Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Since wet bulb is a measure of moisture levels within the air, the larger the differential between dry bulb and
wet bulb temperatures the drier the air feels. For instance, take a look at the following example:
Dry-Bulb Temperature
Wet-Bulb Temperature
Relative Humidity
Day 1
80F
70F
61%
Day 2
80F
63F
39%
In the above example, both days have the same ambient dry bulb temperature, however Day 2 has a lower wet
bulb and will therefore feel like a more pleasant day.
Cooling
Tower
The difference between the cooling tower return and the cooling tower supply temperatures is called the
range temperature. Cooling tower range temperature is typically between 8F - 15F. The larger the cooling
tower range temperature, the less pumping energy is required to move the cooling tower water through the
HVAC system.
The difference between the cooling tower supply temperature and the wet bulb temperature is called the
approach temperature. Approach temperature is typically between 5F - 10F in the mid-Atlantic region and
can be higher in dry climates. As cooling tower approach temperature decreases, colder water is supplied to the
HVAC system. The advantages of colder cooling tower supply temperature will be discussed in the next section.
As indicated in the above graph, the KW/ton of the chiller decreases as the entering condenser water
temperature decreases. This results in the chiller requiring less power (KW) to produce one ton of cooling,
thereby increasing energy efficiency.
The following is a list of several system types that would be potential candidates for condenser water supply
reset strategies:
Economizer Cooling
When the ambient wet bulb temperature is low enough, cooling towers can produce chilled water without using
mechanical cooling. Water side economizer saves energy by turning off the large compressors in the chillers and
self-contained units within the building and providing chilled water straight to the units from the cooling tower.
A common configuration for water side economizer is to provide cooling tower water to a plate and frame heat
exchanger, which then provides cooling to the HVAC system.
All buildings that utilize cooling towers to reject heat are candidates for water side economizer.
Economizer
Cooling
Mechanical
Cooling
Between 4am-1pm the average wet bulb temperature was 53F, which allowed the economizer system to
provide chilled water for free cooling. As the day progressed the chilled water temperature requirements
changed due to the internal heat gains and between 1:00pm and 2:00pm the chiller was required to provide
mechanical cooling to the building. The chiller activation is evident in the graph above by the large spike in
electricity consumption.
The electricity demand during peak economizer hours (6:00am-1:00pm) was reduced by approximately 200 KW,
when compared to the 2pm to 5pm profile. This resulted in energy savings of approximately 1,400 KWh during
the economizer hours. Economizer savings for this particular example were only realized during a portion of the
day due to fact that this was a moderate day in mid-fall. During late fall through early spring, the building will
operate almost exclusively in economizer mode. Therefore, potential savings for the building over the course of
an entire year can be significant.
Economizer savings for this particular example were only realized during a portion of the day due to fact that
this was a moderate day in mid-fall. During late fall through early spring, the building will operate almost
exclusively in economizer mode. Therefore, potential savings for the building over the course of an entire year
can be significant.
Approach
Range
Two things were immediately noticed by AtSite engineers. First, the approach temperature is between 3F-4F
consistently throughout the temperature readings. Second, the range temperature is between 15F-18F. These
temperatures differed from the approach and range indicated on the construction documents (9F and 8F,
respectively). The low approach and high range temperatures are indicative of a potential flow problem within
the cooling tower system.
Based on this analysis, a cooling tower technician performed a detailed inspection of the cooling tower system
and determined that the flow was restricted through the heat exchanger serving the closed loop heat pump
system.
Low flow through a heat exchanger can cause substantial losses in energy efficiency and impact system
performance. Low velocity through a heat exchanger causes laminar flow which results in reduced heat transfer
effectiveness and the build up of scale within the heat exchanger tubes. Low flow also causes the cooling tower
fans to work harder to remove the heat from the condenser loop. In other words, instead of varying to meet the
actual load the fans must operate at or near full capacity to satisfy cooling loads throughout all modes of
operation. In addition to the issues cased by low flow, a blockage in the heat exchanger results in additional
head losses through the system which causes the cooling tower pumps to work harder to produce flow.
At the direction of the building owner, the technician was able to clean the heat exchanger to mitigate the
flow issues and restore system performance. By diligently tracking wet bulb temperature and comparing actual
system performance, AtSite engineers and the facility manager were able to diagnose and rectify an issue with
the building HVAC system that was adversely impacting building energy performance. Without this process,
the issue may have continued unabated until the problem reached critical failure and building systems went
offline. By addressing the issue prior to system failure, AtSite engineers and energy managers improved building
performance and protected valuable building assets from additional damage which may have shortened
useful life.