Professional Documents
Culture Documents
practical approach .
Rhodri M.Evans
Incidence of nodules.
Incidence
Thyroid Nodules
70
30
Palpation
50
Age
100
Incidence
Thyroid Nodules
70
US/Autopsy
30
Palpation
50
Age
100
Incidence of malignancy?
Thyroid nodules.
A problem?
The solution?
Ultrasound.
Signs?
Signs?
Solitary versus
multiple?
Indicator of malignancy?
Solitary
Multiple
Cochand
13%
14%
Marqusee
7%
9%
Papini
9%
6%
Occult Incidence.
Autopsy series.
Small (less than 1cm) papillary tumours :
micro-carcinomas.
Reported incidence : 10-30%.
Papillary Carcinoma.
K Jones,CME
Endocrinol,2002;(1)4,4-9.
Signs:papillary carcinoma?
Signs:papillary carcinoma?
Rago et al,Eur J
Endocrinol.,1998;138,41-46
Follicular carcinoma.
Follicular lesions.
CBX:follicular lesion.
Follicular lesions.
Adenomas : solid,homogenous,iso/hyperechoic.
Well defined halo.
Carcinoma : solid ,hypo-echoic areas within.
Medullary carcinoma.
Typically hypo-echoic.
Contains calcification.
Calcification more globular.
Calcification may be amyloid.
Signs?
Predictors of Cancer.
Sensitivity
Micro-calcifications
Absence of halo
Irregular margins
Hypo-echoic
Intra-nodular flow
MicroCa. & irreg m.
MicroCa. & hypoechoic
Solid & hypoechoic
40%
66%
64%
83%
70%
30%
28%
73%
Specificity
90%
46%
84%
49%
65%
95%
95%
69%
RSNA 2005
Predictors of Cancer.
Sensitivity
Micro-calcifications
Absence of halo
Irregular margins
Hypo-echoic
Intra-nodular flow
MicroCa. & irreg m.
MicroCa. & hypoechoic
Solid & hypoechoic
40%
66%
64%
83%
70%
30%
28%
73%
Specificity
90%
46%
84%
49%
65%
95%
95%
69%
RSNA 2005
Predictors of Cancer.
Sensitivity
Micro-calcifications
Absence of halo
Irregular margins
Hypo-echoic
Intra-nodular flow
MicroCa. & irreg m.
MicroCa. & hypoechoic
Solid & hypoechoic
40%
66%
64%
83%
70%
30%
28%
73%
Specificity
90%
46%
84%
49%
65%
95%
95%
69%
RSNA 2005
Predictors of Cancer.
Sensitivity
Micro-calcifications
Absence of halo
Irregular margins
Hypo-echoic
Intra-nodular flow
MicroCa. & irreg m.
MicroCa. & hypoechoic
Solid & hypoechoic
40%
66%
64%
83%
70%
30%
28%
73%
Specificity
90%
46%
84%
49%
65%
95%
95%
69%
RSNA 2005
Predictors of Cancer.
Sensitivity
Micro-calcifications
Absence of halo
Irregular margins
Hypo-echoic
Intra-nodular flow
MicroCa. & irreg m.
MicroCa. & hypoechoic
Solid & hypoechoic
40%
66%
64%
83%
70%
30%
28%
73%
Specificity
90%
46%
84%
49%
65%
95%
95%
69%
RSNA 2005
Predictors of Cancer.
Sensitivity
Micro-calcifications
Absence of halo
Irregular margins
Hypo-echoic
Intra-nodular flow
MicroCa. & irreg m.
MicroCa. & hypoechoic
Solid & hypoechoic
40%
66%
64%
83%
70%
30%
28%
73%
Specificity
90%
46%
84%
49%
65%
95%
95%
69%
RSNA 2005
Predictors of Cancer.
Sensitivity
Micro-calcifications
Absence of halo
Irregular margins
Hypo-echoic
Intra-nodular flow
MicroCa. & irreg m.
MicroCa. & hypoechoic
Solid & hypoechoic
40%
66%
64%
83%
70%
30%
28%
73%
Specificity
90%
46%
84%
49%
65%
95%
95%
69%
RSNA 2005
Predictors of Cancer.
Sensitivity
Micro-calcifications
Absence of halo
Irregular margins
Hypo-echoic
Intra-nodular flow
MicroCa. & irreg m.
MicroCa. & hypoechoic
Solid & hypoechoic
40%
66%
64%
83%
70%
30%
28%
73%
Specificity
90%
46%
84%
49%
65%
95%
95%
69%
RSNA 2005
Thyroid nodules.
1 : Normal.
2 : Probably benign.
3 : Indeterminate.
4 : Suspicious.
5 : Malignant
Nodules R
classificationthyroid?
1 : Normal.
2 : Probably benign.
3 : Indeterminate.
4 : Suspicious.
5 : Malignant
R1
R2
R2
R2
R2
R3
R?
R?
R3
R4
R 4/5
R5
R5
R5
Lymphoma
R5
Metastases
Thyroid nodules.
R Classification.
Cytological classification(1 -5)
Clinical scenario.
Correctly manage patient.
Case 1.
R2
Case 2.
R 2 or 3?
Case 3.
R4
FNA(x2) :non-diagnostic.
Case 4.
R4
Case 5.
R2
Case 6.
R4
Case 7.
R1
Case 8.
R2
Case 9.
Incidental nodules-predictors of
cancer?
Incidental nodules-predictors of
cancer?
Incidental nodules-predictors of
cancer?