Cong STH tera,
‘Standard
10 attr,
es Cocohecen, Fanaa 1928285,
rie tates of Anes. Ts copy hs been made
by the Cette fr Saar nd Quay (TAME) wes Ks
Sulfur In Petroleum and Petroleum Products by Energy
Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry*
“Tiemann dere Sd designation DID: he smb nm flloing he eit int te yr
Tie eae ca ven yur rn mer pens nese ero a apa A
‘Soke taeda Cage sce eat ono PON
"hand has Br pred for st by ec oe Deparment of Dee
1. Scope
LA This test method covers the determination of total sulfur
in petroleum and petroleum products that are single-phase and.
either liquid at ambient conditions, liquefiable with moderate
heat, or soluble in hydrocarbon solvents. These materials can
include diesel fuel, jet fuel, Kerosine, other distillate oi,
naphtha residual oi, lubricating base oll, hydraulic oil, crude
cil, unleaded gasoline, gusohol, biodiesel (see Note 2), and
similar petroleum products.
Nove |—Onypenaed ful with ethanol or methanol contents excct-
ing tel given fa Tble Len be deat dh ung his west method, bat
the precision and bias atements donot apply (see Appedix X3).
‘Nore 2—For samples with high oxygen comets 3 wt ®) sample
lion a2 deebed fn 3 or mavix maching ust be performed to
‘eure score re.
1.2 Interlaboratory studies on precision revealed the scope
tobe 17 mgfkg to 4.6 mass %. An estimate ofthis test method's
‘pooled limit of quantitation (PLOQ) is 16.0 mg/kg as calcu-
lated by the procedures in Practice D6259. However, because
instrumentation covered by this test method can’ vary in
sensitivity, the applicability of the test method at sulfur
‘concentrations below approximately 20 mg/kg must be deter~
‘mined on an individual basis. An estimate of the limit of
‘detection i three times the reproducibtity standard deviation,
‘and an estimate of the limit of quanttation® is ten times the
reproducibility standard deviation,
1.3 Samples containing more than 4.6 mass % sulfur can be
For toca ASTM anda, i th ASTM web, west.
zens ASTM Cuter Servo ates mg For Aaa Bok of ATH
‘Sd vole info, lr te wails Dosanet Suma Pe
east wee,
“+A Summary of Change ston appear tthe ed of hie standard.
crores) AST han 18 aH Pt 7S Wt Cachan err 8-28, Ue Sei
See AST a aa ree Wet Apa o4st EDT 2010 |
Naa ee a ee anenon tra eqns atsy STA Fer
St onsen, Pensa 10-2859,
SESS ed aes tse is orbs ee mae
1 the ere lr Snares ane Quay (SAME) unde ies
ra AS
sal 10 Sor Hare Di,
1D6299 Practice for Applying Statistical Quality Assurance
‘and Control Charting Techniques to Evaluate Analytical
‘Measurement System Performance
D733 Practice for Optimization, Sample Handling, Cali-
‘bration, and Validation of X-ray Fluorescence Spectrom-
‘etry Methods for Elemental Analysis of Petroleum Prod-
‘ts and Lubricants
£29 Practice for Using Significant Digits in Test Data to
Determine Conformance with Specifications
‘3, Summary of Test Method
3.1 The sample is placed in the beam emited from an X-ray
tube. The resultant excited characteristic X radiation is mea-
sured, and the accumulated count is compared with counts
i from previously prepared calibration samples to obtain the
sulfur concentration in mass % and/or mg/kg. A minimum of
three groups of calibration samples are required to span the
concentration range: 0.0 to 0.1 mass %, 0.1 t0 1.0 mass % and
110 to 5.0 mass % sulfur. (See Practice D7343.)
4, Significance and Use
41 This test method provides rapid and precise measure-
‘ment of total sulfur in petroleum and petroleum products with
minimum of sample preparation. A typical analysis time js 1
105 min per sample.
42 The quality of many petroleam products is related tothe
amount of sulfur present. Knowledge of sulfur concentration is
necessary for processing purposes. There are also regulations
promulgated in federal, state, and local agencies that restrict
the amount of sulfur present in some fuels.
43 This test method provides 2 means of determining
whether the sulfur content of petroleum or a petroleum product
‘meets specification or regulatory limits.
444 When this test method is applied to petroleum materials
with matzices significantly different from the calibration mate-
‘ial specified in 9.1, the cautions and recommendations in
Section 5 should be cbserved when interpreting results.
5. Interferences
5.1 Spectral interferences are cavsed by the closeness ofthe
“Xray characteristic ins ofthe elements present ina sample
and the Kimited detector ability to completely resolve them. AS
4 result, the lines produce spectral peaks that overlap with each
oer. Spectral interferences may arise from samples conain-
ing lead alkyl, slicon, phosphorus, calcium, potassium, ha-
Tides and eaalyt particles if present st concentrations greater
than one tenth ofthe measured concentration of sulfur, or more
than afew hundred miligramsfllogram (parts per milli —
mass ppm). Follow the manufacturer's operating-guise 10
compensate forthe interferences.
‘5.2 Matrix effects are caused by concentration variations of
the elements in a sample. These variations directly influence
Xcray abvorption and change the measured intensity of each
element. For example, performance enhancing additives, such
as oxygenates in gasoline, may affect the appurot sur
reading. Other matrix related imterterences may arise fom
heavy metal adtives, lead alkys, and elements such as
silico, phosphors, calsium, pouasiom, and the halides,
‘erty AST wt teh, We A 2 08:41 EDT2010| 7
See ac rem netsacmnarenecanane
TABLE 2 Maire Divents
wa ats Dt Riraie a
Fait 72 ies Keone
Naga Kereare =
eran Keroire 200m
ewe Uaeot Nome
CEetpnee ow tee St own
yeu Oe some
Ce oF lie ot home
Sesatne (vate
"SOW = mapa we avy
‘Mom = meara ot wae om
especialy if present at concentrations greater than one tenth of|
the measured concentration of sulfur, or more than a few
hundred milligrams/kilogram (pars per million—ppm). These
types of interferences are always present in X-ray Buorescence
analysis and are completely unrelated to spectral interferences.
‘53 The interferences mentioned in 5.1 and 5.2 may be
‘compenssted for in contemporary instruments with the use of
built-in software for spectra deconvolution or overlap corec-
tion and interclement correction by multiple egresson or by
‘other mathematical methods.
‘54 In general, petroleum materials with compositions that
vary from oils as specified in 9.1 may be analyzed with
standards made from base materials that are of the same, oF
similer. composition. Thus, a gasoline may be simulated by
mixing isooctane and toluene in a ratio that approximates the
‘uve aromatic content of the samples to be analyzed, Standards
‘made from this simulated gasoline will produce results that are
more accurate than results obtained using white oils. Sugges-
tions are given in Table 2.
[Nora 3—In the case of petroleum marils tat conan suspended
ste itis ecommended tt the water be removed before texting or that
the sample be thoroughly homogenized and immediately tested. The
Inference is retest fhe water rests layer over the transpret fin
fit wil atenuate the Xray intensity for sulle One such retbod 10
‘complih the removal of water sto cestifuge the sample fist under
“inbiet sealed conditions, wing care Oat the sample Imegriy is at
compromised
6. Apparatas
6.1 Energy-dispersive X-ray Fluorescence Analyzer—
nergy dispersive X-ray Borescence anelyzer may be used if
lis design incorporates, as 2 minimum, the following features
and if test results from it are shown to be equivalent oo the
‘samples of interest. Required design features include:
6.1.1 Source of X-ray Excitation, X-ray tube with excitation
energy above 2.5 kev.
6.12 Removable Sample Cup, equipped with replaceable
Xray transparent plastic film windows and providing a sample
epth of atleast 4 mm and a diameter of atleast 10 men
‘6.1.3 X-ray Detector, wih high sensitivity anda resolution
value (Full Width at Half Maximum, FWHM) not to exceed
800 eV at 23 keV.
6.14 Filters or other means of discriminating, between
sulfur Ker radiation and other X-rays of higher energy
‘6.1.5 Signal conditioning and data handling electrons that
include the functions of X-ray intensity counting, « minimum‘of two energy regions spectral overap bat
sein of tlle Koay ham ts geese
concentrason.
61.6 The analyzer shall have the seasitiviy under op
‘mized measurement conditions to measure the concentration of
sulfur at the 0.08 % level with « demonstrated eror due to
counting sastis with one standard deviation not greater than
5 perent relative atthe 500 mg/kg level. Tis requirement
Peruins to sample measurements of less than 1000 mg/kg.
‘61.7 Display or Printer that reads out in mass % sulfur
andlor ma/eg slr.
‘62 Analytical Balance, with an accuracy and resolution of|
0.1 mg and capable of weighing up to 100 g.
Nore 4—Opeation of euyzer wing Keay be sources i be
candice in cordance wih the manfacarer ssf ncn
7, Reagents
71. Purlty of Reagenss—Reagent grade chemicals shall be
sed in al tests Unless otherwise indiated, itis intended that
all reagents conform tothe specifications ofthe Committee on
‘Analytical Reagents ofthe American Chemical Society (ACS)
here soch specifications are available Other grades may be
ted, provided it is frst ascerained thatthe reagent is of
suficiendy high purty to permit ts use without lessening the
accurcy ofthe determination.
12 Diw-BurylSulfde (DBS), a high-purity standard with a
cfd analysis for sulfur conten. Use the certified sulfur
content and the material purity when calculating the exact
concentrations of the calibration standards (see 9.1)
(Warning—Di-n-butyl sulfide is arumable and toxic.)
Noe Siti eweatal o know the concettton of slr in he
em ali tol the psy, ce impure may ab alt
conainingcompoxnds
13 Drift Correction Monitors) (Optional)—Severl difer-
xt materials have been found to be suitable for use as dit
correction monitors. Appropriate dif moniter samples should
be permanent materials that are stable with respect to repeated
exposure to X-rays, Stable igus lik polysulfide ols, glass or
metalic specimens ae recommended. Liguds, pres pow
ders, and solid material tht degrade with repeated expostre to
X-rays should not be used. Examples of sulfur containing
Iaterials that have been found to be suitable include
renewable liquid petroleum material, a metal alloy, o a fused
‘ss disk, The monitor's counting rate, in combination with
count time, shal be suficient to give a relative counting eror
of less than 1%. The counting rate for the monitor sample is
Viena
ASTM of (al igh eer; We Ape 21 0:14
pumvsot io Llcee Agreement No further eproductosaubarize,
Cony ASTH neal, 10 Bar Harr Ori,
Cashoeces
esas 19025,
his copy has been made
that are highly stable, the
bction factor may not difer signif
714 Polyslfde Oil, generally nony!polysalfides conning
|: knowm percentage of sulfur dtd ina hydrocarbon matrix.
(Warning—May cause allergic skin reactions)
ors 6—Folywle ol ae high moeclar weight ol that contain
igh concetsns of ai. x igh 50 weight pct. They exhibit.
cele pyc properties sch as wise, lw voli, ead
Sable set fe wile being completely mise ia whol. Police
‘ls readily avaiable commer, The sl content of te ply
{del cocenoe I eterna va mas dato nurs whi ol
followed by «cect compara ease aust NIST referee mae-
a
15 Mineral Oil, White (MOW), ACS Reagent Grade con-
taining less than 2 mg/kg sulfur or other suitable base material
‘containing less than 2 mk sulfur. When low level (200,
mg/kg) measurements are anticipated, thea the sulfur content,
‘if-any, of the base material” needs to be incloded in the
calcalation of calibration standard concentration (see 9.1).
‘When the sulfur content ‘of the solvent or reageat Is not
certified, verify the absence of sulfur, Use the purest avalable
igades for chemicals to be used for preparing calibration
apdards,
116 X-ray Transparent Film —Any fm that resists atack by
the sample is ee of sulfur, and is suiciently X-ray tanspa
ent can be used. Fm types can include polyester, polypropy-
lene, polyarbonat, and polyimide. However, samples of high
‘aromatic content can dissolve polypropylene, polycarbonate
and polyester films.
17 Helium Purge Gas (optional, Follow manufscrre's
segqnmendon fer comeponding specicaos when of
helium purge gas is required.
78 Coming Gas, for intruments equpged wih fow
79 Sample Cells, compatible with the sample and the
‘geometry requirements of the spectrometer. Disposable cells
‘are preferred over reusable ones for ultra low (