Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Network Coverage
Planning
www.huawei.com
Objectives
z
Page1
Contents
1. WCDMA Radio Network Planning Process
2. R99 Coverage Planning
3. HSDPA Coverage Planning
Page2
Capacity
Cell Coverage
COST
Quality
Quality
Page3
Coverage
Page4
Page5
Coverage Related
-Coverage Region
-Propagation Condition
-Area Type Information
QoS Related
Number of NodeB
Carrier configuration
CE configuration
Iub configuration
-Blocking Probability
-Indoor Coverage
-Coverage Probability
Page6
Implementation parameters
Cell parameters
Page7
Finally ,we obtain proper site location and parameters that should
satisfy coverage requirement
Page8
Coverage by transmitter:
Display the best server
coverage
Overlapping zones:
Display the signal level
across the studied area
Page9
Page10
By iteration, U-Net get the UL/DL cell load, connection status and
rejected reason for each mobile
Page11
1st snapshot
2nd snapshot
3rd snapshot
Simulation result
100%
20%
60%
100%
0%
75%
60%
40%
Page12
Page13
Handover Status:
Display areas depending on the
probe mobile handover status
Pilot Pollution:
Displays pilot pollution statistics
across the certain area
Page14
Contents
1. WCDMA Radio Network Planning Process
2. R99 Coverage Planning
3. HSDPA Coverage Planning
Page15
Contents
2. R99 Coverage Planning
2.1 Process of R99 Coverage Planning
2.2 R99 Uplink Budget
2.3 R99 Downlink Budget
Page16
Path Loss
Propagation model
Cell Radius
NodeB Coverage Area
NodeB number
Total coverage area
=
NodeB coverage area
NodeB Number
End
Page17
9
Area = * 3R 2
8
3
Area = * 3R 2
2
Contents
2. R99 Coverage Planning
2.1 Process of R99 Coverage Planning
2.2 R99 Uplink Budget
2.3 R99 Downlink Budget
Page18
Lo
ss
Body Loss
UE Antenna Gain
Cable Loss
NodeB
Sensitivity
UE Transmit Power
Penetration
Loss
Interference margin
Cable Loss
Penetration Loss
UPLINK BUDGET
Antenna Gain
SHO Gain
Maximum
Allowed path loss
Margin
Loss
NodeB reception sensitivity
Page19
The Class 4 UE, with maximum power 21 dBm, are normally considered
due to their popularity in the market
Grade of UE power TS 25.101 )
Power Class
Tolerance
+33dBm
+1/-3dB
+27dBm
+1/-3dB
+24dBm
+1/-3dB
+21dBm
+2/-2dB
Page20
Page21
Page22
Omni
11
2 Sector
18
3 Sector
18
6 Sector
20
6. Cable loss ( dB )
- Cable loss between NodeB and antenna
Cable Loss
5. NodeB_AntennaGain ( dB )
Page23
Page24
Probability Density
The higher the standard deviation is, the more SFM is required
SFM required
Coverage
CoverageProbability
Probability@
@Cell
CellEdge:
Edge:
PPCOVERAGE (x)
= P [ F(x) > Fthreshold ] ]
COVERAGE (x) = P [ F(x) > F
threshold
Without SFM
With SFM
Fthreshold
Page25
SHO reduces slow fading margin compared to the single cell case
SHO gain against slow fading can improve the coverage probability
SHO Gain against slow fading = SFM without SHO - SFM with SHO
SHO Gain Against SFM
(dB)
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Standard deviation=11.7
Path loss slope=3.52
98%
95%
92%
90%
85%
Page26
the factors affect FFM include channel model, service type, BLER requirement
Page27
SHO gain against fast fading exists for both uplink and downlink
(Typical value of SHO gain against FFM is 1.5dB)
SHO Gain Against Fast Fading = Eb/No without SHO Eb/No with SHO
Page28
[dB ]
UL Load
Copyright 2008 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. All rights reserved.
Page29
Page30
N th = 10 log( K * T * W )
Nth = -108dBm/3.84MHz
Page31
Page32
Processing gain is related with the service bearer rate, and the detail
formula is present below:
chip rate
Pr ocess Gain = 10 log(
)
bit rate
Page33
Service type
User speed
Page34
Contents
2. R99 Coverage Planning
2.1 Process of R99 Coverage Planning
2.2 R99 Uplink Budget
2.3 R99 Downlink Budget
Page35
Pa
th
Lo
ss
Body Loss
UE Antenna Gain
NodeB Transmit Power
CableLoss
Penetration
Loss
UE
Sensitivity
Interference margin
Cable Loss
Penetration Loss
DOWNLINK BUDGET
Antenna Gain
SHO Gain
Maximum
allowed path loss
Margin
Loss
UE reception sensitivity
Copyright 2008 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. All rights reserved.
Page36
IM(dB)
30.00
25.00
=0.6, f
PMax=20W,
= 1.78,
DL = 0.9
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
120
125
130
135
140
145
150
CL(dB)
Copyright 2008 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. All rights reserved.
Page37
Page38
Page39
Contents
1. WCDMA Radio Network Planning Process
2. R99 Coverage Planning
3. HSDPA Coverage Planning
Page40
Coverage Requirement
Simulation KPI
Page41
75%
HSDPA
power
90%
CCH
More power
to ensure
R99 capacity
CCH
time
time
Page42
Other Parameters
R99:
HSDPA:
Page43
HSDPA+R99
f2
HSDPA+R99
R99+HSDPA
f1
R99+HSDPA
R99+HSDPA
HSDPA+R99
f2
R99
f1
R99+HSDPA
R99
Urban
HSDPA Performance
Initial Phase
Focus on:
HSDPA coverage
no impact on R99
Page44
Page45
DL Coupling Loss
Ec
= 10 log(
No
PHS DSCH
( + f ) DL Pmax
+ 10
DL _ CoupleLoss NF Nt
10
Page46
The HSDPA link budget is usually based on the R99 link budget to get the
cell edge throughput in downlink
Page47
Simulation Conditions
Channel model-TU3
5 codes
DL_CoupleLoss=DL_PL+TxBodyLoss+TxCableLoss-TxAntennaGain+RxBodyLoss+
RxCableLoss-RxAntennaGain+PenetrationLoss+SlowFadingMargin
HSDPA power
Ec
= 10 log(
No
PHS DSCH
( + f ) DL Pmax + 10
Simulation Results
Page48
DL _ CoupleLossNFNt
10
HSDPA power
PHS DSCH
( + f ) DL Pmax
Ec
No
DL _ CoupleLoss =
NFNt
DL_CoupleLoss=DL_PL+TxBodyLoss+TxCableLoss-TxAntennaGain+RxBodyLoss+
RxCableLoss-RxAntennaGain+PenetrationLoss+SlowFadingMargin
Page49
( DL _ CoupleLoss Nt NF + ( + f ) DL Pmax )
Pmax
HSDPA Power
Page50
Ec
No + P
HS SCCH
Assumption:
Body loss : 0 dB
Slow fading margin without soft handover gain against SFM : 13.1
Page51
Assumption:
UE Category: 8
Page52
PHS DSCH
+ f ) DL Pmax + 10
DL _ CoupleLoss NF Nt
10
6000
( 0 . 5 + 1 . 78 ) * 0 . 9 * 20000 + 10
144 . 66 108 . 16 + 7
10
) = 10 . 2 dB
Base on the simulation result, the Cell Edge Throughput for HSDPA
can be obtained is 173.80 Kbps
Page53
Thank you
www.huawei.com