Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 of 6
https://www.labome.org/research/Estimating-HIV-incidence-from-groupe...
Topics
hiv infections
malawi
Abstract
Prevalence and incidence are measures that are used for monitoring the occurrence of a disease.
Prevalence can be computed from readily available cross-sectional data but incidence is traditionally computed
from longitudinal data from longitudinal studies. Longitudinal studies are characterised by financial and logistical
problems where as cross-sectional studies are easy to conduct. This paper introduces a new method for
estimating HIV incidence from grouped cross-sectional sero-prevalence data from settings where antiretroviral
therapy is provided to those who are eligible according to recommended criteria for the administration of such
drugs.
Introduction
Antiretroviral therapy (ART) has helped to alleviate the suffering of AIDS patients in the world. In many countries,
patients have access to ART. In Malawi, ART is also available for free but not all HIV positive persons have access
to ART. By 2011, over 30% of HIV positive persons were on ART [1].
Incidence is a very important measure of disease occurrence. If the incidence of HIV is known, it is easy to monitor
its spread. On the other hand, prevalence alone does not give complete information about the magnitude of the
spread of HIV or any disease in general.
Consider a virulent disease like Ebola which kills after just a few days from infection. Individuals who are infected
with the Ebola virus die after a very short illness if no meaningful therapeutic intervention is available. In that case,
prevalence can never give a true picture of the extent of an Ebola epidemic since those who die from the disease
are never counted. As a result, a low prevalence of Ebola does not mean Ebola is about to be non-existent or is
almost eradicated from a community. On the other hand, the incidence of Ebola is the best measure which can be
used to monitor the disease since Ebola deaths are included in its computation. Consequently, incidence gives a true
picture of an Ebola epidemic. In the same vein, HIV incidence gives a true picture of the spread of HIV in a
community.
Traditionally, incidence is computed from data from longitudinal studies. Unfortunately, there are many financial and
logistical problems associated with conducting longitudinal studies. To avoid these drawbacks, a viable alternative is
to estimate incidence from data from cross-sectional studies. Two good examples of methods for achieving this are
models by Podgor and Leske (1986) and Misiri et al (2012) [2, 3]. These models produce estimates of incidence
which are adjusted for differential mortality. Both approaches are for estimating HIV incidence where ART is not
properly rolled out in the community. It is possible to estimate the incidence of HIV from cross-sectional data from a
population where ART is provided.
The aim of this paper is to introduce a new method of estimating HIV incidence in settings where ART is provided to
HIV positive people who need it regardless of the extent of coverage of such services. This method also adjusts for
differential mortality.
Materials and Methods
Motivation
Podgor and Leske (1986) proposed a method for estimating incidence from grouped cross-sectional data [3]. In the
spirit of Podgor and Leske(1986), we proceed to motivate our approach. Let
the HIV incidence,
therapy,
be
21/10/2016 09:01
2 of 6
https://www.labome.org/research/Estimating-HIV-incidence-from-groupe...
Let X1, X2, X3, X4 and X5 be independent random variables where X1 is the time to death from natural causes, X2 is
the time to HIV infection, X3 is the time to death whilst HIV positive, X4 is the time to ART registration and X5 is the
time to death whilst on ART. It follows from the above description that X1, X2, ... , X5 have exponential distributions
with parameters 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 respectively.
We will proceed by dividing the population into three strata namely: HIV negative persons, HIV positives on ART and
HIV positives who are not on ART. Denote the total proportion of HIV positives by P0, the proportion of positives who
are not on ART by P01 and the proportion of positives who are on ART by P02. Both P01 and P02 are proportions of
the population.
Consider an interval [x, x+t]. The number of HIV positives at the end of the interval is
(1)
N1P1=N0P0S1+ N0(1-P0)S2
S1 is the probability of surviving the interval given that one entered the interval already infected.
S2 is the probability of being infected in the interval given that one was HIV negative at the beginning of the interval.
Furthermore, the number of HIV negatives at the end of the interval is
(2)
N1(1-P1)=N0(1-P0)S3
to
the
relationship
among
3+ 4
3+ 4
these
exponential
random
variables
[3,
4]
(3)
1
1
=1
(
0
4)
S2=1
1+ 2 3
1+ 2
1+ 2 3
and
=1
(
0
2)
1+ 2
1+ 2
In the interval [x, x+t], some people may have just been registered to receive ART but some were already registered
prior to entering the interval. Therefore the formula in (1) above does not capture the number of infected people in [x,
x+t] in a setting where ART is provided. If ART is provided, at the end of the interval there are two groups of HIV
positive individuals namely those who are not on ART and those who are on ART.
Not every infected person is eligible for ART. For example, an individual who gets infected with HIV in a 5-year
interval can never be eligible for ART as the therapy is for HIV positives who are in a reasonably advanced stage of
infection. Therefore, the number of HIV positive individuals who are on ART at the end of the interval is the sum of
old HIV positives who entered the interval already on ART and those HIV positives who are newly registered to
receive ART. This can be denoted by
(4)
N0P02S4 + N0P01S5
S4 is the probability of surviving to the end of the interval whilst on ART given than one was already on ART at the
beginning of the interval
S5 is the probability of surviving to the end of the interval having been newly recruited to receive ART given than one
was not on ART at the beginning of the interval
Using the relationship between independent exponential random variables as described in Lagakos(1976) on pages
553 through 555 [4], these probabilities are defined as follows:
4
5
1
0
3+ 4 5
3+ 4
3+ 4 5
21/10/2016 09:01
3 of 6
(5)
0 02
0 01
https://www.labome.org/research/Estimating-HIV-incidence-from-groupe...
3+ 4
3+ 4 5
(6)
1 1
0 01
3+ 4
0 (1
0 )
1+ 2
1+ 2 3
0 02
0 01
3+ 4
3+ 4 5
N1(1-P1) =N0(1-P0)S6
where
S6
is
the
probability
of
remaining
HIV
negative
having
survived
the
interval.
Now,
1
6
2)
1 (1
1)
(
0
(8)
1+ 2
0 (1
0)
1+ 2
1+ 2
1 0
0 1
1
1+ 2
.
1 0
0 1
1
1+ 2
0 02
From
1+ 2
this
( 2) =
1 0
0 01
3+ 4
expression
1+ 2
1
1 1
where 1- P1 > 0,
01
0 01
1+ 2 3
we
3+ 4
> 0 and
define
02
2)
1 0
2)
1+ 2
( + 1)
2
a
01
function
5
3+ 4
3+ 4 5
0 01
( 2)
(1
0) 2
3+ 4
3+ 4 5
as
follows
1+ 2
1+ 2 3
> 0.
can be estimated given appropriate data.
( )
2
'
2
2
is
1+ 2
1
1 1
2)
1+ 2
2 1 0
1+ 2 3
has an asymptote at
1 0 3 1 + 2
1+ 2 3
1.
3
2 1 0
1+ 2 3
1+ 2
root on either side of the asymptote. Nevertheless, we will retain the roots of which are to the right of the asymptote
because these are the only values which satisfy the condition that. Nevertheless, we will retain the roots of (
which are to the right of the asymptote because these are the only values which satisfy the condition that (
= 0 given
2)
2)
> 0.
was estimated using the delta transformation. An explanation of how the formula for the
The estimated population of Malawi in 2011 was 14,388,550 [5]. The national prevalence of HIV was 10% in 2010
[6]. The provision of ARV therapy in Malawi is overseen by the HIV Unit in the Ministry of Health and Population. By
2011, 382,953 people were on ARV therapy [1]. The remaining 1,055,902 were not on ARV therapy. In the same
year, the number of deaths due to HIV was 43,000 [1].
21/10/2016 09:01
4 of 6
https://www.labome.org/research/Estimating-HIV-incidence-from-groupe...
From the ARV Supervision database for 2004-2009 which was maintained by the HIV Unit, in 2004 there were 3,262
ART registrations [7]. By the end of 2008, a total of 20,393 HIV positive persons were recruited to receive ARV
therapy. This gives a recruitment rate (
found that ART reduces mortality by 10% [8]. Therefore given HIV mortality rates, the rate of mortality among those
on ART is
= 0.9 *
3.
The age-specific HIV sero-prevalence data analysed for this paper are extracted from the database of the Malawi
Demographic and Health Survey (MDHS2010) which was conducted in 2010. The data are in Table 1 below.
15-19
3208
0.022
71
0.022 63
0.020
0.002
20-24
2370
0.051
122
0.051 114
0.048
0.003
25-29
2141
0.108
232
0.108 197
0.092
35
0.016
30-34
1560
0.181
283
0.181 227
0.146
56
0.036
35-39
1224
0.246
301
0.246 232
0.190
69
0.056
40-44
870
0.247
215
0.247 155
0.178
60
0.069
45-49
817
0.193
158
0.193 95
0.116
63
0.077
50-54
295
0.129
38
0.129 25
0.085
13
0.044
In 1992, HIV was not endemic as it is today. Mortality, in general, was mainly due to causes other than HIV. As HIV
spread throughout Malawi, HIV became the leading cause of mortality. The provision of ART to HIV positives has
reversed this trend in mortality. Therefore, the mortality estimates for 1992 represent true natural mortality rates for
Malawi which are not contaminated by HIV mortality. The source of HIV mortalities is a study by Crampin et al(2002).
This study reports mortality rates for HIV persons not on ARV therapy from a study conducted in a typical rural
setting representative of an average rural area in Malawi [10]. These estimates represent HIV mortality rates in rural
Malawi in the absence of ARV therapy. Table 2 below contains the natural and HIV mortality rates.
Results
HIV
incidence
estimates for 15-19,
Age group index (j) Age group Natural mortality rates ( 1 ) AIDS mortality rates ( 3 )
Men
Women
15-19
0.0038
0.0053
0.0471
20-24
0.0041
0.0036
0.0593
25-29
0.0068
0.0068
0.0675
30-34
0.0084
0.0072
0.1354
35-39
0.0076
0.009
0.1354
presented.
The
40-44
0.0101
0.0089
0.1427
incidence
estimates
were obtained by using
45-49
0.0097
0.0096
0.1427
50+
0.0097
0.0096
0.2339
the
Newton-Raphson
method.
values of
The
2
initial
plucked
into the Newton-Raphson algorithm were obtained by a combination of methods which include inspection, use of the
R function uniroot and numerical search procedures.
The age group with the highest incidence is the
Agegroup FOI
SE
Incidence per
5 years
95% CI for
incidence
Lower
limit
Upper
limit
45-49
age
groups
have
the
same
15-19
0.0607 0.000358 61
60
61
20-24
0.0858 0.000779 86
84
87
25-29
114
121
30-34
0.1628 0.00157
163
160
166
35-39
0.1428 0.00108
143
141
145
40-44
143
146
Discussion
21/10/2016 09:01
5 of 6
45-49
50-54
https://www.labome.org/research/Estimating-HIV-incidence-from-groupe...
143
146
2 ).
Obviously, the force of infection (FOI) 2 is the function of both P0 and P1. That is to say 2=f(P0, P1). Therefore to
find the variance of 2 we use the delta method of transformation. Using the delta method
2
= (
1 ).
0,
( 2) =
2
0
0) +
2
1
1 ).
(1)
1+ 2
1 1
1
1 0
01
3+ 4
3+ 4
02
4
1 0
3+ 4
3+ 4 5
2
1+ 2 3
1+ 2
Therefore
(2)
!
0
1
1 0 2
01
02
4
1 0 2
3+ 4
3+ 4 5
Similarly,
(3)
!
2
1+ 2
1 1
1+ 2
2.
1+ 2 3
1+ 2
1+ 2 3
1+ 2
1+ 2 3
(4)
2
0
"
#0
1 2
1 1 2
"
2
and
1 2
1 1
2
1
"
# 1
"
2
21/10/2016 09:01
6 of 6
https://www.labome.org/research/Estimating-HIV-incidence-from-groupe...
The partial derivative is the quotient when the result in (2) is divided by the result in (3) above. Similarly, the partial
derivative is the quotient when the result in (4) is divided by the result in (3) above.
The variance of P0 is
0)
0 1 0
$0
1)
1 1 1
$1
Declarations
Competing interests
I am very grateful to ORC Macro International for allowing me to analyse the MDHS2010 data.
Authors' contributions
HM conceived the study, conceived the method, obtained the data, analyzed the data, drafted the manuscript and
revised it.
References
1. . HIV Unit: 2012 Global AIDS Response Progress Report:Malawi Country Report for 2010 and 2011. Lilongwe,Malawi: Ministry of
Health,Malawi Government; 2012.
2. Misiri H, Edriss A, Aalen O, Dahl F. Estimation of HIV incidence in Malawi from cross-sectional population-based sero-prevalence data.
J Int AIDS Soc. 2012;15:14 pubmed
3. Podgor M, Leske M. Estimating incidence from age-specific prevalence for irreversible diseases with differential mortality. Stat Med.
1986;5:573-8 pubmed
4. Lagakos S. A stochastic model for censored-survival data in the presence of an auxiliary variable. Biometrics. 1976;32:551-9
pubmed
21/10/2016 09:01