‘These precautions are necessary, as the materials observed in our borings are highly moisture and disturbance Sensitive, and will Become weakenod if water intrudes into the footing excavations. Therefor, ‘we recommend that all excavations be properly dewatered, ifmecessary, using conventional sump pit ditching ad pumping operations. ‘This site shouldbe graded such tat surface water run {s directed avay fom the excavations. ‘Exposure to the environment may weaken the soils atthe footing bearing level ifthe foundation excavations remain open for too long a time. Therefore, foundation concrete should be placed ‘the same day that excavations ae dug. If the bearing soils ae softened by surface water intrusion for exposure, the softened soils must be removed from the foundation excavation bottom ‘immediately prior to placement of concrete. Ifthe excavation must remain open overnight, or if rainfall becomes imminent while the bearing soils are exposed, we recommend that @ 1 to 3 ‘inches thick *mud mat* of "lean concrete be placed on the bearing sols before the placement of reinforeing steel. In a dry and undisturbed state, the upper 1 foot of the majority of the natural soil at the site will, provide good subgrade suppart for fill placement and construction operations. However, when ‘wet, tis soil will degrade quickly with disturbance from contractor operations. Therefore, good site drainage should be maintained during earthwork operations, which would help maintain the 09-29-00 cave m oem © 6a.6" (54.4° © 24HRS)| ¥m 30.3" @ 24HRS ee rontun EBA [Dain METHOD HOLLOW STEM AUGERoar Te [soar = JONES LANG LASALLE sz2c_| _et-2 | 1 3 ECs... oer wine CAPITAL ONE Ter Beh vez, PHASE | BULDING & GARAGE | AI/RATHCEBAR/cOSS AssOcATES _| See ‘are Taexnow FAIRFAX, VA. 7 ry e| lelble E Flt E excuse i LE Ye) Bl E|E [emer cme Sera BE 5 os ‘SILT, Trace Sand ond Cloy, TT hspeho 5 2 |s|i| 0 sf 1 Scr, Tare Sag, ean sa Tafsslie[ie] Brower haa Weston Bane to 4 Dense, (ML) 4 340] 7 hehe 7 esse 7 20 334 f [| -325| 7 ssf 4 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE. 33.0" 8B ws on @| Bonne sturreo 10-09-00 _| ssrraur oepm 3" / svowe oem | [yews 22.4" Yruscy [BORING COMPLETED 10—O9—O0 | CAE bePTH © 47.0" (30.0" @ 24HRS) Fm 22.4" © 24H9S [ee ramon CBA [mute sce uw seu Amencan a7 ‘oR a JONES LANG LASALLE. s2e2c_| Bi-2 | 2 © 35 ‘PROIBET MME CAPITAL ONE= ‘mower weneER PHASE | BUILDING & GARAGE | Al/eaTHcEeAR/coss assocurcs | =————| “Sie iaemow FAIRFAX, VA. DESCRIPTION OF waTERAL ‘SURFACE ELEVATION 351.00 SILT, Trace Send, Reddioh Brown, ‘Moet, Medium Dense to z £ fe EEE] ct ell Danse, (wl) 18/0) Micoceous Weathered SI, Trace ‘Sond, Greenish ond Ligh Brows, Weis; Dense fo Extremely Dense, (wR) 16 73 e 76 20 Fa] ss/e] 2 60: CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE. gm 33.0" 2 @| ome sur 10-09-00 _[ sermir oer 3° / rove oer 6 [yen 22.47 Yeas some SHEE 10-09-00 |e m worm 42.0" (90.0 © 70mm) Be 22.4" @ 24HRS me ronan EBA Sein MEO HOLLOW STEM AUGER r c r r , raa a eT = —= 7 JONES LANG LASALLE ezezc_| pi-2 | 3 © 3 EGs... OEY WR CAPITAL. ONE= Teerasr bee PHASE | BUILDING & GARAGE | AI/RATHGEEAR/GOSS associATES | =emees| i] aerial =O La eRSAET FAIRFAX, VA. pe 2 fi TESGRPTON OF MATERA, He Pee eee | 7 i cust ws HI | [uRPACE ELTON as @ econo aE a icoceous_Woohered SIT, Trace FEE Song, Greenish ond: Ugh Brown, FSt-200] Metal Genge fo Extremely 7 Bens (we) E = 2 209 j ! 0 END OF BORING @ 70. 200 74 4 275 27 4 265 ' tin 33.0° 8 on @[omne mums 10-08-00 | rns erm 3° / soe sera 1 pawn 22.4 Yes cae SME! 10-09-00 [ewe w nome ® 42.0" G00’ @ 7285) fen 22.4" @ 2AHRS = ramon EBA SRL HIG WOWOW STEM AUGEReT JONES LANG LASALLE 6292¢ B1-3 iw 3 ECs rao ase | sasae 8 @ PHASE | BUILDING & GARAGE | AI/RATHGEGAR/GOSS ASSOCIATES _— matt r z DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL » |e He if Elf FETE cum oxme i 7 il--==——., 4H oF By ree Sond, ‘end Clay, a Fi |ssfis fie (ML=Possible FILL) 335) 4 ‘SILT, Troce Sond, Reddish r sy (ML) r q +325} + 7 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE. lym 18.4" vo @[oonnc swe 09-27-00 [rerson oro 4" gms) 14,0" Yeuve ome comnts 09-27-00 len w owrnt 620" (600 © am) fem 12.4" © 24HRS go reenu EBA PAINE METD HOLLOW STEM AUGERJONES LANG LASALLE ay 6292¢ ‘ROWCT MAME CAPITAL ONE te AI/RATHGEBAR/GOSS ASSOCIATES = PHASE | BOING & GARAGE besa SS FAIRFAX VA. a : cane ae e| Jelfle gl | ella freee LE Ye) gfe] frown fi 304 Weathered SILT, With { Youre aan | vod een Sve (wR) 7shef 3 soo wlsLel 104 ass Tstehe E Fi 209 dase 3 0 E ate ss 200 6 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE. pi." Svs on @[scnve sues 09-27-00 | rorsou xrrn 4° [yman 14.0" mses rome connate 09 =2: "7=00 [ewe w oer 67.0" (60.0" © 24H) ft 12.4" © 24HRS reson EBA, pune TOG HOLLOW STEM AUGER et |JONES LANG LASALLE wr ane BI-3, 6292¢ PROIBCT MAKE CAPITAL ONE PHASE | BUILDING & GARAGE “aT -ENCaRERR AI/RATHGEBAR/GOSS_ASSOCIATES = iF Laciron FAIRFAX, VA. DESERIPTON OF MATER, ENGLISH UNITS t i iffe==—Sa EE eae | Tae A Ws a ae os, ioe RS ee (wR) 3 END OF BORING © 70.0° 265 (sss Emm 14,0" Yr FORME COMPLETED __Q9-27—O0_| ave m Derm @ 62.0' (60.0" @ 24HRS)| $m 12.4" @ 24HRS m0 roreum EBA DRILUNG METHOO HOLLOW STEM AUGER 4‘cuRNT 108 ‘BORING # ‘SHEET ——| 7 JONES LANG LASALLE ezo2c_| at-4 | 1 2 ECs... ! wise vane __{ ae 8 — ¢ FAIRFAX, VA. ‘DESCRIPTION OF wATERAL SURFACE BLEVATION 348.40 SILT, Tacs Sond and Mico, Roais, Reddish to Greenish Brown, Malet, Loess fo Medium Danse, (ML) fs [ssf Fe |ss|ie) SILT, wore Sond and wee, i Brown, Moist, Dense, (ML) Fe |ss[rel 4) 30: CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE. Ten son @|somsc send 10-05-00 [tors rm 3” yews 26.0" yun) scene corer 10-05-00 [ove w oem © 42.0" (40d @ Zann) [em 24.3" @ 24HRS [me ror EBA DRANG ETICD HOLLOW STEM AUGERSane Tor woe 7 oer — JONES LANG LASALLE s2szc_| si-s | 2 © 2 EGs._. ‘PROIECT MAME CAPITAL ONE ‘CHET ENCE — PHASE | BUILDING & GARAGE | AI/RATHGEBAR/GOSS ASSOCIATES. ‘FE LoeimOn “O- Sula PRESET FAIRFAX, VA. pe DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL fot ‘SURPACE BNATON or i i men 7) 348.40 SIU, Wace Sand ond Wice, Brown, Mois, Dense, (Ml) Weathered SLT, Trace Sond ond Mico, ‘Brown, Moet, De Extremely "Dense, (WR) 310] °° 77 Ct e@e AUGER REFUSAL @ 52.5° 295| 290} 60 i ia v8 or @[oome sure 10-05-00 | rorson orm 3° [ynan 26.0" yunc omc coWPUE? 10-05-00 [cam oerm « 42.0" (40.4" © 24HR5)| 324.5" © 24HRS me rome EBA PRiume HET HOLLOW STEM AUGER aaan a7 Bonne F 2 = JONES LANG LASALLE szszc_| si-s | 1 # 3 Es... ‘HoieeT NAME CAPITAL ONE Tera BrenER PHASE | BUILDING & GARAGE | AI/RATHGEBAR/GOSS ASSOCIATES _| [Semmes | | sifioerrow FAIRFAX, VA. z ‘DESCUPHON OF MATERAL urvanon or SIT, race. Sond, Reddish Brows e|ss|ie[ic} ond’ usht Brown, weist, Loose 5 te"Dene, (UL) 4s} 105} 0 ss[iefie Weccwus Wealhered SILT, Trece s5[1@ [10] Sand, Greenish Brown ond Light Brown, Melst. Dense. to, 330] Extremmaly: Dense, (WR) 25 325| sof CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE. 937.0" Bw on @| wonns seus 10-09-00 _|rorou oar 4” gman 22.5" yuu ‘ne COUPER 10-09-00 [owe m oem e 470 (S10 @ Zann) 3022.4" @ 24HRS we roroast EBA Deuine WEIOD HOLLOW STEM AUGERcaer ore ane 7 meer JONES LANG LASALLE szg2c_| ai-5 | 2 — : at oats ae ECs... 8 — RHASE | BUILDING & GARAGE | AI/RATHGEBAR/GOSS ASSOCIATES a | "Fanta. va. ta ae s =. 5 YE lel Els om Pies se 7 CELE ee HT enemies | Wicoceous Weathered SLT, Trove ‘Sand, Greenish Brown ond Light F Brown, Moist, Dense To. Extremely Dense, (am) Fsssfie[e roofs | is] - | 40 319} i i [ss[i6| as 305| r q rp Feist sof 300 xt r 295] pr [eo = CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGI B | a aa Tn RT RT RRR OT REEL TT Te a —] 937.0" wor @]romac samo 10-09-00 | rorsou osm 4° [yma 22.5" Yeune) fomne EOWRUTE 10-09-00 [care w term « 420" (31.0 @ Zenns)| [$e 22.4" @ 24HRS ee ono EBA mune WET HOLLOW STEM AUGER r ta T= JONES LANG LASALLE ezszc_| Bi-s | 3% 3 ECs. CG ae ee panse RULING & canace | “ai/eaTHoesaR/onss assocurcs | === =e SS FAREAR. VA, = 3 ao e | Jeldle g ORSSS iq en oe i i i ‘SURFACE LRVATION aaeianl oo —«, 5 et ‘Wicactous Weathered SILT, Trace ' Beet erent econ and Last soe, tea oene « Birt Gense tans | 1 4 ¢ es 28s] 1 4 “ 22d END OF BORING © 70.0 a a 26s | | ee cea Oo lame © { yen 22.5" yee ee WLR 10=09—00 [owe w He wz0" 31.0" @ zais)| j=" 22.4" @ 24HRS lad Fors EBA | DRELLING METHOD HOLLOW STEM AUGERrae a JONES LANG LASALLE ezo2c_| Bi-c | 1 © 2 EGs._.| isc NE CABITAL. ONE me ee e PHASE | BUILDING & carAce | AI/RATHGEBAR/cOSS associarcs | === Seer > oe rex VA. ark ar 8 : r ole fle Eli E/E) Feu vers g rer fn HPEE[ peer sesso U SE Gees Sond ond Root | Triahala] ust Bown Whale, tay Te [ssf pf ede SI, Tass Song, Roan a lssfie]ie| Stove, tetas Watton Bones to ‘Dense, (WL) ssfie| sfielie r ie r 320} Wesseoue Westared SUT Wik r Erne a TH] Extra ana, ) CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE. ae ws on @]enne son 10-05-00 | roeson vor 3 [gman 21.7" env some coMPUTE? 10-05-00 [owe m oerme ana (ai @ Zanms) ym 21.3" © 24HRS re Tonos EBA, enue ETO HOLLOW STEM AUGERaa TF ‘ome ar TOMES LANG LASALLE saoxe_[ai-e | asa aa on | mere Voz: PHASE 1 BURQING & GaRAGt | _Al/RATHGEBAR/GOSS ASSOCIATES ao SS FAIRFAX, VA. en 7 mare woe eon ils Lee 3] | [pecan samo i = Wicaceous Weathered SILT, Wit is Sond, Greenish Brown, Melst, Extremely onze, (WR) wif 310] BE ao 208 230 AUGER REFUSAL © 58.5" 60 5 a a a ST - ge SSE ws ox @[oome rawr 10-05-00 [rere oar 3° I frame 7" ge Teme eUra® 10—05—00 [ewe w ome as. (ela © zanna) [en 21.3" @ 24HRS = ronmun EBA SRLING WETHED HOLLOW STEM AUGER 1!Teg TT mp ~ 8 as! 3 1 Bm 2 £0) qe: =—r _ a eee Project: Capitol One ‘Engineering sulting Services, Ltd. = = anEngineering Consulting Services, Lid Canty, Vila é Pressuremetr Data Reduction Program @ ‘Menard G-Am Pressuremeter . ‘ete: 92572000 rolet No: 6202: Project: Coptal One 4 Boring No: B13 “Toot By: CLF PressuremeterTeat No: PZ Project Engineer SAA USCS Clssticoton: WR Papal Engst: HLL 4 “Sol Description: DECOMPOSED MICACIOUS SHIST, DK. BROWN, MOIST, EXT. DENSE. __Tost Parameters REMARKS: Wioler Head Depth: 46 8. WetecCorrcion 066 bars Fae Pressure. | Comected | Volume Resdings Tagine | Pease 90sec. | 60. wo | co | wo | @ Dar 738) 105.0 239) 340 163.40 4a 5.43 793.00 Tat 796.60 0.00 952 "202201 0.007 1.58 720580) (0.00 1561 208.40 0.90 1770 713.60 ‘0.00 21.80 218.00 0.00 25.80 726.00 20.88 23220 0.00) a 35.08 24620, 0.0 20.18 726620, 300 | 480 445 793.40 3.00. 5 47.30 310.80 9.00 [294 1 49.2 343.40 a B34 573.0 7000—[ 164 EE 496.40 0.00 —[ 120 @ mation Modulus, 1800 (TSF) Limit Pressure, Dotor E % sr) 4 Rebound Modulus, E, (sr) Fallure Press., P| (tse)3 i : a 3 i Bs > CORRECTED PRESSURE (TSF) femsin ocroraiigh acres 6633) Bongo 575 [Soi Descsfion’ DECOMPOSED MIGACIOUS SHIT, DK BROWN, MOIST, EXT. DENSE FN Chantilly, Virginia Pressure Meter Data ReductionEnginesring Consulting Services Lic Chen, Vea SS Pressuremeter Data Reduction Program ) ‘Monard G-Am Preasuremeter J ete: 9292000 ‘Project No.: 6292-C 7 Boring ‘Tested By: LF ressuremeter Test No: PMS Projet Enginoes SAA USCS Cision: WR. nepal Engineer: HUL 4 carter: DECOMPOSED MICACIOUS SCHIST DK. BROWN, MOIST, EXT. DENSE Tost parameters 7 5 5) Deformation Modulue,E,: #01VIO (TSF) Limit Pressure, P: (rsF) ‘Rebound Modulus, E: arsF) Follure Press. sr) !Bs g 8 CORRECTED INJECTED VOLUME (CC) a ‘CORRECTED PRESSURE (TSF) [= son DEFORMATION a-cREEP (co x70)] Ne a eae i Description: DECOMPOSED MIGACIOUS SCHIST, DK. BROWN, MOIST, EXT. DENSE PN: Tis Classification: WR Capitol One Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd. 6292.6 Chantilly, Virginia 9/29/2000 Pressure Meter Data ReductionEngineering Consulting Services, Lid 7 hana, vga cq Pressure Dats Reduction Program onard G-Am Prosuremeter 1 ate: 9729200 Projet Na: 6200-0 Proc Capt One 6 ‘rngNo: B16 Teed 57 GL Pressremet Tost Ne: Pu een pineal Engrece HL A USCS Classification: WR sol Description. DECONPOSED MICACIOUS SCHIST, DK. BROWN, MOIST, EXT. DENSE Toot Parameters 4 5 —— ae © Deformation Modulus, Ej: 367 (TSF) __Limit Pressure, P Rebound Modulus, E, (Tse) allure Prees., Pc 180 (TSF)7g ee a _ ' i | a0 gu | g i ¥ 20 i 3 i B aso § i 3 am @ 150 2 10 Bs ° Z : ° 3 10 6 20 2 0 CORRECTED PRESSURE (TF) |--0n DeroRMaTion ~i-GReEP (cc x10) Tear ar I Descripion! DECOMPOSED MIGACIOUS SCHIST, DK BROWN, MOIST, EXT DENSE [at 115 Classifcaton: Wt Project: Capital One Engineering Consulting Services, Lid. Project No.: 6292-C ‘Chantilly, Virginia Date: 972972000 Pressure Meter Data Reductione Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd. Chantilly, Virginia @ Laboratory Testing Summary Date: 10/18/00 Project Number: 62926 Project Name: Capital One Phase | Project Engineer: SAA Principal Engineer: HLL. ‘Summary By: DVT Percart oring | Sample | Depth | Moisture Jcvia| Plastic |Ptastioty| Passing |Mi@amum optima] CBR Number | Number Content | uscs | Limit Limit | Index | No. 200] Density |vaiue} Sieve re [St rs [ese bret s+ a3 Bre] 7 28 Bie | S10, 1341 Bi7_| sz Bz err_[ ss 20.1 ety | —s8 a7 BET | Sit era _| —s3 Bre] $6 So. Siz ss ST. S10, S13 S38 'UCS = Unconfined Compression Soil LUCR = Unconfined Compression Rock $0087 7M.xts ,@ , 404 243 4a4 a4 ATA TNA 4 Engineering Con: Chantilly, Virgina Services, Ltd. Laboratory Testing Summary Project Number: 6292C Project Engineer: SAA orig | sampte | oepin | Moisture| Tse isa 10} 385-40 [92 ‘S2_[ 355 [iz $8 ists | 359 ‘$8 [asa0 [772 43545 | 225, ‘S3_[ 675 | $64 Se | 7e5:20| 49 So [sss35 | 269 485-50 | 227, S4 | a5-10_[ 101 ST | 235-05 | 36. 10 —|-39.5-40 52556 55 | 195-15 ‘S-8—] 285.90 5545 725 35-10 235.25 365-40 Hyd = Hydrometer [N= Modified Proctor V= Viginia Test Mettod ‘0C = Organic Content DS = Direc Shear GS = Specie Graviy Ligia|Prastic| Past Number | Number | (feat) | Content | uscs | Limit | Limit Principal Engineer: HLL. roont | — Compaction Slove LUCS = Unconfined Comoression Soi LUGR = Unconfined Compression Rock LS= Lime Siabitzaton Passing [itaximam| Optra] CBR Index | No. 200 Densty | Moisture |Vaue] aT’ ATA TAA 10007T.xsProject Number: Project Engineer: Boring Number Bre Bt ‘sample Number sz Ss. 3 Sit So So 50. S ‘ST St Sz. Sa St S2 Summary Key: SA= See Attached = Standard Proctor Modified Proctor ay 62926 SAA Depth (feet) EE 15515 23590 3545 675. 785.20, 33.535 ‘35-10 23525 385-40 33.555. 25. 355 35-10 25 355. 675. Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd. Chantilly, Virginia Laboratory Testing Summary Project Name: Capital One Phase | Principal Engineer: HLL. Parcent] — Compaction Moisturo| Liqus|Ptastic | Ptasticty| Passing [taximur Optimum) CBR ‘Content | uscs | Limit Limit | Index | No. 200 | Densty | Moistre| 725. aa 2a ier 20.1 12 ft 187. TS. THs. Tat 155 75. 104 238 28 30.1 353 Hydrometer G8= Specific Gravy Sieve {UCS = Unoonfined Compression Soil LUGR = Unconfined Compression Rock LS= Lime Stabilization (CS = Cement Stabization @,, 5.554 Date: 1000 ‘Summary By: DVT ge otner 100977RAxIs| , @ ,ed oe Se) AaA’ AIA Engineering Cor Services, Ltd. Chantilly, Virginia Laboratory Testing Summary ; Date: 10/18/00 Project Number: 62920 Project Name: Capital One Phase | Project Engineer: SAA Principal Engineer: HLL ‘Summary By: ovr Percent] compaction Boring | sample | Depth | Moisture Liquia}Ptastic | Ptasticty} Passing |Rlaximum/Optimam] COR. other Number | Number | (fee) | content| uscs | Limit Limit | index | No. 200| Density | Moisture| Sleve are [st ae erz2_| sa] 675 Br [S53 | 735:15 Bras |S _| 1.25 123 | s-4—| 85-10 Br23_[ 87] 235.5 Br23_| —S-10 | 98540) Bi2e| —s2 [355 Bra | S53 | 735-15, Bro | S83 | 285-30 Br25_| s3| 675. Br25_[ S68 | 76520 1-25 | —s.0 | 28530 28 | St 125 128] —s3 | 675 i286 | —s5 | 13518 i268 | $8 | 18520) ei | si] 125 iT 355. BLT 35-10 BI 125 Hyd = Hydrometer (Con = Consolation DS = Direc Shear = Vigna Test Method (OC = Organic Content 100077 xse Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd. Chantilly Mirginia Laboratory Testing Summary Project Number: 62926 Project Name: Capital One Phase | Project Engineer: SAA Principal Engineer: HLL Summary By: OVT Facer Bocing | Sample | Depth | Moisture Liquio| rast |Pasticty| Passing [Rfzxmumnoptmaa] CBR Number | Number | leet) | Content| uscs } Limit] Limt | Index | No. 200] Densty | Molsture| Vee] Slove ‘sre | Sa e 3 Bria] sa | 675 etio | st | t2s_| 418 site| —s2 [ses | 138 erie] sa as10 | #19. 20] S| 425 B20] sa] 675 Brs0 | es Waste] 284 Beat | 728 [284 Brat 356 | 28 Br2t_| —s« | 85-10 | 255 Brat | s8 | 1es20[ 95 UCR = Unoonfined Compression Rock LS= Lime Stabization (6S = Comet Stabization3 3 PLASTICITY INDEX PI foxx x0 r 20 0 — r maa ob = . 0 m 3 0 5 6 7 © © 10 110 aui0 ie, LL BORNE pe sare | cpm | esr DESCRIPTION Po wmac 4 % {4 w ” irc! 5 x0 g 7 ” 5 1 30 a eam x 4 » 7 0 mea] 7 oe ti, I . ~~ » » © © © m 0 w 1 10 ‘quo Lan, LL ! test SYMBOL DESCRIPTION 1 ae SS Sree ove ae — rs a T a 7 F + = 1 n z u 2 =e u 3 =e 7 + ealecals T + TTT 41 ¥ ject: ‘Capital One Phase! Er onsulting Services Lid. 7 Projecto: S20 Chant, Vilna ‘¢ pate oa Sito __—_Piastc chart sororrs 47 ee 1009706 x8 Ia’ TA’ TIA be Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd. Chantilly, Virginia Laboratory CBR Test Data Project Name: Capital One Ph + roject Number: 62026 Street: 1-18, B1-19 Bags 0-10 Sai Tioaman | Oponun | Poco Deseripton ‘Giassibcaton | reseny | Cena] eure | compact ses [asi] Fase nd Tivica Urowan Volow [mu [ATS [To St Tics BIBrown Me conan ‘Average Laborotery CBR=__6.7 Design CBR Vale (VDOT) 45 Mica Contnt=__Yoe ReslieneyFactor=_1 ‘Stebitzation Requred=__No Principe Engineer: Troe oa a8 [10 —Pairo | 69 [008 Date: 10725100 Frat Soared_[ Viewed] contest | suet mz [at zr [27 1000706 xlsVTM-8 CBR Penetration — a aT Sea Se nn —Sitwisand Tica brownish YelohstatonNo; 6148 Casstcaton, ML Romar aximum Dy Densy (pe) [1104 Ursoaked | Soaked et hoki Content (x) | 16.7 | Garecied CBR @) OT Zs [60 etrat Moisture Content FA | corecied CBR @ 0.15" sa [ ar Tid LiL) 5 [conected CoR 07 fea 40 Poste Lint PA) $1 on bent as Woided cn Pasty index 4a | wood Wowture Content 15105 Tigi dex Porcent of Maximum Densiy —[ 684 | 06.4 La Ca aa Seve —| 0,0 —{ wolsture Content +- Opt 2p 02 ce RNa Seve | 0.0 | Perent (H)Swel 34 ® [Percent Passing No 200 Sieve ——— FProect_CopteOne Ph Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd. Chantilly, Viginia Project No.: 62826 California Bearing Ratio Curves _ee VTM-8 CBR Penetration ‘0.000 0.100 0.200 = SVS 0400 Penetiaiton (neh) 00 0.600 Chantilly, Virginia J pate: 10-12-09, I California Bearing Ratio Curves Sample Nos 57-10 Steet Bi-18 Bag 0-10, p [[Desciption: — Sandy Sit Trfica DiBrown ‘Station Nox B1-19 Ciassification Me Remark: pp [Maximum Ory Densty (pc 111.0 Unsoaked | Soaked ‘Opt. Moisture Content (%) 16.9 | Corected COR @ OT" 253. 73 Natural Moisture Content 245 | Corrected CBR @ 0-15" 207 8.0 pr [eequid Limit 005 40 [Corrected CBR @ 0.2" 76.0 aT. Plasic Limi (PL) 26 |[Dry Density as Molded ait 7 Prasteity index (PI) “14 | Molded Moisture Content 46.8 | 168 fr [felqutty inex (i) Percent of Maximum Densily 400.6 | “700.6 | [Percent Retsined 377" Sieve 0.0 Moisture Content +- Opt 04 04 Percent Retained No_4 Sieve | 0.0 | Pereent (%)Swell Br Percent Passing No200 Sieve | 61.0 Project: Capilol One Ph 7 Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd. pr [Project No: sasecProject Number: 6282C Project Engineer: SAA Borirg | Sample | Depth Number | Number | (feet) ore | Sako 21-18] Buk | 0-10. ‘Summary Key: ‘SA See Attached 'S= Standard Proctor t= Melted Proctor Ve Vigiia Test Method (OC = Organic Content @.,,5,,@,,,- Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd. Chantilly, Virginia Laboratory Testing Summary Project Name: Capital One Phase | Principal Engineer: HLL Percent] com Moisture Liquia|Ptastic | Ptasticty| Passing [Maximum] Optima] CBR ‘Content | uscs | Limit Limit | Index | No. 200] Density | Moisture| Valve] ) ‘Sieve, 4) Same Pe | eros [tos [ior To 2a5—[ me [-40-| 26 [af oto tte 73 Hyd = Hydrometer LUCS = Uncorfined Compression Soi (Gon = Consolidation UCR = Unconfined Compression Rock (DS = Direc Shear LS= Lime Stabilization GS= Speci Gravity CS = Cement Staiiization bate: 10 ‘Summary By: DVT otter “F 00870MxIs @, 4—s 1 pi é 400 r| ® amon) » » ‘@ Ste: | oo » wo ww mw wm” Wo vay a Or aa pf cone | cen | wor coma sano. oescreron lola rari SCT SS Be partartie : = ates f z HE — 3 Sete | : EE re + =F oo Saag CTnG TONS ret os eee Chany, vga sity Ca ct5 “o I 1 oj ! Zoro A Vols Cuve . Z e 180 7 -™ a 7 2 7 Fi ] :” ar > | 1 Eos ] 0 1 0 = — 7 0 1 z ° Ps @ Sete seo erseeumor | et 1eeuno10 1 a a Sistas ae | oganeame 1 ca cs i gt = = O Rectan z = ] pasa oa 7a wi 5 Pessina te oF Roatan oF ts me To 1 co Engineering Consulting Services, Lid Chany, Virginia Moisture Density Relationship CurvenT it TT 00 ET ET OB weet GE 100 ” 1 01 aot cot PARTICLE SIZE NMALLAETERS Project: Capital Phase | Projeet No. 62820 Date: 10725700 Engineering Consulting Servic Chantily, Virginia Grain Size Analysis LtdEngineering Consulting Services, Ltd. ‘Chantilly, Vieginia Laboratory Tésting Summary z Date; s2sf00 Project Number: 6292 Project Name: Fairax Build To Sut Project Engineer: SAA Principal Engineer: HLL ‘summary By: ov Fem saing | samp | conn [astro] luna Piste resi easy farses] aR Nanter | Name: | Gea) |'Sonet| uscs|timt| tint | Tear’ | neva Sean ee ae oo See ett set eee tae er} estes ts ert tee Bt} eat ass Ett se ee er ea = aE S See Sa [aes eases ee eee Eales Sees oe ee Ss Sete 3 Sop eae Sn_baeet are mary oy: exTEee Athos t= trometer Sonia Peder Con Cocoon GR Umoned Gmpresten Rsk iis me oer 58 oven Shear {SS ine Staten ver feStienes «GS epeanerety «= 8 Comet Staion 6 sone coment ‘oases Poss a ss MsITI I’ VAI VB |S AA AIAG a Chantilly, Virginia Laboratory Testing Summary Date: 6/26/00 Project Number: 6292 Project Naiiie: Fairfax Build To Suit z Project Engineer: SAA Principal Engineer: HLL ‘Summary By: DVT Pareanr aon Boring | sample | Depth | moisture Ligua|Ptastc | Plascay| Passing [ifpamum] Optinamn| CER. Number | Number } een | content| Uses | Limit] Limit | index | No. 200 | Densty | Motstur| Vatu Sieve S7_ [mew] 218 Se | ass0 [232 Sa [sa535 | 210 S10 | sasa0| 183 S11 [ass | 78 S12 | 435.50 | 210 S13 sass8 | ies ‘$8 [ 33508 | 204 S10 | 050] 164 S11 [3545] 169 1 IEE /E/Eiele| S19 [535-55 | 160 S14 | 505-00 | 137 Sis [63505 | 167 S10 | sas40 [00 S11 [43545 | 144 48550129, 33555] 171 38 a 63.565 | 183 68 753 5 | | | lo 1B) 2153 Hyd = Hydrometer LUGS = Unconfined Compression Sol UCR = Unconfined Compression Fock DS = Direct Shear LS = Lime Stabitzation Vs Vignia Tes Method GS = Specie Gravity (GS = Cement Stabilzation (0¢ = Organic Content ‘10088741 xisEngineering Consulting Services, Ltd. # Chany Vigna ~ Laboratory Teeting Summary Date: 82800 Project Number: 6292 Project Name: Fairfax Build To Suit Project Engineer: SAA Principal Engineer; HLL ‘Summary By: = OVT rt] Compaction Boring | Sample Moisture Liquia} testi | Ptastcty| Passing [Maximum] Optima COR Number | Number Content | Uscs | Limit Limit |" Index | No, 200] Density | Moicture| Vale Sieve ars 04 e786. cx BT [87 130, BT [ 8a. 150 So. 208 By. 253 e7 [sit 243 Be I Ba 98. BS 580] 128 Be. 55 | 155 Ba 748 Bs. 14s, Be 142 ‘Summary Key: ‘SA See Allached Hyd = Hydrometer 'UCS = Unconfined Compression Sot 'S= Standard Proctor (Con = Consolidation 'UGR = Unconfined Compression Rock ‘Ne Modited Proctor DS = Direct Shear LS Lime Stabiization V= Virginia Test Method (G8 Spectic Gravity (6S = Coment Stabiizaton (0c = Organic Content, 100SB7H as . &, A Ju asee} 7 Project Number: Project Engineer: Boring | Sampte Number | Number = Bo, Ba Bo co Bo Bo. Bi0 B10, 5-10 BY B10) B10, B10, Bat Bat Bit Bit Bt Bz 52 Summary Key: 5A= See Attached 'S= Standard Proctor [Me Medited Procioe \V= Vigna Test Method (0¢ = Organic Content 10038712 xs I7I aU. 2 I 44I44 Engineering Cont Services, Ltd. 6292 SAA Chantilly, Virginia Laboratory Testing Summary Date: 5/28/00 Project Name: Fairfax Build To Suit Principal Engineer: HLL ‘Summary By: ovT ion Percent Moisture Liquia|Ptasc | Ptasteny| Passing fifxdmum] Optimum] CBR ‘other Content | Uscs | Limit] Limit |" index’ | No, 200] Density | Motsture| Valve| Hyd = Hydrometer ‘Con = Consolidation DS = Direct Shear GS = Spectc Gravity ‘Sieve UcS = Unconfined Compression Sail UCR = Uncontined Compression Rock LS = Lime Stabitzation (65 = Cement stabilztiona Project Number: Project Engineer: Boring ‘Number ‘sample Number Ba Ba, Bi, = Si Si ‘Summary Key: ‘SA= See Attached 'S= Standard Proctor [Me Modifed Procor \V= Vigna Tact Method (0c = Orpanic Content "008872. 6292 SAA Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd. Chantilly, Virginia Laboratory Testing Summary Depth (eet) 1. 58 205 3865 [177 Hyd = Hydrometer ‘Con= Consolidation DS = Direct Shear GS = Specie Gravity Principal Engineer: HLL. Liquia| Plastic | Pst ‘content| Uscs | Limit] Limit | Index | No, 200] Density | Moisture Value Date: 5/28/2000 Project Name: Fairfax Build To Suit ‘Summary By: DVT eran con Passing | aman optima] CBR LUCS = Unconfined Compression Sot LUGR = Unconfined Compression Rock LS= Lime Stabiizaton @,g PLASTICITY INDEX, PI 8 o 1 2 0 4 6 6 7 8 © 100 110 ‘Lou Lin, Ware vest syMBot. DESCRIPTION. [Sit w/Sandanica(ML 1 [SitwSandetica(iL)UCive Brown ‘2 |S wiSendaica(t)Yetow - tet = x 5 © 5 5 + z x Engineering Consulling Services Lid (Chantity, Virginia Plosticty Chart rf8 PLASTICITY INDEX, PI 9 100 WareR 7 ‘CONTENT — DESCRIPTION. oy | oo 260 aeEngineering Consulting Services, Ltd. Chantilly, Virginia | Laboratory CBR Test Data Project Name: Fatfax Baldo Suit Project Number, 6252 ‘StrectB-486-12 Buk 240 Si Description Fat Gay wisandatiics Velowsh Brown Lesn Clay wiSendalica Stong Broun 1003820 xe ate ein Tinian | Open | Poa Giassiicaton | nesters oesty| este | Conpacten Uses [asiTO] reser’ | een | cont ATS | 10 | 00s care | 10 [7083 Average Laboratory CBR = Design CBR Velue (VDOT): {Mica Content = Resloney Factor = Principal Engineer "80 70 64 None oe 700.8 any 1 Laeas, PE\VTM-8 CBR Penetration . | 400 _4 . Er 200 | : T 1 1 | = ko 1 o | D a | Someta a Set BRET Deseiplon Fat Gey wanda Yolowsh Bl StatonNes 4 Glasseators CH Remar Maximum Dr Densty (pe) | 1083 Unsosied | Seabed Opt osu Content (x) | 180 | Goreced CR @ OT zo [50] | ‘atta! Moise Contant | 22.3 [ Corecied COR @ 0.15 “13 [ 33 Tigi Ui LL) 33 | Comeied CBR @ O02 s7—[ 27] Pras Umi PL) 25 bry Dens as Noted nase] | Pras nes (1 26 [welded Welsure Conte “4184 index Patert of Maximum Denaly —T “01.8 [1015] 9 Patent Retaied S'Sieve [0 Weisure Content +7. Op 4 [04 Percent Retained No.4 Sieve a8 x Build to Suit Project No.: 6292 Date: __5-26-00VTM-8 CBR Penetration Sanpie No. Buk Sires B12, Buk E10 Description: Lean Clay wSandéMica Strong Bro | stain Nos B12 Clessficaton CL. Remark: [Menu dv Densiy we) | 1088 — [unseated Opt Moisture Content (6), 47.0 [Goneced ROOT 233 Natural Moisture Content 22.3 Conecied CAR @ 0.157 730 guid uit (UL) 41 [Conecied caR @ 07" 750. Piasic Lit 25] Or Densiy as Molded EEDEY Piast index PD 16 | Molged moisture Content Giz Z igi inex (L) Percent of Maximum Densiy | 100.5, x Percent Retained SIF Sieve | woisture Content «/-Opt oa 04 Percent Retained No.4 Seve Percent (2)Swel 14 [Percent Passing No200 Sieve | 717 Project: Feirfax Bull to Sut Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd Project No.: 6292 Chantily, Virginia Dai 5.26.00 California Bearing Ratio Curves% Project Numbe Project Engineer: Boring | Sample Number | Number Ea Bia] Bui ‘summary Key: SA™ See Attached 'S= Standard Proctor Me Modified Proctor = Virginia Test Mettod (0c = Organic Content 100382015 6282 SAA Depth eet) =r 207 Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd. ‘Chantilly Virginia Laboratory Testing Summary Project Name: Fairfax Build to Suit Principal Engineer: HLL Percent] Compaction Moisture ut) Pasi [last] Passing |Maximum| Optima] CBR Content | Uscs | Limit] Limit | Index | No, 200] Densty | Moisture| Value Stove wa ens |e | oe | oar | t08s | tof so FA LUCS = Unconfined Compression Soil UCR = Unconfined Compression Rock LS Lime stabization ‘GS = Speatc Gravity 65 = Cemont stabiization a ®@, ee > & _,