JURGEN HANNEDER ABHINAVAGUPTA’S PHILOSOPHY OF REVELATION MALINISLOKAVARTTIKA 1, 1-399GRONINGEN ORIENTAL STUDIES VOLUME XIV Publiied un the smpices of the J. Gonda Fe Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences ” bir HT. Baler, Gromingn bial Board H.W, Bedewite D.D.S. Goodall H, Isaacson - GJ, Meulenbeld Adin Baad 6. Cat, ris RE, Emme, Hang J Eso, Goin RF. Gobi, Oe (J.C Heesterman, Leiden - D. Sbuiman,,seo: Panchasnana Siva. Pancaala Temple imac Pee, ih Congo ‘is tok wa pit wih Sinaia apport fi the ) Gonda Foundation, Amsterdam, sans 908801857 Tain ek demain ‘ag fr cnc pm Netra Copyright© 198 Eger Footen, Groningen, The A ge rar Nef of isk my hep = serait oo) Preface The prevent work ean tempt o et and translate he is po he Mat slokavda, which deals with the origin ofthe Suva revelatng, This, sits mame indicates. averse commentary on the Malnayaratantns snd was composed bythe Kashnian philosopher Abbinaagaps, whos le ‘cary activity must ave centred aroun the end ofthe 1th and the begining the 11th cetury AD. Its writen na style which sometimes lols simple, tut never is andthe high degree of absinction i displays combines wih he ‘ad stato the ransmited texto present formidable tsk to ever ead. As this eae proves on inal naively andthe commitmeat to ishinga degree ina predetermined tie ean perme one wo pute sacha werk. Even fi sated at every der verse, my interrelation cannot be anying bet ro ‘Sonal Neverles it, 1 hink, ful to make thi temp, because tak 'simporant fr fuer states of Abhinavagupt's concept ofthe Siva canon ‘The grate pr ofthis work was completed during ane andaalfearstay ‘in Oxf, whee Tad the opportunity to dscuss spoil alone ‘on ai tanslton a wells many issues lati othe intrettion this ‘ext wit Profesor Alexi Sndersn ofA Sals Calls. He ery gsaeosy made available to me some of his taps niles and drew my teaion "many ofthe sourees ule in hs hei exaggeration oy tha iho his guince his wek woud have heen impose. ao wish otha Professor Michael Haka to whom me mos f my ‘illogical ning in Sanit and who tek up himself he supervision a ‘hs doctorate His unin suport in every sage was eri othe comple tin ofhie hesis Foc creating the Hvely and simulating atmosphere in Oxo would ik te tank my fellow students, especialy my calles ad end De Dominic ‘Goal ot ony framers dscsionson Siva mates, bas forproot ‘eating aod improving the English Dr: Harunaza Imac, especially for is "tose inspection of my etn, and Some Vasudeva for is thermore, nchrnolgial ore: lanes Schneider Rei Son (Mathur), Dr Pes Savestivara Sharm (Mu) and ProCirce Mer dal nprove te plea ea res th eon B®. Shar, ane, who as bcs SS res remataahstithek, GOtingen, and the Bodlelan Library, Oxford er be ‘use their manuscripts for the present publication, the permis Contents, 1 The iva Revelation 4 16 The Validity of None Revelation Siva’s "Body" ‘The Strcture of the Siva Cao “Models of Iteration Abinavagupt'sDefinon of Agama ‘The Threfold Divison Tamtalovieta 8 2 The Malintokavarika 3. The Text ofthe Matinsokavarat al 32 33 a4 a 36 a Parra Par 1 Imvodastory Verses 2 The Molsatra 3 The Nau of Knowledge The Names ofthe Text, Eons and Manussipts Description ofthe Manuscripts ‘Textal Citi Sls Pecuiarites ‘Notes onthe Talton andthe Commentary Abbreviations Use inthe Eton ‘TEXT AND TRANSLATION CCommuestany4 The Tika 2p Sista as the Knowled Inherent in Consciousness § The Five Powers $1. The Naure of Time $2. Ligheas Knowlede $5 The Natur ofthe Light of Consciousness Sa The Number of Powers $5 The Transcendence of Purity 6 TheFive Steams ofthe Sastra 61 Kol 62 Time 63. TheSixth Steam 664 Tika Defined as “Half of Si 65. The Five Fes of Sadasiva 66 1sna 67 Tapers 68 Sudyojaa 69. Sadyojta (continued) 610 Vamadeva 6.1 Aghora 7 The Three Divisions ofthe Sista ApPenpices Appentix The Setkanpht 1 Summary of Contents Appentix 2. Verse Index Appendix 3 Bibliography Part 1 Introduction__ Chapter 1 The Saiva Revelation The fist par of the Matinfsotaarika® als with the origin ofthe five streams (pafcasroms) of Saiva revelation (alvassta)? tha is, with the. \ivisons and hierarchies of the texts taught by Siva Tn order to understand the positon ofthis religion in what we are used to call Hinduism, as wells the. context of the Var, some preliminary considerons may prove useful Since the term ‘Hinduism’ asa moder eeation isnot considered sui | forthe description of Indian religions in a historial perspective, a ion between Vedism or Vee eligon, Vaignavim and Suivi ‘opted in textbooks on “Hinduism The fist term unfortunatly ‘or the word "Vedi" is used by medieval Indi etegees nota term, tut as denoting one, namely the erthodox, segment of ‘One of the main criteria tht defined the position of “set” or India vas their postion relative to onboprany, i,t the Acceptance of it was demonstrated through the practice ofa bused on exegesis of a twofold canon of scriptures, “vedic” andthe more elastic eategory of smrt, Because of ther ‘boprany for instance though rejecting est — ‘ne Buddhists or Jainas, were considered tobe “un-vedic” ‘he orthodox, even Saivas and Pitcarikas were veda ot fundameataly iffereat from the Buddhist ~ om scriptures that were revealed by Siva or Vig1 todion «jpoxieromimain tie yon, te Tce a fe Vole! In ord Te Yemntctye thors difleenaa Be tae jen oe os jm to bier fom he Vo Fee ppl oh eyter, te Parr, bu args that i ha noe of a law that complicates the issue: some Vedic sce app oa pats of society ad not only tothe higher he oe opht 1 be te addressee of Vedic injunctions. Othe i eter seen of Sivism is un-vedicin a mach si Toe eure the Tatras which tc held tobe superior othe Paar tira uide range of cl, some of which accep the Ved while eo wer and soteiologialy ineffective revelation. The Ft manne potion with tepndto he Veda, howevernoninalinn aan to ty the inclusion of Saivism asa whol into aoe anpupaown pilosophy iscertainly among the morale decrees tha would nt openly contadict onhoprasy ont eee nso caste, puny and te ike, but deny its efficacy in secur voc. 'soch a poniton ss explained, for instance, by the following caerning God, n onde to preserve a functioning society, created Owens fine st cach hese ebvioural rues and support them with the oo thatthe tesa. Prout for this, according to Abhinavagupta’s school that the toot propagated these rues did not necesaily conform to the ‘what they do, but do what they sy.” orf de matter we have to distinguish at least between a onde 95 tam pup ca bua py hai sds aa iia cmt uct vedaosyaaye en chone anyar vedabytvam cyte | nnd ia steno pS me ‘sro Hino faces cone Pen eared at brit smaca| See TAH 1 The sia Reelin congrn devon Sivas repented byt Sv ; ‘scone hand nd Tae Savane eee Thee Sane en des ot means wor of Sb an hao “Sch Sa sn ca cee ae nerd stemef wonhip wha pedomfeaay fae patioeneay sulficient to rank them in a different religious category? = “Tew ae however ony cuties tt faces ondenesag OF complied process of alaptaton on tthe Fe eli ag: son ae ued by atenpn on he io fee Ta aloe iba Voli lion. as vel aby he eflons f te more const Wag tian no onbodosy fe mon ing compl fr te the cl of the Sv which, aliongh sare as ee ae withthe Bara con, ts age a al Sankante onder at Sgr, which is totay one of xe pens fot Hinds. it we eclde the Siva ofthe Parga and te Sater We ae a twofold diineton, marely between the s-aled AAs a he Stanandra. The Alia is more ores Kena wit Pear aa ‘ferent Kinds, wheres the Mantra cones Tanti Sava a ‘ubiisions" In Abhingagepas tine the in letnetn Wii Tat ‘Sivsm was the dict ete ‘he (Ssiva)Sddhanta andthe non dualisti sebools The Siddha adhered * See Sao 1996, ho eft Ay 3.10, 42594264 Thee ‘hs wold meg The te wing sen prim = ao 2 ‘rey some Saat a contest Ye ‘Cease rs ha aes Vo ‘tana pally me ‘sd eat re flowing ce SaDERSON SSDI7 ~tppe is we ing peo in Bi one i em ocvine according to which Siva is merely he | Tisha das ity dal a raine wit coma 10 the lower and one of te wor ee ties! fom the souls and the wed "The theo of he Kashi cl ef oreo isallpervnine re confined by tat, cannot KIOW OF ac ad tt Sidi the cl of Neath represent bythe Nerang ala Wi ich is dependent on teats of experience acces oes aah altar eto th mayo he cand mea, Tis | bond whch is called dy and conse [the he Tis wit i ab evels nd aly the Kena” The nc geo a or Miah won of mcr of eon mc nee ala. i ara substance, could according othe Sa peer eed trough an action: he ital of ation which removes ‘oot as is expe om the Krams which son top end oe oa es fal beatin t death wit the aling away of there in co dig comrcdou ls SORE Seb end secures fal cette eae sc on laing cemriction w the Stet to be a coming ee amaanrniions he sal ti "hc sole Siva revelation whereas the Tika with ts alae ena” Te eon to recognize tis fact n an act of nuidon inorder de seca encompase a aie of ext mc catncons ae by the isis ae tis ee ee rac Al ie " is te te Srna - ny ale Siva, Wher he ae 2 id tht wan see oe Sa So ad eee ot telat ole he forme a “cere Bet he sprit ns prey atoning bas hc of Atinwapops sco a d the non form of revelation. Theil by rectly challenging “eteal” religion acceding tothe fen the bole spectrum of religions", since itincloded not only unt ne shouldbe “inwardly a Kaul Sava tothe side ad a the sidan, bu alvo Baddhist philosophy, Yop andthe ‘nunc daily ie". one was sppoted wo Keepones te lion ety ine positon ofa religion could be dedoced fom its rot. Since Tantric practice was sential private and ot ca pelea nti case of Siva schools ~ more inportanly he temple the actual practice of an inate would wt bose pe bapsogelepmanytpeniensp iy ei ‘In otc words, the practioner envisaged by Abinragupa would pbably fetron, mc can sce tat the defining characteristic in their panto have heen kno to be an init Sav, but wold et appen iffee emt To ano tte ome oe oop Sana teal ee a ean ti ot a shin en ea et Seine tic tts aga ‘rane onc py og taincasi er rent Ts si ere Tete Saunt thine sect fr wots, 1 eae aig aon Yonve form ofthe Tints and in the acount ofthe descent ofthe isan. 6 esa sai sesdind ap nevaitprananvenaive primirabonpgamsardgumas ‘vind | Mesoprancttar ik 3b es {set a rman na eae peer paeepratotam ain Son ran Nota ed tea +» nati 813 ea erttrough different divine so semi-divin beings, iti ae eis pays 10 important olen Tanti at tactics is ot 3 cult of images, but cul of ee Ss toown fom Pu ‘tehuman Tr Foch Suva practitioner the fon orm of Asninovagupn’s depiction ofthe “five streams tao ar mantras or powers which are the somes er becomes he srpture, not an artificially absirat vg washing an Agama. but more faithful tis al account For instance the Mrgendratantra ts mae of pow Sata vapus) in order a follows Siva’s body i to present the practitioner with an Ln describes how the five mantras form Siva’ ‘trough which be govems the whole iy) the bead, because it occupies a snot a part of the by. 1 Compu rma he Srp te ie faces inn blow wi seo dene ce whch ty me em SoS Soapurne 9 28 has OE 6 pee pa ater meer parrot ‘Sn nine yin 19 es Sil mes eoaeeineioteereeaistorrs 1 toon wagon pen can poe tatoo sper mee pa tc emer tora pepe | mdm 1 The ais Renton ‘ety anhant oes hat he quay the mes tna, cane it the upmost of lhe steams of Sera cia eae Som hte eb then. Te eet ene op rie the eter paso the ‘boy of the tially blow Gos, |: compicues tha the Tan el tes empty te oft by throaghnirecanasof heer mea "hea iy 2 pa of he dy, but oly ian fonsonng a the spree To hich we athe expec om a piloupher who wie tome eam Sch own reading ofthe doting si act ie appropri fo tartcsog in hich deities ae fis of all mantras. Only sed sepa = sly caf fhe fares Sib rte eo ‘ort or Sahel ore a mane be Morte tp rcs. Inher words one lk ofthe mans a fest iewven “Tic conection between the names (na tatpurasa, aghora, madera ott) ete pas ofthe bay inthe coms of S's orice ‘shen we loka the form of tee mans ie om hom tinamtrdine naas (ot hem atpurgavalariya nama ‘os um aghorahrdayaya nama on hin vdmadevagahyya nana ‘om ham radyeiuamsruaye nama “crated with parts of the worshipper’s, and therefore Siva's, body. ‘os pad comeited ih many oer sce ff Ie heries itas follows: ike space. Beneath this formless and all deserted: put vw will summarily each how far the “cause dete] pervade rahm is presiding aaa ove re, vara over air and Sad8Siva over spaced senor ieseton can be mde With e HE Nera et re st of Kenton hate ot ean Sa La he ive Lanesore second he eB ee ike urinzont ces Ge. xcept ek oe ea four Vedas, vo thal the following picture e iret upward) with he rection bralmaface Marana serine wet Sodyojita Brak Rgveda for VimoderaVisqa = Yajurveda fou" Aghon Roda Simaveda fest Taipurga—Tvara— thar resi Sediiva ‘sanvavdamaka’ This is followed by another set of idenifteation withthe same names faces 4 Ins commesay Kenan ante dt re oly heme erm iGreen at ser cern ett wha Siri a fei ied of ve is therefor ot ote fet ie ie can be derstn atps o esave ncns ses ‘Scud also estan edaction of te et an one iE ‘stony of etext by aang tse states ARAB SSoupon fs xr sete may ele ps Tea 5 Ise! as cmplaion of stone, bat possibly concn ccna 4 Lanna par Yop tay sana | rae prt | pen ape sho vin ada as samt 0 1 Seren be : | The Suva Revelation Swot lauam vnam Vamadevn allan Agen adit Ta mane \We wil see thatthe mantramarga (‘mantathya) i gain divi ito fie yams, but the tu gives no clue asto haw we are to understand the encom theve sts of five ces. Ae they tobe enti, stator instance the same Sadyojita isthe source for the Reveds nd for “warlly knowlege"? In some sense his may be correc, because the fivefold strate remain he ‘asi of diversity and further multiplication woud sly be seen an iaten: rol iflrenaion bat onthe ote hand one st conclude that the twos ‘of five aces form hierarchy: the Tina in ou fis list was described one ll knowledge" (sarvavidamaka) whichean ony be explained ss summary f the next set In the case of the nex ina, hn isa Be the “ource ofthe uantramrse(mantrdkhya, he same eincple mst be applied, forthe nantamargafalls into five groups hat ae again associ w Sadat cc. AsTaras lead se, none of the stree preceding ABinavagupa spec how many set of five faces are tobe assume fr the expartion of spe, sd our author ses the doctrine of further suivisin ofthe ve more in ‘an ifte varity of seriptures, rather than forme dete of ore an fe ‘steams. But some later soures proceeded further i this dieetion by deteomining the namber of ‘steams’ as tweaty-five, be. five fivefold ces. The issue of hierarchy of faces i farther completed by iconographic ‘unl more pervasive may beindicatedby lack form. Theremay note aad ‘dasa fo sculytors inthis mater, bt this suggessthat ie dota ack sound or specie numberof heads may be dificltio determine Ie were "oconsrut an image that would arrange he birch of facesand comespod- in douines nthe Siaechanda passe uote above, we would nat Tak he change of perspectives info aecount: Viewed fom blow ‘ould be single heads the sours of allowed! stove the same [sina would not be ne ace, but five ‘0 tes of faces would ideally have tn faces, but in fat1 teraction sac te lower Kien wood foe its identity 28 one head epic, sce tr net oe wre to produce aolographic image off ne one or five according to perspective, there ween the concept of different sts ofl ae shows at y Bowed tp creation ofthe Saivatantas ofthe five faces with other chapter of the Tanrloka he solve out of the uniform reality Siva, consciousness (praia mantras a bis body, the points of . na. Tatpurasa (nr). Ahora, met face. [ina is above, ashe consists of ws [as itis] spreading out. Aghora (acam to sother clement, namely “Tight Sommarizes the correspondences ofthe five 2 Se Sas ie oh rea ie ee of tre wi xp aie ot ear ue lees te tent fe aes of aa (6 fa 208), oe trom atin ptcoman aa ih (Bie tte pecker param van pres Yt Sa ae mre | perc sabe pei ‘ne attr apres shah Th 15 1 Sexton Lacnasn (969, Agenda Ve For or mpc wits Cement. sc Th 15207 a0 1204 ck we pcan ee Mena 1 The Sata Renin ive ie sagas. apheresis Soe Se oe ee ee tae Sate = time mae eos ele Oo jin see keys Sepia fcthiee spuden ae a ‘any oer comespondences between the fv bahman faces of Sra be ided withthe cases.” the pars of mantras Uke on nd namah fgg? but having shown through the preceding examples thei importance for “suring imporantcootiates ofthe Sava iver, We May mow fa ‘oe erchy of Sava revelation thts connate othe five aces 1.3. The Structure ofthe Saiva Canon. A rather late but convenient summary of Siddhanta doce, the Crrraa, ges sn count of he ovigintion ofthe Tas: ‘At the time of eration Siva creates pore knowledge characte ye creams inorder to make Known the pols of man." a “Tos commentary ay thatthe fve reams arth oper the ester. th sot 5 te porter andthe westem and tat Knowledge i ths vide by this ‘ie fold fom of SadiSva his ive fares Following the twofld division of “lege the higher oe ia the frm of "undertandig” or realization” and 1s onc ne he orm of ote” the commenty sp taint sk ‘rsp “snd (nda) is produced fom the formless Siva ad then the Taras =compass ll forms of 1 Reeser » ‘Thee problem was tht thet “tighe” septs were face of Vimar) and Agha. Ts a pera cof 0 in he Varia serves to expan why the Sina ate eons pac ot the highest doce 2 many ler soem of the same proces for ntance inthe et ‘Kamiaguma, bat maybe eae oqo apse eo saranalars, 3 volumes eacjclopeia tht has» egy ae Bo cacerision of thet les impo scan amy cat ea the upper. ith fac nthe only one mentioned say according the srs. With ther respective names, a te following.” m (he Mins face) ae four seams. Tugh them were crated crs these ae] taken seperately th Gea, the Dalia, Vie ad its aid that nthe Grunt ne sto peoen soni of ‘mata of Tapa and mediate on tina pric way (Tl Tura teaches particularly and clay Mantras and bets forte eae sons, ike that of snakes, Daksintanta one sould matte om and perf wonip of the 6 to temporary results with whi iy, the Upper fae js reserved fe crested the view that he 2. but could only 6050 wi tem with the necessary thes applications ate taupe there which bring vicory over enemies. Jn the Boats the might ofthe manea of Sdyofia is tld aswell natrasand herbs forthe poiieation of ghosts prs tina te 1A Models of Integration sss pee What mus have concerned th theologians tht advocated the wasp of more codox panthons waste fact that the pa Siva model fran wih ams favoured the Siddha, In onder wo achieve an integration of ter cpr sho Ses -Th he Sh e e pe1 iedoton| Lad The Lower face eration ofthe disstons in space explained wih a oy Sinai by analogy. demands sixth fae rangement ft se omer fac scaled padavatra (TA 152063 digi downw ar Tans the source ofthe Kaul doctine. nthe nthe pin of his face as otside the nora vith dichotomy of the other faces nds Asshown above Athinvagupa's syste plans why trans fource of non dual rips jower fae completely destroys all tains of duality fr . a ‘of upper and lower [levels] vanishes.” wontipped, the multe yatta this faeis the sinth steam ota of revelation, the Mat spurs that each on aiy ; oS fragt mth lot Trsirbhairavetonraate ‘his Teka-Tara knew six streams: “ofthe Sava srpture that has three objects, a twenty-five fd 1 iviion often and eighteen [sciptre], o six steams, ti 12 pomeranian Th see? Grout (972 p88 and DvcoROWSKY (98) Tits oe Sc ba oa Sp Sy wat mr aa et ‘Shon noe Sd Comp he gion ‘Seat cr a Jonson a quae in DYCEEONSE ery 1 The SsivaReeaon sin te eet ern oh oe neon ia fee eS a inten ee ee 142 Beyond the Higher Inte Varta Abbinavagupta does pot mention the Picurara te th ware forthe higher revelation es above the upper fae na and issmply called Sndhvordna, the one higher than the per. Thi fae, which aso. sith the female power (alr) of Siva, isthe souce of higher sxptres and “respons fo the higher levels isi the Tika, namely the Kol, Kaa ad ‘Mau. What is stonishing shat Abhinva does not mention on import Souce forth ida: the Joyadrahayaala. Thee we Badin the section a= lysed by DYCZKOWSKI,asystem osx steams which ds higher seam to the normal ive. 143 Amnea “Te ifr: Srp sou tat nll hae been aed by ABB ‘Tor a tegration of conficung pnts: he Nera. Krai pests hich could eile i a ilar way athe Malian Ssocctkve of all les,” and te ae abo good uments fr 320 (StS. In haters SHI thei a deseo of seessew min ey of his an oe wont Athrough which Othe request by the goddess that Siva may specify 0 SEE ply tow it is thatthe worship of forms of the deity ‘aug before, ihe Vama, Daksina and Siddha, but also Seuray all the sips be chosen at will and lead to the desired frit, Tha sn ee Tae, el os ‘of all the Agamas and therefore bestows the fruit of all m cons crm (9.18, like a wishfuliling gem: if worshipped ag § eer ane bane crn oe of atconsin chapter 9a desc roca deipon of Uhaava as worked wc secre ee aa en puna “he ft cal aaa Pe ft and ieee Toba She ae so ofS ad who's oul “Techn for Abhinava'streament ofthe ft steam athe and especially with rites for sexual attraction. Interestingly this e St ed aac” anes om a anage a teTe “hs Kats marae oie ner dec non Cinema cone bas oracle st agcon wi ion of eae te “The series of pantheons in the Netratantra continues in chaples x Kaas econ meg ote ae % Stonminon is) p er eecin of main 1 SsoRas0n (1980. 8 90) and 212-214 1 Ocinbe etc. be Maina ee HnBNEDES 1578 1 The sia Reetaton a he receding ye If dos no cts onof the Kaul si inchsvsm extend, inch toa ep Niriyans and Surya." This expais why the Nera, despite Pall ignored by Abhinavagupa in the context ofthe deseo of the ‘ao: this Tanta is aware ofthe Vama, Daksa, Teka 1337-43) and Kaul, tutincudes them merely a possible forms of the worship of Neti ttle words. forAbhinanvagops oo neat the tah the Tay Ba oy far from his sect pion, duces the dete that he Kala the vided essence of ‘eas. ic Siddhin, Daksina and Vira, bt the Tata theo 15 Abhinayagupta’s Deir of Agama {nthe las chapes of his Tanrdloka,Abhinavagpt expounds specs of his Plosopy of Siva revelation. bik 35 deals withthe "unity ofall Sra” {vs 1)as taught by his teacher Sambntha (vs 4), Theauhor stay dei inzagaa asthe basic knowledge (pasa) on which every lang ethic act (yanahdra) depends, and whichis perception that express ise ino sound, or words (19a) Without such prior knowledge even diet perce ‘ion woul! be inconsequential ike that ofahungry eid that witout: ‘ion ~ would not he able to select eaables. So itis that without Being aware ‘o-teveryone depends on the primary dgama that sit source in Siva. na parallel inthe Tontrasra’® he ads tha, fundamentally the Sra er nt vied according othe variety of desired salts and the diver of palin ‘ons ada), ba traggh Siva’ ower of limitaion people became devoted ‘nl to parts of this Ur-Apama: some to the Veda, where duality predominates: “ove woth Saya rt the Vasa serps hi fue search for eration: some who Bold tht the ate of Siva is separate from the world to he Saiva-Siddhiat; some who each the bighest deity as omniform 0 the acagatanta; and very fe tothe Tika, In this way Siva eas every soul sroualy othe “one fru tue Hberain, which is that of the Tek © Dycznonse( 1989.48, uh Tn fra son ie eam a 72pm ee 1 Secchi p Be1 Iretcton sentation this prasiddi spreads ether a anu A eine (parampara, oF as sripture (TA 35.15) a ede higherritcannotbe attained through the lowerd rane te Kula i the essence ofall Ststras (30-34) are conti thatthe lower ccs, ketal ve: he onerspstens have perceived spa of the ely oft ovsne, but rejected it, e See the nature of delusion in these CREE pmctsceaton,Fornstaeeinthe holy Anan SSS Sie athe word fthe Rss isthe ane of] mich to se icnain and ion rest fends therefore mie he wise take it as an authority, but resort ony to the scripture of Siva ‘Bus this snot al: forthe same reason, ie. because the Vedas inthe of delusional hat goes agsinst it wl lead one beyond delusion: TB that are the cause of sini the Veda produce rapid esut in this theleft_."¥ According to SANDERSON vdmassane here mean th sos, s the Anandtantra which is quoted here, belong may ce cnt, a ven ssp tons” in ni rly bs the ver aang show that both worldly knowles une et os lan th knee that crys 8 re apt ce same | alah ops md mannan pon poem “Seren ton mi primar as aa 1 Sal ape pasha ad sin vase Sie vaio’ ay pon dra sv Sebannnson 5. fen Sah 28 | The Sata Revlon a ‘the whole Sava eyelation by following the mor genera definition of vna ax sarsaraviparta® “Te ao continues by diving te eee tht by Sia up branches, ea transmit by Seana (Tate Suivi te ther by ae talesvar (PasopatSaivism (14). Whereas bh gant We epee former as asthe capability wo grant "ejoyment The die of Sag ld, because ofthe five powers of Si, a alle te read “res (1 fas ino the parss rout eeand on ofp ca tures, and above it are the sixty-four Tantras of the “Bhairava division”. tn ‘ serses 18-24 the system of Pitas is introduced. According to this classification. sh Malinois be "wien ewens oh Sdn she the mai sep of he ihe it the VP Ae ee Sip he spony of he late be ques fen oe a Inte sna eo epi ie en nancy a sacs fo Tse ‘To (om init ale eta al of "fai betas eas ae ‘he shane se at on eae ‘vs diet fre Ss it eo as ees vil Tints aid een ie Coord needing We ete ee ‘or the validity of the “Agamas” as a group ‘was their freedom from contradic ‘on eae) cer ere to ee st wa eres a i i Schon tt wold ssl para ab rari em in ‘tick oust he eee ee oO [Seiolmescapnes tienes ews beets Tai ‘the chapters that deal with the “descent” of the scripture (lanervatira)."® On Gelowlofengess ted teens ties et em Sis was logieal and intended by Siva The Sida had modifica ‘novo tt sapere ih weed iho or Soa sue ere bre mais vd i plo on ‘he Shaman hao finde toxin thrown Ses 9 Seo taha ow section of Abhinawagupta's ari The Threefold Division snavagupta descnbes a division shed wits ox Tateas, the ravebheds ‘ith sinty-foar Tanta im i o promulgate dual 1) whereas the Bbairavatantas higher form of revelation, fi probably extracted from the wopement of the paseasrotas tht pes the fist two categories the Tantrs that i the pafleasrotas come Ot oh foes the Viana and the Dakin iy classificatry sytem with ‘anue, oto the Kterature of rica nly, the snty-four Bhai ace ws ae the dasnatantas i interpreted as an tempo reduce that of mere Daksinatntras; it wou eof these systems is neutral enough description of Tantric Iteratre Since the ta parts the self description of «shook onion systems without assuming aie devoid by PitLiG2At as given in he Ajtai rong al five faces, s anos 208 rt Sst | The Se Revit 2 he ignored here. The confusion case by such comparisons sem fom te cbvolte assumption that the Tatas tani in Sot er revo te twenty-eight ae thon ety works to which te ety cape 1a fot. “ofthe twenty-eight ata tha seid a srpees oe Sle Sthdhint er few are demonstrably eu works Mos we Sota ‘ecole fresh eomponions hat wer unknown to Rimakanta”™ Ay Soc the sritingealy Tanta are from the Sa, ad only ery foe ‘erences this par of the canon ate kaown ney Herat, we cnet ‘hut the iva and rudrabhede re mone real than the baie abeda ‘he Kathninan non duals of Abnavaqupt' school te sera aa vote deal ofthe division of he pscarnar was th Sanit Fee "vote thi pat of he txt has ben discovered by Pro SANDERSON in Toisskovans' Ninddiamgraha, Kasi tal mana. The ade il ‘ic tancriprhat given nthe append that the Sant poids “hs multe of classifications amogg which we fod he roo of sty our Tanta. ts ain clawfenton ofthe enon however tt heel division, bt a visin ino six teams ve pls he lower a= 2 “Sone Se amt of be a ee ea aS ae ‘os coh ec ch of at eu a ee "Snead 35 gu en te Cbg ih isn lies fr ee lina we Gots 99) pa a un i i me te ty a anu The it he Ratna ye ip oe Pony ss mts, Kron el Gol, ica ‘ine anemige Mt Aad 108 seed SANBERION Pons ‘Wen suasranehar, Sarasa ae Sanne A "So tsa 2 p I-86 wee sone te pn mae vm Pe Dreanoma fo pale tec yeni te Pa Se Bat TPE eS ee= Tepes Sa srt pens ter ppd o. -6). There se en ip = coe ce ee spp ce erie appear Oe 10 2 in ich Gy i redemaet Tae Veeaters Ne. a Ahern Ne, ame no ee ton tat hep er we fe fee za] ad [Sadyopa) tae be me > en fa i bc Sadia ack owe ere ey Some Sy peste commutes we dace So face semac: Iie and Views 3 raw Views Ne Sees te tis fre nays to come the Sve faces in ope fom ‘nevecned above tt there no comme of ja Vieadevs ad Aguors by four como of rv (16. ISVA(I7)b By combing1 reson eeu ot wih ne doy anus ach mn Fate ne slo enone err combine wih the When shea foes sour have tbe omit] as ‘can never acquire knowledge ‘hs ssen remain Bares he naar fV Pach [ith these 100 Fade which hs been to? the holy Seika in detail ater idhanaparvam: she thatthe division called Siva [receives ts opi by Sous [Ee diferent manifestations of dra [ast] wag by Rada igh mips withthe [number of] vasus,ie-cigh are vom of Bhairava. To explain: in the souther face, whichis ‘Say snd whic is of fourfold nature: essence (svaripa), Sivas {Ge ppl which is called “their union”! ther isi 1 The saing scope es hana mar, ead merce une eon a for em Hater ST eee arn ae es "Se cane fe 1 The Sava Renelon fourfold form... being abou to aise arse. about Sprered When this stecnfold form fot Agha, ‘esther four faces. then thee tal combination su visions of Bhairav ia which nondanty the main dace] es taught [ewer ‘ [ootton of MVV 383-384 and 3884-390) “The same hasbeen stated inthe ant in deal fcr ving the of the (ripe: ving the names [quotation of Srikantht 27081} “pi (kina rh vs iis ha tigen ‘nu hough i dvsons and sabivsins Torey eager ‘sions and subdivisions has been taught the tam oo: “inna luton Sid) stg esonid— Joost of 2) and he [Vinal ce] te gute tt floes (by Abhinavagupal {gootation of 378) A therefor it san estabised doctrine that ‘sels Jbl, dali-cumson-aaty and aod ‘Sight by the sae bor : {gootation of 391-3924] “Andhos the Lord! immenesthisva: Vaa Dakin. spaces fret forthe thes powers Par a according tothe saying: ng bathed in supreme non-duality] the Sista attaining the supreme state. This hasbeen ta Onherwise [withoot foe come means Fo hy Abbinavapt: 39Sed-96 and 398 [quotation of 395c- 7 spponen:} What isa valid source for this a6 no such doctrines ree pt] has tught thatthe Ramer! In this matter [Abhinav gna of MVV 3930-30496] opponent) You re turing the objection, namely that this {ost sore merely fom human intllest [ie bas no seriptal soul is really an unprecedented feat of leaning ge catural source has to agree with iin order 4 answer For Agama itself is taught to be undisputed ue remainder of Jayaraha's commentary on this him th fact that great Gurus agree on this point is sufficient proof feisty ofthis Jotrine. The long discussion of objections that fl tear rong tone oft! might indicate that the arguments Foi pretation of the pafcasrotas, an interpretation whose hardly vee) tocontet the supremacy of the Siddha, were indeed withoutael opm 2 Jayatta then concludes his commentary on TAV 1.18 witha the gradation of Sava srpture Thee perhaps wrong for pari, See comment 9 Peet ian ener Chapter2 ‘The Malinislokavarttika The Malin iavouoraantra is Abhinavagupt’s main souce forthe Tk nd fur of is work deal with the lst Parana! he Maina, the Tanraloka andthe Tatrasdra. For Abhinavagupta thi Tanta was he sipeme esence” of the Siddhaogearhata, which i tum i he ata scripture of the Vidspiia division The name of the Tanta recs it Jom tat i isa shorter verson® of a eater Malin, which in tn @ ‘hor version ofthe SiddhayogeSartnata.* The exis als calls Malin or Spina Ite looks Abhinavagopt's works hat del wih his Tatra, we have one Pla of th Tika system as aight inthe Alin Tada) ie sumey Uiontrasara, one work tht was petbaps an extensive prose commentary (Parvaparila, anda Varia ‘coming othe pope definition we would expect 2 tia exaine what i taught, what i noe taught or aught imperfect in a work Ife Took at the most famous Varies en the tational Indian syllabus those hy KatySyane and Kuminla, this deition sems juste bth inlode a ritgue oF at east elarifiation of thei sours, namely the Asay an the Salarabhge, This cannot be applied o an Agama, if one hols the ‘sow tha it sm some sense the sourte of knowledge The only method a 1 Theme thi wok fo wich ge GOEL TA phen a Papas, sich so eee veel eee ee wt star oh aga ne ree yh ese laa tsa Mic Sten One 0) Te wok feo a on Peri {rapa p57 I TR 2375 ens cea ree a rahe ences vee oom el mE 4 STA Jor difownsaps inte exe isp, 5 Se-Gyo11 1972 886, Par CF Seah © shit ian Kanai 982 7.3adopt isto make explicit adden Sense, which ope g verte foer in which the Agama has come doga veri. Abhinavagup Commits himself to ae at everything i told in the Malinnanira expe Ain he sales in another passage that there cane neaning (arthawida) 2 regards the wordt sony ty the ab dhe secrecy of the ison by sayin # rs Fpl Cea samen of neti ae ete i atheoogical program: onetee exegesis Abhinav Be alt finition of a warttika could the Th a ed way ooh config ata See rejecting sone, namely provisional, rules lke the inn Fa iy any pv he agunen ata perch of these conflicting injunctions. 1 think this approach eee othe dscusson of Malin 187-81 in the fourth che eco (219-278) andthe same principle applies to ourtex afk Vr allsinto two spre chapters th fist shone ih 38 verses which are mos anugubh with only shor ie ak wens in longer mete. Tere are no any quotations an ‘ho nan the MVI-The fist questions therefore on which pans org SSrcrte Tan the authors aetly commenting won. ‘ns ew tobe found inthe secondary trata that oF the Wa vinta en on thirst verse ofthe MVE ts sedan he ‘cnoty the suthor inset n which he sates that he has commen {heft ee, and ths impression reinforced bythe fact thal the fest the Tina squotedinflinhe beginning ofthe commentary. TSS so fina conceptions, as fr instance in PANDEY’ pone Abhiavagapn where be sys ofthe Papa From its name, Paik, which means a detailed exposition fiequet references to it in most of Abbinava’s writings teen very big work. An idea ofits size cam be formed from ar of the Mint Vijaya Varika which isan expos ; ‘ese of the Malin Vijaya Tanta, as he himself says is e003 © TA mantoasatona ca aye mltvare et Tit ‘a agen Sd als of andra a rts Tats Se Sabot Svombnastrsamerah 164, Me TA aca Vary Avago imi penarpuranimalee pre pve Kio “hina Tikiguamaaie an ad mea gna o ‘Whatmusthavebee th sizeof te dete exposition othe whole he above Tan tisotdeato magi. This work, weve em iecovenby lost sos oS piso erature Although it does not become clear whether tis PANDEY's view that the ‘vita as itis is incomplete, seems that he takes the statement about he Varta being a commentary on he ist ers only as itera te ‘We ind anther early suterest onthe Varia by MADHUSUDAN KAUL, who writes nhs inrodocon tothe MVT: “The fist vene ofthe Tana Be ‘ook up in is Malnvjayavdetika ad explained ito thorcushly that como ans of several tems are made clear} itll. The pons, thet could not, ind room in the Vaca for was of space at owing 0s limied scope as Vanuha,heescussed inthe Tanaka! “Thetis probably no wor limit for «vrtka andthe argument oF pace is herfor noo be akon seriously, but the impression tht the connotations of Fist yerseof the Tanta are explained at great length is cenainly comet Thisfint vere, whish forms vere 4 ofthe Varia ne flows ‘Therays ofthe moon af knowledge whihissve rom he face of Paramesa lie. Siva) and are eapable of destroying [everthing] opposed o universal iss spas al. (14) The light from the half-moon on Siva's bead, which sient with knowl lsc sted i ie fae and sends out voting ais Although not easily snderstod from a north European perspetive, one standart comparison for “amsara's "eat. an the knowledge that destroys ignorance that the ease ‘or samsarg, is consequent assaiaed withthe cooiness hats embodied in ‘he moon. But for Abhinavagupathisisnoustan introductory poeticimage iv amangalo-verse. implies the descent of his Heating knowledge fom source above Sivas head down to his ve heads and through his ‘eletion its ferentiation into seriptralreelton. The 10 Pawo 0.9% 1 NVI ado pa "Ones nt eh pan ‘espn are Tras1 Iodvetion| -.srmmary ofthe whole Varta beyond the present work; but at cus is sttre. we look atthe concding vee of tam Gan expt stement ote effet thatthe st pga ar pees I-17 ofthe Malian Obviously the ede ra oft fact cus there are arly any indications ert nyc econ the oer and from thechoice of word ha thee coin, Aina til as heist verse ofthe Tantra ind rath Varia, whic has only 339 verses, starts una wtepectodhe 18h chapter ofthe Tanta, thereby confirming that ‘Peranaining chapter ofthe oot ext, Again, the end ofthe second es anent ofthe first vers ofthe Malina the Ist verse of the Vani capethe statement quoed above thatthe author has only commented on semen ofthe Tanta robe fac tat the first part, at east in some sense, deals with Chap 17 ofthe Tanta andthe second part withthe remaining chapters we ‘ude tat the text ofthe Varia as we have tis a sel-contained wor isrecoprized by the editor Madhustdan Kaul in his introdaction oth tthe text Mach less obvious isthe reason forthe division into Chapters The MVT is not divided into pidas but into 23 ad ‘hapter i ina section on Yoga, which started with chapter 12, bat tance foe Abhinavagupa lies in the fact that tis mainly there that passage to sstun is mons interpetation ofthis basically d {opostulte a hierarchy of Ives inside monisticSaivism.!4 ‘Another important question isthe relationship between the srtta ad the Tantralok 1 caneot quote any conclusive figures that there are many parallels and quite a few almost identical et the second Kinda and pars of the TA, but almost none of te fis ofthe st Kinds, ie vss. 1-399, Although there isthe poss Purvapaij hss dealt with the same issues, this section of the tumique enough tobe referred to by Ablinavagupta himself inthe {the aut os desiption ofthe descent of he Sava revelation: 1 “The wl wor as been ho wo pars or Kids te it i ‘test at dwn et seen age ine ern in aig prio” Fs page of he ois "See S00 (1982) fc ann the Mt, SANDERSON 947 ean oe igen chaser 2 The Maia he nature ofthe [five streams starting fom the mmo has been taught by usin the Malle dria i to kno shouldbe abet understand it fom there, vselesrepetion, 7 beh al de ngs Bu ve dont saeton °S mei saa sm anteapadl d | dados “2 ie ean natin Kam ‘aaah IChapter 3 The Text of the Malinislokavarttika 3.1 The Names ofthe Text spe Tuan whichis the bass for Abhinavagepta's comment i woe omar abbreviate Malinijaya and our texts thee Mi eee MV), Maliniartika, or Matintlokavaraiy ave oy abkinavgupa himself to refer to the textin the vpeeptions about the name ofthe text and some em sary for laifation. Trier on the Works of Abhinavagupta RAGHAVAN BOSS" p. lor offis Tanase (Kas. Texts, XVI, Abhinavagupta mai vp Tuna and ad toi perplexing reference 1 a stoka Vas sre to understand a work of Abhinavagupta here, and if 50 Wh JRetoown works ora new one?! The text under discussion nuns tomvartham eda darstam rantrdloke Slokavartike ‘ime pase in his Krama Tanricism RASTOGI Says“ fefer to one Slokavirtika in the Tantrasira, tis uncertain identical with the famous Mimaimsi text of the same name BY ‘But he way Abhinava refers to it and the context in which it i nak it quite probable that Abbinava might have attempted Wonk tame. Or else it might be another name of the Malinivijayavaat introduction to the Tantra RaSTOGK modified his view: Be cre oe Taos wert name vir od ade which are given by Abhinavagupta in the fvaraptay the TA is quoted there. one rust conclude thatthe TA fas indeed Slokavria. But fom this and the “non-discovery of ay text PH have been afew mis 2 Rasrooi (19. p 139 {0,29 mayen rake iat yon, 1066 amram ia atric, 3: yt may gad 3 The Tet ofthe Maina * ‘he STokoatik (pertaining to K ashi aim)" he conch hat he Cross tference i the Taras can only mean “in the tn 1 Stokavariba’. ‘Treo, whch ie “Decne buh em otra oa 1 toprol contenu he Kc ee Sion i cel tetas he Se ea i ins aloo ee tn 1h sede ov tne ree TAs 2iay bee rn ete a tut Sola we oats hts ‘aoc unr dices, ela a RA sic he one en ec vara" Tala elcome a 3.2. Editions and Manuscripts The MV appeared in pint forthe fist time Sn 1921 in the Kashmir Series Texts and Stdies (KSTS)® an as, tomy knowledge, never been redid. ‘We ca ore version ofthe fet that appeared i 1985 a a tal booklet | xs by Krshndnanda Sagi, since itcontsins the textof thee pringeps, but he sprints proced bythe new typesetting and the mission f the etal spats mes it vial useless for this ty. Tes nt easy to timate the vale of the fst eon, Despite is shorcom= ings we stb very grt fort 50 the whole KSTS,withoat which his ‘meat of Tantric philosophy would sil esti from the Sarvadanana= “amgraha, From this perspective to lament he lack of tention rode woul ‘nd! he unr, because the ets who wished to print itu all the main ‘ext the known Sava philosophy of Kashmir could not indulge ong d= cussions However it st be pote thatthe editors sometimes decided on ‘ext tht harly makes sense ors not even metrically comets ‘The KSTS edition is based on two manustrips which are deserted inthe induction as follows: ws 4 G90110979),p.150. 5 Sistas Vram f Aina Gp Et wiht ‘Sha, SYS Soa © Sceaattinatagupdcayistan ea Sage if{8 a i Kashmiri paper of old type, one-half Fg fn ie has We cach, The st 1 eaves of the MS. sem toh raven ; era a Kashi ppt Thee i 0 meno Cre nas made Tes complete and is write nov mistakes hereand there. Itbelongs tls sey BHIATTARAKA son of PANDIT SURADEVA Of tbe life of a Sava teacher othe lst day of De yey the mancrpt fom which Ube arian sraerne tom the edition ofthe Mainviavottaratanra, a comparble hich as substantial ist of eomections, the la to the edition of the Varta is also slighly di Teer Shrumtances it woul! no doubt be desirable to finda ee patent the editors, but the current politcal situati sjove te seach tour, 80 atlempt has been made os Av i can be made plausible that the whole 1 scemed unecessary t0 risk one's life for es — ries searchin manoscrpt extalogues Don ton othe ew catalogue ofthe Set Rant Li Devwnigar mans ofthe txt With the com | was frat i obtaining Xerox OS Aiters tt conparinn withthe KSTS edition, my ets se wa found that bth tnuserps more oss ha isn, Thi are ht ll sources that ae avilable a ache tht was copid under circumstances whet # a scomplat text ould ote obtained. Bearing ‘he Jame collection, mamely the fact tat many of is Devanigar copies tics ra Sra archetype inthe te ioe ce mgt eet thse two ms. 0 be no moe than ans ‘Sod fre edit prncps and tha oly of mie bel te teat Foran thn ok he case. The manuscs 3 The Text othe Maina trom Stra archetypes, but ot only is one ms data {Ap. 1789, bt fe etn the cet eating saint te Sede urcven ith hese aio tesa mean tendons stable through conjectre:outof hemor tha hundred insanee {fe preset ton dirs rm the KSTS eon aot haa egjnaeh Ther are cases where ne would want snue tae conjure ‘ins high probability the reading ofthe act, in otereses heaped | ‘Ratings ar dtgnostc, that means they merely alow us to make seme gfay_ ‘Gherw se meaningles text or help torestone te mere Prot, SANDERSON dew my attention oa futher manus (G)in which 321 Critical Apparat tne appaats of the preset eiton all variant readings? ofthe nie exception ofthe purely onhographical variant ar mentioned be jos, have boon listed according to the following conventions emma es mn inde the Beginning, bat the ful passage hai replced npr nana wth hileren reading itis ot epoted, his varae sun Gl For instance: 3525 svatntram: satonrana J, means ha in pa bo ‘ene 362th reading f Js is uametrcl ot tht one more sylable ote it alte is to be replaced amie af hs varia ‘mentioned above, the edo princes indicates the source ofthe ade ing rom ts two sources only asi pha These readings are marked m= ‘bough describing the rita text ofthe edit princes shee "Kies it deserinesonly one ofthe Allens a passage, oF where I suspect a misprint a fave emend iy Aste iglum K owing t its ambi, appears only where ss dsr, t wasnt posible to provide the present ei ‘ve apprats It was onthe other hand necessary to give here Ks reading was aoseptd, but waste with ‘he the followingsek prspadyte Kat ‘of Je and K constitute the critical txt, whereas ig fon the basis ofthe other Sra xis no variants and our critical text est ‘mss. ie. Jy and Js. This practice may 7 to Bethe least complicated ey sane of Ku appropriately: forthe purpose of from a~ however skilf he two Devandgari mss. are nt given in numbering, most cases of eminstion andi nike the We of anusvira for elas for m.* and in some cases ii rca forccafor instance hs been noted mn of the partly overlapping ts not been recorded excep in suspic ‘ain ata ooked slightly more r-interpretation ofthe scribes esis tobe found on p55. 33 Description ofthe Manuseripts cried inthe new catalogue of the Sri okavirtik, Pfaper), Dfevandgati. 193 15-21 letiers, good, fairly old. ng te: cae the re i ot ene min ane ht har an then sel Irapeonsamra in sony So Sica Win Fn At i 1 Thy wenn Sra eh alo eee cer one anon sma pe te 3 The Tet he Matinee 2 (1639) Matinivarskam, Paper). Devan 34x 145 cme, 129 leaves, 16 ines, 10-14 letes, ood yo | ave not been able to work fromthe mana themselves, bt rm ery fully produced Xerox copies, or which have to thaak BP SHARD aed lian of the She Ranbir Sankt Reach Insitute 3 logue nmber and tite: 623 20 ka 2) Malin kavdeiam. "ag on what seems be the outer wrapping the following tex (= in lcs: "Shei Raghunath Temple MSS Library. JAMMU, No 20 12. Tile: malniokasdrikam. Astor abhinavapptah Extent 285 pra Age Subject tantra”. The lef upper margin hs futher number: 605%, ne desrpin inthe catalog is unforuntely very inadequate. Altough ‘he MVV is probably the most exciting text contained in his manuscript. tein codex which contains a varey of works, writen i Detar aswell 15 fll description wil have o be the abject fan independent The Malinnavtia si Devansgar spas folios 1-62 snd is umbered sso the left omer margin. No marginal ie. om namo vghnaharre om namal aya om imal Fal (62 tt mdlindokendrikam srimadacsrabhinevagupeviracion taniptam || Sabha ats sarap ‘The stings characterize by an almest ued width ofthe stroke Thee a “cvrecis a0 wll a marginal variants (154,31, 86D, 95, 1a, 188d) by There is cccasional elp for reading as for stance "sommas” tadecha ner jAdnam vat, Ria ‘he ligature for gua sap “chose by arizona sok ‘seting uns didnt allow a arable width of ook viualy denial1 otrotion 132 ner and tile: 622 (1639) Mainivrtikam, CCamtorve nue ater wrapping has th following text (Sevandgar Te oe os Tene NS Lay, JAMMU, No. Tae Ee a ee 29 rte Abs son 1846 eva upper margin has a further number: 6028. oat arn Three no danas an th vees renumbered Beginning 1: milntdrttitam inthe cenue ofthe page, below a fie bay, The text starts on I ftr a few invocations ig niatir iyommanah sidevya sidaidasinya savavikam srmanmahamahelvardaryava iam samapam it svadam bobhavtw mbhavath | Srinagar pans 1856 cite J Notes: ya and tha are sometimes indstingushable 2): fea and Sa are identical 333 6 Ma 130° kep in Niederschsische Staas- und Universittsbiblionel ‘ingen, and described in detail in JANERT AND PoTt (1970), No, isan undated Sirads paper manuscript that contains the few verses Varia ientied below Mo130 MYV 15-15" L1012e6-1017 is 135-40 hes follows the attribution of the passage: ly dcaryabkinaya iniartile | tathatatrava, and another queation fom Hef style onthe Xa apy i aby and ai ping te mip 3 Te Tex of he Manna Mol30 Mv 15527 120568-2005 1s" 1358-259 Ls216? 12556-2570 34 Textual Criticism 34. General Principles sy there isnot much writen n textal ertcsm ss ppt Case sical Sansritnois hee eonsensis boat he est approach. The dco the heretical problem in ther disciplines evinces the wide derpnes tha xt: the BEDIER school is extemely sceptical bout he valid of al judgements, which sults in an unllnges fo do anything cla ta rit "the best” maneserpt This ext onthe asmpin tha th understand Ing of medieval seribe must be nearer othe text we wih pubis hn a othe contemporary eto It ppaent thi ths cannot be appli to Sanit manuscripts, many of which were writes by cies who cul not underand ihe ens they were copying: Moreover the seeps tte ein! atemst0 ‘dt texts andthe deconstutional pessimism it pays is arly appropae for aseiplis like Indoogy, whee the ed oretabl eons ss vious The other main trends define themselves by the degrses of acceptance ‘ejection of stemmatolgy. For some the conseuton ofa sma ofl. manuscripts of a text i til the very Beart of ex ercism and T sb. "heer deal withthe question by ad examine it appliction fr editions of Casical Sanit “The idea bn sermaicanalsis i to find a method throuth which he ‘dtr can ave atthe orginal reading ofa text witout editorial is ins "nc ahr te ole ele ad Siete me eae ae iin asia oa cee er ns es eae peices SS gee eet ‘neater gta Sse a eaandeaishing genealogical lations between pall mechanically are atthe on ia Os erece oscar jogs, One Tiend was developed by LACHMANN while fing oon hogy Be archetype was nt ikaw focused on ts falar wo recognise ihe motitiations of the 2 The Teno he ig esc 9 tm Seamer ceigae of semmogy, 3 oe nas ‘nssrintom ws tonics hater te me ieee ‘te rath «by iting lee panes ach he cy 2 teed.” Wher thei ion i cheat pai propane race tm ahourlelge th ay ete oko apo I reltesbips: to produces Seow emma os aceon {rcp ant ~ atta ‘epee Ta meas a ic part A Sanskrit tes there hardly eve a hance roe tnt sch 2 pragmatic: semana. For exh ene emma Cair7 whe ackoanelges on rece ice te td as gg “ire seni “dem 3 bate semen that mcm toe mek evestn sargeted by commen enon secntig to the wash ode, nly teas teen oat eatery tte, cers ron cma crite ewsra wold maemataly “Chiat 3 macs hier moder a alow te tite “mac lve pe neg tee ver dette uc comping eas." bn nde to eg ag va cat be wel me have othe ito Sect the cts tee cectancal prise fT i CoE Tabs is memes, bee vy demuly tee commerpn. cm, toma. Sememadogy werk fe come retgs we wih oe te le Som bch ne base out semana. ie me have exh the cea ces vo th keto mand 3 mc A pei’ Devan man ofthe Varta, Yor example, sechetype wan writen in Sead. Oe Cas mpd a I 9 i omimp. Se epeey war TD 1821 inzodacon ~eepout sorb mistakes. The reason, as noted already by BUi wil have trou arly cic gte teaaaa se eto ong sea — might induced ino the new copy by coed came i Vien ea tg er are _ farang ci See 1 Alton many Indian commentators mento and sess variant edi 4 scout te methdlogy. We can magine that ernst have some sai harm a scm pecan SSS Tana pen cacao Peertetemermectecegrpe eee Seana dom 3 The Text ofthe Manat 2 igh ped et otaon sede ct mnuchps ar et tine fe ee ea a stcuse NBs cue ura tai esse Cover no copes ancl We Wem coed em ieee chance works wis wie opp an eae in eats con enh pre tea 7 gv ca ee evn ty a et rat clang i metnct ee dec td a Wilts fre mp ih me ea "Shc ofeorincon bc ae memesig ete Wie ‘heen ince o sons Latino a es a ose memory” ioe ely ein cone abe te eng ea eed heat fr oe te me ‘more sof we recall that Tian clr always hala higher ea for orl than for writen knowledge, ‘The eoneluson must bea stong devaluation ofstemmatology exceptinspe- lly proven cases ani the application of meds designed or open rene Sos" (can aoverthless be very hep to produce astemma fromevidene hats ess vulnerable to contamination ike lee seb err, mison ey tnunerinhavea criterion fr seleting a rating fal other methods f° se anor peca eases like compilations. ou guidelines mist be te canons [or the elit of open ecensons. once contamination x proven. The mn rule isda unless eters of grammatical, metic or contextal pausiity ts force us to emend the uansmited reading. a eaing wou! yaiansis ‘ccc archetypal wants es, th neta anexpan he ogi | ‘ofthe others sascepted a primary. The appliction ofthe ast ue ead oa ‘rey of further considerations: ote he more dificult reading soins The pong agua SLA 9D} 4 Sc West (97 rk xp Scene 190, pnt As Sh 3 pi "Koo Svs (9H ordeal sn othe ‘sis aeny ope wl pata cen "ramet our hon ston Sao SS Anca conby pat {5 Ts we ro rp SHAS ¥ SIC (0) raheemona a Se a ptt ec ba sie comet simple” sb mig hereby fo cours of Variants invariably degrades the edition tom Seams cot fhe “Te fist observation concer he lacunae: virally al he onions a ound lth to anu ss. but thee are abs Kanata of hm ee ones One oan ej canlK This means we hae to conlue that he est trata se ene ot yl neg from which al oer copis derive r rae thc vare readings X ight seem that he patos ment point toa group formed by J; and Jp against the Sarad mst: Buti ret fut quay of eos ta scparate these rou, we i tekst beween thy Jamin ms. ear sibal eros coment isin meaningfl variants, which may have ain thos sen Ooe igh argue that we may atleast assume that tec vemrad fom the archetype of x, but as even the comector of Tl {hearts overlapping withthe Sarai mss. (the marginal mite tore pal tha the Varia sans in an open Teen cena bene bt eae uy aig ua (soon. nny yan Senvnsas caper 1454 Coie ei mo retin, inept ran) i arn be made no ee i os Tes ae ypc vari tt ive san eet eine Subs 2 fetta a in dn ‘etal fay text hee extra anys hasan «age naseare ewan sein in 257s pets isi 3 The Testo eMart percentage of metrically comet and more o ess meanin ful vats sno ‘ealings pont to coeskeable redaction in the ou of : 343 External idence An import issue isthe staus ofthe exemal tansmision of pats of the ‘ext moatons We have seen that all surviving manus bck ft sy incomplete and possibly quite faulty archetype atonal evidence from ouside the transmission could therefore be extemelyvaluble, The Shenson Usk compared 10 the Varian inside the transmission of the Vania, the exeral witnesses sometimes preserve an abeoply diferent St of the text with Sometimes even convining vans might be tes vs poo! ofthis. On the eter hand there are several fctrs that demand Cauon: the Vara Is quoted only few tne in late works, a= apart trom one instance in Svopichyaya's commentary onthe Witnabhainva — ‘hese quotations ar tobe found in ayaratas commentary onthe Teta, Sine the source of these quotations is nt mentioned, the song variation ako ical that Jayaratha as suggeted by GNOLI, sometimes gooey in fat fom another, now lost ext by Abtinaagupt, the Pirvopaik. Bua "sch where it is lar thatthe Varta isl is te, another consiestion spesks spans using extemal evidence as equal the wansited tex this boon observed hat Abinavagupta's quotation ae often not liter, even when e quotes sriptue. This s only pany explained by th neces of ‘heme: if we take, for instance, the recurtng quotation fom Kallas ost Tarnarthacintamani, we can sce that even When Weng in prose our authors \idnot el obliged to quote literally The easonfortisistoe found inthe ‘ules fr Tare exegesis (na) ~ expounded by Abinasagua himself Inthe Tasraloa ~ which donot demand a werd for word explanation, Bt, simply enjoin tat che teacher shoul propound units of meaning (st in ‘he Tanta by various exegetical means This freedom in etgssis ean be ‘crajuraaremeabis MWY 7 1 nchipe ete TA te soto in ic te Deajeri te pet of quting ESSA ch the Word of tse nna We ave to ext hat yaaa dag a a ns rm the Vt ae 8 Ew ad a Via sel. Fo this reason extra evden was gs he anascrts n few wellounded ase 35. Silistc Pecuiarites nine enzpinot Aaron ee A cam ceervains. nl tos conceaig thee pea ae a xsi we om Se 2 es anveneate got aula o neato oa ee Se ae oe Pi Alot ents ae ae Aa en wh oe a ong cae tanec ee Se ee So ee ahi Sa, An ody ne An enlightening quotation in his Vinarfint on: snore radial breach the usual rules was considered admissible ‘Stet by Abhinavagupa, When interpreting pidas band eC) af a's Karidas a compound, be usites this by saying: “The role it ‘mac foinde with] the connecting point of two half verses in pct, ut sin technical iteratre"*® Aknough fat reachin oO J meta, -The Gus, anwing te worn of ccc saa es aH ‘Sen hi pop rk os, travarncha cpr nth st ade sina TA 202) Se so DYCERONSELO 1 Sed ed 2 gh consign nme Spray someon se BV 1 cannot be drawn from this passage, ita prevented me from cones» “herniation hates ond he Vata Te snare or tata Catach vee tonite «qa etn sicukhalbhidham sztisatpat 19 tat tit 5 ndasampadah [105 1 Texan Tana “The mutes esplendent (maka with th ever new rein that ess on the immaculate ome, sd heater hose foo ll iden his dese fi ie ‘ay my heart which th emission of vibrancy fom his coupe ‘ou teretore| ul of the sopreme nectar hie. (I) ‘ay [my |sache surpass al, who wi the rays of is knowledge appearing cveryabee bs made the tus of my heart Bosom and] whe enn me Shih currents of docties (arta) that re defied o destroying he os [of samara. (Thee docties) ae radiating ike wel inthe five rus (of Sava revelation), which Rave as tees the “al ote sit hat ae Forred bythe five steams} together with its efeson. This teacher} Scmbunstha, who was purified by this teacher the glorions Samed and ‘bustle sands tue devotees, ay he be please wih mend satisfied wih cing ofthe] Hower tht are my work! 2-8) devotes [out of samsaral (6) The tes | composition ofthe Bs of consciousness, which are exaded hy se gloat Cpa deva boca of his being] awakened bythe laa Somazunds and spread imo al directions, surpass all inthis they resemble compositions of fragrance which are exuded bya wate ily (upala) whichis ei (rma because ofits awakening =blosoming] which isthe joy of the oon of beauty. (7) ‘The words ofthe glorious teacher Laksmanagupa, who teaches is fhe. Ue falas] system, the [philosophy of recognition which us off sams et= 'y whom the bee of my mind, though (ap) intoxicated only By vss pe tats, (eventually sted with the imate "atthe uimate reality nd, taining unity with ‘vn el] hata wealth of eiffereat soul {oetrines irte Tana ° smyamartio "ay gush aman ym at kvaeitkvacit [11 eyo i | avs asaya varia [12] aarti pe savasya cana Boca | an ye anism POR dacandramsusamesy [13 xenon i arama | ead SO redaikabbaginal | Senne enna SI are ea -yopideyavarjitar | San a ant eetan6 es nd daar paramest | tad ay bimarsasvabiva eee | ‘at Say asaya samapati prim vrajet | saree a ep Se ona xsi penis Faces ng saints aaa dine pre aaa Serta sia er oa Stee ere Scope 96 yu sth: samsthitame TAY 1.1. His bt: yor comes 1 ATI Sere 1 Tet an elton since (0 I shal ~ repeatedly enretd by my wot : Manta -cipain be mening of ke dca sens Goes osioss Ma yotantanta, sometines (sect Krad oop sh when appropri, lower fms of inerettion] Gar) in te center an denoted or his reason] his eat Gh) foi Sioa! Cowra) of approdehes (rartanam) and is Wherefore «ye ae) ‘We adore the colestio f 4s of he moon oF Siva, which sine day and ght ut ar ot within each of everyone and [therefore ever new [ai Zu nde [ring the by 13) “Thereof the moon ef knowledge wich issue fom he eof Paramesa [pe Sinaloa capable of destroying [eveything oppoxedonivenal ise suas all. (14) “Te ast odes thai probe in he begining ri) rm hein ues rcltyodbhava) that lone wihthe weed (Dv) and ha {sibs pervaling nature (ibaa) ofthe mas ofthe moon's ad 2 has Sore rer, [sil ofthe same natura fom nga Beaeeped CY shun hat are crested bys own creative power mda), and diversified srl y sown expanding manifoldes fry This knowledge] whose rot ition s the heart ofthe highest Lor [Siva 151736) ‘When Mahar nites ever therewith the power thats lays part of his ‘tnd tans to spree perfection, the ishighet fae which isthe abode from which emission flows which s beau through is universal Biss "sing fom the unfolding ofthe highest eaity( appeas). Sie tis fice} ‘sesabishe a he see of he universe without difereticn int fuer faces (bavi itis called beat, vibration, knowledge) theighest evel of peo, essence, nameless, wave ee (1728-230) # a aa 2 OF "he abode of [pimary] emission ane “Yrs while in fom 9 ri) a2 ere nse paren reel etaeeclac eal Seetincinineniae am ; Suc gma vad ith yap ii cn ee Siatnaranoingteac a in ie rs aD ene ee J ee oe i He ssksmasktiayasimarasyena vartat [23 "is as ee Sie the self] remain his state of Goqanipens enn oe “asic ces nee il me eras ‘Serene enc me esate ‘Guat ha social Sind pues Beng inmene a sarap Bd sap fa Che cermin ame a) eae ee ini is gis i sided and ibe sel ofthe wo he iy {atrmarsasvabhivo “yam yah prakasah rakasste 26) {porn pe sty] eonacton is ect — the ics sa eva kim na Sistraughah kim anyair yuk bg é Pe eyed in the formation of differential thought? (24cd= estan Taran a sora rinks. inwhicll powersareyet undivied: meer Sa tious th pens of ble ‘the subject, j.. will, action and knowl ‘Seams which parsvigdevatiddhas arson eval Bhavet [2 2 atu lahihanyiyavamaputjavieita | Tarver) We teach hat ‘ktm spstyabbsiyam atmasamsthasya bhisanam| og hon) Bing {sy eva na ina tam cchmarsh pravarate | Ftepeay crane Ssablivam svabsasya vimarsam vido anya 29) prako "thoparakto pi tuo ratidikairit 1 knoe part ofthe ght of eonseiousness Sere (mars) of consioasess (self. 38 tema of light. Here “being aware’ means the aor rhiyofteliht to shinee. become manifest,” (25ed-26) ree ifn light hat which consti the loo of Sasas? What itil rhe guns? I ths stat trai the Hood of Sistas ‘inven assed bythe godess of be highest [plane] of speech, But not ‘rdifeenie no mas of sons which are used in exery-day if and {Ses rout of aya (27-230) Ties inthe Prabha that “only] wht rests the self appears ute Sle) Weta itanavasoesofwilloulé not arse. The nature of appearance iimownas"bcomingawar ff te objets that pea] ohervise the ight cre hh coloured by objets, wool e ike tht of] ewes ee (which are soured objets at not conscious of them." (28cd-30a8) Lace tesponen 2 tse oftheo 1 TextandTanstaton -Kimea yah kadcansoaris ciceamathragocrah 0) Dikdatipedvigyas san Hav sphugh| “dvimarcntarslambasamocchalanayogatah 31 pascatsusphutaim et tatiea gorur elvan | ‘yah svaxamvidhsiddham sukhidl vyavatithat 32) ‘nai yyavasthisamaye vedyate ta svasamvid | ‘thivassopagantayam svasamitsdhand it [33} ‘eva stp paso ya Sanadyullsavartman | ‘arvibhedaray bhimirylvad dmssyatim vrajet 34) ‘vat tadueitodaravimarsasasphtatvatah | ‘dk sa eva Sisratvam pragvisargab prapadyte 38) tad eva tu yutar st tat hy anupadtiay pa | ‘Sisrrthe ‘pi samacraleSah ko "pi vibhivyate [36] Savina sphtatsdhdmabhavijAdnadigaingn | targa atastatadvaicitryaparbembitah [37] ith mokasyatadsyaktsthne "psu mokure mapa | [Khagge catclasadvtasuksmadirghika sti [3 tad itham parame rope prodohota janasampadah | snavacchinnahrdayabjstmatrayasundarah [39] ‘ol ochaladsklrasvataratgdtariomald | ‘sips bhvaughin bhaiavah éaktibembitah 40) {ad eva vjnassrppadastadupsdhijim | ‘eatriySsamcarayantranim sams va [1 i yah a amma cn) Hi tn Ka Mie} ste pid sma nda Ka 3 Tee ate sew: tras J, 338 same Spe smahe S24) 386 panty: penn Se tra srana Kron 388 omar Se tata oat idan ane bv fecha 3 1 extandTasaon| « arenes th ate of whi to ein he sphere of. omnes ad wih ia For sane Yo af exp eames tere ld) prep soon peas Bit ee his awareness and its ony} later that it becomes a ss rein (ad bjt oe teachers te same hs Joy ley peer et ony becnse they are established by one's own ‘eer leer tka ugh ope ownconsciousesst the tine co yy exublsid as existent independent of our percep a a sinly ase tht er existence depends on one's Fes ote case? 03833) om or woe. totheemergene ofthe Stal for Gud) 10 ra ut) ain tn coue of appearance OF knowledge te the ae thenentg isundvided comes intoawateness ota exten his na ner pea takes onthe ate of the Sra, asthe pans ffs tr amaeness. which st rth [tate become perceptible. G4-35), Tis acon ofthe naire of he Stra] sone is eee or We Suppose stress highest doctrine ofthe Sista, which is without imiing afnets (tigen comprises trace ofan extaordnay op) eis) practice ‘sonacira Tis ighest Sone as thas] hepotetal of cognition ate he powers] which wl become (hd) asf, tough is infin Cepia ats) ceruily nourished by great diversity. 36-37) 1 ae ape [een depending] on where appears: unsteady in voter.ip he oe run fo in a ior, sal ina jewel and etched in te bie oa sont cc Tn the same way the riches of knowledge hat ae ‘esti by tee (powers ying undivided inthe ears Seeds awe arisen (iii the hgh being (parame [svarpe). (38-39) Bu when Bia [ike the ocean) trimming with power desires to emit ‘flo kings hat are ut] oher waves of kms whose fons are fam ‘nou welingup.henthes rites knowledge etm aks on coast {testlapacice whichis [ony] asligh activi facnstran] which seaseed on superimposed on that (knowledge. (40-41) ee an inward we mie often Sion a1 Text and Tastation arias tatarahgaughassimatin semupsée {uthipijagadanandasundare bodhabbarave [2 ‘hivanitaratmitrasamtrpte Satin | parma niasatyaivanyakkre Saktimatpad 43] {dry eva vimarStn jSinadhied vibes | asym bhogopadesena ko pi lidah peavanate [4 ‘yadiyasumvidactracaryisranbhabhavita | bbhogavrato 'p\ dhanyanam nibsreyasapadyate 4] Yatrocyate svacakiydihsobhasamrambhanbhaa | devas yagapriyaa visesan matmadhyata 46) siSvaryasakiyodrekepa lables varapadbinh | ‘devo vifinamahin prodbhouo "yams prapta [47] apy anantabhivansasamyojanaviyojane | prigdatabhedasamdnid asumlhyatvam passe igh tadupidhivasi eva samwiinapadojita | ayant wvidhah Sstakryajnanavibbitaya [49] ‘mukhyas tv esa prapafico "yam palietmalvena earch] tat ca vakeyatetattvanabbionam api paeadha [SO ‘avyjrdhpatenataddinaprerakatvatah | scoinivtte svasthatud ityBdyair kyasameaya an civat sandarbhe desakilakalakra | nna sarsanty eva bigham om i yaemahe [2 ‘8 bya kilatattvasya mmamtram vibhivyate| aban ap abil Sakti nitra wjeembae [3 ‘ary abhinne svasampame tad patet punaryad8 | rata cst ko nv esa vacoyuktparigrahah [4] fe Cette oche> ase a cn): i Kati, $e svat: ‘ib ios: ds pgs 2 pe roped the ex i satthoameyaK Se ho: he aves of objects a), But femalns] beauied by univer Ce on eae nO este is whch on etsesoy ed ea ‘Rincon in exoymant (ogo), pervades [everything (24) ranean [athe Servdottara), “Go's sie for Worship is exceseve ene See chen es tbe a isis bah eee ch eee “Eire to ot diss cee pe al i etm mt ti a ee ea a i na ie ene a a ‘rab nine Atha she vas ceria te pee (mahikall) does not manifest here, (52- a me ai Opp hen wy oyster ‘ean ‘evan wih ee inp nist iy 2 Ort 1 Meta« 1 Texan Tain Basher eayen on vests tip Sate catasege ery ung fo Tredhnya ava nye prviareiapeat | I wcuatvers ys Dn Dede SO] siloqarnca or pokiansarasylnyav jt] Shere Vy oye lay erecta pactbomasya veya ats pape Pepe chiara ta dre foatatyer aba cr mod Shae Ffakoiyande dvr nav ava Tinea vimodha ye bocham apart tapranainarn bay sarocorancas tate f thm ln behaya belay Kapa pup veayarj kalo ‘sau Shedalhaviuy Kara ft ‘itva bf bodhabtinnar td aatve naa praklcna samavis chr bivab rai 62] Mfgapakn evar sat carayalva dana ‘stp tines naman sci Dhas ct pak sa vlyate Siiieas tv amu tha ly are Gera CT seetapskat Bvt paki xt kt ‘tnan sa iavo asa yt ripakavavcyih (SI ‘hsapum pra ea arta vide api gama | sv clea dara pala st bat [6 1S iad va Kim tam apa rasan | ‘iiveay capasacatve pata sal [Tl shiva aio Bhaa vastus bie | S80 ox erm ‘adv na aka se ey hte is comet ba in reality these concent of ener and Fe leg, ven the creation of tates has aie tae dot nfl, The eson is that time can dive fon} Fe af something ese: and gulf such 5 forint bye jcsomeing whieh is istinly (iedena pecepaBieoly i aE a al OS) oe i eo perce knowledge ast be pereived something Batre panes sd 10 the grace Of the light [feo ae re] igh anit knowledes fm wool be Sewn Trdg ad he esting initaton of ight wool ined cn ety those deluded people who desebe knowledge nota expand- niet bt bats] eosising of te expansion manifest ee aioe are deed by theirawn words. (0) “otters isumble to case diferent in consciousness nos this mane fbecomin iferettr fie diferemating quality] of theo stot fection, Forte universe does not exist outside of knowledges ther= Toei ad) would espe 61-62) {we sy tat objets appear variously. Hecause they ae pervade by ghee word would be manifest (Svaprakada) to everyoneallthetime. [hire sight which scaled knowledge ie ght belonging to thesub- Ft te objet becomes manife (6263-63) ‘hover one wer 0 supose tha] an objec i iret fom lg iil beni as ving tats sence For we say his abject isto ight [doesnot marie te doctrinal poston (darana) woud beds (ie nonce ofthe abject (64) Batit[ehorecallyspesking] this omight, which has the nature of a ob {wold masifes, it would certainly disappear, Besse ts ature, whichis ‘ote wibou ight, would persh. And even the Ceatois unable ot Some ‘ing ino ih which sno ready] ofthe naar of ih. (65-6605) (Opp) Bat so far [your pos i ject rato very ea ‘Pears as soon as there is light. (66cd) Sal oe ees ¥ accom” 1 Textand Tasltion tad slay watiriken paces Sv ath 6 tasmit pak evs gto ya paramah Sia | ‘evicintyamafima svatanyoddimaghimitah [69 paket tsa babar aejutasthith | ‘ira sarvatra sarvajdahaval kaseana Saye [70] ham cairo ghatam ved na pata, veda tam aya | ‘yar vet pata, so "ham je @htapaty 7 eisai nav, porvar jn naiva vAkvact ramena vedi yugapad dvathyam ubbayavagjm. (7 Serva vedi. koi ca ne nai kana | vat anu aivaham. aha sarvam ca sav, Svan arty aan vs Ki savam rad Bat iyi eka vaya prakish pravirmbbae 74) fn eko yay as asi, prakago ma tad pra | tatham buved ao mh katham vyuipiyatim aya 5) ‘Sul praksah tant etarupah priate - ‘stl cama cio sau, nto bhedadsanat [76] ataprakce vasrsya prakiso yadisambhavet| ‘pea hataprakasah yl dviprakaso hy asa bhavet [77 [o petaty va, no nf tad am Watprcoditam | ‘hatiomans praia ‘sya mi bidity avaithate [78 ‘Ee cayuktr pakiasy bodhatatsvtmaimbbana | Inisamam ya tat ko "yam vei vagjladambarl 75) pavcchinnsprakasatvam jadssya kl aksanam | Jad vilakgano bodhoyato na priya [80 tesmid arkayy adhe sida Kal kal babi | troy kathar ayam svmpsosubrasesabhr i [8 stan nian parson Ra et anammaT48 are Tee rcncr sams Tea Cai caiyera Kash, clpaieh. #0 = se a See mesa 1 texts Tramlaton ”