4 - TD Lte (Á ºà¿) PDF

TD-LTE Overview
November 2012
Bong Youl (Brian) Cho,
brian.cho@nsn.com
Contents
Why TD-LTE?
NSN with TD-LTE
TD-LTE technology overview
TTA LTE/MIMO Standards/Technology Training

2
Nokia Siemens Networks
Why TD-LTE?

3
Difference b/w 3G-TDD and 4G-TDD

1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
GSM/GPRS/EDGE enhancements
Rel 99
W-CDMA
Rel 4
1.28Mcps TDD
Rel 5
HSDPA, IMS
Rel 6
HSUPA, MBMS, IMS+

Rel 7
OFDM
MIMO
HSPA+ (MIMO, HOM etc.)

Rel 8
LTE, SAE
Small LTE/SAE
Rel 9 enhancements
Rel 10 LTE-Advanced
4
Rel 11 LTEAdvanced
Global TDD Situation
4+
Frequencies
2.3
2.6
1.9
2.5
Global
Global
Russia, China
Japan

5
50+
Countries
60%
World Pops
50%
Land-Mass
Informa
Over 50% of operators
planning to deploy TDLTE
3GPP E-UTRA TDD frequency bands
E-UTRA
Operating
Band
Uplink (UL) operating band

BS receive UE transmit
Downlink (DL) operating band

BS transmit UE receive
FUL_low FUL_high
FDL_low FDL_high
Duplex
Mode
33
1900 MHz
1920 MHz
1900 MHz
1920 MHz
TDD
34
2010 MHz
2025 MHz
2010 MHz
2025 MHz
TDD
35
1850 MHz
1910 MHz
1850 MHz
1910 MHz
TDD
36
1930 MHz
1990 MHz
1930 MHz
1990 MHz
TDD
37
1910 MHz
1930 MHz
1910 MHz
1930 MHz
TDD
38
2570 MHz
2620 MHz
2570 MHz
2620 MHz
TDD
39
1880 MHz
1920 MHz
1880 MHz
1920 MHz
TDD
40
2300 MHz
2400 MHz
2300 MHz
2400 MHz
TDD
41
2496 MHz
2690 MHz
2496 MHz
2690 MHz
TDD
42
3400 MHz
3600 MHz
3400 MHz
3600 MHz
TDD
43
3600 MHz
3800 MHz
3600 MHz
3800 MHz
TDD
44
703 MHz
803 MHz
703 MHz
803 MHz
TDD

6
LTE-FDD, TD-LTE Integration

Fully integrated over time
FDD-LTE
TD-LTE
TD-LTE / FDD-LTE
Transparent hand over
Global Roaming
FDD-LTE & TD-LTE

Standards Integration
Product Integration
Maximized commonality b/w FDD and TDD

for high level of integration/interworking
7
TD-LTE Capacity
Similar spectral efficiency for TD-LTE and LTE-FDD

Mbps
Similar
Spectrum
Efficiency
35
FDD-LTE
DL = 10MHz
UL = 10MHz
30
TD-LTE
config.1
DL/UL = 4/4
timeslots
Similar DL
and UL
capacity as in
FDD
TD-LTE
config.2
DL/UL = 6/2
timeslots
Optimized
for very
asymmetric
traffic
FDD-LTE
DL = 20MHz
UL = 20MHz
Double spectrum
= double capacity
25
20
15
DL/UL
Ratio
Flexibility
10
Downlink
Uplink
FDD 2 x 10MHz

8
TD-LTE 1 x 20MHz TD-LTE 1x20MHz
( FDD 2 x 20MHz )
TD-LTE a very relevant tool for every operator

True 4G performance
Comparable Performance FDDLTE
Traditional CSP Augment FDD-LTE

Increased Capacity (Overlay/Underlay)
or specific Apps (M2M, Video Broadcast)
Global & Local

Roaming
TD-LTE / FDD-LTE / 3GPP /
3GPP2
Greenfield TD-LTE main LTE network
Affordable Spectrum
Global roaming + potential MVNO capability with

other 3GPP/3GPP2 operators for underlay in
early deployment stage with transparent
Sold for 10x less than FDD

equivalent
Economy of Scale
LTE Momentum Driving
Common Network Hardware
TD-LTE
Early Market Opportunity
Large Operators TD-LTE
Opportunities Driving the

Device
Economy of Scale

9
WiMAX CSP Possible migration path

Leverage current spectrum asset
Scope for evolution to TD-LTE when time is
right
TD-LTE Applications
Leveraging Flexible DL/UL Ratio

Transport On-Board Infotainment
DL Bias Use Case
- Layer coverage of transport networks for added capacity and supporting the
infotainment nature of the likely applications used during transport
- Leverage Very High Downlink Capacity for fixed line BB like service for
supporting more subscribers and high quality and innovative applications
Surveillance & Video based M2M
UL Bias Use Case
Spot Coverage of Crowd Based Events/Gathering, Public Safety Incidents /

Traffic Monitoring, Hazardous places access, Remote People monitoring, ...
- Leverage HD quality video uplink, responsive service with very long distance
remote control capabilities
Mobile Reporter
UL Bias Use Case

10
- TD-LTE enable report to leverage the power of now in the field and with HD
Quality and instantaneity for live studio-like dialog
- Avoid Complex, Slow & Costly deployment of TV vehicles on site
NSN with TD-LTE

11
Nokia Siemens Networks LTE references

67 commercial LTE customers
Canada
Canada
Sweden
Sweden
Latvia
Korea
Latvia
TD-LTE
USA
Denmark
Denmark
Finland
Finland
Lithuania
Russia
Korea
Poland
South
Korea
IMS
USA
USA
Germany
Germany
Estonia
Estonia
TD-LTE
Brazil
TD-LTE
France
61
LTE radio deals

(incl. 8 TD-LTE)
32
LTE EPC deals
35
commercially launched
networks
(incl. 5 TD-LTE)
Croatia
Austria
Slovenia
India
Singapore
Japan
Portugal
Italy
Azerbaijan
Bahrain
Australia
Japan
TD-LTE
UAE

12
LTE supplier to the

largest operators in
Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia Japan and Korea
Japan
TD-LTE Developments
Award
The Economic Figure of the
Year of the China Information
Industry
Progress
Demos since 2009
Commercial deals since 2011
Significant deployments 2012
7 commercial deals to date

(leading)
for NSN innovation & leadership in TD-LTE
Worlds 1st
Simultaneou
s multiple
UE TD-LTE
connection
Worlds 1st
TD-LTE
drive tour at
ITU Geneva
Worlds 1st
3GPP R8
TD-LTE call
& HO
1st CMCC/
VDF proof of
tech.
Worlds 1st
Worlds 1st
1st TD-LTE
Femto cell
demo
3GPP R8
TD-LTE
E2E L3 call
with comm.
EPC
2009
13
China Information Industry Economic

Conference
Beijing, Dec 1st 2011
100% pass
MIIT lab test
E2E call with
throughput
>80Mbps
end-to-end
1st TD-LTE
trial network
parallel
connecting
to CMCC,
Shanghai
Expo
1st TaiwanMainland
TD-LTE live
HD video
1st TD LTETD SCDMA

video call
controlled
by IMS
Worlds 1st
1st TD-LTE
Open Lab
2010
Worlds 1st
1st TD-LTE
TDSCDMA
concurrent
mode
2011
We are here
2.3GHz
MIIT field
trial test
1st TD-LTE
demo in
India &
Russia
IOT with UE
vendors
(incl. Altair,
Sequans,
HiSilicon,
Innofidei,
Qualcomm)
3 Large
scale trials
slots in
CMCC large
field trial
Successful
trials in
India and
Russia
Leading
vendor in
MIT 2.6 GHz
field trial
First
1.3Gbps
demo for
LTE-A with
CMCC
First to finish
CMCC Ph1
large scale
testing
(97%)
2012
NSN extends TD-LTE speed record in China

14
TD-LTE technology overview

15
Duplexing
FDD
TDD

16
Duplexing contd

17
LTE FDD vs TD-LTE

Same RF Structure, Same Resource Block => Same RF Power/Time/Bandwidth Density
Same Power Transmitted during the Same amount of time as FDD-LTE
LTE FDD
TD-LTE
Power
Spectrum
Time
Single UL Frame
Resource Block
DL
10W
DL
UL
10ms
5W
1/5 W
5MHz
5MHz

18
UL
10ms
1/5 W
5ms
10MHz
3GPP LTE FDD vs. LTE TDD

High degree of commonality
Features
LTE FDD
LTE TDD
Frame structure
1ms sub-frame
1ms sub-frame
Switching points
N/A
5ms periodicity and 10 ms periodicity
BS Synchronization
Asynchronous/Synchronous
Synchronous
DL Control Channel
Can schedule 1 DL and 1 UL

sub-frame at a time
Can schedule 1 DL and multiple

UL sub-frame at a time
UL Control Channel
Single ACK/NAK corresponding

to 1 DL sub-frame
Multiple ACK/NAK corresponding

to multiple DL sub-frame
PRACH
0,1,2,3
0,1,2,3,4 (Short RACH)
Special slot usage
N/A
DwPTS: RS, Data and Control

UpPTS: SRS and Short RACH
Numerology, Coding, Multiple Same

Access, MIMO support, RS
etc.
Same
HARQ Timing
TBD
DL: Async, UL: Sync
High Degree of Commonality

19
N=8 stop-and-wait protocol

DL: Async, UL: Sync
LTE FDD vs. TDD performance comparison

TD-LTE
FDD-LTE
Spectral Efficiency
DL/UL Balancing
TD-LTE can adapt to DL/UL traffic ratio

(typical of internet traffic)
Real Life Performance
+
+
+

20
Better in big-sized cells
Paired-band is not needed, no duplexing gap

Coexistence requirement for adjacent
frequency in the same geographic area
Coexistence
New Spectrum Pricing
Dedicated UL/DL pipes (no need to wait for

UL or DL slot)
Comparable Subscriber Experience
Coverage
Spectrum Flexibility
Fix bandwidth for DL & UL

(typical of voice traffic)
Slightly longer latency
Latency
Negligible advantage (No need of switching)
TDD Spectrum had traditionally auctioned for

lower $/MHz
+
Because of higher demand FDD has so far
sold for higher $/MHz
Frame Structure
Type 1 for FDD
One radio frame, Tf = 307200Ts=10 ms
One slot, Tslot = 15360Ts = 0.5 ms
#0
#1
#2
#3
#18
#19
One subframe
Type 2 for TDD

One radio frame, Tf = 307200Ts = 10 ms
One half-frame, 153600Ts = 5 ms
One slot,
Tslot=15360Ts
30720Ts
Subframe #0
Subframe #2
Subframe #3
Subframe #4
Subframe #5
Subframe #7
One subframe,
30720Ts
DwPTS
GP
UpPTS

21
DwPTS
GP
UpPTS
Subframe #8
Subframe #9
Frame Structure: FDD/TDD

22
TD-LTE: UL/DL configurations
Subframe number
Configuration
Switch-point periodicity
0
5 ms
5 ms
5 ms
10 ms
10 ms
10 ms
5 ms

23
TD-LTE: UL/DL configurations

24
TD-LTE:
Special subframe config for max cell range
* assuming Normal CP

25
Mapping of control channels to TDD config #1
<cf> FDD LTE

26
Coexistence among neighboring TDD systems

27
Typical RF interference scenario for a TDD

28
Coexistence b/w TD-SCDMA and TD-LTE

29
Coexistence b/w WiMAX (16e) and TD-LTE

30
System Information
Master information block (MIB) includes the following information:
Downlink cell bandwidth [4 bit]
System Frame Number (SFN) except two LBSs
Etc
LTE defines different SIBs:

SIB1 includes info mainly related to whether an UE is allowed to camp on the cell. This includes info
about the operator(s) and about the cell (e.g. PLMN identity list, tracking area code, cell identity,
minimum required Rx level in the cell, etc), DL-UL subframe configuration in TDD case, and the
scheduling of the remaining SIBs. SIB1 is transmitted every 80ms.
SIB2 includes info that UEs need in order to be able to access the cell. This includes info about the UL
cell BW, random access parameters, and UL power control parameters. SIBs also includes radio
resource configuration of common channels (RACH, BCCH, PCCH, PRACH, PDSCH, PUSCH,
PUCCH, and SRS).
SIB3-4 mainly includes info related to cell-reselection.

SIB5-8 include neighbor-cell-related info. (E-UTRAN, UTRAN, GERAN, cdma2000)
SIB9 contains a home eNB identifier
SIB10/11 contains ETWS (Earthquake and Tsunami Warning System) notification
SIB12: CMAS
SIB13: eMBMS
More to be added
MIB mapped to PBCH, Other SIBs mapped to PDSCH

31
Coexistence b/w TDD and FDD

32
MIMO Spatial Multiplexing (SM)

Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO)
Multiple antennas at both transmitter and receiver
MIMO uses multipath to advantage to multiply data rate
Transmits different data along different paths (simplified view)
MxN MIMO can multiply data rate by M or N (whichever is less) if there is enough multipath.
Best in urban high-multipath environment (and indoors)

Less effective in suburban and rural low-multipath environments

33
How can we get multiplexing?

Simple concept
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Transmit one data in one link (1 Tx & 1 Rx antenna)

Transmit two data in two links far away from each other (1 Tx & 1 Rx antenna, respectively)
Transmit two data in one link (1 Tx & 1 Rx antenna) ??
Transmit two data in one link (2 Tx & 2 Rx antenna) ??
(4) is just the special case of (2)!!
Simple linear algebra

Matrix ()
Rank
Favorable channel condition for MIMO SM?

Rich scattering (i.e. multipath) for high rank
High SINR for reliable decoding
34
SVD MIMO as a closed-loop MIMO

In CL-SU-MIMO, SVD-MIMO is the optimum

35
MIMO Channel Decomposition

36
MIMO Channel Decomposition

~
w
1
x
~
x
VH
n
UH
~
w
nmin
min
Channel
Pre-processing
Post-processing
With number of transmitting antenna=nt and receiving antenna=nr,
y Hx w
x C nt , y C nr , w ~ (0, N 0 I nr )
37
~
y
Channel Diagonalization
H
~
yU y
U (Hx w )
H
U H (UDV H x w )
U H (UDV H V~
x w)
D~
x UHw
~
~
y D~
xw

38
Codebook for Precoding 2 ports
For transmission on two antenna ports, p 0,1 , the precoding matrix W (i) shall be
selected from Table 6.3.4.2.3-1 or a subset thereof.

39
Codebook for Precoding 4 ports
The quantity Wn denotes the matrix defined by the columns given by the set {s}
from the expression Wn I 2ununH unH un where I is the 4x4 identity matrix and the
vector u n is given by Table 6.3.4.2.3-2.
{s}

40
3GPP Release 8 DL transmission modes

Two approaches to multi-antenna transmission
MIMO
CQI
PMI
Rank
Beamforming
CQI
SRS
CRS
DRS
MCS
PMI
Rank
If UE uses multiple receive

antennas, it also has to
transmit SRS on multiple
antennas in order for UL
measurements to fully
reflect DL channel state
MCS
PDSCH Channel estimation based on

common reference signal (CRS)
PDSCH Channel estimation based on

dedicated reference signal (DRS)
Closed loop, codebook precoding (TM4)
Open loop, non-codebook precoding (TM7)

41
Multi-Antenna Technology Summary

Diversity
Same data on all the pipes (mode 2)
Increased coverage and link quality
But, the all pipes can be combined to make a kind-of beamforming
MIMO
Different data streams on different pipes (mode 4)
Increased spectral efficiency (increased overall throughput)
Power is split among the data streams
Beamforming
Data stream on only the strongest pipe (mode 7)
Utilize different amplitude/phase at all pipes to optimally match per-UE
radio condition
Increased coverage and signal SNR

42
3GPP Release 9/10 DL transmission modes

Enhanced beamforming: dual-layer beamforming (TM8)
Multi-layer (TM9)
With cross polar antennas in mind TDD

operators have been eager to extend Rel8
Beamforming to support two streams.
Spatial multiplexing supported
- Up to 2 layers per user (SU-MIMO)
- Up to 4 layer in total (MU-MIMO)
CQI
PMI
Rank
SRS
DRS
MCS
Rank
PDSCH Channel estimation

based on DRS
43
CRS based PMI and rank reporting supported

for beamforming
- Similar feedback schemes as for Rel-8 SUMIMO
(tx-mode 4)
- TxD CQI also supported
- One CRS per polarization via sector beam
virtualization (as in Rel-9)
PDSCH Transmission Modes

Mode
Details
Single-antenna transmission
Transmit diversity
Open-loop codebook-based precoding in the case of more than one layer,

transmit diversity in the case of rank-one transmission
Closed-loop codebook-based precoding
Multi-user-MIMO version of transmission mode 4
Special case of closed-loop codebook-based precoding limited to single-layer

transmission
Release-8 non-codebook-based precoding supporting only single-layer

transmission
Release-9 non-codebook-based precoding supporting up to two layers
Release-10 non-codebook-based precoding supporting up to eight layers

44
Cell-Specific RS Mapping
RS Overhead
One antenna port
R0
R0
R0
R0
R0
R0
R0
R0
l0
l6 l0
Normal CP
Extended CP
1 Tx ant
4.76%
5.56%
2 Tx ant
9.52%
11.11%
4 Tx ant
14.29%
15.87%
l6
Resource element (k,l)
Two antenna ports
R0
R0
R0
R0
R1
R0
R0
R0
Four antenna ports
R0
R0
l0
R0
odd-numbered slots

45
Nokia Siemens
Antenna portNetworks
0
l0
R2
R1
R3
R2
R1
l6 l0
even-numbered slots
R3
R2
l6
odd-numbered slots
Antenna port 1
R3
R2
R1
R1
l6
l6
R1
R1
R0
l6 l0
even-numbered slots
R1
R1
R0
Reference symbols on this antenna port
l6 l0
R1
R0
R0
l0
l6
Not used for transmission on this antenna port
R1
R1
l6 l0
R0
R1
R1
R0
l0
R1
R1
l0
R3
l6 l0
even-numbered slots
l6
odd-numbered slots
Antenna port 2
l0
l6 l0
even-numbered slots
l6
odd-numbered slots
Antenna port 3
UE-specific RS (R5) on top of CRS

UE-specific RS (antenna port 5)
12 symbols per RB pair
DL CQI estimation is always based on cell-specific RS (common RS)

46
New DM-RS for scalability

47
Multi-Antenna Technology Summary

Diversity
Same data on all the pipes (mode 2)
Increased coverage and link quality
But, the all pipes can be combined to make a kind-of beamforming
MIMO
Different data streams on different pipes (mode 4)
Increased spectral efficiency (increased overall throughput)
Power is split among the data streams
Beamforming
Data stream on only the strongest pipe (mode 7)
Utilize different amplitude/phase at all pipes to optimally match per-UE
radio condition
Increased coverage and signal SNR

Not any more focusing on the strongest pipe in transmission mode 8 in
R9 and mode 9 in R10

48
LTE FDD vs TD-LTE link budget comparison

(700MHz example)

49
3GPP Defined LTE CA Band Combinations

Release 10
Band1 + Band5 LG U+
Release 11 Work Items
LTE_CA_B1_B7: LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 1 and Band 7

LTE_CA_B3_B5: LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 3 and Band 5 SK Telecom
LTE_CA_B3_B7: LTE-Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 3 and Band 7
LTE_CA_B3_B8: LTE-Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 3 and Band 8 KT

Carrier aggregation is supported for

both FDD and TDD, although all
component carriers need to have
the same duplex scheme.
In the case of TDD, the uplink
downlink configuration should be
the same across component carriers.
The special subframe configuration
can be different for the different
components carriers though, as long
as the resulting downlinkuplink
switch time is sufficiently large.
LTE_CA_B7: LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation in Band 7

LTE_CA_B25: LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation Intra-Band, Non-Contiguous in Band 25


50
CA for TD-LTE
* CA Band Combination
HARQ Retransmission Timing

Acknowledgement of a transport block in subframe n is transmitted in subframe
n + k , where k 4 and is selected such that n + k is an uplink subframe

51
HARQ Acknowledgement Bundling

For DL transmissions, there are some configurations where DL-SCH receipt in multiple DL
subframes needs to be acknowledged in a single UL subframe
Multiplexing
Independent acknowledgements for each of the received transport blocks are fed back to the
eNodeB. This allows independent retransmission of erroneous transport blocks. However, it also
implies that multiple bits need to be transmitted from the terminal.
Bundling of acknowledgements
The outcome of the decoding of DL transport blocks from multiple DL subframes can be combined
into a single hybrid-ARQ acknowledgement transmitted in UL. Only if both of the DL transmissions
in subframes 0 and 3 in the example below are correctly decoded will a positive acknowledgement
be transmitted in UL subframe 7.
The downlink assignment index in the scheduling assignment on the PDCCH is used to avoid
confusion

52
UL Grant Timing
For TDD configurations 16, the uplink transmission occurs in subframe n + k , where k is
the smallest value larger than or equal to 4 such that subframe n + k is an uplink
subframe.
For TDD configuration 0 there are more UL subframes than DL subframes, which calls for
the possibility to schedule transmissions in multiple UL subframes from a single DL
subframe. For DL-UL configuration 0, the index field specifies which UL subframe(s) a
grant received in a DL subframe applies to.

53
Random Access
Short PRACH preamble (format 4) only for TD-LTE (to utilize UpPTS in small cells)
For TDD, multiple random-access regions can be configured in a single subframe.

The reason is the smaller number of uplink subframes per radio frame in TDD. To
maintain the same random-access capacity as in FDD, frequency-domain
multiplexing is sometimes necessary.

54
Better Utilization of SRS

SRS (Sounding Reference Signal)
SRS can be used for both DL beamforming and UL CAS
Calibration needed for channel reciprocity

Model to illustrate the impact from RF units to channel reciprocity
(capital letters indentify matrixes)

55
FDD-TDD Handover
FDD - TDD mobility
Network controlled
Event triggered based on DL
measurement RSRP and RSRQ
Inter frequency measurements
triggered by events A1/A2
Configurable thresholds for
coverage based (A5),
best cell based (A3) handover

56
S-GW MME
TD-LTE is IMT-Advanced approved too!

57
TD-LTE is IMT-Advanced approved too!

58
TD-LTE Summary
Market potential
High level of commonality b/w FDD LTE and TD-LTE

Slight difference in frame structure (FDD vs. TDD)
Time synchronized network
Need to ensure coexistence b/w neighboring TDD systems

Better beamforming performance with channel reciprocity
Smaller link budget which fits to capacity networks
Flexible DL/UL capacity for various applications

59
Thank you !
www.nokiasiemensnetworks.com
20F, Meritz Tower, 825-2
Yeoksam-Dong, Kangnam-Gu
Seoul 135-080, Korea
Bong Youl (Brian) Cho

Lead Product Manager Korea, Ph.D.
LTE Business Line, MBB
brian.cho@nsn.com
Mobile 010-4309-4129
60

4 - TD Lte (Á ºà¿) PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

4 - TD Lte (Á ºà¿) PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

TD-LTE Overview

TTA LTE/MIMO Standards/Technology Training

TTA LTE/MIMO Standards/Technology Training

Difference b/w 3G-TDD and 4G-TDD

HSUPA, MBMS, IMS+

HSPA+ (MIMO, HOM etc.)

Global TDD Situation

TTA LTE/MIMO Standards/Technology Training

3GPP E-UTRA TDD frequency bands

Uplink (UL) operating band

Downlink (DL) operating band

TTA LTE/MIMO Standards/Technology Training

LTE-FDD, TD-LTE Integration

FDD-LTE & TD-LTE

Maximized commonality b/w FDD and TDD

Similar spectral efficiency for TD-LTE and LTE-FDD

TTA LTE/MIMO Standards/Technology Training

TD-LTE 1 x 20MHz TD-LTE 1x20MHz

TD-LTE a very relevant tool for every operator

Traditional CSP Augment FDD-LTE

Global & Local

Greenfield TD-LTE main LTE network

Global roaming + potential MVNO capability with

Sold for 10x less than FDD

Large Operators TD-LTE

Opportunities Driving the

TTA LTE/MIMO Standards/Technology Training

WiMAX CSP Possible migration path

Leveraging Flexible DL/UL Ratio

DL Bias Use Case

Surveillance & Video based M2M

UL Bias Use Case

Spot Coverage of Crowd Based Events/Gathering, Public Safety Incidents /

UL Bias Use Case

NSN with TD-LTE

TTA LTE/MIMO Standards/Technology Training

Nokia Siemens Networks LTE references

LTE radio deals

LTE EPC deals

TTA LTE/MIMO Standards/Technology Training

LTE supplier to the

Demos since 2009

Commercial deals since 2011

Significant deployments 2012

7 commercial deals to date

for NSN innovation & leadership in TD-LTE

China Information Industry Economic

1st TD LTETD SCDMA

NSN extends TD-LTE speed record in China

TTA LTE/MIMO Standards/Technology Training

TD-LTE technology overview

TTA LTE/MIMO Standards/Technology Training

TTA LTE/MIMO Standards/Technology Training

TTA LTE/MIMO Standards/Technology Training

LTE FDD vs TD-LTE

Same Power Transmitted during the Same amount of time as FDD-LTE

TTA LTE/MIMO Standards/Technology Training

3GPP LTE FDD vs. LTE TDD

5ms periodicity and 10 ms periodicity

Can schedule 1 DL and 1 UL

Can schedule 1 DL and multiple

Single ACK/NAK corresponding

Multiple ACK/NAK corresponding