Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISSN 1818-4952
IDOSI Publications, 2011
Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, 94300, Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia
2
Department of Energy and Environment Engineering, Quaid-e-Awam
University of Engineering, Science and Technology Nawabshah, Sindh, Pakistan
Abstract: This paper presents the comparative study of the different models that used to predict the solar
photovoltaic module temperature, which is one of the most important factors responsible for lowering the
performance of photovoltaic modules. The approach of the different models was examined in order to evaluate
the estimated behavior of module temperature increase with respect to ambient temperature and solar radiation.
A total of 16 models have been reviewed by employing monthly mean daily meteorological data of Kuching,
Sarawak. The most models showed similar trend of increase or decrease of solar photovoltaic module
temperature due variation of solar radiation intensity. However, the results of reviewed models were quite
different under constant solar radiation and ambient temperature conditions. It was found that the variation in
the results was due to the use of different variables, climatic conditions, configuration of photovoltaic modules
and the approach used by various researchers in their models.
Key words: Photovoltaic modules
Sunshine hours
INTRODUCTION
Solar radiation
Corresponding Author: Abdul Qayoom Jakhrani, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, 94300, Kota Samarahan,
Sarawak, Malaysia. Tel: + 60-82-583324, Fax: + 60-82-583409.
World Appl. Sci. J., 14 (Special Issue of Food and Environment): 01-08, 2011
World Appl. Sci. J., 14 (Special Issue of Food and Environment): 01-08, 2011
) GT =
GT + UL (Tc T )
(1)
(2)
,NOCT
=
Ho
GT
Tc =
Ta +
GT , NOCT
U L, NOCT
) 1
m, ref
9.5
Ta, NOCT
T
5.7 + 3.8Vw NOCT
) (1
m, ref
360n
Gsc 1 + 0.033cos
365
s sin sin
(8)
cos cos cos s +
180
(3)
GT
Tc =
Ta +
GT , NOCT
24 3600
284 + n
= 23.45sin 360
365
(9)
(4)
= cos
( tan
tan )
(10)
World Appl. Sci. J., 14 (Special Issue of Food and Environment): 01-08, 2011
Table 1: Empirical Models for Estimation of Photovoltaic Module Temperature
Sr. #
Author (s)
Empirical Models
01
Ross (1976)
Tc = T + k GT where,
Comments
02
Rauschenbach (1980)
GT
Tc =
Ta +
Tc, NOCT Ta, NOCT 1 m
GT , NOCT
03
04
Schott (1985)
Tc = T + 0.028 GT 1
05
Servant (1985)
Tc = T + GT (1+ T ) (1 Vw)
(Tc Ta )
k=
GT
= 0.0138,
= 0.031,
= 0.042, Temperature
G
Tc =
Ta + T Tc, NOCT 20 and
800
06
Tc = T + 0.035 GT
07
+ 1.14 (T 25)
Author (s)
Empirical Models
01
Didier (2001)
Comments
Tc, NOCT 20
Tc =
Ta +
800
Cf = 1 1.17 10
( 219 + 832K t )
(SM S)2
02
Krauter (2004)
03
GT
9.5
Tc =
Ta +
04
m)
05
Fig. 1: Estimated values of Module Temperature verses Time at Kuching from various Models
4
World Appl. Sci. J., 14 (Special Issue of Food and Environment): 01-08, 2011
Fig. 2: Estimated values of Module Temperature verses Time at Kuching from various Models
World Appl. Sci. J., 14 (Special Issue of Food and Environment): 01-08, 2011
Fig. 5: Estimated Module Temperature verses Ambient Temperature at Constant Solar Radiation
Fig. 6: Estimated Module Temperature verses Ambient Temperature at Constant Solar Radiation
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
World Appl. Sci. J., 14 (Special Issue of Food and Environment): 01-08, 2011
2.
3.
4.
5.
CONCLUSIONS
6.
7.
8.
World Appl. Sci. J., 14 (Special Issue of Food and Environment): 01-08, 2011
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.